UAE gold prices hit record high: Why yellow metal will rise further after hitting $3,000
Gold prices are expected to scale new record highs due to the US tariffs row and geopolitical developments around the world pushing investors to safe-haven metal, say analysts.
The yellow metal hit a record high of $3,000 per ounce on Friday as investors shifted to safe-haven assets to cover from economic uncertainty sparked by US President Donald Trump's tariff war.
Khaleej Times reported in October last year that gold prices could touch $3,000 in the first quarter of 2025 due to geopolitical tensions, interest rate cuts and central banks' buying.
Gold closed at $2,986.65 per ounce over the weekend, up 0.23 per cent. In Dubai, gold prices hit an all-time high on Friday with 24K at Dh360.75, 22K at Dh335.75 per gram, 21K at Dh322.0 and 18K at Dh276.0 per gram. Gold prices closed the week slightly lower, with 24K at Dh359.5, 22K at Dh334.5, 21K at Dh320.75 and 18K at Dh275.0 per gram.
'Concerns over the stability of the US economy could further boost the appeal of gold. A cooling labour market and slowing inflation could push the Federal Reserve toward a more dovish stance at its next meeting, potentially driving gold prices to new records,' said Joseph Dahrieh, managing principal at Tickmill.
In the latest tariff war, Trump threatened a 200 per cent tariff on European Union-imported alcohol like champagne and wine.
'After several back-and-forths on tariffs this week, market uncertainty surged following President Trump's announcement of a 200 per cent tariff on alcoholic imports from the EU, fueling risk aversion and boosting demand for safe-haven assets like gold,' said Dahrieh.
Ahmad Assiri, research strategist at Pepperstone, said recent tariff threats play a significant role in the precious metal rally, particularly with the White House hinting at imposing tariffs that could reach up to 200 per cent on certain European products in the event of an escalation, in addition to anticipated tariffs on April 2 on both Canada and Mexico as well as reciprocal tariffs.
'This increases the uncertainty surrounding both the US and global economic growth prospects, pushing investors toward gold as a reliable hedging tool. Alongside trade tensions, gold receives strong support from the weakening of the US dollar, which stems from a shaking image of US exceptionalism and growing concerns about economic growth prospects. With the dollar trading below the 104 level, gold gains further momentum, making it attractive to international investors,' said Assiri
However, Joseph Dahrieh of Tickmill cautioned that a cautious US Fed tone, driven by inflation concerns over ongoing trade tensions, could limit the precious metal rally.
'Geopolitical developments also play a crucial role in shaping market sentiment. A ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia could improve investor sentiment, potentially weakening gold's bullish trend. However, the agreement remains to be seen, with Russian President Vladimir Putin leaving room for renewed uncertainty that may bolster gold prices once again,' said Dahrieh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Global investors bracing for a knee-jerk selloff in stock markets
Investors are bracing for a knee-jerk selloff in stock markets after the weekend's US attack on Iran raised the specter of retaliation and higher oil prices. The Middle East situation takes center-stage for markets, overshadowing US economic data releases this week, as investors assess the impact of President Donald Trump's sudden decision to join Israel's military campaign against Iran on sentiment, inflation and interest rates. Trump called the attack "a spectacular military success" in a televised address to the nation and said Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities had been "obliterated". He said the US military could go after other targets in Iran if the country did not agree to peace. "It's hard to imagine stocks not reacting negatively and the question is how much. It will depend on Iranian reaction and whether oil prices spike," said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at Interactive Brokers in Connecticut. "Really what we're looking at is secondary order effects - the price of oil, market stability, price hikes through the economy. No globally important stock is directly affected by what happened tonight.' The S&P 500 is hovering just below its February highs but has rebounded sharply from its early-April selloff, as tariff-related tensions have eased. However, the US benchmark index appears to be taking a breather at some 2.7% below its February closing high. The index has gone 27 trading sessions since coming within 5% of its February high but has not yet set a new record. The Israel-Iran conflict has already sent oil prices sharply higher and led to caution in markets. So far, the oil market has absorbed most of the impact from geopolitical turmoil, with equities relatively stable. Yet stock investors remain concerned that higher oil prices could stoke inflation and upset plans for interest rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. On Wednesday, the Fed held rates steady and policymakers signaled borrowing costs are still likely to fall this year. But they estimated the overall pace of expected future rate cuts would be slower than they saw at their March meeting. They cited expectations that higher inflation would flow from President Donald Trump's tariff plans. "The question is oil prices and what that does to inflation - which has implications for monetary policy and how long the Fed keeps rates "meaningfully restrictive"," said Sonu Varghese, global macro strategist at Carson Group. While investors expect the Middle East tensions to spur a near-term bout of nervousness in stock markets and a rush to safer assets such as the dollar and Treasuries, some also envisage a de-escalation in the situation. "I think it's going to be very positive for the stock market," said Mark Malek, chief investment officer of Siebert Financial, referring to how investors had been primed for two weeks of uncertainty based on White House statements that Trump would take that long to decide on his next move. "So this will be reassuring, especially since it seems like a one and done situation and not as if (the US) is seeking a long-drawn out conflict." Investors will also parse a slew of incoming data releases, including US business activity and housing sales on Monday, consumer confidence numbers on Tuesday and the PCE Price Index on Friday. US consumer confidence plunged in the past few months, with households fearing tariffs could prompt a recession and higher inflation. However, with inflation in check and the US reaching a truce in its trade fight with China, investors were expecting to see a pickup in sentiment. "Remember, the survey-based data all got crushed in the March, April, May time frame ... my expectation is we're still going to see an improvement," Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide said before the US struck Iran. A key concern for markets would centre around the potential impact of the developments in the Middle East on oil prices and thus on inflation. A rise in inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate cuts. Saul Kavonic, a senior energy analyst at equity research firm MST Marquee in Sydney, said the more likely scenario would see Iran respond by targeting American interests in the Middle East, including Gulf oil infrastructure in places such as Iraq or harassing ship passages through the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and is the primary export route for oil producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Kuwait. "Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days, but this could set us on a path towards $100 oil if Iran respond as they have previously threatened to," Kavonic said. While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13. "Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days, but this could set us on a path towards $100 oil if Iran respond as they have previously threatened to," Kavonic said. While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13. Reuters
Dubai Eye
6 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Investors brace for oil price spike after US bombs Iran nuclear sites
A US attack on Iranian nuclear sites could push oil prices even higher and trigger a knee-jerk rush to safety, investors said, as they assessed how the latest escalation of tensions would ripple through the global economy. The reaction in Middle East stock markets, which trade on Sunday, suggested investors were assuming a benign scenario, even as Iran intensified its missile attacks on Israel in response to the sudden, deep US involvement in the conflict. Trump said Iran's "key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated" and added that the US military could go after other targets in Iran if the country did not agree to peace. Iran said it reserves all options to defend itself, and warned of "everlasting consequences". Investors said they expected the US involvement would cause a selloff in stock markets and a possible bid for the dollar and other safe-haven assets when major markets reopen, but also said much uncertainty about the course of the conflict remained. "I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher," said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital. "We don't have any damage assessment and that will take some time. Even though he has described this as 'done', we're engaged. What comes next?" Spindel said. "I think the uncertainty is going to blanket the markets, as now Americans everywhere are going to be exposed. It's going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil," he added. One indicator of how markets will react in the coming week was the price of ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency and the new gauge of retail investor sentiment after bitcoin, which is now held largely by institutions. Ether was down 5 per cent on Sunday, taking losses since the first Israeli strikes on Iran on June 13 to 13 per cent. Most Gulf stock markets, however, seemed unconcerned by the early morning attacks, with the main indexes in Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait up slightly and Israel's Tel Aviv main index at an all-time high. OIL PRICES, INFLATION A key concern for markets would centre around the potential impact of the developments in the Middle East on oil prices and thus on inflation. A rise in inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate cuts. Saul Kavonic, a senior energy analyst at equity research firm MST Marquee in Sydney, said the more likely scenario would see Iran respond by targeting American interests in the Middle East, including Gulf oil infrastructure in places such as Iraq or harassing ship passages through the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and is the primary export route for oil producers such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE Iraq and Kuwait. "Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days, but this could set us on a path towards $100 oil if Iran respond as they have previously threatened to," Kavonic said. While global benchmark Brent crude futures LCOc1 have risen as much as 18 per cent since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13. In comments after Trump announced the strikes, Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group, agreed oil prices would likely spike on the initial news. But Cox said he expected prices to likely level off in a few days as the attacks could lead Iran to seek a peace deal with Israel and the United States. Economists warn that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs. Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past prominent instances of Middle East tensions coming to a boil, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead. On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3 per cent in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3 per cent higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro.
Middle East Eye
9 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Why has Turkey stopped short of condemning the US strikes on Iran?
Turkey has stopped short of condemning the US strikes on Iran, despite many of the Islamic Republic's major allies, as well as several regional states, criticising the escalation and viewing it as a risky gambit. US President Donald Trump said in a televised address late on Saturday that Washington had struck three of Iran's nuclear sites in an effort to disable the Islamic Republic's nuclear enrichment capabilities. "I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated," Trump said, adding that Tehran needed to "make peace" as he threatened more intense attacks if it did not. "There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days," he added. Several hours after the attacks took place, Turkey's foreign ministry warned that the strikes risked further destabilising the region's security environment. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Turkey is deeply concerned about the possible consequences of the US attack on the Islamic Republic of Iran's nuclear facilities," the ministry said. Israel-US attack on Iran: The price of Netanyahu's forever wars Read More » "Ongoing developments could escalate the regional conflict to a global level. We do not want this catastrophic scenario to become reality." This measured tone stood in stark contrast to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's remarks a day earlier, in which he described the weeks-long Israeli strikes as "banditry". Although Ankara has long opposed Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, it has also consistently advocated for diplomatic solutions. Notably, in 2010, Turkey and Brazil brokered a nuclear fuel swap deal in an effort to defuse tensions. "Iran's pursuit of so-called nuclear deterrence, justified by its leaders as a necessary defence, is viewed in Turkiye as a dangerous gamble that could trigger a regional arms race," wrote Murat Yesiltas, a security expert at the Seta think tank and a member of the Turkish Presidency's Council on Foreign Relations, on Sunday. "Turkey's opposition to Israeli aggression does not imply tacit support for Iran's nuclear ambitions." Long-term political considerations Ankara has characterised Israel's recent attacks on Iran's facilities as unprovoked, particularly in light of reports that neither US intelligence nor the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) believes Tehran is actively pursuing a nuclear weapon. This explains why Turkish officials were quick to condemn the Israeli attacks, which they see as opening a new rift in the region and potentially provoking a broader war, especially following Israel's attacks on Gaza, Lebanon and Syria. According to Iranian state-run Nour News, citing Iran's Ministry of Health, Israel's strikes since 13 June have killed 430 people and injured around 3,500. Israeli officials say at least 25 people in Israel have been killed by Iranian strikes and hundreds have been wounded.. Erdogan has instead sought to de-escalate the situation, and has held several phone calls with key leaders, including Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Trump. Through these conversations, Erdogan has positioned himself as a potential mediator, offering Istanbul as a venue for nuclear talks between the US and Iran. Rather than issuing harsh condemnations of Trump, Erdogan appears keen to maintain his good relationship with the US president, a relationship that previously helped persuade Trump to lift sanctions on Syrian President Ahmed Al Sharaa's administration. Turkish officials, confirming weekend reporting by Axios, told Middle East Eye that Erdogan succeeded last week in convincing Trump to send Vice President JD Vance and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff to Istanbul, where they were to meet with an Iranian delegation led by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Trump even suggested he might attend the negotiations himself. US attacks Iran: What are the Islamic Republic's options? Read More » However, the meeting ultimately did not take place, as Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei could not be reached to make a final decision, Turkish officials said. The Turkish foreign ministry's latest statement reflects Erdogan's continued desire to host talks between the US and Iran. "The only solution to the conflict regarding Iran's nuclear programme is through negotiations," the statement read. "Turkey is ready to fulfill its responsibilities and make constructive contributions." Despite his fiery rhetoric, Erdogan often walks a fine line in regional conflicts, seeking to avoid taking sides in order to position Turkey advantageously. Turkey's Nato membership and its ongoing close relationship with Washington give it leverage with both adversaries and allies in pursuit of its strategic goals. "Turkey's stance on the Israel-Iran conflict is not based on short-term political considerations," Yesiltas said. "The risks are not abstract. They include direct threats to [Turkey's] territorial security, energy security, economic goals and demographic stability."
