Powering progress: South Africa, the AfDB and the infrastructure imperative
The country's geopolitical stature positions it as both a contributor to and a demander of coherent multilateral reform
By
South Africa has entered a new era — politically recalibrated, economically pressured, yet fundamentally poised. The 2024 general election, resulting in the country's first national coalition Government of National Unity under President Cyril Ramaphosa, was not just a political outcome — it was a societal reset. South Africans demanded a new social contract: delivery over rhetoric, partnership over posturing, credibility over complexity. In his campaign and subsequent inaugural commitments, Ramaphosa emphasised infrastructure renewal, energy security, youth employment and national coherence as pillars of renewal. The task now is not to define direction — but to deliver at scale.
The economic headwinds remain sobering. In 2024, GDP growth hovered at 1.1%, well below the levels needed to address poverty and exclusion. Unemployment stood at 31.9%, with youth unemployment exceeding 44%. Public infrastructure continued to underperform, with deteriorating logistics capacity and ongoing energy insecurity compounding economic constraints. The 2024 Electricity Regulation Amendment Act marked a major policy shift, opening the generation and transmission sectors to competition and seeking to reduce dependence on Eskom. However, implementation bottlenecks persist, and the gap between legislative intent and lived experience remains wide.
Amid this environment, infrastructure is not just a sector — it is the backbone of recovery. The government's Economic Reconstruction and Recovery Plan rightly centres infrastructure-led growth, but delivery capacity and funding constraints have limited momentum. South Africa's capital expenditure as a percentage of GDP remains below 6%, far from the National Development Plan's 10% target. Logistics inefficiencies alone are estimated to cost the economy billions of rand annually. Transnet's operational and governance challenges have undercut freight reliability, while delays at major ports continue to undermine trade competitiveness.
I propose the creation of a Private Capital for Africa platform — housed in Johannesburg — to crowd in institutional investors, deploy blended finance tools and de-risk large-scale regional infrastructure.
Dr Sidi Ould Tah
This is why the updated National Infrastructure Plan 2050, Phase 2 (released in 2024), declared: 'A fit-for-purpose infrastructure delivery system is a precondition for inclusive economic participation, regional trade, and long-term fiscal resilience.' That framing reflects the reality: South Africa's infrastructure challenge is not only national — it is continental. As the anchor of the North—South Corridor and a key node in the Maputo Development Corridor, South Africa's success in unlocking logistics performance has direct implications for Sadc trade volumes, intra-African commerce and African Continental Free Trade Area implementation.
In this landscape, South Africa needs a multilateral development partner that not only shares its sense of urgency, but also matches its institutional sophistication. The African Development Bank (AfDB) has shown glimpses of this. In 2024, the AfDB approved a $1bn sovereign facility to support Transnet's recovery — one of the clearest signals of confidence in the state's commitment to reform. The bank has also contributed to Just Energy Transition efforts, from concessional project preparation to financing renewable energy pilots and public — private structuring. But the scale of South Africa's infrastructure imperative — and the shifting global landscape — demand a more decisive, fit-for-purpose partnership.
Global economic realities are evolving fast. Fiscal tightening, geopolitical fragmentation and climate financing imbalances are reshaping the development finance ecosystem. South Africa's own geopolitical stature — as a G20 member, Brics founder and climate diplomacy broker — positions it as both a contributor to and a demander of coherent multilateral reform.
As debates intensify around SDR Special Drawing Rights rechanneling, multilateral development banks reform and global infrastructure liquidity, I believe the AfDB must become more than Africa's lender. It must become its bridge. And that includes being a credible internal steward — governed with the transparency, institutional discipline and accountability that member states like South Africa have long championed.
This is where I believe the AfDB's upcoming leadership transition matters, not as a continental ritual but as a strategic inflection point. I offer a vision that aligns with South Africa's expectations: credible delivery, innovative capital mobilisation and institutional relevance.
As president of the Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa (Badea), I helped reposition the institution from a quiet partner to an influential force — mobilising Africa—Gulf co-financing, targeting SMEs and supporting infrastructure corridors with agility and accountability. Under my leadership, Badea attained prestigious AA+/AAA credit ratings, quadrupled project approvals, modernised its digital systems and expanded total assets from $4bn to nearly $7bn — all while maintaining one of the lowest non-performing loan ratios (0.4%) among African development finance institutions.
My platform for the AfDB speaks directly to South Africa's core priorities. I propose the creation of a Private Capital for Africa platform — housed in Johannesburg — to crowd in institutional investors, deploy blended finance tools and de-risk large-scale regional infrastructure. This responds directly to South Africa's call for the AfDB to partner more strategically with its own development finance institutions such as the Public Investment Corporation, the Development Bank of Southern Africa and the Industrial Development Corporation — pools of capital that remain under-leveraged for African integration.
My proposal to scale AfDB's annual capital mobilisation to $50—60bn through hybrid instruments, sovereign wealth partnerships and diaspora finance aligns with South Africa's preference for innovative, non-distortionary financing that does not increase debt distress.
Beyond capital, my focus on institutional integrity — through a proposed Pan-African Results & Governance Lab embedded in the bank — reflects South Africa's long-standing emphasis on fiduciary control, transparency and performance culture. This commitment builds on my introduction of environmental, social and governance-aligned sustainable financing frameworks and ISO-certified governance systems during my tenure at Badea, credentials that mirror South Africa's own calls for accountable multilateralism. The need for institutional discipline, not just policy ambition, has never been clearer. With a reformist state, deep financial markets and advanced project planning systems, South Africa is not short on technical capacity — it needs a partner that can co-implement.
And that co-implementation must be based on trust and shared vision. In South Africa's case, the most impactful development partnerships are those that work horizontally — not just from capital provider to state, but across institutions, development banks, private capital pools and regional alliances. This is where the AfDB, under the right leadership, can amplify what South Africa already possesses: a sophisticated institutional base and a continental integration agenda that is both credible and executable.
South Africa's credibility on the world stage — particularly on matters of climate finance, regional stability and multilateral equity — is not accidental. It is the product of decades of institution-building, diplomacy and democratic resilience. The next AfDB leadership must recognise that countries like South Africa are not merely recipients of development finance — they are architects of its future. A strong, responsive and politically attuned AfDB must amplify that influence, not compete with it.
My platform is not a promise — it is a blueprint. It is not only about who leads the AfDB, but how it is led. For South Africa, the choice must be strategic, not sentimental. The development bank it helped to build must now evolve in tandem with its own transformation.
The moment demands alignment between national ambition and continental delivery. South Africa has done the political heavy lifting. It is now time for the institutions around it to match that seriousness — with resources, with reform, with partnerships and with results. The AfDB, under the right leadership, can be the partner that powers this next chapter.
Dr Sidi Ould Tah is one of the candidates running for the African Development Bank presidency. He previously held the position of minister of finance, economic affairs and development in Mauritania
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
12 minutes ago
- The South African
Malema slammed for singing 'Kill The Boer' at mass funeral
Economic Freedom Fighter (EFF) leader Julius Malema has been criticised for singing Kill The Boer at the mass funeral for those who died in a bus crash earlier this week. Ten people – EFF members – died in a head-on collision near Ulundi, KwaZulu-Natal, while returning home after a June 16 rally in Durban on Monday. Malema has been condemned by his critics – including US President Donald Trump and the world's richest man, Elon Musk – for his decision to back the controversial struggle song. On Sunday, Julius Malema attended the mass funeral of 10 EFF members who were killed in a KZN bus crash. The bus tragically collided with a truck on the R34 near Ulundi in KZN. The funeral – dubbed the June 16 battalion – took place in Vryheid and was attended by the party leader and his leadership. Malema told the crowd of those who had died in the horror crash: 'They died while in pursuit of life. They were travelling with hope in their hearts. But the journey that should have taken them toward opportunity ended in tragedy.' Malema – who used the opportunity to mobilise EFF party members – promised to build a house for the families of those who had died. As he does with many rallies, Malema closed the event by singing Kill The Boer. However, his decision left many South Africans on social media questioning the timing and choice of song. @LangelihleMaph1: 'If there's no connection between these deaths and the Boer, why sing the song?' @MariaJacob49230: 'No respect for the dead, Julius Malema? You're at a funeral, not a political rally! This has been an occasion for a Psalm.' @muzizaks: 'What shameful display for lack of sense of occasion'. Meanwhile, Gayton McKenzie has condemned the EFF and Julius Malema for their decision to sing Kill The Boer. Speaking at the welcoming party for the Proteas at OR Tambo International Airport, the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture claimed that the anti-Apartheid song had no place in modern-day society. He said of the national cricket team, which recently won the ICC World Test Championships: 'This country has amazing sportspeople, and it is the greatest sporting nation in the world. If you do not agree with me, or if you want to argue with me, I do not argue with idiots. EFF leader Julius Malema and party leadership in Free State. Image: X/@EFFSouthAfrica 'Today, we had Black, Indian, White, and Coloured kids singing the Temba Bavuma song. Why should we worry about nonsense like Kill The Boer? These players [Proteas] will go places because we have the best team ever. 'Those people who are singing the Kill The Boer song are idiots'. He added in an X post: 'They are the biggest idiots, the current South Africa has no place for such a song. It has no value and contributes nothing towards the SA we are trying to construct. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
36 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
National Dialogue? NMB wants its own metro dialogue, based more on action and solutions than talk
The upcoming National Dialogue has attracted a flood of criticism for being yet another talk-shop about the country's problems. In Nelson Mandela Bay, we have a different idea – let's have a talk driven by solutions and action. South Africans are abuzz with commentary and criticism of the National Dialogue announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa – mostly, and validly, centred on the view that the last thing the country needs right now is yet another talk-shop. We do not need to 'unpack' our social and economic problems, yet again. We know what they are. What we need is capable, competent, skilled and experienced people implementing solutions. Ordinary people all over this country are tired of hearing politicians talking; they have been saying this for a long time, and even more vociferously since the announcement of the National Dialogue, which is already looking to be a drawn-out process of talk and more talk continuing into next year. Meanwhile, the people of this country are highlighting the urgent need for action and change. They want jobs; they want to be able to do business; they want public services that work – healthcare, education, policing, transport, water, electricity; they want not to be dodging potholes; they want to see the corrupt behind bars. The principles of broad participation and diversity of voices – a 'people-led, society-wide process' seeking a shared vision and common values through the National Dialogue – are all well and good. However, as an intervention to bring about change, the whole initiative lacks a sense of urgency, seemingly blinded to the realities on the ground in our metros, cities, towns and rural villages that are fast becoming unlivable, unworkable and not conducive to retaining the investment we need to create jobs and grow the economy. The envisaged outcome of a 'programme of action to shape the future of the country' is also all well and good, but any plan is only as good as the people who implement it – their capacity and commitment, the support and resources at their disposal and how they are held accountable for delivery. Functioning municipalities are the foundation of service delivery to citizens and an enabling environment in which business can operate and create new jobs. Municipal dysfunction is now a critical hindrance to economic growth, and improving this level of government should be the absolute key priority. The Auditor-General's latest report on municipal audit outcomes presented a damning indictment of the dire state of financial management and performance management, stalled and delayed infrastructure projects and absence of accountability, which underpin failing municipal service delivery and crumbling infrastructure. The extension of Operation Vulindlela into addressing municipal service delivery, along with the review under way on the white paper on local government, are urgent and critical interventions that must lead to local government reform. Central to such reform must be the appointment of capable, qualified people and the effective performance management of officials and contractors that leads to actual consequences for non-delivery, underperformance and criminal actions. However, we are not operating in a policy vacuum in the meantime. South Africa is highly effective at developing policies and plans – we have a lot of very good structures and systems on paper; we are just not very good at implementing them. Our own version of dialogue That is why the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber proposes that this metro has its own version of a dialogue, focused less on talk and more on action. Dialogue, by definition, is a two-way street, a place where all parties can have their say. Just as important, if not more so, is that dialogue involves listening. Listening to the people on the ground who have first-hand knowledge and lived experience of the problems and who know what needs to be done to fix them. Dialogue is not mere conversation; it needs to come to a resolution, followed by action. That is the only way we will advance along that two-way street towards achieving positive change. Otherwise, we are endlessly circling a roundabout of conversation with no way to change lanes and exit onto the road towards our destination. Like the National Dialogue, such a 'metro dialogue' must be broad-based and participatory, involving local government, the business community and representative civil society organisations. The provincial government should be involved too, as well as relevant organs of the national government and state-owned entities such as Eskom and Transnet, because their support will be required to effect the change required. The difference is that this local dialogue would focus on solutions and actions, on enabling the implementation of plans and policies already in place and holding those doing the work accountable. The principle is local solutions to local problems. Local communities – in a broad sense of a business community in a particular sector or area, residents of a neighbourhood or township, NGOs working on similar issues – know what the problems are in their areas, they know what needs to be done about them, and they must be heard. A top-down approach driven out of a government office is not the answer. More than 70% of this municipality's income is derived from business customers. Business must be listened to, and through the Business Chamber, we have a business community incredibly willing to roll up their sleeves and offer expertise and resources to support the municipality in fixing problems. While the blame for all of the Bay's problems cannot be laid solely at the door of the Municipality, the political instability and resulting failure in the administration is at the root of the failure to have the basics in place to support living and doing business here. A local dialogue must press for a solution to root political interference out of the running of the administration, particularly in supply chain management and appointments of contractors. Revolving door The revolving door of acting city managers must be closed. In five years, at least 14 city managers have come and gone, many of them in an acting capacity, and we are on our third acting administrative head since the start of the 2024/25 financial year. Instituting an appointment process to recruit a permanent, qualified, experienced and competent city manager is imperative, and should not be a difficult thing to do. Similarly, recruitment must happen for the many municipal directorates headed by acting executive directors for extended periods, some also regularly revolving, and the substantial vacancies in funded posts at senior management level, for essential technical skills and in service delivery-related posts such as electricians, plumbers and artisans. Solutions exist for the metro's unacceptably high losses in revenue for electricity and treated water. We need to stop talking about them and implement them. Eskom, for example, stands ready to assist the municipality in addressing its electricity losses and financial unsustainability (what should be a profit-making function running at a R1.3-billion loss) through its Active Partnering programme – the politicians just need to say yes. The city is regularly faced with threats of the National Treasury withholding essential grants because of under-performance and non-compliance with grant conditions, and serious under-spending on capital and maintenance budgets (less than a quarter spent halfway into the 2024/25 financial year). The required infrastructure investment and maintenance can take place if suitable contractors are appointed timeously and the money available is spent effectively. An inability to spend money should be an entirely solvable problem, particularly if the supply chain management is capacitated and permitted to do its work without interference. In the news just this past week, the municipality announced plans to spend more than R1-million refurbishing dysfunctional 'business hubs' meant to support township entrepreneurs. The reason for this? The three facilities have decayed because of vandalism and theft, some hijacked by other organisations and one relying on illegal electricity connections. This highlights the municipality's inability to secure key infrastructure through security facilities and personnel, with surveillance, monitoring and response to prevent vandalism and theft. Again, a problem solved simply by hiring the appropriate services. The work of 11 geographic business clusters supported by the Business Chamber, as groups of businesses coming together to speak with a united voice and working together to address problems specific to their areas, we have seen a wave of solution-implementation and positive change. This includes businesses collaborating to clear litter and illegal dumping, repaint road markings, provide security to electrical substations, install street lighting and security cameras, repair potholes and clear stormwater drains – there is a long list. Similarly, technical task teams on electricity and sanitation, comprising engineers, other experts from business and senior municipal officials, are recording successes in improving the performance of the sanitation system and key electricity networks. This shows that partnerships and collaboration work, that fixing the metro's problems is possible. As much as we are tired of 'talk-shops', one of the great things that does come out of not only talking but listening to each other, is the formation of collaborations and partnerships – where we meet in mutual interest across boundaries of place, race, class, culture, religion or competing business interests and act together to bring about change. The municipality's acceptance of the help offered and agreement to work with business and civil society on the myriad problems requiring attention across the metro will be key to driving action and implementing solutions coming out of our proposed metro dialogue. In announcing the National Dialogue, President Ramaphosa said the idea was not a new concept in South Africa, that 'having dialogues is part of our DNA as a nation'. Yes, as the President said, we did end apartheid and establish a democracy through dialogue. But we are 30 years down the line and still face possibly even worse poverty, inequality and unemployment than we did in those days of optimism and hope of the 'rainbow nation'. Action and change – that is what we want to see out of any kind of dialogue, and it is up to us as 'ordinary' South Africans to make it happen. DM
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
Gupta mansions going under the hammer
JOHANNESBURG - South Africans have heard about high-level state capture meetings, including then-president Jacob Zuma, taking place inside the Gupta Compound, but what is it really like? It took Park Village Auctions over seven years to sell the properties.
