Sweeping policy reset needed to reconnect with voters, senior Liberals say – as others call for lurch further right
Senior Liberals are warning that the party must urgently reconnect with traditional supporters, women and younger Australians if it is to find a pathway back to relevance, describing John Howard's broad church as 'broken' after Saturday's election drubbing.
As remaining MPs and party strategists begin to consider the scale of the loss under the outgoing opposition leader, Peter Dutton, most agree that a major policy and messaging reset is needed to return the party to its roots under its founder, Robert Menzies. But, in a sign of the fight to come, some leading Liberal figures are pushing for a move to the right, arguing that the party has not been conservative enough.
The senior moderate and former finance minister Simon Birmingham said on Sunday that the melding of liberal and conservative thinking within the party had been lost.
'The Liberal party has failed to learn lessons from the past and if it fails to do so in the face of this result then its future viability to govern will be questioned,' he said.
Birmingham used a lengthy reflection on the result to call for quotas for women in party preselection, saying they should be 'hard, fast and ambitious'. Liberals have resisted quotas for decades, while Labor has reached gender parity in its caucus since implementing them in 1994.
'The Liberal party is not seen as remotely liberal and the brand of conservatism projected is clearly perceived as too harsh and out of touch,' Birmingham said.
'A Liberal party fit for the future will need to reconnect with and represent liberal ideology, belief and thinking in a new and modern context.'
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Early discussions about the leadership took place in private on Sunday, even as a slew of seats remained too close to call. Most MPs contacted by Guardian Australia agreed that a root-and-branch policy review was needed, with some pointing to Dutton's plan for nuclear power and divisive rhetoric on Indigenous welcome to country ceremonies.
The New South Wales senator Dave Sharma said the Liberals had suffered a devastating loss due to a failure of strategy and campaign management.
'It is clear we failed to convince the public that we would be a better government, even if they had misgivings about Labor,' he said.
'A loss of this magnitude demands a serious set of reflections, reviews, and internal conversations about our policies and direction. That will take some time.
'The nation is best served by a strong opposition. We need to ensure the Liberals can provide this.'
Internal party polling put the Liberals ahead in a series of Labor-held seats in the final days of the campaign, including Werriwa, Whitlam and Gilmore in NSW. The results gave false hope to the Dutton camp, even as published polls showed Labor on track to win.
Some party figures blamed key strategists in the campaign, including the former minister turned Dutton adviser Jamie Briggs. Some Liberals said Dutton's efforts to promote party unity after the Coalition's 2022 election loss meant not enough policy fights had taken place.
Others said the Coalition had drawn the wrong lessons from the no vote in the voice to parliament referendum, believing it was a sign of a rightwards shift in the electorate.
The Liberal grandee and former Howard government minister Philip Ruddock said party MPs elected on Saturday were responsible for charting a course back to power.
'My father said the Liberal party always knows how to bake a bigger cake, and the Labor party only know how to cut it up,' he said.
'If you're looking at the way forward, you need to be very focused on how you're going to create wealth and opportunities. The Liberal party of the future has to be very focused on building a bigger economy, creating the opportunities, and then later deciding on how you might better apportion the gains.'
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
MPs said more checks and balances were needed to the new party leader's authority.
'We lost the trust of metropolitan voters and need to urgently work out how to get it back again,' said one MP, who was narrowly re-elected.
The re-elected NSW moderate Andrew Bragg said Australia was 'drifting' under Labor. 'It was the toughest night for the Liberals ever,' he said.
'The message from the electorate is clear. For the Liberal party, the road back starts with a deeper understanding of modern Australia.
'We must offer an ambitious economic agenda and a centrist, inclusive social vision. Reclaiming enterprise and the centre is not a departure from our values – it is a return to them.'
The former senator and party strategist Arthur Sinodinos said the Liberals needed to return to first principles and rebuild Howard's broad church.
'Grievance politics was not enough to win,' he wrote in an opinion piece for Guardian Australia. 'An opposition must have a clear and coherent plan that demonstrates they are ready to govern.
'Listening to our fellow Australians, grappling with the complexity of demographic and social change in a way consistent with Menzian values will succeed if we do the hard work.'
The former deputy prime minister and Nationals frontbencher Barnaby Joyce declined to say who should lead the Liberals. While the junior Coalition partner will have a stronger presence in the joint party room due to fewer Liberals winning their seats, Joyce said there was little room for celebration.
'It is a wake-up call. There is no winner in our loss but you can't turn yourself into another party. You have to do what you're meant to do better.'
The rightwing South Australian Liberal Alex Antic blamed policies which did not resonate with voters. 'Unfortunately, we've sent the troops into battle without ammunition,' he said.
Antic told Sky it was time to 'make the Liberal party great again', echoing Trump's campaign slogan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Some refuse workers will lose money
The leader of Birmingham City Council has admitted for the first time some refuse workers will lose money under plans to reform the workers who are members of Unite the Union have been in a stand-off with the Labour-run council over proposed changes to roles and pay, since January. In an exclusive interview with the BBC, council leader John Cotton said he "absolutely understood" there would be "implications for individuals", but the authority had to "implement job evaluation fairly across the council". Unite claims 170 workers face an annual pay cut of £8,000, but the authority has said only 17 members of staff lose up to £6,000 - something Cotton had not acknowledged publicly. Cotton stressed that the council continued to negotiate with Unite in order to find a "reasonable settlement" to "reflect the workforce's concerns".He denied claims from Unite that the deal to end the dispute had been "watered down" and said the authority had provided a "fair and reasonable offer", which was being discussed by arbitration body Acas. All-out strike action in the city began on 11 March and rubbish has continued to pile up on streets, but securing a legal injunction in May enabled more bin lorries to to be brought in to clear the mountains of bin bags."Regarding the city as a whole, since we secure the injunction and have been able to deploy our available fleet we have collected 33,498 tonnes and average 1,288 per day which includes weekends," a spokesperson for the city council said."We have cleared the backlog so are now able to continue to implement our contingency plan, providing residents with one collection each week." 'Avoid repeating mistakes' The leader of the Labour-run authority described the situation as "incredibly frustrating" and said it continued to urge Unite to accept the offer it had placed on the table. "This strike needs to end so we can carry on with transforming the waste service and ensuring everyone gets the services they're entitled to," Cotton the council leader added that he had "set some straight red lines" to avoid "repeating some of the mistakes that happened in the past"."We have had to take a look at the grading of the driver roles, that is part of the process we have signed up to together with the trade unions, it is a recognised methodology for evaluating jobs."He said a negotiated settlement was "in everyone's interest" and it would allow the council to "get back to the business of improving the waste service in the city". Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
NBC News
7 hours ago
- NBC News
In a scathing dissent, Justice Jackson says the Supreme Court gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests'
WASHINGTON — Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her colleagues on Friday in a scathing dissent on a case involving vehicle emissions regulations. In her dissenting opinion, she argued that the court's opinion gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests' in the way they decide which cases to hear and how they rule in them. The court had ruled 7-2 in favor of fuel producers seeking to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency's approval of California clean vehicle emissions regulations. She also said she was concerned that the ruling could have "a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests." With the Trump administration reversing course on many of Biden's environmental policies, including on California's electric vehicle mandates, the case is likely moot, or soon to be, Jackson wrote, making her wonder why the court felt the need to decide it. "This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this court than ordinary citizens," Jackson wrote. The case said that the producers had legal standing to bring their claims, resting on a theory "that the court has refused to apply in cases brought by less powerful plaintiffs," she added. The decision has little practical importance now, but in future, "will no doubt aid future attempts by the fuel industry to attack the Clean Air Act," she said. "Also, I worry that the fuel industry's gain comes at a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests," she added. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has often faced claims that it is particularly receptive to arguments made by big business. The conservative justices have been especially skeptical of broad government regulations and they have consistently made it harder for consumers and workers to bring class action lawsuits. Last year, the court overturned a 40-year precedent much loathed by business interests that empowered federal agencies in the regulatory process. Some legal experts have pushed back, saying such allegations are misleading. Jackson concluded her dissent by noting the court's "simultaneous aversion to hearing cases involving the potential vindication of less powerful litigants — workers, criminal defendants, and the condemned, among others." Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who authored the majority opinion, responded to her claims, saying that a review of standing cases "disproves that suggestion." He mentioned several recent rulings in which liberal justices were in the majority, including one last year finding that anti-abortion doctors who challenged the abortion pill mifepristone did not have standing to sue. The bottom line, he added, is that the government "may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders." The underlying case stems from the EPA's authority to issue national vehicle emissions standards under the federal Clean Air Act. In recognition of California's historic role in regulating emissions, the law allows the EPA to give the state a waiver from the nationwide standards so that it can adopt its own. The case focused on a request made by California in 2012 that EPA approve new regulations, not the state's 2024 plan to eliminate gasoline-powered cars by 2035 for which it also sought a waiver.
Powys County Times
7 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Powys MPs support assisted dying bill as vote passes
Mid Wales MPs voted in favour of the bill to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales as the law cleared its initial stages in the House of Commons. As the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill reached its final stage in Parliament on June 20, the bill passed through the House of Commons by a narrow margin of 23 votes, ending with 314 votes in favour and 291 against. Among the MPs who voted in favour of the legislation were Mid Wales representatives, David Chadwick of the Liberal Democrats who is MP for Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe, and Steve Witherden of Labour, MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr. Following the vote, Mr Chadwick said: 'After carefully considering the arguments on both sides, I voted in favour of the Assisted Dying Bill because I believe people with terminal illnesses deserve the right to die with dignity and control and that the legislation has the necessary safeguards to do this in a safe way. 'This was not a decision I came to lightly, and I'd like to thank all the constituents who contacted me to let me know their views on the issue, whatever side of the debate you were on. 'I have heard too many stories of families forced to watch loved ones suffer unnecessarily, and as a Liberal and someone driven by compassion, I feel the law should allow for someone to make a clear, informed, and voluntary choice at the end of their life in a dignified and humane manner. 'Throughout this process, I have been struck by the thoughtful and respectful debate on both sides, driven by compassion and deep personal conviction, and while people may disagree, we have done so and continue to do so civilly and with empathy.' Mr Witherden had already expressed support for the bill before the final vote, saying in November 2024: 'At a pre-election hustings, I made it clear that I supported changes to the law to legalise assisted dying, provided I was satisfied that safeguards against any abuse would be enshrined in the new law. 'I am aware of the opposition to the legislation and understand fears, especially from some disabled people, those with mental health conditions and groups suffering from specific diseases. "However, I believe the proposed legislation enshrines sufficient protections for such groups, ensuring their voices will not be marginalised.'
