
Pasadena Solar Firm Acquired by Florida Energy Company for $10 Million
Pasadena-based Heliogen Inc. agreed to be acquired by Zeo Energy Corp., a Florida-based provider of residential solar and energy efficiency solutions, for $10 million. The transaction is currently expected to close in the third quarter of 2025 and has been approved by the boards of both companies.
'Heliogen brings a set of practical solutions to customers, particularly data centers, looking for longer duration energy storage with substantially lower costs than alternatives on the market,' said Tim Bridgewater, chief executive of Zeo Energy, in a statement.
Piper Sandler & Co. acted as financial advisor and Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP acted as legal counsel to Zeo. Pickering Energy Partners is the financial advisor and Cooley LLP is legal counsel to Heliogen.
Information for this article was sourced from Heliogen.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
19 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Dutchie's Fresh Market and company director fined for not paying employees
A former Dutchie's Fresh Market butcher told court Friday that getting shortchanged on his wages made him feel 'betrayed and exploited.' Dutchie's pleaded guilty to nine charges, under the Employment Standards Act, of failing to comply with orders to pay employees. Michael Renkema, the sole director of the Waterloo-based company, pleaded guilty to four charges. In provincial offences court in Kitchener on Friday, the company was fined $25,000; Renkema was fined $7,500. Complaints about unpaid wages surfaced in October 2021. Several employees were shortchanged. The charges involve a total of $35,956 in unpaid wages. Employees have now been paid what they were owed. The man who worked as a butcher at Dutchie's got a job there shortly after moving to Canada. 'We came to Canada with the goal of providing a better life for our family,' he wrote in a victim impact statement read aloud in court. 'When the payment delays began, I felt betrayed and exploited. I could not afford groceries for my family and had to rely on the Kitchener food bank for food.' 'It was hard to accept that this happened, especially since I had worked so hard and never imagined facing such a challenging situation within just five months of living in Canada,' he added. The first Dutchie's opened more than 40 years ago. At one point, the company had three grocery stores in Kitchener-Waterloo. Only one remains. Rachel Goldenberg, counsel for Dutchie's, explained what happened. 'Some very severe issues with the company's refrigeration vendor came to light in 2021,' she told court. 'As a result, the company faced significant financial losses in the millions of dollars and incurred significant debt.' 'The defendants deeply regret that when faced with this sudden loss of financial resources and mounting debt, employees were not paid their wages,' she said. They chose not to declare bankruptcy, Goldenberg said, because 'they did not want to deprive the employees and other creditors of amounts owed.' Renkema has not taken a salary or dividends from the company since the financial challenges began, she said, and 'he does not plan to do so until the company's debts are satisfied.' In handing out the fines, justice of the peace Michael Cuthbertson said Dutchie's employees were 'deprived of their livelihood.' 'I must ensure that Mr. Renkema and the corporation never again put themselves in the position of depriving employees of their wages, including any overtime work,' he said. 'Equally important, this message must be driven to employers … who have employees who are dependent on their wages: Those wages must be paid.' It's good news that all employees have been paid, Cuthbertson said. 'On the aggravating side, it took a long time to get here, and the employees had to suffer without those wages for quite a long time.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Florida Homeowner Says Neighbor Reported 8-Inch Grass 'Because It Looks Bad' — Now She's Facing A $5,000 Fine Despite No Rule On Height
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A Florida homeowner says she's been slapped with a potential $5,000 fine after a neighbor reported her for having grass that was "too tall"—specifically 8 inches. The catch? There's no actual law about grass height in her area. "It's just dirt and sand," she wrote in a Reddit post. "The grass my builder put in is bad, so it only grows in certain areas." The homeowner, who lives outside an homeowners association, said this was her second violation, and city code enforcement warned that a third could escalate to the Code Enforcement Board and result in a fine of up to $5,000. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can And while the code enforcement officer left a violation notice, the city couldn't point to any clear rule she broke. According to her, there's no defined maximum height for grass—just vague wording about how it looks compared to neighboring properties. "It's based on the officer's judgment," she said. "They told me they base violations on comparisons to my neighbor's lawn." One Redditor replied with what many were thinking: "Wow, they reported you just because it looked bad? I have neighbors who let their weeds overtake their lawn and mine and still wouldn't call." The first violation happened during a stretch when her lawnmower had been recalled, and the second came during a period of declining health. She said she figured as long as it stayed under "a ruler length," she'd be fine. Trending: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Now, she's exploring a legal workaround: converting her yard into a certified Florida native habitat, which is protected under Florida's SB 82 (2019) and other landscaping laws. These protect edible gardens, wildflowers, and native plant restoration efforts from local government restrictions. "One user recommended I convert my front lawn into a wildlife habitat," she wrote. "I want to get written confirmation from the city and put up a sign citing the law." She's also planning to speak with the zoning supervisor after being transferred by a confused staff member who had never heard of native habitat certification. In a follow-up, she thanked commenters for their support: "I didn't think anyone would care, but I'm so glad I reached out to this sub. You restore more of my faith in humanity." , In Florida, cities can legally fine homeowners for overgrown grass—if their local code defines a clear violation. But when no height is specified, enforcement becomes subjective. In one case reported by the Tampa Bay Times, a federal court upheld $30,000 in fines against a Dunedin homeowner for tall grass, though he planned to appeal. While fines like these can hold up legally, vague ordinances—like the one this homeowner describes—leave room for challenge, especially when violations are based on appearance rather than measurable rules. It's one thing to get fined by the city. It's another when the call is coming from just down the block. Whether it's lawn height, flowerbeds, or the wrong shade of yellow paint, the real challenge isn't just code enforcement—it's waking up each day next to someone who weaponizes it. Read Next: With Point, you can This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to . Image: Shutterstock This article Florida Homeowner Says Neighbor Reported 8-Inch Grass 'Because It Looks Bad' — Now She's Facing A $5,000 Fine Despite No Rule On Height originally appeared on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Florida Homeowner Says Neighbor Reported 8-Inch Grass 'Because It Looks Bad' — Now She's Facing A $5,000 Fine Despite No Rule On Height
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A Florida homeowner says she's been slapped with a potential $5,000 fine after a neighbor reported her for having grass that was "too tall"—specifically 8 inches. The catch? There's no actual law about grass height in her area. "It's just dirt and sand," she wrote in a Reddit post. "The grass my builder put in is bad, so it only grows in certain areas." The homeowner, who lives outside an homeowners association, said this was her second violation, and city code enforcement warned that a third could escalate to the Code Enforcement Board and result in a fine of up to $5,000. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can And while the code enforcement officer left a violation notice, the city couldn't point to any clear rule she broke. According to her, there's no defined maximum height for grass—just vague wording about how it looks compared to neighboring properties. "It's based on the officer's judgment," she said. "They told me they base violations on comparisons to my neighbor's lawn." One Redditor replied with what many were thinking: "Wow, they reported you just because it looked bad? I have neighbors who let their weeds overtake their lawn and mine and still wouldn't call." The first violation happened during a stretch when her lawnmower had been recalled, and the second came during a period of declining health. She said she figured as long as it stayed under "a ruler length," she'd be fine. Trending: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Now, she's exploring a legal workaround: converting her yard into a certified Florida native habitat, which is protected under Florida's SB 82 (2019) and other landscaping laws. These protect edible gardens, wildflowers, and native plant restoration efforts from local government restrictions. "One user recommended I convert my front lawn into a wildlife habitat," she wrote. "I want to get written confirmation from the city and put up a sign citing the law." She's also planning to speak with the zoning supervisor after being transferred by a confused staff member who had never heard of native habitat certification. In a follow-up, she thanked commenters for their support: "I didn't think anyone would care, but I'm so glad I reached out to this sub. You restore more of my faith in humanity." , In Florida, cities can legally fine homeowners for overgrown grass—if their local code defines a clear violation. But when no height is specified, enforcement becomes subjective. In one case reported by the Tampa Bay Times, a federal court upheld $30,000 in fines against a Dunedin homeowner for tall grass, though he planned to appeal. While fines like these can hold up legally, vague ordinances—like the one this homeowner describes—leave room for challenge, especially when violations are based on appearance rather than measurable rules. It's one thing to get fined by the city. It's another when the call is coming from just down the block. Whether it's lawn height, flowerbeds, or the wrong shade of yellow paint, the real challenge isn't just code enforcement—it's waking up each day next to someone who weaponizes it. Read Next: With Point, you can This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to . Image: Shutterstock This article Florida Homeowner Says Neighbor Reported 8-Inch Grass 'Because It Looks Bad' — Now She's Facing A $5,000 Fine Despite No Rule On Height originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data