1.5 million UK citizens could be out of the disability benefit net soon, new bill proposes drastic changes in eligibility criteria

File photo: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Synopsis The Labour government's new welfare bill proposes significant changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP), potentially impacting around 1.5 million Britons. Under the new guidelines, the 'daily living' element of the benefit effectively will get harder to claim after the eligibility criteria are tightened. All applicants will receive points according to their ability limitations for each activity. Around 3.7 million Britons are currently availing the benefits of Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which helps them with some extra money to take care of the cost incurred by living with an illness or disability. But that number is set to drastically come down as nearly 1.5 million people will soon lose the right to claim PIP benefits.
ADVERTISEMENT The Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer has introduced a new welfare bill revealing the full extent of the plans and roadmap to cut welfare for millions of disabled benefit claimants. This comes as the ruling party faces a crucial vote next month.
An analysis by the Office for Budget Responsibility and verified by The Independent, the latest bill is likely to take away the eligibility of around 1.5 million people who currently claim the benefit of PIP. The watchdog further states that the 'behavioural response' can possibly reduce this to around 800,000 people.
It, however, acknowledged that this is a 'highly uncertain judgement'.The 'Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill' precisely explains what will happen to PIP claimants if they end up losing their entitlement under the new rules.Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) secretary Liz Kendall had in March 2025 announced the proposed changes.
ADVERTISEMENT Under the new guidelines, the 'daily living' element of the benefit effectively will get harder to claim after the eligibility criteria are tightened.Similar to what has been happening till now, assessors will ascertain if an applicant has limited ability to conduct day-to-day activities. The assessment will be based on how the applicants carry out a range of activities. They will be awarded points based on how limited their ability is.
ADVERTISEMENT All applicants will receive points according to their ability limitations for each activity. They will require eight overall to secure this element of the benefit at the basic rate and 12 for the higher.Things, however, will be different from November 2026, as the applicants will need to score at least four points in a single daily living activity to be allowed to avail this element of the benefit. The eight required points can no longer be spread across activities.
ADVERTISEMENT
The changes planned by the Labour government have received strong backlash from charities and campaign groups. According to The Independent, over 100 Labour MPs are likely considering voting against the government on the plans.
ADVERTISEMENT If someone availing themselves of the benefits of PIP loses entitlement, they will not witness any reduction in it without attending a reassessment which takes place every three years on average.After being invited for reassessment, for which attendance is mandatory, applicants will be assessed as before. However, the new points-scoring system will now apply.If things go south and someone ends up losing their entitlement due to legislation changes, it will not stop being paid at that rate immediately. Payments will continue at that level for 13 weeks as a 'transitional cover', according to the government press release. This will not be paid if the recipient moves abroad or is reassessed and becomes entitled again.
'The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will provide 13 weeks of additional financial security to existing claimants affected by changes to the PIP daily living component, including those who lose eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer's element of Universal Credit,' the release read. After these 13 weeks, payments for the daily living part of the benefit will stop.
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)
(Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates.
NEXT STORY

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

First Post

36 minutes ago

• First Post

As US considers attacking Iran from Diego Garcia, will UK need to inform Mauritius in advance?

As the United Kingdom has ceded the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, analysts are divided on whether the terms of the treaty would require the UK to inform Mauritius in advance about any military action from the Diego Garcia base, which is on one of these islands. read more The photograph shows military aircraft stationed at the joint US-UK base at the Diego Garcia island in the Chagos Islands archipelago. (Photo: AFP) As UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is discussing options about joining US military against in Iran, there are concerns that any UK operation may be compromised by the recent Chagos Islands deal. Last month, the United Kingdom signed a deal with Mauritius to transfer the sovereignty of Chagos Islands. Under the terms of the deal, the UK has leased the Diego Garcia island, for 99 years. The island houses a military base that the UK shares with the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There are concerns among analysts that the UK may be required to inform Mauritius in advance about any military mission launched from the Diego Garcia base. If this would be the case, any mission involving ships or planes at the base would be compromised. The Diego Garcia base, formally called the Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia, has housed submarines, ships, fighter planes, and bombers. B-2 bombers, which were stationed at the base in March, are one of the types of aircraft that the United States may use to strike Iran's underground nuclear sites. Will UK need to inform Mauritius about any operation? While analysts say that the terms of the deal are ambiguous, sources in the UK government have said that there is no scope of advance information. The Chagos Islands deal has said that the UK would need to 'expeditiously inform Mauritius of any armed attack on a third state directly emanating from the base on Diego Garcia'. The Daily Telegraph has reported officials as saying that any information to Mauritius would be given after the operation has concluded, not before launching it. However, not everyone agrees with this. Some have stressed that the terms in the treaty's text released by Starmer's government are ambiguous. Philippe Sands, an international lawyer who previously acted for Mauritius against the UK, has told the parliament that there were 'presumably different interpretations' of the treaty's text and there was a chance of Mauritius interpreting it as being notified before the attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Irrespective of such concerns, Starmer's government would not notify Mauritius before any attack from Diego Garcia, according to i newspaper. The report further said that Mauritius does not hold any veto about military activities conducted from Diego Garcia.

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

‘Anti-worker move to downsize...': TCS policy to cap bench time, 225 mandatory billing days slammed; here's what All India IT employees' union said

TCS has implemented a revised associate deployment policy that requires staff members to be billable for 225 days per year. (AI image) Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)'s latest move to mandate 225 billing days for employees and cap their bench time to 35 days has been slammed by the All India IT & ITeS Employees' Union (AIITEU). The union has called TCS moves as a ploy to 'downsize' teams and has also termed it as an 'anti-worker' policy. The policy, effective June 12, was introduced by Chandrasekaran Ramkumar, who leads the Global Resource Management Group (RMG). AIITEU, representing technology workers, has labelled this directive as unfavourable to employees, suggesting it aims to reduce workforce numbers. AIITEU has reportedly issued a statement: "The RMG of TCS is known to be responsible for ensuring adequate billability of the employees. While it is true that long period of inactivity has an adverse effect on employees' compensation, individual growth and overseas deployment prospect, the policy also has an ulterior motive of transferring the responsibility to ensure adequate billability from the RMG to the employees. " Also Read | Tata Electronics builds India's 1st semiconductor fabrication unit: Gujarat enables 1,500 residential units; mainly for Tata Group staff, suppliers The union further stated: "It is an attempt by TCS Management to justify the organisation's anti-worker policy of Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) that the management often resorts to, during downsizing." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo What is the TCS updated deployment policy? Earlier this week TOI reported that TCS has implemented a revised associate deployment policy that requires staff members to be billable for 225 days per year, with bench duration limited to 35 business days annually. This directive seeks to enhance efficient resource allocation whilst ensuring alignment between company and employee objectives. According to the document examined by TOI, "At any given point in time, associates must be allocated for a minimum period of 225 business days in the last 12 months," adding that "Long periods of remaining unallocated shall adversely impact associate compensation, career growth, avenues of overseas deployment in future, and continuity of employment with the organisation." The Resource Management Group at TCS is responsible for employee deployment and allocation. This division ensures appropriate talent placement across projects whilst maintaining optimal utilisation levels throughout the organisation. "In the event an associate is unallocated, it is the primary responsibility of the associate to proactively engage with the Unit / Regional RMG for seeking allocation and take initiative towards pursuing suitable opportunities provided by the organisation," states the policy. Unallocated resources comprise associates who have been released to RMG, are available for their next assignment, and report directly to RMG. TCS offers various developmental platforms including iEvolve, Fresco Play, VLS, and LinkedIn. Associates without current assignments are required to dedicate 4-6 hours daily to relevant learning through iEvolve, fulfil all mandatory and priority training requirements, participate in RMG-recommended in-person sessions, and continuously enhance their skills to maintain interview readiness. Also Read | Big win! China companies now exporting 'Made in India' smartphones & electronics to US, West Asia; notable shift for Chinese brands Additionally, they need to utilise the Gen AI interview coach, analyse and implement feedback received from previous interviews, and ensure timely completion of all training programmes with complete attendance. TCS has mandated compulsory office attendance to ensure rapid deployment, and consequently, work-from-office exemptions and flexible working options are not available. "However, associates may request short-term flexible work options for personal emergencies in exceptional circumstances, subject to organisational policies and prior approval from the RMG." The company has indicated that allocating employees to multiple projects for brief periods is not encouraged and could trigger HR inquiries and subsequent disciplinary action. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

UK tries to ride two boats, its ties with Israel delicate as Trump threatens to bomb Iran

Military moves amid calls for peace Live Events Military bases: The UK's strategic leverage The US-UK alliance: pressure and expectations (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The United Kingdom is sending mixed signals as war between Israel and Iran escalates, with British leaders publicly pushing for deescalation, including a high-profile meeting this Friday in Geneva with the Iranian foreign minister alongside their French and German counterparts, while quietly reinforcing military assets in the region. This dual approach exposes the UK 's complex position: a close ally of the US, a nation with historically strong but now strained relations with Israel, and a country that insists on the need for peace even as it prepares for is not the first time Britain has faced a conflict between public statements and military moves. In 2003, the UK joined the US-led invasion of Iraq under Operation Telic , sending about 45,000 troops alongside aircraft and naval vessels. The government justified the war as necessary to eliminate weapons of mass destruction and stop Saddam Hussein's alleged support for terrorism, despite UN inspectors finding no evidence of decision sparked fierce debate in Parliament and widespread protests. While the UK later played a major role in stabilizing Iraq - training local forces and providing aid - public support dropped sharply as the war continued and the original justification fell as tensions between Israel and Iran threaten to ignite a wider conflict, the UK's actions appear to echo its past contradictions. British leaders are speaking publicly about the need for calm and a diplomatic solution, even as they bolster their military posture in the region. This has led critics to question whether the UK is acting hypocritically, preaching restraint while preparing for the crisis deepens, the UK has deployed additional Typhoon FGR4 multirole fighters and Voyager air-to-air refueling aircraft to RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus. The move is described as 'contingency support,' with Prime Minister Keir Starmer emphasizing that the UK is not seeking to escalate the situation.'Our constant message is to de-escalate, and therefore everything we're doing, all discussions we're having are to do with de-escalation,' Starmer said. 'But I will always make the right decisions for the UK. We are moving assets to the region, including jets, and that is for contingency support.'Yet, the deployment of advanced fighter jets and support aircraft sends a clear signal of readiness and deterrence. RAF Akrotiri, a critical base for British operations in the Middle East, is now at the heart of the UK's efforts to protect its interests and support its allies, even as Iranian state media threatens to target British bases if the UK aids the other hand, The UK, along with its European allies, has advocated for a return to dialogue, recalling its role in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action ( JCPOA ), which allowed for UN inspections of Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. However, the UK's diplomatic overtures have been complicated by its recent sanctions on two Israeli cabinet members, which have strained relations with UK's military footprint in the region, particularly its bases in Cyprus, the UAE, Bahrain, and Oman, has become a focal point of international Akrotiri in Cyprus, for example, is a key asset for both British and allied operations, having provided air defence support for Israel during previous Iranian missile and drone attacks. The US has reportedly considered using British-controlled bases—notably Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and Akrotiri—as staging grounds for potential strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, particularly the heavily fortified Fordow enrichment Garcia, jointly operated by the UK and US, is strategically located 2,300 miles from Iran and could host US Air Force B2 Spirit heavy bombers—capable of delivering the massive 'bunker-buster' GBU-57 bomb, the only weapon believed capable of penetrating Fordow's any US use of these bases would require explicit British permission, a decision fraught with political and legal Trump administration has made clear that it expects its allies, particularly the UK, to support any intervention on Israel's side. This expectation is rooted in the long-standing defence and intelligence partnership between the two nations, as well as the US's continued commitment to NATO's collective defence principle (Article 5).However, the UK's Labour government faces a dilemma: should it approve the use of its bases for US strikes, it risks being drawn into a conflict it seeks to avoid; refusal, meanwhile, could strain the transatlantic dual approach reflects both the UK's commitment to its US alliance and its desire to act as a responsible global the UK's legal and political constraints are significant. Attorney General Richard Hermer has advised that any military involvement must remain strictly defensive to comply with international duality reflects the complexities of modern alliance politics and the challenges of navigating a rapidly evolving crisis in the Middle East.