Toddler mauled by Japanese fighting dog which couple bought online for £150
A COUPLE have been jailed after a Japanese fighting dog bought for £150 online left a toddler scarred for life.
Kayleigh Godbert, 39, and Thomas Moir, 38, housed the dangerous Akita dog - historically used for hunting bears - before it savaged the child's face.
3
3
3
The toddler was left with "truly breathtaking" facial injuries from the attack by the powerful dog, a court heard.
Judge Simon Mills said the child was "lucky" to be alive and described one of the kid's lacerations as "absolutely awful".
Prosecutor Emmalyne Downing said Godbert had bought the Akita dog from a Pets4Homes website for £150 before bringing it into their home.
The couple had already been warned over their mut's behaviour, after it attacked someone nearer their home.
The couple failed to protect the child in this instance.
Miss Downing said a woman had warned Moir: "That dog could have ripped them to bits".
She urged Moir to "get rid of the dog because it could not be trusted".
But the couple ignored the warnings - and the dog struck months later to savage the toddler.
A paramedic found the child - who cannot be named - had a deep cut to the head and a facial injury.
Thankfully, the tot was taken to hospital - but they will be scarred for life.
An expert who has seen the child said the appearance of the scars "is getting worse with time," according to the judge.
The dog called Nuqe bit the poor youngster at least six times.
Moir had been drinking for 18 hours and was asleep at the time of the attack in Flintshire, North Wales.
Duncan Bould, for Godbert, said she had tried to have the dog rehomed after that first incident and that she believed it should have been put down.
Alexandra Carrier, defending Moir, said her client had taken steps to rehome the dog but there had been a "failure to see them through."
"It was not a failure to act altogether," she added.
The dog had been "utterly beyond" the defendants' ability to control it, he added.
The judge described the injuries as "truly breathtaking" and said that the dog should have been euthanised before that attack.
He said the first attack had been a "clear warning that the dog posed a risk".
Speaking to the pair, he said: "I accept you had taken some steps to rehome it or muzzle it.
"But the dog can't have been muzzled because it caused the injuries it did.
"It bit six times.
"The injuries suffered in what appears to have been an unrestrained dog attack were frightening.
"Although the doctors have done a good job in repairing those injuries, the child still, to this day, carries the scars."
The dangerous dog has in fact been put down since then, but that factor "pales into insignificance in comparison to what it did."
He said: "This incident could and should have been foreseen."
Godbert and Moir were both jailed for 18 months after they admitted owning or being in charge of a dog dangerously out of control which caused injury.
Jailing the pair at Mold Crown Court, he also disqualified them from keeping or owning a dog for seven years.
Detective Constable James Grimwood said: 'This was a horrific incident and has sadly resulted in serious and lasting injuries to a vulnerable child.
"Both Moir and Godbert have shown little remorse throughout this investigation despite the lifelong consequences their actions have had on a young child.
'The court outcome reflects the seriousness of this incident, and I hope that this sends a message to any dog owners to ensure that they do not leave dogs alone with children."
ends
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'You money grabbing little dog' - 'Jealous' drug dealer's messages to his ex-girlfriend are heard in court as he is accused of brutal murder of 'love rival' who was 'tortured to death' in his own home
A 'jealous' drug dealer accused of masterminding the brutal torture and killing of his alleged love rival branded his ex-girlfriend a 'money-grabbing little dog', a court heard today. John Belfield, 31, allegedly plotted the murder of Thomas Campbell out of 'hostility' because the victim had begun dating his ex-partner, as well as to steal from him. The 38-year-old's bloodied body was found bound in extra-strength duct tape and dressed in only a pair of socks in his own home in July 2022. In the run-up to the killing, Belfield was given crucial details about the intended victim's movements by Campbell's ex-wife Coleen, a jury has heard. She was later found guilty of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob. Today Manchester Crown Court heard of threatening messages that Belfield sent to his ex-girlfriend Demi-Lee Driver, who had begun a relationship with Campbell. In one he wrote: 'You and that helmet will get domed. 'Shut your mouth you dog.' Another read: 'There's not a thing you or him will do so. I think you should get my draws out your house Monday.' Belfield added: 'And I'm going to shag his baby mum now for the point of it, you money grabbing little dog.' Ms Driver refused to give police access to her mobile phone but shared screenshots of the Instagram messages, jurors were told. Giving evidence in his defence today, Belfield admitted being a drug dealer but claimed he had been at his sister's home on the night of the killing. His barrister Richard Wright KC asked him: 'Do you understand that the prosecution allege that, together with his ex-wife Coleen Campbell, you had personal motivation to attack Thomas Campbell because he was in a relationship with your ex partner Demi-Lee Driver? 'You were annoyed or jealous of that relationship?' Belfield replied: 'I understand that.' Mr Wright asked: 'Did you conspire with Coleen Campbell and others to target Mr Campbell as a victim for robbery in his own home?' The 38-year-old, pictured with Coleen on holiday, was discovered by shocked neighbours 'No,' Belfield replied. Mr Wright asked: 'Were you motivated by jealousy or anger to attack Mr Campbell because he was in a relationship with Demi-Lee Driver?' Belfield anwered: 'No.' Belfield admitted that he had planned to to target Mr Campbell at some point in order to steal his drugs and admitted that he himself was a drug dealer. He denied being part of the team which placed a tracking device on Mr Campbell's VW van five days before the murder and said he did not know it had been put there. Belfield admitted he had taken part in alleged 'recces' of Mr Campbell's home in Mossley, Greater Manchester. But he denied that he had been one of the men who bought items used in the torture of Mr Campbell from a B&Q store in Oldham four days before the killing. Mr Wright asked him if he was with Reece Steven - who has been convicted of Mr Campbell's murder - when he was attacked and killed. He replied: 'No. I was at my sister's house with my niece and nephew.' Belfield admitted that he had taken part in efforts to disguise the van used in the attack but said he had done so 'to help my friends'. He also agreed that he had fled the country after the murder, travelling to the former Dutch colony of Suriname in South America. But he said: 'I was scared his friend were going to attack me and kill me because of the rumours they had heard.' The court has heard the 'horrific' killing was the result of 'very careful planning by a team of highly organised criminals' who used a tracking device placed on Mr Campbell's car and carried out reconnaissance on his home in the days before the assault. Jurors have been told that at a 2023 trial Reece Steven was convicted of murder and conspiracy to rob. Stephen Cleworth, from Heywood, who acted as a driver, was convicted of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob. He was responsible for planting the tracker on Mr Campbell's vehicle and assisting with surveillance although he was not present during the murder. Belfield - alleged to have been the 'driving force' behind the killing - is now standing trial for the murder after being extradited back from South America. The prosecution case is that Steven, Belfield and a third unknown man were all present when Mr Campbell was tortured to death. Belfield, of no fixed address, denies murder and conspiracy to rob. The trial continues.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Girl, three, has arm ripped open by cockapoo as her father is forced to 'hold her skin together' after attack outside primary school
A girl, three, has had her arm ripped open by a cockapoo, with her father forced to 'hold her skin together' after the attack outside a primary school. Bunnie was walking home with her father Rowen Skinley and two siblings in Rainham, Kent, on Tuesday when the designer dog attacked outside Miers Court Primary School. She had to be rushed to hospital in London for emergency plastic surgery after the Cocker Spaniel and Poodle crossbreed brutally mauled her unprovoked. The owner of the small, sandy-coloured pooch 'just disappeared', leaving no details, after pulling the dog off the toddler and tearing her skin in doing so, Mr Skinley said. The father explained: 'I was so shocked. All I had to stop the bleeding was my hands. I had to basically hold her skin together.' Thankfully, he continued: 'She's doing well now. She's just a bit shaken and keeps talking about how scared she is of the dog... 'It's really upsetting that the woman didn't stop because it makes you fear for the safety of other kids.' A Kent Police spokesperson confirmed an investigation is ongoing. Cockapoos have often been touted as family-friendly bundles of cuteness - playful, warm, curly-haired teddy bears, who are easy to manage and train. But Mr Skinley had a rather different experience with the popular breed: 'It happened parallel to the school on the main road. I was just walking home after the school run. 'The path is quite narrow and a woman was walking her dog on the actual road itself. 'Then, out of nowhere, the dog just lunged for my daughter and pulled her to the floor.' Bystanders rushed over to help: 'People who saw what happened came over and said that my daughter hadn't even put her hand out to the dog.' Bunnie was taken to Medway Maritime Hospital in nearby Gillingham before being transferred to St Thomas' Hospital in Westminster, London, the next morning. There, she had several X-rays to ensure the puncture had not hit her bone, before undergoing the reconstructive surgery. Mr Skinley explained: 'She also has a lung condition and really bad asthma so she had to be marked down as a high-risk category for sedation.' The girl will have to return to hospital within a week for a check-up, to assess if she needs even more surgery. Anyone with information that could assist officers' inquiries, including CCTV or doorbell footage, should contact police on 01634 792209, quoting 46/102876/25. It comes after MailOnline revealed at the end of last year that at least 16 dangerous dogs are seized every day in the UK. Just under 6,000 dangerous dogs were seized by 27 forces from November 2023 until the same month the following year, a Freedom of Information (FOI) request found - meaning 114 dogs are taken every week. Of the forces which responded to the FOI, Greater Manchester had the highest figures, with 19 dogs seized a week. It took 1,000 in a year and put 337 of the animals to sleep. Second highest is the West Midlands force with 17 dogs, followed by Northumbria with nine. West Yorkshire seized eight a week, while Leicestershire said it seized six. Experts have now warned that banning dangerous dogs in order to keep the public safe has 'critical flaws' and the focus should be on making owners more responsible instead. A spokesperson at which obtained the data, said: 'The Dangerous Dogs Act has been in effect for over three decades and yet, hospital admissions due to dog bites continue to rise.' They added that instead of focusing on breed, the emphasis should be on 'addressing the root causes of dog aggression' instead.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Desperate homeowner who destroyed his £150,000 property 'brick by brick' in 17-year war with tenant loses everything as it's repossessed and sold by bank
A desperate homeowner who tried to dismantle his house after he exploded in frustration following a long-running dispute with a tenant has 'lost everything' after the property was repossessed. Louis Scudder, 53, was forced to give up his childhood home which has now been sold off at auction. The three bedroom home had been left in a shocking state of disrepair for nearly a year after Mr Scudder launched into a frenzied one-man demolition mission. Mr Scudder was at the centre of a 24-hour stand-off with police in riot gear last August after he began destroying the end of terrace house - starting with the roof. Friends told how Mr Scudder snapped after reaching the end of his tether following a 17-year battle to take back control of his £150,000 property in Sheerness, Kent, which he became convinced had been 'stolen from him'. After a series of court battles the property was put up for sale by the bank with whom he had taken out a mortgage. The house had a reserve price of £115,000 when it was put up for sale by estate agents Barnard Marcus at an auction at the Grand Connaught Rooms in central London in April. It sold for £134,000 and is believed to have been purchased by a property developer. The sale catalogue pointed out that auctioneers had not been able to inspect the freehold home and that purchasers would have to 'rely upon their own enquiries as to the internal layout of the property'. No viewings were conducted and auctioneers explained 'no keys will be provided to the property upon completion. The property was being sold 'by order of the mortgagees'. Neighbours - who were ordered to evacuate their homes during Mr Scudder's rampage - told how they are now hoping the house can be made habitable again and they can return to their peaceful lives. Tanya Gray, who has lived in the streets for 28 years, told MailOnline: 'It was a lovely house but he completely wrecked it. 'He wanted to get the house back but he went about it the wrong way and now he's ended up losing it because the bank took it and put it up for auction. He's lost everything.' Tanya, 58, added: 'The house has been in a terrible state ever since. It's a real eyesore. 'Before it went up for sale his friends were regularly going into the property but there has been no one since it went up for auction. 'No-one was allowed to go inside to view it because it was classed as unsafe. We've heard someone from London has bought it. They must be planning to do it up. Good luck to them. There must be even more damage now because it's been left open to the elements for nearly a year. Hopefully that's the end of it. This is a family-orientated area and it would be nice if a nice quiet family will move in now.' Mr Scudder took matters into his own hands after growing increasingly frustrated that he had been unable to live in his property. Fearing the authorities were against him in March last year, Mr Scudder waited for long-term tenant Ayshea Kramer, 51, to go out before climbing in through a window to gain entry. He removed her possessions and dumped them outside before changing the locks but was ordered by a court to quit the property and hand back the keys. As a legal battle rumbled on, Mr Scudder returned to the property in June last year where he began ripping tiles off the roof and smashing windows with his bare hands - leaving himself covered in blood. He was arrested and was bound over to keep the peace for 12 months for causing a public nuisance and breaching an injunction. A dilapidated chimney and police tape are just two of the sorry sights to meet neighbours Two months later, he returned with a sledgehammer to finish the job. Neighbours told how at the end of the terrifying rampage Mr Scudder left behind a scene of devastation they likened to 'a disaster movie'. Officers in riot gear were drafted in while specially trained negotiators tried to coax him down from the rafters of his wrecked property. Ambulance crews and fire fighters were also called in amid fears damage to pipes and cables could cause an explosion. Walls came crashing down and pipe work was shattered as Mr Scudder rained blow after blow on the property reducing brickwork to piles of rubble. At the time Danny Owen - who has lived in the street for more than a year - told MailOnline: 'He got on the roof and started tearing the house to pieces. He did it twice. The first time he tore the whole roof down with his bare hands. He smashed all the tiles. He was ripping them off and was throwing them. 'He punched the windows with his hands which were all cut and bloodied. There was scaffolding put up after that as attempts were made to fix the roof. 'He wasn't happy with it and he went up there again and wrecked the place. 'All I heard him say was 'I'm not coming out until I take this whole place apart - brick by brick. He said he was going to destroy the house. It's his family home. He grew up there. He owns it but he hasn't been allowed to live there. 'He says he tried to do things properly but in the end he felt helpless as everything always went in her favour. He demolished all the inside. He smashed up the bathroom and there was a worry because of all the pipework that was damaged. There was water leaking. 'There's been this long dispute with the tenant which has ended in a long legal fight. He reached breaking point and it ended with this. I feel sorry for him. He went about it the wrong way. It's very sad. He's hit rock bottom. He thought the authorities let him down and he had a genuine grievance. 'He should have gone about it differently but he obviously wasn't thinking like that.' Another neighbour said: 'His attitude seemed to be 'If I can't have my house, you can't have it either' so he set out to demolish it. He went up there on the Wednesday and he didn't come down until Thursday evening.' In the aftermath of the rampage Mr Scudder said: 'I feel like an injured fox being hounded. No-one's listening to me. I'm so angry inside.' One friend of Mr Scudder told MailOnline: 'This has destroyed this man's life. He's a broken man and it's not fair how he's been treated.' After one of Mr Scudder's court appearances last year, friends told how the property had been his childhood home which he went on to buy from the council. One friend told how Mr Scudder was forced to leave the house for a number of years after finding himself in 'a challenging personal situation'. He asked a relative to arrange for it to be rented out to help him pay off his mortgage. But Mr Scudder claims that unbeknown to him a 25-year tenancy agreement had been signed. In 1999 Ms Kramer moved into the property and it was there that she brought up her three daughters - twins aged 27 and their older sister who is now aged 31. The friend claimed Mr Scudder only discovered about the terms of the tenancy in 2007. The friend said: 'During all those years he's been homeless. He's been jumping from friend to friend, living in spare bedrooms, on sofas. If friends had motorhomes he would stay there for a couple of months, he stayed on boats - anywhere he could find. 'He's a man with a home that's homeless. It's ridiculous. 'He's the loveliest man you could ever meet. He just wants a quiet life. His dream in life which he was hoping this house could help him do was to buy a small piece of land and rescue animals. Friends of Ms Kramer told how she has been left traumatised by the experience - losing her home and most of her possessions including treasured family photographs. But Tobe Hayden, who assisted Mr Scudder in previous legal actions, said: 'I didn't know the house had been repossessed. I was assisting him for a while but then they went in a different direction. It was a terrible miscarriage of justice for him.'
