Employees struggle financially making it paycheck to paycheck, while employers fall short in meeting expectations for support
NEWARK, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE: PRU) released today its annual Benefits & Beyond study that reveals day-to-day financial stress is a leading concern for employees. Employees are raising their expectations for robust workplace benefits and believe their employers should play a larger role in helping them alleviate that stress. Employers agree, yet many aren't keeping up with those demands, instead focusing more on longer-term financial support.
"When benefits are aligned with your company's values and workforce needs, they become a powerful driver of culture, business performance and long-term growth.'
Share
Key findings from the first installment of Prudential's 2025 Benefits & Beyond study, ' New Workforce Expectations: How evolving needs are reshaping the workplace,' include:
Many employers recognize that workplace benefits aren't adequately addressing employees' day-to-day stress. While 75% of employers believe their benefits help with retirement savings, only 35% believe they help with immediate financial stresses like everyday expenses.
Employees' top challenges are saving for retirement (45%), cost of everyday goods (44%), cost of housing (29%) and making it paycheck to paycheck (26%).
The study's findings are clear: When it comes to workplace benefits, there is a disconnect on what companies offer and what employees actually need — now and in the future. The study finds that 86% of employers think their benefits are modern, while only 59% of employees agree.
With a backdrop of economic uncertainty, shifting expectations and evolving social norms, today's employees expect holistic support from employers to help solve the challenges they face. They seek modern benefits that offer flexibility and financial support, and prioritize their overall well-being, according to Michael Estep, president of Prudential Group Insurance.
Beyond pay, employees want their employers to provide modern benefits that reflect the real needs people are facing today. That includes benefits that help people balance their personal lives and address what happens outside of work, with employees considering flexible benefits like a four-day workweek (41%) and 'pawternity' leave (23%) as optimal.
'Employees want benefits that go beyond traditional coverage and more completely address how they live and work,' said Estep. 'The workplace is at a tipping point, and there's so much at stake for employers. When benefits are aligned with your company's values and workforce needs, they become a powerful driver of culture, business performance and long-term growth.'
The study shows there's a gap between employers' perceptions and the reality of how employees view modern benefits. While almost all employers (97%) say well-being is a priority, only 7 out of 10 employees (69%) agree their employers feel this way.
The research identifies opportunities for employers to help solve employee challenges, including retirement savings, making it paycheck to paycheck, job security and flexible work arrangements. 'Effective communication and awareness are needed to better demonstrate commitment to employee well-being and highlight how benefits can meet each person's unique needs,' Estep added.
Click here to view and download the study. The research was conducted with 2,946 full-time employees and 750 employers in the U.S. via national online surveys in January and February 2025. Visit prudential.com/employers/group-insurance for more information on Prudential Group Insurance's portfolio of workplace benefits, absence management and risk mitigation solutions.
Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE: PRU), a global financial services leader and premier active global investment manager with approximately $1.5 trillion in assets under management as of Dec. 31, 2024, has operations in the United States, Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Prudential's diverse and talented employees help make lives better and create financial opportunity for more people by expanding access to investing, insurance, and retirement security. Prudential's iconic Rock symbol has stood for strength, stability, expertise and innovation for 150 years. For more information, please visit news.prudential.com.
Prudential Group Insurance manufactures and distributes a full range of group life, long-term and short-term disability, and corporate and trust-owned life insurance in the U.S. to institutional clients primarily for use within employee and membership benefits plans. The business also sells critical illness, accidental death and dismemberment, and other ancillary coverages. In addition, the business provides plan administrative services in connection with its insurance coverages, and administrative services for employee-paid and unpaid leave including FMLA, ADA and PFL.
1086500-00001-00
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Zeta Global (ZETA) Jumps 12.6% on Untapped AI Opportunities
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (NYSE:ZETA) is one of the Zeta Global Holdings rallied by 12.63 percent on Friday to end at $14.18 apiece as investors snapped up shares following a study that marketing companies are lagging behind AI execution vis-a-vis its ambitions. In its study called 'It's Time to Get Serious About AI's Business Value,' Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (NYSE:ZETA) said that while many marketing organizations have begun implementing AI, most are still in the early stages of building the data, skills and systems required to scale it effectively and realize its full enterprise potential. Based on a survey of 300 North American marketing technology decision-makers, the study found that 62 percent of organizations described their current AI deployment as 'limited' or 'moderate.' The study was viewed by investors as a huge potential and opportunity for Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (NYSE:ZETA) to tap. 'Marketing should be at the front lines of the AI revolution, but many teams are held back by fragmented data, legacy systems, and skills gaps,' said Chairman and CEO David Steinberg. A marketing manager looking at the data dashboard of a marketing automation software showing successful campaign results. 'This study reinforces what we hear every day: marketers don't need more AI promises; they need practical, scalable ways to turn AI into better performance.' While we acknowledge the potential of ZETA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Upturn
2 hours ago
- Business Upturn
INVESTOR NOTICE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Tempus AI, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Tempus AI, Inc. (NASDAQ: TEM) common stock between August 6, 2024 and May 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until August 12, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. Captioned Shouse v. Tempus AI, Inc. , No. 25-cv-06534 (N.D. Ill.), the Tempus AI class action lawsuit charges Tempus AI and certain of Tempus AI's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Tempus AI class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected]. CASE ALLEGATIONS: Tempus AI is a technology company advancing precision medicine through the practical application of artificial intelligence, including generative AI. The Tempus AI class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Tempus AI inflated the value of contract agreements, many of which were with related parties, included non-binding opt-ins and/or were self-funded; (ii) the credibility and substance of Tempus AI's joint venture with SoftBank Group Corporation was at risk because it gave the appearance of 'round-tripping' capital to create revenue for Tempus AI; (iii) Tempus AI-acquired Ambry Genetics Corporation had a business model based on aggressive and potentially unethical billing practices that risked scrutiny and unsustainability; (iv) AstraZeneca PLC had reduced its financial commitments to Tempus AI through a questionable 'pass-through payment' via a joint agreement between it, Tempus AI, and Pathos AI, Inc.; and (v) the above issues revealed weakness in core operations and revenue prospects. The Tempus AI class action lawsuit further alleges that on May 28, 2025, Spruce Point Capital Management, LLC issued research report on Tempus AI that raised numerous red flags over Tempus AI's management, operations, and financial reporting. On this news, the price of Tempus AI stock fell more than 19%, according to the complaint. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Tempus AI common stock during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Tempus AI class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. Contact: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 800-449-4900 [email protected]
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What if Elon Musk Is Right About U.S. National Debt? 3 Stocks to Buy if He Is.
As Elon Musk argues, rising national debt and debt servicing costs are curtailing the growth prospects of the U.S. economy. More debt could lead to higher interest rates over the long term. These stocks are beneficiaries of rising interest rates. 10 stocks we like better than Prudential Financial › The highly public spat between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump over the One, Big, Beautiful Bill highlights an ongoing, decades-long debate over national debt. The focus of this article is to explore a potential scenario and suggest a way to invest in protection against it. That path is via life and retirement insurance companies like Prudential Financial (NYSE: PRU), MetLife (NYSE: MET), and Corebridge Financial (NYSE: CRBG). Here's why. This chart gets to the heart of the matter. As shown below, the U.S. national debt has increased substantially, and so has the level of debt in relation to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). The shaded areas show recessionary periods, including the financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the pandemic, whereby GDP contracted and spending soared, so naturally, the debt-to-GDP ratio did, too. Still, the response in both cases was the same: more spending and more debt. Musk's view is that the national debt issue needs to be addressed as it's out of control and has the potential to saddle Americans with an unsustainable debt burden, which the bill will exacerbate. To be fair, the Trump administration's aim is not to increase the deficit as officials believe it will lower the deficit, through implementation of mandatory savings and promoting GDP growth. Again, this is not the place to debate that matter. However, what if Musk is right and the U.S. continues down the path of rising debt? Rising debt levels and debt servicing payments imply more debt issuance. Simple economics argues that, unless demand improves, the rising supply of debt will lead to a rise in the price of debt. In other words, long-term interest rates will rise, and could be higher than the market is expecting. The chart below indicates that the market is comfortable with the matter and isn't attaching a significant premium (beyond the usual premium to reflect the increased risk of holding longer-dated debt) to long-term interest rates over medium-term rates. But the market could be wrong. And while Musk's primary concern appears to be the difficulty of cutting rates caused by rising debt, it's only a short step away to argue that rising debt could lead to higher long-term interest rates. The situation might not be catastrophic, but interest rates could be higher than anticipated. It's not an ideal scenario for stocks overall, as it makes them relatively expensive compared to bonds. However, there is one sector that could do well, namely life and retirement insurers such as Prudential Financial, MetLife, and Corebridge. These insurance companies pick up premiums from policyholders. The policies create long-term liabilities for insurers that they need to balance against their assets. As such, they tend to invest in relatively low-risk assets, such as government debt. While rising interest rates will reduce the value of the existing debt holdings, they will also increase the discount rate used to calculate the net present value of their liabilities. Consequently, as rates rise, insurers will be able to buy corporate bonds, mortgage loans, and government debt at higher rates. Here's a breakdown of all three insurers and the assets they hold in their general accounts, which are used to match their liabilities. General Account Assets Highest Share Second Third Notes Prudential Financial 54.9% in publicly available for sale fixed maturities 18.3% in privately available for sale fixed maturities 14.4% commercial mortgage and other loans Mainly corporate and government fixed maturities MetLife 31.6% investment grade corporate debt 18.4% Net mortgage loans 16.1% structured products Only $11.6 billion of its $430.9 billion in general account assets is in non-investment grade corporate and foreign government bonds Corebridge 35% public corporate debt 10% private corporate debt 7% residential mortgage-backed securities 97% in fixed income or short-term investments Data sources: Company presentations. As indicated above, the assets in their general accounts are fixed income and relatively safe investments, giving all three companies good exposure to the theme of higher long-term rates. It's important not to be too alarmist here. The debt problem is undoubtedly an issue, but it's very hard to predict where interest rates, or total interest payable, will be. That said, if you are a young person worried about the public debt burden and the possibility of higher rates over your lifetime, then it makes sense to buy stocks in this sector as a form of (I'm avoiding the obvious word) matching your assets to your potential future liabilities from rising public debt servicing costs. Before you buy stock in Prudential Financial, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Prudential Financial wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. What if Elon Musk Is Right About U.S. National Debt? 3 Stocks to Buy if He Is. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
