US Restarts Student Visas, Makes Social Media Checks Mandatory For All Applicants
Last Updated:
The US State Department has resumed student visa processing, now requiring all applicants to make their social media accounts public for government review.
The US State Department has resumed processing student visas for international applicants after a temporary suspension, but with a significant new requirement: all applicants must make their social media accounts publicly accessible for review by government officials.
In a notice issued Wednesday, the department confirmed the reinstatement of student visa appointments but stated that consular officers would now scrutinise applicants' online activity. Officers will be instructed to look for posts or messages that could be interpreted as hostile toward the United States, its government, people, culture, institutions, or founding values.
Applicants who refuse to unlock or set their social media profiles to public may face rejection, as such refusal could be seen as an attempt to conceal potentially disqualifying behaviour. 'We must ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country," the department said.
The decision follows a pause in visa interviews announced last month by the Trump administration, during which officials reviewed ways to tighten scrutiny of international students' digital presence.
The reopening of visa appointments has brought relief to many prospective students. A 27-year-old Chinese Ph.D. student based in Toronto, who asked to be identified only by his surname, Chen, secured an appointment for next week. 'I'm really relieved," he said. 'I've been refreshing the website several times a day."
Students from countries like China, India, Mexico, and the Philippines have been closely monitoring visa portals and State Department briefings, hoping for updates amid a narrowing window to book travel and prepare for the academic year.
In addition to the social media requirement, consular officials have reportedly been instructed to prioritise visa applications for students planning to attend US colleges where foreign students comprise less than 15% of the total enrollment. While this detail hasn't been officially published, it was confirmed by a US official on condition of anonymity.
That benchmark affects nearly 200 universities across the US, including public institutions such as the University of Illinois and Penn State, as well as all eight Ivy League schools, where international students account for a large share of the student population.
Heightened Scrutiny And Political Overtones
The move is part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to tighten immigration policies, particularly involving international students. Earlier this year, the government revoked student visas from thousands — some for relatively minor infractions — before reversing course under pressure. It has also expanded the criteria for terminating student visa status.
Harvard University, which relies on international students for roughly a quarter of its enrollment, has been a particular target. President Trump has suggested capping foreign student numbers at elite universities like Harvard to no more than 15% of the total enrollment.
Critics argue that the social media screening policy echoes Cold War-era ideological testing. Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, called it 'deeply troubling," saying it risks suppressing legitimate political expression.
'This policy turns every consular officer into a censor," Jaffer said. 'It will inevitably chill speech, both inside and outside the US"
Meanwhile, the administration has also asked 36 nations to tighten the screening of their own citizens, warning that failure to meet US standards could lead to travel bans. These countries have been given 60 days to comply or risk joining the current list of 12 nations already facing US travel restrictions.
As the US seeks to increase its security protocols, many prospective students are left weighing the benefits of a US education against increasing hurdles and heightened surveillance.
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 19, 2025, 09:10 IST
News education-career US Restarts Student Visas, Makes Social Media Checks Mandatory For All Applicants
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
China Sides With Iran, Greenlights Hormuz BLOCKADE? Beijing's First Response As U.S. Seeks Help
/ Jun 23, 2025, 06:00PM IST United States' airstrike on the Iranian nuclear sites has triggered a massive global oil crisis scare. Tehran's parliament has decided to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil chokepoint. The strait accounts for 1/5th of the movement of oil containers across the world. According to reports, United States had urged China not to led the Ayatollah Khamenei-led regime to shut the strait. Will China heed to Trump's request after a bitter trade tariff war between the two superpowers?
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Did the US really wipe out Iran's nuclear sites? Reports say Trump may have been tricked by Tehran
Despite President Trump's declaration of a complete victory, the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have yielded mixed results. While some sites sustained damage, particularly at Fordow, doubts remain about the extent of destruction to underground facilities. Concerns linger regarding Iran's potential relocation of enriched uranium, potentially hindering but not halting their nuclear ambitions. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Did the US really wipe out Iran's nuclear sites? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What do satellite images reveal about the damage? What do experts think about the attack? Has Iran secretly moved its highly enriched Uranium? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How does this impact Iran's nuclear ambitions? FAQs US President Donald Trump announced with confidence that US airstrikes had destroyed Iran's main nuclear sites and called it a complete victory. However, expert opinions and satellite images present a different Saturday night, Donald Trump dispatched seven B-2 stealth bombers from the United States to destroy Tehran's nuclear program by dropping massive bunker-busting bombs on three enrichment facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and underground facilities may have survived, and enriched uranium may have been moved without anyone knowing. The attack may have slowed down Iran's nuclear plans, but it did not stop them, as per reports by CNN and of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday that a US submarine used Tomahawk cruise missiles to strike an Isfahan location where a US official estimates that approximately 60% of Iran's stockpile of already-enriched nuclear material is kept Isfahan facility was not hit by massive "bunker-buster" bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, in contrast to the other two Iranian facilities targeted in the operation, as per a report by the US used 12 bunker busters to destroy Iran's facility at Fordow, another underground location that contained centrifuges needed to enrich uranium, the facility's evident survival has prompted doubts about whether Trump's declared objective was even to commercial satellite imagery, the U.S. attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant seriously damaged, if not completely destroyed, the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it contained, but experts said on Sunday that there was no proof of it. However, it is unknown how much damage has been done because the facility has layers of Technologies' satellite imagery from Thursday and Friday revealed "unusual activity" at Fordow, including a lengthy line of cars waiting outside one of the facility's Lewis, a weapons expert and professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, has closely examined commercial satellite images of the strike sites and said the damage to the facility seems limited to aboveground structures.'They just punched through with these MOPs,' said David Albright, the head of the Institute for Science and International Security and a former U.N. nuclear inspector, in reference to the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busting bombs that the United States claimed it Eveleth, a satellite images specialist and associate researcher with the CNA Corporation, pointed out that it was impossible to confirm the destruction below ground. The hall that houses hundreds of centrifuges is "too deeply buried for us to evaluate the level of damage based on satellite imagery," he stated to Iran, prior to US attacks on its nuclear bases, the majority of its highly enriched uranium was smuggled to a hidden location. Iran claimed that it had moved its 400 kg stockpile, much of which was kept at Isfahan, and satellite photos showed convoys departing all three locations in recent days, as per a report by think that the majority of Fordow's 400 kg of 60%-enriched uranium was transferred prior to Operation Midnight Hammer, as per a report by The of 16 trucks snaking down a road near the entrance of the Fordow plant, obscured by rubble and dirt, was released by US defense contractor Maxar Technologies on June defense company TS2 Space reports that trucks, bulldozers, and security convoys swarm Fordow, where analysts observed a "frantic effort" to move shielding materials or intelligence analyst Ronen Solomon stated that transferring Iran's uranium would be "like having fuel without a car" and that they are unable to do much with it unless they develop a small-scale project that we are unaware of, as per The also warned that Iran might be concealing this and other nuclear components in places that Israel, the United States, and the U.N. nuclear inspectors are unaware would take years and rely on Tehran's capacity to restore essential equipment before Iran could produce a nuclear weapon, even though it might have the entirely; experts believe some deep underground facilities and uranium stockpiles were has the potential to rebuild, as key equipment and uranium may have been secretly relocated.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pakistan in political turmoil over Donald Trump's nobel bid after US and Israel bomb Iran's Fordow, Isfahan, Natanz facilities
Multiple political leaders and civil society voices in Pakistan have criticised the government's decision to nominate U.S. President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The criticism grew louder after the U.S., alongside Israel, carried out airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz. The nomination letter had already been submitted by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar. It praised Trump's role in de-escalating tensions during the recent India-Pakistan conflict. However, opposition leaders now argue that the developments in Iran completely contradict the principles of peace. Political leaders strongly oppose government move Veteran JUI-F leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman openly condemned the nomination, calling Trump's actions the opposite of peaceful. Speaking at a gathering in Murree, he criticised the government's quick decision following Trump's lunch meeting with Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir. 'How can support for Israeli attacks be seen as a mark of peace?' he questioned. Former Senator Mushahid Hussain echoed this, accusing Trump of being influenced by Israeli leadership and labelling the Iran strike 'an illegal war.' He demanded that the nomination be 'reviewed, rescinded, and revoked.' PTI lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan also responded with a direct call to 'reconsider,' highlighting U.S. complicity in Gaza. Statements continued to pour in from other political parties and public figures. PTI's think-tank head Raoof Hasan described the nomination as 'a source of shame,' while Afrasiab Khattak criticised what he called 'sycophancy' in diplomacy. Jamaat-i-Islami's Naeemur Rehman said the move hurt Pakistan's 'national dignity.' Public figures join chorus of disapproval Former diplomat Maleeha Lodhi stated that the nomination did not reflect public sentiment, while journalist Mariana Baabar remarked that the country's image had taken a hit. Author Fatima Bhutto questioned whether the nomination would now be withdrawn, summing up the mood on social media. With mounting criticism across political and public spheres, pressure is building on Pakistan's government to formally withdraw Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination.
