Can Iran really shut down the Strait of Hormuz?
Amid Israel's ongoing attacks in Gaza and Iran, US President Donald Trump's unprecedented decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites has deepened fears of a regional conflict in the Middle East.
Over the weekend, the United States military carried out its first known strikes against Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution toppled pro-Western Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
Tehran has vowed to respond, prompting fears of escalation.
During an address to a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Istanbul, Turkiye on Sunday, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the US crossed 'a very big red line' by attacking Iran's nuclear facilities.
One way Iran could retaliate is to shut the Strait of Hormuz, a vital trade route where one-fifth of the world's oil supply – roughly 20 million barrels – and much of its liquified gas, is shipped each day. That would lead to a surge in energy prices.
So, what do we know about the strategic passage, and can Iran afford to block it in response to the US and Israeli aggression?
What is the Strait of Hormuz?
The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and the United Arab Emirates on one side and Iran on the other. It links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea beyond.
It is 33km (21 miles) wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 3km (2 miles) wide in either direction, making it vulnerable to attack.
Energy traders have been on high alert since Israel launched a wave of surprise attacks across Iran on June 13, fearing disruptions to oil and gas flows through the strait.
While the US and Israel have targeted key parts of Iran's energy infrastructure, there has been no direct disruption to maritime activity in the region so far.
Still, even before the US strikes on Saturday, the escalation of the conflict between Israel and Iran had sparked ocean freight rates to surge in recent weeks.
Freight intelligence firm Xeneta said average spot rates have increased 55 percent month-over-month, through to last Friday.
Who would need to approve the closure?
Iran has in the past threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, but has never followed through on the threat.
Iran's Supreme National Security Council must make the final decision to close the strait, Iran's Press TV said on Sunday, after parliament was reported to have backed the measure.
However, the decision to close the strait is not yet final, as parliament has not ratified a bill to that effect.
Instead, a member of parliament's National Security Commission, Esmail Kosari, was quoted in Iranian media as saying: 'For now, [parliament has] come to the conclusion we should close the Strait of Hormuz, but the final decision in this regard is the responsibility of the Supreme National Security Council.'
Asked about whether Tehran would close the waterway, FM Araghchi dodged the question on Sunday and replied: 'A variety of options are available to Iran.'
In his first comments since the US strikes, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said that Israel has made a 'grave mistake' and 'must be punished', but did not make any specific reference to either Washington or the Strait of Hormuz.
How would the closure work in practice?
Iran could attempt to lay mines across the Strait of Hormuz.
The country's army or the paramilitary Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) may also try to strike or seize vessels in the Gulf, a method they have used on several occasions in the past.
During the 1980s Iran-Iraq war, the two sides engaged in the so-called 'Tanker Wars' in the Persian Gulf. Iraq targeted Iranian ships, and Iran attacked commercial ships, including Saudi and Kuwaiti oil tankers and even US Navy ships.
Tensions in the strait flared up again at the end of 2007 in a series of skirmishes between the Iranian and US navies. This included one incident where Iranian speedboats approached US warships, though no shots were fired.
In April 2023, Iranian troops seized the Advantage Sweet crude tanker, which was chartered by Chevron, in the Gulf of Oman. The vessel was released more than a year later.
What would it mean for the global economy?
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
Speaking to Fox News, Rubio said: 'It's economic suicide for them if they do it [close the strait]. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours.'
For starters, shutting Hormuz risks bringing Gulf Arab states – which have been highly critical of the Israeli attack – into the war to safeguard their own commercial interests.
Closing the strait would also hit China.
The world's second-largest economy buys almost 90 percent of Iran's oil exports (roughly 1.6 million barrels per day), which are subject to international sanctions.
According to Goldman Sachs, a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could push oil prices above $100 per barrel. That would push the cost of production up, eventually affecting consumer prices – especially for energy-intensive goods like food, clothing and chemicals.
Oil-importing countries around the world could experience higher inflation and slower economic growth if the conflict persists, which could prompt central banks to push back the timing of future rate cuts.
But history has shown that severe disruptions to global oil supplies have tended to be short-lived.
Before the start of the second Gulf War, between March and May 2003, crude oil surged by a whopping 46 percent at the end of 2002. But prices quickly unwound in the days preceding the start of the US-led military campaign.
Similarly, Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sparked a sharp rally in oil prices to $130 a barrel, but prices returned to their pre-invasion levels of $95 by mid-August.
These relatively quick reversals of oil price spikes were largely due to global spare production capacity available at the time, and the fact that the rapid oil price increase curbed demand.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
34 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
After Donald Trump bombs Iran, what comes next?
The US has bombed nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. Meanwhile in Washington, political parties are divided about President Donald Trump's decision to strike. What could be next in what many fear to be a regional war?
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
US attacks on Iran risk global conflict, Russia and China warn
Russia and China have strongly condemned US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, warning they could drag the world into a broader war and set a dangerous international precedent. Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday described the American strikes as 'unjustified' and said they were pushing the world towards a perilous tipping point. Speaking after talks with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi at the Kremlin, Putin said Moscow would try to help the Iranian people but stopped short of detailing how. 'The absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran has no basis and no justification,' Putin told Araghchi. 'For our part, we are making efforts to assist the Iranian people.' The Chinese government also weighed in, with Foreign Minister Wang Yi condemning both the Israeli strikes on Iran and the US bombardment of its nuclear facilities. He said the rationale of attacking over 'possible future threats' sent the wrong signal to the world and urged a return to diplomacy. Wang called for all parties to 'immediately resume dialogue and negotiation', warning the escalation risked destabilising the region. Bringing the world 'to a very dangerous line' Tensions have soared in recent days, with US President Donald Trump and Israeli officials openly discussing the possibility of assassinating Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and pushing for regime change – moves the Kremlin warned could plunge the region into a full-blown war. During the high-level Kremlin meeting on Monday, Araghchi reportedly handed Putin a message from Khamenei, though the contents were not disclosed. A senior Iranian source told the Reuters news agency the letter called for increased Russian support, but Moscow has not confirmed receiving any such appeal. Later, while addressing a gathering of elite military recruits, Putin spoke more broadly about growing instability. 'Extra-regional powers are also being drawn into the conflict,' he said. 'All this brings the world to a very dangerous line.' Despite signing a 20-year strategic pact with Iran earlier this year, Russia has avoided making concrete military commitments to defend Tehran, and the agreement lacks any mutual defence clause. Iranian frustration Iranian officials, speaking anonymously to Reuters, expressed frustration with Moscow's perceived inaction. They said Tehran felt let down by both Russia and China, despite repeated calls for support. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov declined to say whether Iran had asked for weapons or military aid but insisted Moscow's ties with Tehran remained strong. 'Our strategic partnership with Iran is unbreakable,' Ryabkov said, adding that Iran had every right to defend itself. Still, the Kremlin appears wary of any move that might provoke a direct confrontation with Washington, particularly as Trump seeks to ease tensions with Moscow amid the war in Ukraine. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said US-Iran developments would not affect the Russia-US dialogue, calling them 'separate processes'. Memories of US-led wars in the Middle East still linger. At Sunday's United Nations Security Council session, Russia's UN envoy Vassily Nebenzia drew comparisons with the 2003 Iraq invasion. He recalled how the US falsely claimed Iraq held weapons of mass destruction. 'Again, we're being asked to believe the US's fairytales,' Nebenzia said. 'This cements our conviction that history has taught our US colleagues nothing.' Russia, China and Pakistan have jointly submitted a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East.
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
The Take: After Donald Trump bombs Iran, what comes next?
The US has bombed nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. Meanwhile in Washington, political parties are divided about President Donald Trump's decision to strike. What could be next in what many fear to be a regional war? In this episode: Akbar Shahid Ahmed (@AkbarSAhmed) – HuffPost Senior Diplomatic Correspondent Episode credits: This episode was produced by Ashish Malhotra, Khaled Soltan, Chloe K. Li, with Remas AlHawari and our guest host, Natasha Del Toro. It was edited by Ney Alvarez. The Take production team is Marcos Bartolomé, Sonia Bhagat, Spencer Cline, Sarí el-Khalili, Tamara Khandaker, Phillip Lanos, Chloe K. Li, Ashish Malhotra, Haleema Shah, Khaled Soltan, Amy Walters, and Noor Wazwaz. Our editorial interns are Remas Alhawari, Mariana Navarrete, and Kisaa Zehra. I'm your guest host, Natasha Del Toro. Our engagement producers are Adam Abou-Gad and Vienna Maglio. Aya Elmileik is lead of audience engagement. Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Our video editors are Hisham Abu Salah and Mohannad Al-Melhem. Alexandra Locke is The Take's executive producer. Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera's head of audio. Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on Instagram, X, Facebook and YouTube
