EU seeks to relax rules on turning away asylum seekers

Magnus Brunner said the proposal is a tool to process asylum claims more efficiently. (EPA Images pic)
BRUSSELS : The EU unveiled plans on Tuesday to make it easier to send asylum seekers to certain third countries in the latest overhaul aimed at reducing migration to the bloc, sparking criticism from rights groups.
The European Commission said it proposed broadening the so-called 'safe third country' concept, which allows member states to 'consider an asylum application inadmissible when applicants could receive effective protection' elsewhere.
'EU countries have been under significant migratory pressure for the past decade,' said migration commissioner Magnus Brunner, describing the proposal as 'another tool to help member states process asylum claims in a more efficient way'.
Brussels has been under pressure to clamp down on arrivals and facilitate deportations, following a souring of public opinion on migration that has fuelled hard-right electoral gains in several member states.
Under current rules, asylum seekers can have their application rejected if they could have filed it in a 'safe' third country where they have 'a genuine connection'.
This is normally understood to mean a nation where the applicant has lived and worked, or has family.
The commission proposal weakens such requirements to include any country that an asylum seeker has transited through on the way to Europe, as long as it is considered safe. This opens the way for failed applicants to be sent there.
The planned reform also says the safe third country concept can be applied in absence of any connection or transit if there is a deal between member states and a third 'safe nation', and removes the suspensive effect of appeals.
The change would significantly boost the number of those who could see their applications refused and become eligible for deportation, as many cross numerous borders on their way to Europe.
In April for example, of almost 20,000 people who reached Europe via sea from northern Africa, many came from as far away as Bangladesh, Eritrea, Pakistan and Syria, according to the EU's border agency.
The move comes after EU leaders called in October for urgent new legislation to increase and speed up returns, and for the commission to assess 'innovative' ways to counter irregular migration.
In response, Brussels in March unveiled a planned reform of the 27-nation bloc's return system, which opened the way for states to set up migrant return centres outside the EU.
And, in April, it published a list of countries of 'origin' it considers 'safe', making it harder for citizens of those nations to claim asylum by introducing a presumption that such applications lack merit.
Featured on that list are Morocco and Tunisia, among the main points of departure for migrants and asylum seekers crossing the Mediterranean by boat.
The latest proposal, which critics say is instrumental to the creation of return hubs outside the bloc, needs approval from the European Parliament and member states to become law.
It also relies on the cooperation of third countries willing to take in applicants rejected by the EU.
Currently, fewer than 20% of people ordered to leave the bloc are returned to their country of origin, according to EU data.
The plan has already triggered fierce criticism.
Sarah Chander, director of the Equinox Initiative for Racial Justice, said the EU was 'cynically distorting the concept of 'safety' to meet its own repressive ends'.
Estrella Galan, an EU lawmaker with the Left group, called the proposal 'a lethal blow to the right to asylum'.
'It seeks to legalise forced deportations to third countries where refugees have never been, and where they have neither ties nor any guarantee of protection,' she said.
Nearly one million people applied for asylum in the EU last year and about 440,000 people were granted protection.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Malaysian Reserve

3 hours ago

• Malaysian Reserve

A new world order is here. Is your portfolio ready?

Global shifts are challenging US market dominance, putting diversification back in play by IFAST RESEARCH TEAM OVER the period from 1994 to 2024, US equities have consistently outperformed their international counterparts. For many young investors, it's hard to recall a time when the US did not dominate global markets. As a result, global diversification has long been a losing strategy for most investors. Not this year. The 'Liberation Day' market crash sparked by Trump's tariffs has coincided with rallies in other global markets, including Europe and China. While the S&P 500 recovered most of the losses year-to-date, the MSCI AC World ex-US Index is up more over the same period. While periods of underperformance by the US are not unusual, the gap this year has been particularly pronounced. A New World Order is Taking Shape For decades, there has been no bigger winner on the global stage than the US market, with its stellar performance over the years leading to an approximate 63.7% weighting in the MSCI AC World Index (as of 30 April 2025), up from 43.3% back in 2011. And rightfully so. Investors were drawn to America's exceptionalism: Its technological dominance, deep and liquid financial markets, leadership in free trade, willingness to underwriting global security and a government historically seen as a wise steward of the economy. However, president Trump's erratic policies — including his on-again, off-again tariff announcements and escalating trade tensions with China — along with his transactional approach to diplomacy, suggest a significant shift in America's position on the world stage. This has prompted the rest of the world to diversify trade partners, forge new alliances and pursue long-delayed economic reforms to boost growth and economic resilience. The European Union (EU), for instance, has launched a charm offensive to diversify its trade alliances in Asia and beyond. The bloc has resumed long-stalled negotiations with several countries, including India, Malaysia and Thailand. The clearest sign of the EU's renewed urgency is its revived deal with The Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR), a South American trade bloc that includes Brazil and Argentina. After 25 years of delay, an agreement was finally reached in December. While major European countries such as France and Poland remain opposed, Trump's tariffs could push them towards ratification. Austria, a staunch critic of the deal, has already abandoned its long-standing resistance to the trade agreement. Furthermore, with the US now stepping back from European security, the continent has significantly ramped up its defence spending. Even German lawmakers have voted to loosen the purse strings, allowing for a huge increase in defence and infrastructure investment — a seismic shift for a country traditionally known for its pacifism and fiscal restraint. The recently concluded UK-EU deal has also drawn a line under Brexit, signalling the start of a much closer relationship. Changes are Afoot in China Five years ago, regulators in China launched a sweeping crackdown on technology companies, casting a chill over the private sector. Now, the mood is shifting. Amid China's economic challenges, the government has recognised that revitalising the private sector is crucial to achieving an economy recovery — a task made even more urgent by Trump's tariff war. President Xi Jinping's handshake with Jack Ma — widely seen as the face of China's private sector but sidelined by authorities since the crackdown — at a symposium this year is the surest signal that the party wants the private sector to thrive again. China has also intensified its efforts to steer the economy toward a consumption-led growth model. A raft of stimulus measures, coupled with a revival in consumer and business confidence, is laying the groundwork for a sustained recovery. The government's strategic focus on artificial intelligence (AI) is also providing new momentum for tech leaders. Meanwhile, the recent revival of China's economic dialogues with Japan and South Korea — both of which have aligned more closely to the US in recent years — suggests that regional powers are reassessing their relationships in response to Trump's tariff-induced uncertainty. At the same time, the economic transformation in Japan continues, with inflation, wage increases and interest rate hikes all becoming entrenched. A virtuous cycle of rising wages and prices will stimulate consumption and capital expenditures, opening up a pathway for stronger economic growth in the longer term. Besides, Japan has shown that it can and will step up to provide international economic leadership. In the absence of the US, Japan has picked up the mantle of leadership in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). As the US retreats from its traditional role as champion of free trade, Japan will likely step up to fill the void and provide trade leadership together with other open-market allies. As a new world order takes shape, the global economy likely to become more balanced, with Europe and Asia shouldering more responsibilities for driving growth and providing international leadership. Against this backdrop, diversification has taken on added importance in our portfolios. An Unprecedented Level of Uncertainty Persists Another reason for diversification: A great deal of uncertainty persists. Start with the tariffs. In just a matter of days, Trump's Liberation Day tariffs have injected the global economy with extraordinary levels of volatility and uncertainty. Trade decisions — along with a slew of other major policy decisions — are now made on Truth Social, often catching even his own advisors off guard. While the tariffs have since been paused, they have not been cancelled. The outcome of ongoing trade negotiations remains uncertain and there's a possibility that the punishingly high tariff rates could be reinstated once the deadline passes. The situation looks increasingly fragile. As if that weren't enough, the legal wrangling over the tariffs have added yet another layer of uncertainty. Most recently, a US trade court blocked the tariffs, ruling that Trump had overstepped his authority — only for them to be reinstated a day later, pending the appeal process. Trade talks will now be complicated by doubts over the administration's authority to follow through on its threats. Rather than offering relief, the development has introduced new complications at the worst possible time. Besides, even if trade deals are struck before the deadline, there's no guarantee they will hold. Given the unpredictable — and often arbitrary — nature of Trump's decision-making, he could very well renege on these deals. With no real clarity ahead, U.S. businesses are faced with an unprecedented level of uncertainty, which has been further compounded by other factors. Lower Market Correlations Help Enhance Diversification As a risk-mitigation strategy, diversification only reduces volatility if the markets involved have low or negative correlations. If all markets move in lockstep, it doesn't matter how many geographic regions you invest — diversification won't reduce risk. This has certainly been the case over the past two decades, as correlations between US and non-US stocks have risen significantly. In other words, most international markets have moved in tandem with the broader US market. To conclude, we're not suggesting an end to US exceptionalism. The US remains the largest and most liquid market in the world. It is also home to many high-quality companies that are dominant in the digital economy and semiconductor space. While it might be easy to boycott a company like Tesla Inc due to the availability of alternatives, it's much harder to avoid companies like Google LLC or Nvidia Corp. Therefore, maintaining exposure to the US remains important. However, for investors who already have a substantial US allocation, a global ex-US exchange-traded fund (ETF) can provide substantial diversification benefits. The views expressed are of the research team and do not necessarily reflect the stand of the newspaper's owners and editorial board. This article first appeared in The Malaysian Reserve weekly print edition

The Sun

5 hours ago

• The Sun

European powers urge Iran to continue US nuclear talks

GENEVA: European powers on Friday urged Iran to continue diplomacy with the United States to find a solution in the standoff over its nuclear programme as Israel keeps up its bombardment of the Islamic republic. 'The good result today is that we leave the room with the impression that the Iranian side is ready to further discuss all the important questions,' said German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul in a statement alongside his British, French and EU counterparts after talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. 'It is of great importance that the United States takes part in these negotiations and the solution,' he added. The statement read by all four top diplomats in their native languages after the talks expressed hope of further progress but did not make any mention of a breakthrough in the talks in Geneva. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'We are keen to continue ongoing discussions and negotiations with Iran, and we urge Iran to continue their talks with the United States.' 'This is a perilous moment, and it is hugely important that we don't see regional escalation of this conflict,' he added. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said there 'can be no definitive solution through military means to the Iran nuclear problem. Military operations can delay it but they cannot eliminate it'. After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not rule out killing supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Barrot also warned: 'It is illusory and dangerous to want to impose a regime change from the outside. It is up to the people to decide their own destiny.' 'We invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the United States, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for,' he said. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said for her part: 'Today the regional escalation benefits no-one. We must keep the discussions open.' Iran's state-run IRNA news agency said earlier the Iranian delegation 'emphasised that Iran has not left the negotiating table'. Israel began its campaign on Friday last week saying the operation was aimed at halting Tehran from obtaining an atomic bomb, an ambition Iran denies having. Iranian strikes launched in response have also caused damage in Israel.

Barnama

13 hours ago

• Barnama

Geneva Meeting Begins In Bid To Halt Escalating Israel-Iran Conflict

GENEVA, June 20 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- A crucial international meeting aimed at halting the hostilities between Israel and Iran began Friday in Geneva, marking the start of an intensive two-week diplomatic effort to prevent a wider conflict in the Middle East. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot, and German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul are holding talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to address Tehran's nuclear activities and identify potential diplomatic off-ramps to avoid escalation. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas is also attending the meeting, according to Anadolu Ajansi.