Removal of mandatory minimum sentences for some dangerous driving offences in Singapore to kick in from Thursday (June 12)

Annual statistics released by the Traffic Police on Feb 21, 2025 showed a five-year high in the number of people killed or injured in accidents across 2024. - Photo: ST
SINGAPORE: Updated legislation covering dangerous and careless driving offences with mandatory minimum sentences for first-time offenders removed will take effect on Thursday (June 12).
The first tranche of amendments in the Road Traffic (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act will lower the mandatory minimum jail terms for repeat offenders of dangerous driving causing death or grievous hurt to two years' jail and one year's jail, respectively.
The mandatory minimum jail term and disqualification period for first-time offenders will also be removed.
No changes will be made to the maximum penalties for repeat offenders. Those convicted of dangerous driving causing death can face up to 15 years' jail, while those who cause grievous hurt can be jailed for up to 10 years.
In a June 11 statement, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said: 'The courts will have the flexibility to decide on the appropriate sentence in every case, and MHA expects egregious offenders to continue to be subject to stiff penalties.'
Annual statistics released by the Traffic Police (TP) on Feb 21 showed a five-year high in the number of people killed or injured in accidents across 2024.
The figures showed that of the 139 fatal accidents in 2024, a total of 46 cases – or one in three – were related to speeding. A total of 142 people died in road accidents in 2024.
'MHA continues to be concerned about the road safety situation in Singapore. TP has intensified its enforcement efforts against egregious driving behaviour, including drink driving,' MHA said.
'We recently announced increases in the penalties for speeding offences, and are reviewing other laws and policies to promote a culture of responsible driving and ensure sufficient penalties for offenders.'
Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim had said in Parliament on Jan 7 that the amendments do not mean the Government is signalling a more lenient stance towards repeat offenders.
Rather, the changes were made to recalibrate the balance between deterrence and proportionality.
Prosecutors will also be given more flexibility to proceed on a 'hurt' charge even when 'grievous hurt' is caused, he said.
This is to enable the prosecution to take into account other circumstances that could have been involved. They include the nature of the victim's injury and whether other road users were partly responsible for the accident.
The refreshed Act will also adjust how motorists' track records affect their classification as repeat offenders for dangerous or careless driving offences.
Under the new Act, motorists will be classified as repeat offenders only if they have at least two prior speeding convictions in excess of 40kmh of the road or vehicle's speed limit.
At least two of the speeding convictions will also need to have occurred within five years of the dangerous or careless driving offence they are currently facing.
Motorists with previous convictions for dangerous or careless driving, or found to have conducted illegal speed trials, will continue to be classified as repeat offenders if found to have committed another similar offence. - The Straits Times/ANN

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Borneo Post

2 days ago

• Borneo Post

Used clothes seller acquitted, discharged of possessing drugs

Mohd Jamri (left) smiles after his acquittal. With him is his counsel Chew. KOTA KINABALU (June 20): A used clothes seller was acquitted and discharged by a Sessions Court here today from two counts of possessing cannabis and syabu. Judge Dayang Ellyn Narisa Abang Ahmad freed Mohd Jamri Basir, 24, after a full trial. The first count accused Mohd Jamri of possessing 158.6 grams of cannabis at an apartment at Jalan Tuaran Bypass on May 15, 2020. The charge was under Section 39A (2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, punishable under Section 6 of the same Act. The second count accused him of having 6.64 grams of syabu at the same place and on the same day. The alleged offence was under Section 12 (2), punishable under Section 39A (1), both of the same Act. The prosecution commended the case on December 7, 2022 and rested it on August 15, 2024. Ten witnesses were called by the prosecution while the defence called three witnesses, including Mohd Jamri. Mohd Jamri was represented by counsel Dominic Chew Ban Huat.

Focus Malaysia

2 days ago

• Focus Malaysia

'Report graft to MACC, PDRM first – not social media – to be entitled for whistleblower protection'

THE issue of whistleblower protection has recently become a topic of public attention, especially in the context of combating corruption. Unfortunately, there is widespread misunderstanding among the public regarding who qualifies for protection and the procedures that must be followed. Some believe that anyone with information about misconduct can apply for protection as a whistleblower but the reality is not that simple. Malaysia has specific legislation to protect whistleblowers from unfair retaliation, namely the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. However, this protection is subject to certain conditions and procedures to ensure its effectiveness and prevent abuse. A common misconception is the belief that whistleblowers may disclose information publicly – such as to the media or social media – before applying for protection. This is incorrect. Under the law, information regarding misconduct must first be reported to an enforcement agency. If someone discloses the information publicly before making an official report, it may compromise their identity and the validity of the disclosed information. There is also the risk that such information may not be verified or could be misinterpreted, ultimately damaging the credibility of the case. Additionally, enforcement agencies cannot provide protection to whistleblowers who have 'exposed' themselves before making a formal report. Criteria for protection To obtain whistleblower protection, an individual must meet several conditions. Firstly, the report must be made to a legitimate enforcement agency such as the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) or other relevant government bodies. Secondly, the report must be made in good faith and not out of malicious intent such as revenge or defamation. Another key condition is that the whistleblower must not be involved in the reported misconduct. Section 11(1) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 clearly states that protection may be revoked if the whistleblower is found to be complicit in the misconduct disclosed. This is to maintain the integrity of the whistleblower and prevent abuses t the protection status as a 'shield' to cover up their own wrongdoing. Challenges encountered Despite existing laws, whistleblowers often face challenges in upholding the truth. Among them, whistleblowers are often labelled as 'informers' or 'traitors', especially if the offence involves their employer or organisation. Additionally, despite legal protections, there remains concern about threats or discrimination they may face directly or indirectly. In fact, many still do not understand the legal procedures to become a whistleblower and how they can apply for protection legally. The process for applying for whistleblower protection is clearly stipulated. An individual must report directly to a government enforcement agency such as MACC or PDRM. Once the report is received and meets the criteria set out in the Act, the whistleblower will be granted protection guaranteed by law. Forms of protection provided include: Confidentiality of identity: The whistleblower's identity will be kept completely confidential and will not be disclosed to any party, including during court proceedings. The whistleblower's identity will be kept completely confidential and will not be disclosed to any party, including during court proceedings. Legal immunity: The whistleblower is protected from civil, criminal or disciplinary action related to the report made. The whistleblower is protected from civil, criminal or disciplinary action related to the report made. Protection against retaliation: Any retaliation such as dismissal, discrimination or intimidation as a result of the report is strictly prohibited. Any retaliation such as dismissal, discrimination or intimidation as a result of the report is strictly prohibited. Protection for related individuals: Besides the whistleblower, protection is also extended to family members or individuals closely related to the whistleblower if they face risks due to the disclosure. Social responsibility, incentives As a responsible society, we must understand the role and responsibility of reporting corruption. Section 25 of the MACC Act 2009 stipulates that anyone who knows of the giving, receiving or offering of a bribe but fails to report it can be fined up to RM100,000 or imprisoned for up to 10 years, or both. Additionally, the government has since 2011 introduced cash reward incentives and recognition for civil servants who report corruption to MACC. These rewards are given based on the value of the corruption involved when their reports or complaints result in convictions in court. As of 2024, a total of 514 civil servants have received rewards exceeding RM1 mil under this incentive programme with the highest reward of RM100,000 given to a public officer for reporting corruption. The whistleblower protection law is an important tool in efforts to combat corruption and misconduct in this country. It provides confidence to legitimate whistleblowers to come forward without fear of retaliation. However, the existing Act still has weaknesses that need improvement to ensure more effective protection. Legal reform The Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2010 (Act 711) was tabled for its first reading in the Dewan Rakyat on March 6. This amendment aims to further strengthen protection for whistleblowers who report misconduct, particularly in the public and private sectors involving corruption. It is expected to provide more comprehensive protection for whistleblowers, including protection against harmful actions and immunity from civil or criminal proceedings. This amendment is hoped to encourage more individuals to report misconduct without fear. Recently, the MACC and Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) expressed full support for efforts to improve this Act during a courtesy visit by TI-Malaysia president Raymon Ram to MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki. Awareness about the role, responsibilities, and protection of whistleblowers must be raised in society. The misconception that anyone can apply for protection without fulfilling the required conditions must be corrected to prevent misuse and abuse of the law. As concerned citizens, we must understand that whistleblowers play a critical role and that all support should be given to expose misconduct and uphold the integrity of institutions. With robust laws and public awareness of their responsibilities, efforts to combat corruption in Malaysia can be more effectively implemented. – June 20, 2025 Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin is the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commissions' (MACC) senior director (legal and prosecution division). The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.

The Star

3 days ago

• The Star

Jail for Vietnamese woman who helped sister to obtain bank accounts, ATM cards for use in scams

Despite suspecting that the accounts would likely be used for illicit activities from the onset, Nguyen Lan Dung agreed to the arrangement. - Photo: ST SINGAPORE: Lured by the promise of money, a woman decided to take up her sister's offer to obtain bank accounts and cards in exchange for payment. Despite suspecting that the accounts would likely be used for illicit activities from the onset, Nguyen Lan Dung, 24, agreed to the arrangement. On Thursday (June 19), the Vietnamese national was sentenced to 10 months' jail after pleading guilty to three charges under the Computer Misuse Act, and one under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act. Eleven charges of a similar nature were taken into consideration during the sentencing. Dung was also fined S$1,700. Investigations revealed that after Dung agreed to the arrangement, she reached out to a man to say she knew people who would pay him for control of his bank account. Court documents do not reveal how investigations into Dung and her sister started. Sometime in March 2024, the man agreed and gave up his bank details and the corresponding physical ATM card. Dung handed over the card and login details to her sister and her sister's boyfriend, and was paid $700. Court documents stated that the man's bank account and ATM card were later found to be linked to extortion scams, and were used to transact a flow of scam proceeds. Under the arrangement, Dung would also act as the point of contact for other Vietnamese nationals who were willing to sell their bank accounts. She would earn between $500 and $700 for each bank account she helped to procure. Sometime in March 2024, she managed to obtain two different bank accounts from two Vietnamese nationals. Court documents do not reveal how Dung had managed to contact the two. Around the same period, Dung, along with her sister and her sister's boyfriend, arranged to sell 11 bank accounts to unknown persons. Dung's sister, Nguyen Huong Giang, remains on the run from Singapore. - The Straits Times/ANN