Security to be beefed up at Donald Trump's luxury Ayrshire hotel and golf resort

The planning proposals come in the wake of an act of vandalism which took place at Trump Turnberry in the early hours of Saturday, March 8.
Plans are in place to beef up security at the luxury hotel and golf resort in Ayrshire, owned by US President Donald Trump.
Ayrshire Live can reveal that plans have been lodged to erect new wrought iron gates to various entry points to the five-star resort.
‌
The planning proposals come in the wake of an alleged act of vandalism at Trump Turnberry in the early hours of Saturday, March 8.
‌
Pro Palestinian group, Palestine Action, later claimed responsibility for the vandalism which saw red paint daubed on the clubhouse and damage caused to the greens.
A message reading 'Gaza Is Not For Sale' was left in large white lettering on one of the resort's greens too.
So far seven people has been arrested and charged in relation to the damage.
Now five new wrought iron gates are to be strategically placed around the resort, including at the hotel entrance, the clubhouse, the lighthouse, the caddyshack and near the Lands of Turnberry Apartments and Cottages.
‌
Agents in the proposals are Glasgow firm 3D Reid and the applicants are Trump Turnberry.
The proposals are listed as 'pending consideration' on South Ayrshire Council's online planning portal and a decision on them is expected in August.
News of the planning application follows the announcement from Trump Turnberry that the iconic Ailsa course reopened at the start of June following an eagerly anticipated £1m renovation.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The National

22 minutes ago

• The National

Palestine Action proscription sets dangerous precedent

Palestine Action's response was clear: 'Today we exposed Britain's direct involvement in the ­genocide, and how ordinary people can act to stop it. In ­response, the political establishment rushes to call us 'terrorists', while they enact the worst crimes against humanity. No amount of smears or intimidation ­tactics will waver our solidarity with Palestine. We will break every link in the genocidal supply chain.' They deserve all of our immediate solidarity. The basis of the 'outrage' is that moral ­authority rests with the state, with the military, and not with citizens, ordinary people – you and I. That is an ­absurdist claim to make given both the history of the British state and what we have been watching unfold before our eyes for many years, grotesquely ­intensified since October 7, 2023. The shocking level of state violence by Israel is now spooling outwards having legislative effects on its own backers as the level of internal repression in the West amplifies. Just as the 'conflict' is spreading throughout the region, the violence is coming home. A History of Authoritarianism THE roots of this descent into authoritarianism and the criminalisation of legitimate protest go back decades. When to date it from? The idea that at least 139 undercover officers spied on more than 1000 political groups between 1968 and 2010? The idea floated, amid her chaotic regime of 'domestic extremists' that was put out by prime minister Theresa May, including that people advocating a Scottish democracy should be equated with ISIS? (see On Separatists and Extremists – if you don't believe me). We know from the spycops scandal that this has a deep history. We now know that a body called the SPL (Subversion in Public Life) was established in the 1980s comprising senior civil servants, MI5 and Special Branch. This sought to control and blacklist trade unionists. READ MORE: UK Government 'set to proscribe Palestine Action after RAF protest' Whenever you put your mark in Britain's long ­descent into authoritarianism, cheered on by the ­rabid tabloids, we are where we are, and it is a ­Labour Government enacting this. The absurdity of it all would make your head swivel. As the writer Ben Wray has said: 'Britain is a country where those wanted by the ICC for war crimes write columns in The Times and those ­resisting genocide get proscribed as 'terrorists'. A deeply malevolent, ­authoritarian country.' If you can be proscribed as a terrorist ­organisation for vandalism and breaking and entering, then the UK is in a very dangerous place indeed, one where ­categories of behaviour, and real threat and ­criminality elide into a confusion, a mess of ­unfocused outrage. Except there is no outrage for what is being done on our behalf by a political elite divorced from reality, detached from the people, and wholly captured by powers they don't disclose. This is a travesty of contemporary Britain, but ­sadly, not a surprise. What is required of you is your silence, your ­obedience. What is required of you is a sullen ­compliance: do nothing at all, look away. Yet ­Palestine Action say simply: 'Ordinary people can take military planes out of service, destroy weapons inside arms factories and pressure companies to end their complicity. We are not powerless. Through ­direct action, we can break the global genocidal ­supply chain.' Isn't it funny how, if people stand up to tyranny elsewhere, far away, or long ago, we celebrate it – the crowd starting the boos against Nicolae Ceaușescu, the man standing in front of tanks in Tiananmen Square, the civil rights leaders opposing brutality in the south of America, the ANC fighting apartheid. Yet here we are, encouraged to criminalise protest against genocide and quietly being drawn into the condemnation. It's insidious how this happens, and how susceptible we are to believing that genocide is ­justified, that dehumanising people is acceptable, that war crimes should be ignored, that ethnic cleansing is a ... solution. Never again. But the brutal reality is that what is going on has been foreshadowed and everyone knows it. As I wrote a year ago: 'The Police, Crime, ­Sentencing and Courts Bill has ­effectively ushered in a police state. Even as the ­undercover policing inquiry continues to reveal appalling abuses by police spying on peaceful campaigners – the police are being given new unprecedented powers of arrest and surveillance.' As George Monbiot has pointed out: 'These are the state-of-emergency laws you would expect in the aftermath of a coup. But there is no public order e­mergency, just an emergency of another kind, that the protesters targeted by this legislation are trying to stop – the collapse of Earth systems. We are being compelled by law to accept the destruction of the ­living world.' And so the much-derided 'omnicause' – a fantasy coined by the gammon right and its adjacent dullards ­pontificating from their blogs. or their Times ­columns. or the pulpits of outrage in various ­Scottish comics. The Omnicause is ­capitalism and no doubt you will be ­celebrating the latest 'crackdown' as you celebrated the last. A generation is waking up to the links between imperialism, settler ­colonialism, extractivism and the ­doomsday cult ­currently arguing in favour of ­'re-opening the coal mines' and 'drill, baby, drill'. This awakening is terrifying and the scribes and sycophants who man the newsbeat are springing into action to act out their duties. One of the things that is terrifying about people making common cause across struggles and causes is that, for far too long, the left has been hidebound by single-issue politics played out in isolation. Solidarity is terrifying to the ruling class. Consciousness, more so. Everyone who speaks out will be smeared. We know the playbook from the meakest mildest questioner to the more militant protester, they will all be dragged into the dirt. The targets are as varied as make the point, from ­Labour leaders such as Harold Wilson, Neil ­Kinnock, Tony Benn, Michael Foot or Jeremy ­Corbyn, to activists such as ­Greta ­Thunberg, Smári McCarthy, ­Julian ­Assange or protest movements from Greenham Common through to the ­Pollok Free State. You don't have to agree with these ­individuals or causes (or indeed give them a free pass on their individual ­behaviours) to see the connection ­between 'threat' and 'response', which is incompatible with living in a functioning democracy. Knowledge is Not Power UNLIKE previous atrocities and ­genocide, we know everything. Despite the media bias and the ceaseless Israeli propaganda, despite the front-loading of Western democracies with vast sums of dark money, despite the continual ­framing and curation of 'narrative', we still know everything. Our response is on a spectrum from internalising rage; reflective impotence; turning away; taking part in sometimes meaningless activities (clicktivism, petitions, letter writing); to marches and ­protests (also sadly, and brutally often meaningless); through to more direct ­actions. At the another end (sort of) of the spectrum is switching off; turning off; turning away; masking, or hyper-consumerism. But the chant of 'while you were shopping the bombs were dropping' as a 'J'accuse' of the hyper consumer is ­darkly poignant but also pointless. READ MORE: Labour blasted as 'deeply authoritarian' over plans to proscribe Palestine Action In this context, Palestine Action, like ­climate activists have taken a stand against the modern horrors, and been criminalised for it. From ­spray-painting buildings of those corporations most invested in fossil fuels through to ­spray-painting 'two military planes with red paint'. Our response to the Home Secretary proscribing Palestine Action as a ­terrorist action must be one of solidarity. This can be expressed by condemnation, financial support, or amplifying their voice. The alternative is giving up and giving in, ­remaining silent as our rights are stripped away. This is yet another Niemöller ­Moment. The Zone of Interest OUR response to protest has been conditioned by the media's shaping of climate action protests which we have learned to snear at and condemn. As the climate catastrophe accelerates, the relationship between 'reality' and the imagined world closes. Hot right now? When you realise that this will be the coolest ­summer you'll ever remember, that might hit home. Equally, as the level of state violence intensifies and the efforts to mask, hide or propagandise the horrors fail, the ­'actionists', as they call themselves, must be criminalised and demonised. Systems breakdown and failure can only be responded to with violence and repression, it seems. It's not clear what course correction or event might change this feeling of inevitable descent. ­Nothing exemplifies this more than the idea of people resenting being able to 'go about their business' as if daily life can just trundle on amidst the horror. And it can, no doubt. As Paul Kearns writes in the Irish Times: 'June is here. Summer has ­arrived. And the beaches in Tel Aviv are full. Just an hour's drive away, two million ­Palestinians are on the brink of starvation. The incongruity of those few words and the bizarre contrast of ­imagery – the busy beach in Tel Aviv, the dystopia in Gaza – are hard to digest, I imagine, for many in Ireland. They are perhaps ­shocking, incomprehensible, and ­sickening even. 'This, however, is the reality of life, and of course death, here in Israel and nearby Gaza.' For Ireland, read Scotland. This is the ambience of atrocity and its mirror, the 'fascist feeling'. It is, and this is deeply ­uncomfortable to say, the land depicted in Zone Of ­Interest, the Academy Award-winning film by Jonathan Glazer which is a study in complicity, banality and the human ability to zone out and turn away from atrocity in pursuit of self-interest. The film is inspired by the real life of ­Rudolf Höss, commandant of the ­Auschwitz concentration camp. The film follows Höss's idyllic domestic life with his wife Hedwig, and ­children, which unfolds in a stately home and garden ­immediately adjacent to the ­concentration camp. Glazer has ­described his characters not as monsters but as 'non-thinking, ­bourgeois, ­aspirational-careerist horrors, people who manage to turn profound evil into white noise'. READ MORE: Owen Jones: Opposing Israeli violence is 'extremist'? The world's upside down It sounds dismally familiar, though the class issue is a distinction worth noticing. Palestine Action reject being drawn into the Zone Of Interest, and urge us all to do the same. They may be imprisoned under a wave of collective indifference, but the issues aren't going away. They can be put in jail but what they are ­objecting to can't be so easily swept away. In our silo culture, different issues ­compete for our attention, the needle of our moral compass and our political ­energy. But in today's meta-crisis these ­silos are collapsing before us. These ­issues pervade not just our ­coming Holyrood elections but our ­wider society and all of the interactions we are supported by – the modern 'enslaved ­people' who support Western lifestyle; the colonial foundations of modern wealth; the reality of global south-to-north climate relations, and the ­witnessing of contemporary genocide in Palestine. As Pankaj Mishra, wrote in The Shoah After Gaza, published in the London ­Review of Books (in 2024): 'Every day is poisoned by the awareness that while we go about our lives, hundreds of ordinary people like ourselves are being murdered, or being forced to witness the murder of their children. 'Adding that, Biden's stubborn malice and cruelty to the Palestinians is just one of the gruesome riddles presented to us by Western politicians and journalists.' If we struggle to absorb these atrocities, it's hard not to buckle under the impression of helplessness, and turn away from the horror. That is the profound message of Palestine Action, and many others like them. As Naomi Klein writes of the film The Zone Of Interest's haunting message: 'It's not that these people don't know that an industrial-scale killing machine whirs just beyond their garden wall. They have simply learned to lead contented lives with ambient genocide. 'Glazer has repeatedly stressed that his film's subject is not the Holocaust, with its well-known horrors and ­historical ­particularities, but something more ­enduring and pervasive – the human ­capacity to live with holocausts and other atrocities, to make peace with them, draw benefit from them.' The situation on the ground is getting worse, if worse can be imagined. Israel's attack on Iran, and America's imminent 'support' (if that is the case) has given a cover of darkness and misdirection. Amnesty International yesterday stated that: 'With the world looking elsewhere, the militarisation of aid adds another layer to Israel's deliberate imposition of genocidal conditions against Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed and injured at or near aid distribution points since ­Israel's weaponised 'humanitarian' aid distribution system was imposed at the end of May. Families are being forced into an impossible choice: die of hunger or die trying to get food. Seeking food should never be a death trap. Israel must end its genocide and lift the blockade now.' Palestine Action has decreed that, 'We will break every link in the genocidal supply chain', but what's becoming clear is that our silence, our indifference, is part of that supply chain. They ­challenge the very idea that Israel is insatiable, ­unstoppable and omnipotent and we are powerless and our position hopeless. In that they are hugely important, both symbolically and actually. The moment demands we learn from their example. And what next? The behaviour of ­Israel and our unconditional support seems to have no end, no threshold. The 'war' is escalating and we, 'Britain', are being dragged further into it, despite ­widespread public revulsion for it. As the journalist Jonathan Cook points out: 'The claim that Israel is 'defending itself' in ­attacking Iran – promoted by France, Germany, Britain, the European Union, the G7 and the US – should be understood as a further assault on the foundational principles of international law. 'The assertion is premised on the idea that Israel's attack was ­'pre-emptive' – potentially justified if Israel could show there was an imminent, credible and ­severe threat of an attack or invasion by Iran that could not be averted by other means. And yet, even assuming there is evidence to support Israel's claim it was in imminent danger – there isn't – the very fact that Iran was in the midst of talks with the US about its nuclear ­programme voided that justification. 'Rather, Israel's contention that Iran posed a threat at some point in the future that needed to be neutralised counts as a 'preventive' war – and is indisputably illegal under international law.' If the proscribing of Palestine Action is an inflection point, so too is the idea that we might support Israel on a new front against Iran. This is a dangerous moment in which we must mobilise a peace movement that joins with the ­anti-imperialist movement and those fighting the war against nature and humanity.

The Independent

33 minutes ago

• The Independent

Trump bombs Iranian nuclear facilities in major escalation. What happens next?

President Donald Trump has claimed to have ' completely, totally obliterated ' Iran's nuclear program in a series of missile strikes and bombings, marking explicit U.S. intervention into Israel's war that risks a wider international crisis. The true extent of the damage is unclear. Retaliatory strikes are expected, as are efforts to revive already-fractured negotiations and diplomatic efforts to lower temperatures. But the United States is now embroiled in a war between two well-armed nations that could spill out far beyond their borders with untold casualties, experts have warned. 'Remember, there are many targets left,' Trump said in a brief address to the nation on June 21, roughly two hours after announcing a 'very successful' series of strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.' The world is watching to see what will happen, as experts and analysts consider how current conditions, history and a volatile political environment could inform what's next. A 'dangerous escalation' Trump had campaigned on a promise to end all wars, including Israel's war in Gaza and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, yet the president has so far failed to negotiate an end to either. Israel sought American military support for its campaign against Iran after receiving virtual permission for its devastating war in Gaza in the wake of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks — 'undermining Trump's claim to be a peacemaker and his assertion that wars would never have started under his leadership,' according to Brookings Institution senior fellow Sharan Grewal at the Center for Middle East Policy. He now risks exploding a wider crisis across the Middle East that could endanger U.S. installations abroad and embolden Iran's allies to retaliate, following a legacy of U.S. intervention and destabilization in the Middle East dovetailing with U.S. support for Israel's ongoing devastation in Gaza and in occupied territories. United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres said late Saturday that he was 'gravely alarmed' by Trump's decision to bomb Iran, calling it 'a dangerous escalation' and 'a direct threat to international peace and security.' 'There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control — with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world,' he said. Iran could also retaliate by blocking the strategically important Strait of Hormuz or attacking the energy infrastructure of the Arab Gulf — dramatically driving up global oil prices. Within hours after Saturday's attacks, roughly 50 oil tankers were seen scrambling to leave the Strait of Hormuz. Iran-backed Houthis have warned that Trump 'must bear the consequences,' Houthi political bureau member Hizam al-Assad posted on X. The Houthi-controlled Yemeni Armed Forces also said the group was prepared to target U.S. Navy warships in the Red Sea 'in the event that the American enemy launches an aggression in support' of Israel. Houthi rebels had previously attacked ships linked to Israel's war in Gaza, and the United States retaliated with a series of airstrikes in Yemen earlier this year. Hardening Iran's resolve — or doing enough damage to force negotiations? Iranian officials have stressed for years that its nuclear programs are for civilian and peaceful purposes only, but Israel has claimed that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, a claim central to the long and now accelerating conflict between the two nations. Following Saturday's bombings, Iran's atomic agency vowed 'never' to stop its nuclear program, according to Iranian media. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said the three targeted nuclear sites came under 'savage assault,' seen as 'blatant violation of international law, particularly the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.' The agency also accused the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog of 'complicity' in the effort as it urged the international community to condemn the strikes and 'never allow the progress of this national industry … to be halted.' Aerial bombardment alone would not be enough to conclusively stop any nuclear ambitions because 'neither Israel nor the U.S. can kill all the nuclear scientists,' former U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker told Politico. Targeted strikes that significantly damage operations could convince Iran to negotiate, according to former U.S. special envoy Dennis Ross. But a wider assault — fueled by demands from Israeli officials and Iran hawks in the United States — could be seen by Iran as seeing that 'they have little to lose and their best bet is to show they can make us pay a heavy price,' he told Politico. When Israel struck nuclear programs in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007, 'the long-term results were diametrically different,' according to Mara Karlin, former assistant secretary of defense for strategy, plans, and capabilities under Joe Biden. 'Tehran could conceivably choose either path,' she said. 'And, as long as the uranium enrichment complex at Fordow remains largely intact, it does not need to decide.' Blowback in Washington — and across America Trump's attacks risk deepening a growing divide between his allies and anti-interventionist Republicans now tenuously aligned with a wider anti-war movement and the majority of Americans who do not want the United States involved with Israel's campaign at all. Several members of Congress have questioned whether the president's actions are even legal, amounting to an unconstitutional attempt to escape congressional authorization. At least two congressional Republicans — Rep. Warren Davidson and Thomas Massie — joined Democrats to immediately condemn the bombings as unconstitutional. 'The only entity that can take this country to war is the U.S. Congress,' Sen. Bernie Sanders said in remarks in Oklahoma as the crowd learned about the bombings in real time. 'The president does not have the right.' 'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers,' said Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. 'He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations.' The New York congresswoman said the attack is 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' Top Democrats on congressional intelligence committees were also not briefed in advance of the attacks. 'The American public is overwhelmingly opposed to the U.S. waging war on Iran,' said Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, who has urged Congress to pass legislation that would require Trump to go to Congress before attacking Iran. He noted that Israeli officials said its bombs have already set Iran's nuclear capability back by two to three years. 'So what made Trump recklessly decide to rush and bomb today?' he said. 'Horrible judgment. I will push for all Senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war.' While Trump touts what he claims are unequivocal military successes, he has also spent his first few months in office developing plans to crush dissent domestically. The deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles to respond to protests against his anti-immigration agenda could be seen as a 'dress rehearsal' for far more expansive emergency powers to impose federal control of America's cities, according to The Atlantic 's David Frum. More demonstrations against further military action in Iran are expected, adding to a steady rhythm of protests and unrest against the Trump administration that exploded across American streets in recent weeks.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Trump's right-hand MAGA ally who correctly predicted Iran strikes now has a chilling warning about World War III

Longtime Donald Trump ally Steve Bannon who was spot-on with his prediction that the president would strike Iran on Saturday is now warning that it could spark World War III. Bannon, who served as Trump's chief White House strategist during his first term and continues to be an influential voice in the MAGA movement, referenced the looming attack on his 'War Room Pandemic' podcast hours before U.S. bombers carried out the strike. 'I'm just reporting what I'm hearing from pretty good sources. The party is on,' Bannon said on his podcast. 'So another big weekend in this unfolding aspect of the Third World War – and no, anyone that's telling you that the Third World War is not here, is absolutely, does not understand the development and evolution of kinetic energy,' he said. Hours later, Trump surprised the world a little before 8 p.m. ET Saturday by announcing on Truth Social that he had given the go-ahead to attack Iran. Trump used six massive 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs and 30 Tomahawk missiles to destroy Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. Trump addressed the nation, calling the strikes on a trio of Iranian nuclear sites a 'spectacular military success.' 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' He also gave a stark warning to Tehran that more attacks would be coming if the regime didn't make peace. But his ally Bannon lunched with Trump at the White House on Thursday, and reportedly argued against the U.S. joining in Israel 's attacks on Iran. Bannon connected the dots on his 'party is on' comment, clarifying that it meant the operation was set to go. 'I will tell you, remember in 'A Bridge Too Far,' in the movie about Market Garden and the last bridge at Arnhem. The phrase there was, "The party is on,"' he said, referencing the 1977 film about the failed Allied operation in Europe near the end of World War II. He also took a swipe at former George W. Bush White House Press Secretary Kayleith McEnany, now a host of 'the Five' on Fox News Channel. 'And so that is our analysis this morning. Is the party on? Is this thing, are we inexorably drawn into this, and maybe today's the day of action? You know, just the one swoop of a jet that Keyleigh McEnany wants, just one swoop of a jet, just going across,' he said. His comments came before a top House Republican turned on Trump and called the U.S. attack on Iran 'unconstitutional.' Bannon spent time on his Saturday show arguing about the risks and losses associated with an attack on Iran. He said the country needed to remain 'focused on the mass deportations' of illegal immigrants. 'I still argue that as important as this as high a priority it is to stop the nuclear program at whatever stage it is for the Iranians, for us yo've got to rank order of strategic concerns. The vital national security interests of this country lie with us making sure that the 10-12 million illegal alien invaders that came here ... have to be deported,' he said. 'This is a central front of what we call the third World War.' 'This is all costing a vast amount of money. Who's paying for that?' he asked. 'Is Israel paying for that? No, they would not be ... You know who's paying for it? You,' he told his listeners.