Sasol report warns of ‘uncontrolled risk' to Joburg park gas pipeline

School learners and families are at risk as residents of a Homestead Park informal settlement light fires over a gas pipeline. The City of Johannesburg says eviction laws are delaying action.
People living in shacks who are lighting fires daily over a gas pipeline, which is only 1.5 metres underground, are causing a huge potential safety risk for the inner-city suburb of Homestead Park.
Yet the City of Johannesburg, despite having received a risk assessment report from Sasol, the owner of the pipeline, warning of the risks, is delaying the relocation of the land occupiers, saying it has to follow legal eviction procedures.
The land occupiers have not only built shacks above the pipeline but are also digging pit latrines directly above it for their ablutions which, over and above the danger of hitting the pipe, could cause it to corrode through human waste, said Suhail Ahmed, the secretary of the Homestead Community Forum.
'We fear that with severe winter conditions setting in, the risks could be exacerbated as fires are being lit day and night. Already, in March, a fire spiralled out of control in one of the shacks and emergency services had to be brought in. This shows the limited safety behaviour and control exercised by these people,' he said.
The City said it was aware of the risk but had to follow proper legal procedures to remove the occupiers, including finding alternative accommodation, which could take months, if not years.
The issue was first reported in Sunday Times.
Sasol's risk assessment says a school is located nearby and learners wait for transport adjacent to the property.
Residents fear a repeat of the July 2023 explosion on Lilian Ngoyi Street (formerly Bree Street) in the Johannesburg CBD, caused by methane gas and which resulted in significant damage and one death.
The investigation revealed that the methane gas resulted from underlying geological layers, and which escaped to the surface due to seismic activity.
The City of Johannesburg delayed the repairs by awarding the R196-million contract to repair the busy street to a company that was facing fraud charges for allegedly defrauding City Power of R94-million. The contractor, Step Up Engineering, was later terminated for failing to meet contractual obligations and for the earlier fraud allegations.
In May 2025, Joburg Mayor Dada Morero said the first phase of the rehabilitation work was scheduled for completion by the end of August. About 450 metres were affected and the road has been closed since July 2023.
'Families at risk'
Sasol confirmed that it had performed and submitted a risk assessment to City officials. This was done in November last year and presented to City officials on 5 February 2025. On 4 March, a site inspection was done with Sasol, the City's disaster management unit and other officials. Nine shacks housing 15 people were found to be encroaching the pipeline servitude.
'Sasol takes this matter seriously and remains committed to ensuring the safety of communities and the integrity of its pipeline infrastructure,' said Sasol spokesperson Matebello Motloung.
'As part of efforts to maintain public safety, (we) continue to engage the office of the City of Johannesburg's municipal manager to discuss existing safety concerns posed by the… informal settlement and to explore mutually beneficial and sustainable solutions.
'(We) do not have the legal authority to remove individuals or communities residing along the gas pipeline servitude. We rely on ongoing collaboration with relevant municipal and governmental authorities to address such matters in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.'
He added that Sasol regularly conducted gas pipeline safety awareness campaigns in communities near pipelines.
The risk report states that informal developments should not be closer than 25 metres from the pipeline and that those encroaching the pipeline 'place families at risk'.
'People living in unapproved structures will… dig pit latrines for toilet facilities. If… not correctly installed, human waste increases sulphur content in soil, which increases corrosion probability to steel structures, such as the gas pipeline.'
It also states that the existing distances between the gas pipeline and the development are 'not acceptable and the informal residents must be removed due to undue and uncontrolled risk'.
Sasol made a number of recommendations to address the risks. (Source: Sasol report)
Egoli Gas said its responsibility for the gas pipe only started at Cottlesloe, not at Homestead Park.
'The responsibility for the integrity, safety and management of the pipeline and the land above it, including any risk posed by informal settlements, rests with Sasol as the pipeline owner, and with the City of Johannesburg as the custodian of land use and urban safety,' said the company in a statement.
'The gas pipeline supplies gas to our network via our manifold station at Cottesloe. This pipeline is a critical supply point for our network and enables the distribution of gas to our domestic, commercial, and industrial customers across Johannesburg.
'We are currently in discussions with Sasol on this matter and are committed to supporting efforts that lead to a safe and sustainable resolution. Egoli Gas' main point of concern relates to any damage or disruption to this line, as it would directly impact our ability to supply gas to customers across Johannesburg. The safety and security of this supply route is therefore of utmost importance.'
City spokesperson Nthatisi Modingoane, replying to a query on whether emergency legislation existed in such a case, said: 'There is a commitment from the offices of the MMC for planning and public safety who are working with other key stakeholders from the departments of human settlements and social development to intervene and address the situation.'
'During the site visits, public education and awareness activities were conducted, so people are aware that they have to move,' he said.
'Home affairs conducted a socioeconomic assessment to determine how many people are residing there, their nationalities and status and whether there are vulnerable persons who may need to be taken to the shelter or place of safety. The Human Settlements Department and the Johannesburg Property Company are actively looking for alternate space. There is no time frame available, but home affairs will have to be part of the eviction process,' he said.
'Foot-and-mouth disease'
Another concern in the area is a herd of cows that has been wandering through the streets for the past three years. After the recent blitz by City officials, residents have now been told that the animals have foot-and-mouth disease and cannot be moved until the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development conducts an inspection.
Ahmed, however, said this could take months: 'While we appreciate the clearing of overgrown trees and grass and we realise there are processes to be followed, it is very frustrating for residents who have invested a lot of money into their properties watching the suburb decline daily.
'Already, a week after the cleaning, people are back there dumping and nothing has been done about the cows who walk in the streets right up to Brixton and Mayfair, endangering themselves and motorists. They are eating rotting food dumped on street corners. They defecate all over the streets and people's pristine pavements. Now they are telling us we again must wait.'
The SPCA has visited often but says that only the Johannesburg Metro Police Department can remove them.
SPAC Inspector Israel Lukheli said they had no knowledge of the foot-and-mouth disease issue.
'We have visited the site often, we even tried to herd the cows on foot to our nearby premises, but they started to run. We don't have the necessary resources or the authority to move them. We have offered to oversee and help the metro police move them, monitor the situation and ensure the conditions at the pound are safe for the animals,' he said.
The Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development did not respond to a request for comment.
Burning plastics
Another problem Homestead Park residents are experiencing is that recyclers have started building shacks in their park where they burn unused plastics, leaving litter all over the park.
'City Parks said it had facilitated two multi-entity blitzes there and cleared the bushes and grass. They have further installed bollards at two access points at the park to prevent illegal vehicle entry, dumping and access by recyclers with trolleys,' said spokesperson Jenny Moodley.
Regarding the shacks and their occupants, Moodley said they had to follow procedures.
Park rangers, together with the metro police and other stakeholders, conducted random patrols and safety check operations across affected parks to ensure public health standards and protect the integrity of the City's green spaces, she added. DM

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

eNCA

5 hours ago

• eNCA

EC sports field tender referred to Hawks for investigation

JOHANNESBURG - The Public Protector has referred an Eastern Cape sports field tender to the Hawks. It follows a probe into the R23-million tender for the Lesseyton sports field. Advocate Kholeka Gcaleka found improper conduct on the part of the Enoch Mgijima Municipality. She found that the work done did not justify the cost incurred.

Daily Maverick

2 days ago

• Daily Maverick

Zionism untethered — inside the legal battle for the soul of UCT

Up until now, a narrative has been pushed in the local and international right-wing press that the council of the University of Cape Town had chosen to wilfully sacrifice R750-million in donor funding on the altar of its so-called Gaza resolutions. But new court papers submitted by an anti-Zionist Jewish group, as well as previously unreported sections of the UCT council's answering affidavit, reveal a concerted effort by the pro-Israel lobby to shut down criticism of the Jewish state. Just like at Ivy League universities in the US, threats and intimidation have characterised the case. Illusions of safety On a Monday morning in March 2024, Professor Susan Levine, the head of the anthropology department at the University of Cape Town (UCT), received an email from a man who claimed to be 'Benjy 'Ben' Steingold' of Tzfat, the famous 'holy city' near the Sea of Galilee in northern Israel. Levine, who had never met or even heard of Steingold, was wary — the events of the previous weekend, when it came to the actions of her colleagues and fellow Jews, had shaken her badly. As she read from the top, her fears were confirmed. 'This may be the most important email you have ever received in your life,' the message began. 'Please read to the end as it could give you the opportunity to change your eternal future.' That 'eternal future', according to Steingold — or whatever the sender's real name happened to be — would, unless Levine altered course, involve a particularly biblical form of punishment. Because she had allegedly 'vilified Israel' by spreading 'untruths and lies', she was destined 'in this incarnation or another reincarnation' to live under one of four enemy regimes: Hamas, Hezbollah, Isis or the Ayatollah's Iran. For the next 10 paragraphs, as payback for the motion that Levine had brought before the UCT senate the previous Friday, Steingold quoted a potent mix of Torah and American literature. Through it all, an undercurrent of menace flowed in a steady and self-assured stream, as exemplified in a citation from the Midrash (ancient commentaries on the Hebrew scriptures): 'If you are kind to the cruel, in the end, you will be cruel to the kind.' Two days later, on 13 March 2024, Levine would include these details in a sworn statement for the South African Police Service. At around the same time, the UCT authorities would deem the threat to her life significant enough to warrant full-time private security. In the third paragraph of her statement, Levine would succinctly explain the motion that she had proposed to the university senate on 8 March: 'The motion was one which urged UCT to cut ties with Israeli institutions of higher education until such a time that they acknowledge the value of Palestinian lives in Gaza and [call] for an end to what the International Court of Justice calls 'plausible' [genocide].' As it turned out, despite her refusal to rescind — aside from the Steingold threat, there was an attempt by UCT staff to place pressure on members of Levine's family, with one colleague even passing on the message that her life would be 'ruined' — the motion for an academic boycott did not win the requisite votes. Still, although she could not know it at the time, Levine's experience was fated to form a core part of one of the most significant court cases in the 195-year history of UCT. Lodged by Professor Adam Mendelsohn on 22 August 2024, the Western Cape Division of the High Court application would attempt to overturn a pair of momentous resolutions that had been passed by the UCT council, the university's highest decision-making body, on 22 June of that same year: first, the resolution not to adopt the international definition of anti-Semitism that encompassed anti-Zionism; and, second, the resolution to prohibit collaboration with academics or research groups affiliated to the Israel Defense Forces or the broader Israeli military establishment. In its 150-page answering affidavit, the UCT council — represented by its chairperson, Norman Arendse — would refer to these resolutions jointly as the 'Gaza resolutions,' thereby making it plain that they were a direct response to Israel's ongoing military offensive and the rulings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). On page 17 of the affidavit, shortly after reiterating UCT's 'zero-tolerance attitude to anti-Semitism' and acknowledging that the Jewish people had in the past been 'victims of gross atrocities and genocide' themselves, Levine's experience was mentioned for the first time. The context, as the UCT papers explicitly stated, was that 'those who expressed views in support of the Gaza resolutions' were likely to face 'threats, intimidation or reprisal' if their identities were revealed. Mendelsohn, the affidavit alleged, was 'probably aware' of Levine's experience, and therefore should not have disregarded the 'safety and wellbeing' of council members by going public with the case. As examples of Mendelsohn's alleged breach, UCT cited the publication of his founding and supplementary affidavits on Politicsweb, 'with council members' identities disclosed … regardless of the request [for anonymity]'. Also cited was reporting on the case 'in pro-Israel and right-wing media in the United States', specifically an article in Breitbart Media by its senior editor Joel Pollak, dated 15 March 2025. What was not cited was a lengthy feature published in Haaretz, Israel's most progressive mainstream newspaper, on 24 September 2024. Titled '' Scary Time to Be a Zionist': Is Africa's Top University No Longer a Welcoming Place for Jews? ', the piece, authored by South African journalist Tali Feinberg, quoted Mendelsohn extensively. With a link to the original founding affidavit, published on Politicsweb on 29 August 2024, Feinberg noted that the resolutions (which were — and are — yet to be implemented) 'should be seen within the broader context of South Africa's fraught relations with Israel'. Here, while Feinberg failed to mention the exceptionally close relationship in the 1970s and 1980s between the Israeli establishment and the white supremacist apartheid regime, she did observe that 'the ruling African National Congress has long backed the Palestinians'. Likewise, while she failed to acknowledge the threats directed at Levine, the fears of certain members of UCT's Zionist student body — most of whom would only speak to her on condition of anonymity — were the central focus of her piece. As graduate student Esther (not her real name) told Feinberg: 'If someone assaulted me for wearing a T-shirt that said 'Am Yisrael Chai' ['The people of Israel live'], it wouldn't be seen as anti-Semitic. It would be 'anti-Zionist.' The overlap between the two is no longer allowed to exist.' In these inherently contested words, by Daily Maverick's reckoning, lay the essence of the case. Levine, who in the interests of academic freedom allowed us access to her story and her name, was for us an archetypal local representative of a deeply disturbing global phenomenon — the split in world Jewry, between Zionists and anti-Zionists, that was now violently shaking the foundations of some of the most prestigious universities on Earth. What if Einstein was an anti-Semite? 'I am an academic, writer and member of the organisation South African Jews for a Free Palestine (SAJFP), currently residing in Cape Town,' Jared Sacks testified. 'I do not disclose my residential address because SAJFP members are often subject to harassment and threats from individuals who support Israel and the ideology of Zionism.' As the opening paragraph of the application for the admission of the SAJFP as amicus curiae (friends of the court) in the case of Mendelsohn versus the UCT council, an affidavit that Sacks deposed on behalf of his organisation on 9 June 2025, the assertion — like Levine's story — was far from hyperbolic. A mere six weeks before, as reported by Daily Maverick, Sacks had been physically assaulted by an attendee of the Jewish Literary Festival in Cape Town, for the apparent offence of protesting Israeli war crimes in Gaza. The incident, it turned out, was nothing new to Sacks. As a PhD graduate in Middle Eastern Studies from Columbia University in New York, he had served as a teaching fellow on undergraduate courses that delved into the highly flammable terrain of Palestinian rights. 'I have first-hand knowledge of the current climate of political repression related to pro-Palestine activism at universities in the United States,' Sacks declared in his affidavit, 'including at Columbia, where a number of former colleagues and former students have been subject to harassment, doxxing, assaults, institutional pressure, procedurally unfair disciplinary processes, and unjust termination of employment due to their research and speech on Palestine.' By Daily Maverick's understanding, this anchoring of the UCT case in the international context, a point that the affidavit would repeat from multiple angles, was one of the primary motivations for the SAJFP applying as amicus curiae — in disentangling the religion of Judaism from the ideology of Zionism, Sacks testified, his organisation aimed to 'debunk the anti-Semitic notion' that there had ever been anything like a homogenous Jewish perspective, either globally or locally, on the actions of the State of Israel. Clearly, in emphasising 'the role that anti-Zionist and non-Zionist Jews have played in shaping discourse on [the UCT campus]', the affidavit was not only rejecting the attempt by Mendelsohn — director of the university's Kaplan Centre for Jewish Studies — to speak on behalf of all Jewish students and staff; it was also affirming the SAJFP's support for free speech and institutional autonomy, particularly in the form of the Gaza resolutions. But as important, 'with billionaire philanthropists and politicians running roughshod over protected speech' at universities in the United States, the SAJFP was drawing attention to the 'distinct possibility' that what had been playing out 'at places like Harvard and Columbia' would 'become an issue at South African universities as well'. The question for the Western Cape Division of the High Court, of course, would be whether the SAJFP was overstating its case. And here, to offset Mendelsohn's opposition to the application, the organisation came armed with expert witnesses. At the top end, aside from the testimonies of Professor Steven Friedman and Professor Isaac Kamola, two local academics with deep knowledge of the issues, the SAJFP submitted an expert affidavit from Professor Joan Scott of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey — the same institute that Albert Einstein had joined in the 1930s, after seeking refuge from Nazi Germany. Scott, as Sacks well knew, had long been a leading global critic of the definition of anti-Semitism as laid down by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, or IHRA — the very definition that the UCT council had rejected in its Gaza resolutions of June 2024, and the very definition, as articulated in his founding papers, that Mendelsohn appeared to be insisting upon. In paragraph 14 of her supporting affidavit, somewhat remarkably, Scott invoked the spirit of Einstein himself. 'Under the IHRA definition,' she testified, 'rejecting the idea of a Jewish state with borders and an army, as Einstein once did, could land even the most famous Jew of the 20th century in the position of being accused of anti-Semitism. Though he was sympathetic to Zionism, Einstein's comparison of Menachem Begin's Herut Party massacres during the Nakba to the Nazi Party would have fallen afoul of [the IHRA definition]. In today's academic world, he could have been fired for making such a comparison.' In other words, according to Scott, a celebrated Jewish scholar in her mid-80s who had witnessed — and commented upon — some of the worst anti-democratic impulses of 20th-century America, the Zionist radicals of 2025 would have burnt no less a luminary than Einstein. It was for this reason, she continued in her affidavit, that one of the original authors of the IHRA definition, Professor Kenneth Stern, came to regret what he called the 'weaponising' of the definition, arguing — in an opinion piece for The Guardian published in 2019 — that 'its misuse undermines efforts to detect and combat real instances of anti-Semitism'. In the same vein, Scott added, this was also why more than a hundred Israeli and international civil society organisations, in April of 2023 — as reported, again, in The Guardian — 'urged the United Nations to reject this definition'. Ultimately, for Scott — as for Friedman and Kamola — the IHRA definition had quickly become anathema to the very idea of academic freedom. Scott, however, had been watching its effects play out on US Ivy League campuses in real time. Republican politicians, she testified, 'many of them anti-Semites themselves', were now using the 'expressions of discomfort' of Zionist students and faculty to foreground anti-Semitism at the expense of all other forms of racial discrimination. '[Zionist] students express their discomfort in terms of feeling 'unsafe' or 'threatened,'' she added, 'when there is little or no evidence of any physical danger they have experienced.' And so Daily Maverick could not help but wonder: was this also the reality of Zionist fears on the UCT campus, as reported by Feinberg in Haaretz? The answer, it appeared, would be for the Western Cape Division of the High Court to decide. For the moment, what could not be disputed was how things were turning out in the US. 'The IHRA definition is now a political test for enjoying rights of free speech and academic freedom,' Scott testified. 'Those who support Israel have rights of free expression, those who criticise it are punished and banned.' The money problem On a Saturday morning in mid-March 2025, almost a year to the day after UCT had assigned full-time security to Professor Levine, the university council was asked to make a difficult decision. With the threat of US federal funding cuts looming, most likely in the form of an abrupt halt to grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the executive orders of President Donald Trump could no longer be ignored — for one thing, as the largest recipients of NIH grants outside of the US, the university's medical researchers were now at serious risk. For another thing, as every member of the council was keenly aware, pro-Israel donors had already withdrawn funding — and more were threatening to withdraw — on the back of the Gaza resolutions of the previous year. Although it had not been placed on the agenda for discussion, a motion was therefore tabled that the university should rescind the resolutions and withdraw its opposition to Mendelsohn's high court application. In a closely contested vote, the motion failed to pass. A few short hours later, as stated in the council's answering affidavit, Joel Pollak of the right-wing US outlet Breitbart Media ran an article under the title, ' South African university votes to keep boycott of Israel despite losing two-thirds of donor funding '. Before the end of the following week, in a similarly alarmist piece in the local Jewish Report (authored, like the Haaretz feature, by Feinberg), Rolene Marks of the South African Zionist Federation (SAZF) would also note her concerns. 'This self-inflicted crisis threatens vital resources and undermines UCT's global standing,' Marks stated on behalf of the SAZF. 'It exposes the ideological capture of its leadership at the direct expense of academic freedom, financial stability and student welfare. Council members have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the university, yet some are wilfully disregarding this obligation. Their hatred of Israel outweighs their responsibility for UCT's future.' By Daily Maverick's reading, this was an uncanny summary of one of the principal arguments from Mendelsohn's founding affidavit of August 2024 — the notion that, by failing to take account of 'UCT's finances, existing relationships … and reputation', the council had acted in an 'irrational' manner. But if Mendelsohn was indeed the source of the leaks, as alleged in the UCT answering papers, he would not admit as much to us. In response to a series of questions sent on 12 June, in which Daily Maverick also sought clarification on the publication of the names of council members, he noted his 'surprise' at our email — we should 'surely know', he wrote, that it would be 'improper' for him to respond while legal proceedings were pending. Given Mendelsohn's extensive interviews with Feinberg, we noted, we too were surprised. Still, irrespective of the source, the tenor of the media campaign against the UCT council was unmistakable — the underlying message was that the university had been financially punished for taking on the Zionists. The SAJFP, for its part, was unimpressed. Referring in a footnote to an attendant statement from Mendelsohn's supplementary affidavit, the organisation pointed out the obvious: 'The assumption that 'Jewish connected' donors would have a homogeneous reaction to resolutions against Israel's actions in Palestine is not only incorrect … it also panders to historical anti-Semitic tropes of a Jewish cabal working in unison and employing financial power to promote its political agendas.' Of course, if the SAJFP was implying that there was no such cabal, the optics weren't working in its favour. Further down in its application, the organisation got at the heart of the matter, noting that since 7 October 2023 the 'risk to university autonomy and academic freedom' from private donor money had become extreme, 'particularly at Ivy League universities' in the US. 'Wealthy donors (with the support of politicians) have drawn on the IHRA's conflation of anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism to pressure universities like Harvard and Columbia to ban student groups like Jewish Voices for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine,' Sacks testified. 'Donor pressure has also forced the suspension and expulsion of students for peaceful protests, the militarisation of campuses by armed police and the resignation of university presidents that sought to push back on their demands.' Unlike Harvard, the SAJFP noted, where philanthropic contributions 'made up about 45 percent of all revenue in the 2024 financial year', private donor funding made up 'only ten percent' of UCT's revenue in 2024. Still, with the overall trend in South Africa towards 'increased reliance on such funding', one of the dangers — as the SAJFP saw it — was that donors' political views would soon play an outsized role at our universities too. A major milestone, according to the SAJFP, had been passed in the signing of a contract between UCT and the Donald Gordon Foundation (DGF) in 2023, wherein the latter had agreed to fund the creation of a neuroscience institute (at a cost of R200-million over a 10-year period) on the proviso that UCT's 'zero-tolerance attitude to anti-Semitism' was anchored in the IHRA definition. As the UCT council's answering affidavit made clear, on 6 August 2024 — around six weeks after it had passed the Gaza resolutions — the DGF informed the university of its 'decision to cancel … the donor agreement'. In total, the council devoted all of 24 paragraphs to the contract's background, arguing that the IHRA clause had never been used or intended as a dealbreaker and expressing the hope that the relationship with the DGF could be restored. But Mendelsohn, in his own papers, had left no room for doubt — not only had the UCT council sacrificed the neuroscience institute on the altar of its Gaza resolutions, he testified, it had burnt the chances of a mooted 'R400- to R500-million from the DGF' for a new academic hospital too. And likewise for the SAJFP (although from the diametrically opposed stance), there was nothing ambiguous about the DGF contract. 'If the DGF donor agreement were to be enforced,' Sacks testified, 'this would mean that Zionism's adherents on campus would be protected by the IHRA in the same way as a racial group or religion. Meanwhile, the agreement would institutionalise discrimination against those who oppose Zionism by branding them with the false label of anti-Semitism.' The Western Cape Division of the High Court, then, was being asked to pass judgment on one of the most heated and divisive topics of the modern era — a touchpoint that was pitching students against professors, voters against politicians, Jews against Jews. For anti-Zionists like Levine and Sacks, the violence that their brethren were capable of was hardly a joke; but for Mendelsohn too, who in September 2024 had requested additional security from the university, the stakes were sky-high. On 23 and 24 October 2025, the matter would be heard before a full Bench. Arguing for the admission of the SAJFP as amicus curiae would be Geoffrey Budlender, a graduate of UCT and one of the most respected senior counsels in South Africa. According to Sacks, Budlender had agreed to take on the case pro bono. Given that Budlender, himself a Jew, had recently been honoured with the George Bizos Human Rights Award, it was likely to be an uncompromising show, a battle worthy of the oldest university in the country.

Daily Maverick

3 days ago

• Daily Maverick

‘I will not step down,' NPA head Shamila Batohi tells MPs

With much riding on the shoulders of the NPA's Shamila Batohi, she says she won't quit amid calls for her resignation. Shamila Batohi, the head of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), has made it clear that she will not leave her position as National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) following renewed calls for her resignation amid growing concerns about the NPA's failure to prosecute State Capture cases. 'I want to say that, as the NDPP, I will not be stepping down because I believe that we are doing a really good job to serve the people of this country – as we have been – and, particularly, the victims of crime,' Batohi told MPs in Parliament. Batohi was responding to demands for her resignation by uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) MP Sibonelo Nomvalo and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) MP Mathibe Mohlala during a parliamentary justice committee meeting on Tuesday, 17 June. Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Mmamoloko Kubayi also appeared before the committee to table the department's annual performance plan. Batohi has faced fresh calls to resign or be removed from office in recent weeks, after the NPA was accused of bungling the extradition of Moroadi Cholota, the former personal assistant of corruption-accused former Free State premier Ace Magashule. The Free State Division of the High Court in Bloemfontein ruled earlier this month that Cholota's extradition from the United States was unlawful and unconstitutional on the grounds that the extradition had been requested by the NPA rather than Kubayi. Judge Phillip Loubser concluded that the court therefore did not have the jurisdiction to try her. The mishandling of Cholota's extradition was the latest in a series of NPA failures in prosecuting high-profile State Capture cases. Other mishaps include the institution's failure to secure a conviction of pastor Timothy Omotoso and the failed extradition of the fugitive Gupta brothers in April 2023. Following the Cholota ruling, ActionSA called for Batohi's removal as NDPP and for a 'full parliamentary inquiry' into the NPA's failures. The DA proposed a set of reforms to 'rescue South Africa's broken' NPA. In an interview with SABC Morning Live Host Leanne Manas hours before the DA and ActionSA issued their statements, Batohi said that there were 'less than a dozen' matters that had 'led to this very, very severe criticism of the NPA'. 'There certainly have been setbacks and I don't want to underplay that. There've been major setbacks for the institution. But we're dealing with them,' Batohi said. Batohi took the same line with Parliament on Tuesday, saying she conceded that there 'have been about a dozen cases' for which the NPA had received 'a lot of flak'. However, last week the NPA scored a major win when the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) overturned a Bloemfontein judge's decision to acquit all the accused in the R24.9-million Nulane Investments case, Daily Maverick's Ferial Haffajee reported. This came after acting judge Nompumelelo Gush threw out the case in April 2023, against three former Free State officials, long-time Gupta enterprise employee Ronica Ragavan and businessman Iqbal Sharma. The SCA order means the accused face a retrial before a new judge. Batohi said the SCA order 'vindicates' the NPA and its prosecutor, because 'the courts agreed with our view'. 'The point I make is that there are legal processes, and I urge that we consider these cases individually,' she said. Batohi said there are 'huge systemic problems in the criminal justice system' and as NDPP, she would 'welcome some kind of commission that looks into systemic issues' about addressing South Africa's high crime rate. 'There are huge challenges within the NPA, within the police, [and] within the court system that we need to address to try and address the crime problem in our country,' she said. NPA doing a 'fantastic job' At the meeting, the MK's Mohlala accused Batohi of being 'incompetent', saying that under her leadership the NPA – which he ironically said 'used to enjoy integrity and credibility' – has been turned into 'a basket of shame'. 'We are very surprised that she has not resigned; it means she has a very stubborn conscience,' said Mohlala. He further accused Kubayi of misleading the House when she, in her earlier remarks, said that the NPA had been doing 'a fantastic job' concerning Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) matters, particularly the work of the Missing Persons Task Team. 'Maybe you can fool your friends, not us,' said Mohlala. At the end of the meeting, Batohi hit back at Mohlala's comments, praising the work of the NPA. 'The question was asked whether we are doing a fantastic job, and I'd like to say that the NPA is, in fact, doing a fantastic job,' she said. 'I will never mislead this House. My integrity is really important and I will always be fair and honest. There are some things that we may not be able to speak about, but I will always be transparent and share whatever I can with the people of this country,' said Batohi. In the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) later on Tuesday afternoon, Kubayi was again confronted with questions about the performance of the NPA. 'We do take cognisance of the public outcry and we do pay attention to what is being raised… If we look at these two cases [Omotoso and Cholota] there are lessons to be learnt out of them and more work can be done by [supporting] and providing in terms of oversight over some of the cases,' said the minister. Kubayi highlighted some of the institution's gains. 'The NPA has moved from an annual performance of 50% in [the] 2020-21 financial year, to an organisation that is performing at 73% in 2023-24… Though challenges remain, the improvement in performance is a demonstration of a well-capacitated, well-resourced organisation,' she said. DM