Steve Bannon's backroom role? Secret talks with Trump raise questions about U.S Iran strike strategy
Trump's secret meeting with Steve Bannon fuels speculation ahead of Iran-Israel decision-
Trump's meeting with Steve Bannon at the White House just hours before announcing a delay in his decision on U.S. involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict has raised serious questions across Washington. With Trump confirming a two-week pause to assess diplomatic options, the MAGA movement is deeply split. Bannon, who opposes immediate military action, urged Trump to weigh alternatives before striking Iran's Fordo facility. The meeting, confirmed by Politico, comes as key MAGA voices either press for diplomacy or demand action. Trump's delay highlights both internal tensions and a potential opening for peace talks.
Why did Trump meet Steve Bannon just before the Iran announcement?
President Donald Trump hosted Steve Bannon—his former White House strategist and longtime MAGA ally—for a private lunch Thursday at the White House. The meeting came just hours before Trump officially delayed his decision on possible U.S. military action in response to the Iran-Israel crisis.
The White House confirmed through press secretary Karoline Leavitt that Trump would wait two more weeks before making a final call on U.S. involvement. The timing of Bannon's visit was no coincidence. Known for his firm stance against foreign entanglements, Bannon had publicly urged caution just one day earlier.
In an interview with
Politico's Playbook
, Bannon avoided specifics but shared this takeaway:
'The MAGA movement tonight is in a great place.'
What did Bannon say about military action and diplomacy?
At a Christian Science Monitor breakfast held Wednesday, Bannon issued a clear message to the president: don't rush into a strike. Referring to a potential hit on Iran's Fordo nuclear facility, Bannon warned against acting in haste.
Live Events
'This strike does not have to happen tomorrow, or the next day, or the next day,' he said, suggesting the president 'take his time and think this through with his advisers.'
Bannon emphasized that Trump has always favored diplomacy first. 'Before he turns to violence in terms of military kinetic action,' Bannon explained, 'he looks at every other alternative.'
This aligns with what Trump reportedly told Bannon during their private lunch—that he wants to explore "other alternatives" before escalating tensions.
Is the MAGA movement united on the Iran-Israel conflict?
Not quite. The MAGA base is visibly divided over how to respond to the growing tensions in the Middle East. On one side are voices like Bannon, calling for strategic patience. On the other are MAGA hardliners urging stronger U.S. backing for Israel's military campaign.
Despite the division, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) voiced support for Trump's decision to hold off, writing on X:
'I'm so glad President Trump is giving time for diplomacy to work with Iran and Israel.'
Meanwhile, conservative activist Charlie Kirk also praised the move, describing Trump's unpredictability as a strategic advantage and criticizing those who push for regime change in Iran.
Why did Trump choose another 'two-week delay'?
The phrase 'two-week delay' has become a familiar refrain in Trump's presidency. Critics note that he's used it before when facing politically sensitive issues. But this time, Trump's team insists it's a calculated move.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt pushed back against the narrative of procrastination.
'If there is a chance for diplomacy, the president will grab it,' she said. 'But he is not afraid to use strength.'
This statement underlines Trump's dual-track approach: projecting power while keeping doors open for negotiation. The current delay suggests that backchannel talks—possibly with Israel and regional partners—may be underway.
Could this meeting reshape Trump's Iran strategy?
That's the big question. Steve Bannon is no longer a formal adviser, but he remains a powerful ideological voice within MAGA circles. His influence, especially when combined with public pressure from Trump's base, could steer the administration away from immediate military action.
It's also worth noting that Bannon publicly stated Israel must "finish what it started', indicating that while he supports Israel's broader goals, he doesn't believe the U.S. should lead or rush into a war on its behalf.
The next two weeks will be crucial. Whether this delay leads to diplomacy or just postpones a larger crisis remains to be seen.
FAQs:
Q1: Why did Trump delay the Iran decision after meeting Bannon?
Trump delayed to explore peaceful options before any military action, as Bannon advised.
Q2: What did Bannon say about the Iran-Israel conflict?
Bannon urged Trump to wait and avoid rushing into a strike on Iran's Fordo site.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Turkish President Erdogan accuses Israel of torpedoing US-Iran talks with strike
Published on Jun 22, 2025 12:51 AM IST At the 51st Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Istanbul, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan delivered a powerful speech accusing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of orchestrating a plot to derail US-Iran nuclear talks through military strikes. Erdoğan condemned Israel's attacks on Gaza and Iran as grave threats to regional peace. Watch for more
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Grossi will pay after...': Khamenei aide's blood-chilling threat to IAEA chief
Published on Jun 22, 2025 12:43 AM IST A senior adviser to Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Larijani, has issued a stark warning to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi, declaring that Grossi 'will pay' after the current Israel-Iran conflict ends. The threat, posted on social media, comes amid escalating Iranian accusations that Grossi's statements and the IAEA's handling of Iran's nuclear file emboldened recent Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Tehran has filed a formal complaint against Grossi at the United Nations, accusing him of political bias and holding him personally responsible. Watch for more
India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei didn't name his son as successor due to...; know real story behind the fear, pressure and inner workings of Iranian politics
Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei did not pick his son Mojtaba Khamenei as his successor due to various reasons. (File) Israel-Iran war: Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei on Saturday announced his three chosen successors, amid assassination threats from Israel and its ally United States. But questions are being raised about the Supreme Leader's choices, especially his decision of not picking his only son, Mojtaba Khamenei, as one of the chosen ones to lead the Islamic Republic after his demise. Why Khamenei did not pick his son as successor? According to geopolitical experts, there are a multitude of factors which drove Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's decision to not declare his own son as successor. These factors are a multilayered web of religious, military and public sentiments, which drive the inner workings of Iranian politics, they say. Iran, as a byproduct of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, looks down upon dynasty politics, which the people equate with erstwhile dictatorship of the Shah of Iran. Who is Mojtaba Khamenei and what's his current role? Mojtaba Khamenei is the son of Iran's Supreme Leader and de-facto head of state, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Mojtaba, a cleric like his illustrious father, has slowly emerged as a powerful figure in Iranian politics over the last two decades, despite not holding any formal position in the country's government or the Shura Council aka the 'Guardian Council', which oversees Iran's affairs. Mojtaba Khamenei has developed deep ties within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and has emerged as an important bridge between Iran's religious and political sections. While not high-ranking in Iran's clerical order, Mojtaba's work with the IRGC alone could have made him a potential candidate to become his father's successor. But the Ayatollah chose otherwise, and did not name his son as successor as it could've been seen as nepotism, and may have been exploited by Iran's rivals to discredit the regime as another family-ruled dictatorship like the Shah. Notably, when Ayatollah Khamenei became the Supreme Leader of in 1989, he did not promote any particular family to top positions within the government. Does Khamenei fear an Israeli attack on his family? Israel has assassinated many of Ayatollah Khamenei's top advisors, including the one who shaped his decisions, in recent attacks, and experts claim that the Supreme Leader fears that the Jewish state may target his family, especially his son if he names him as successor. Additionally, reports suggest that there are differences within Iran's power centres regarding the 'worthiness' of Mojtaba Khamenei to replace his father as the new Supreme Leader, with some considering him a worthy successor, while others view his surging influence within the IRGC as a potential red flag. Its believed that Ayatollah Khamenei is following the 'power from behind the scenes' formula, where Mojtaba remains a power player in Iran, but his name never comes up. Notably, Mojtaba Khamenei is considered a 'mid-tier' cleric, but his influence, especially on Iran's political parties, religious institutions and security forces makes him a powerful back-end operator. This means that he would continue to be a powerful behind-the-scenes force in Iran, regardless of who replaces his father as the new Supreme Leader.
