Residents in some parts oppose Corporation's new vending zones

Residents in several zones of the Greater Chennai Corporation have started objecting to the first list of vending zones approved by the Corporation Council last week. Anna Nagar West Extension resident R. Kamaraj says that the residents have opposed the decision to create a vending zone on East Main Road of Anna Nagar West Extension. 'The Corporation has already erected a board informing that the road is a vending zone. We have objected. Once permitted, vendors will encroach on more road space. Garbage will accumulate in our area. Half of the road will be encroached upon by vendors. Residents will lose their rights. Students of four schools take this route, and it will become unsafe for them. We request the Corporation to remove the board immediately,' he demands.
'Prevent notification'
Ranganathan Garden resident Sridhar has demanded that the ward councillor prevent the notification of Fifteenth Main Road as a vending zone. 'There is a Siva temple in the locality. We do not want vending zones on the stretch that has been peaceful and calm,' he says.
After the resolution was passed by the Corporation Council, the civic body has not sent the proposal to the Tamil Nadu government for gazette notification of the vending and non-vending zones. Once the list of vending and non-vending zones is notified by the government, the civic body will allocate space for vendors.
The Corporation has started receiving letters from residents' associations, objecting to the list of vending zones in many areas. 'The town vending committee will consider the objections and make a decision. We will remove the roads from the list of vending zones if the residents object,' says an official of the Corporation.
The Corporation's designation of 150 vending and 188 non-vending zones, a year after its vending committee was constituted, has drawn criticism for lack of clarity in the zoning norms, interference of political party members, and delays in issuing corrected identity cards to vendors.
'No clarity on unlisted areas'
Sandhya Vedullapalli, a civic activist, says that the vending zone list lacks clarity on unlisted areas. Further, in Ward 103, designated vending streets appear insufficient for Anna Nagar's vendors, raising the question whether the process aligns with guidelines under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, she says.
G. Selva of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) points out that in 2021, more than 900 vending zones were identified, but now it is 150. 'In the name of organising, vending zones must not be reduced. Small vendors provide low-income individuals with increased purchasing power, playing a vital role in driving the economic growth. Regional and sub-vending committees must be formed to check on issues related to vending.'
Gopalakannan, a vendor on Anna Salai, received a text message that read: 'The Greater Chennai Corporation has requested that street vendors who require any correction in the details on the identity card issued to them take a copy of the issued identity card, mark the required corrections on it, sign it, and submit it along with supporting documents at the respective zonal or divisional office during the special camp to be held from October 19 to 23, 2024.'
'No new cards yet'
'Many submitted the copies for corrections. But I have not received any update on new cards. When we made enquiries, Corporation officials said the cards had not been printed yet,' Gopalakannan adds. S. Kumar, a vendor for 24 years, says the zonal officials have been saying for three months that new cards will be issued in May at the Royapuram Zonal Office. 'Those who were issued new cards were instructed to hand over their old cards. If we received new cards, why would we still have the old ones? We were not informed of the new rules. We continue to use plastic for distributing beverages. The wastewater is discarded down the drain through silt traps,' he says.
Some vendors say that moving to another location would be tough as there may be competition and lack of space. P. Karunanidhi, general secretary of the Chennai Street Vendors' Association and a member of the Corporation's vending committee, acknowledges that there is lack of clarity in the norms.
Political interference
'The vending committee and the Corporation have the powers with regard to vending zones and the number of permissible traders who can be issued identity cards. But some councillors and ruling party members interfere in these matters. When higher authorities were informed, instead of rectifying the issues, they asked us to coordinate with the politicians,' another vendor claims.
Denying these allegations, an official of the Corporation's Revenue and Finance Department says that more than 32,000 cards were issued at camps held in February. 'There were roughly 2,500 vendors who requested for changes in the name, the address, and the date of birth in the cards. The changes were made and new cards were issued,' he says.
The Corporation has proposed regional committees for vending and sent the proposal to the government. Once the government approves it, the civic body will start regularising the operations of the vending and non-vending zones and monitor them, the official says.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

17 minutes ago

• The Hindu

Information Commission orders SCOLE Kerala and Nirmithi Kendras to adhere to RTI Act

The Kerala State Information Commission has brought the State Council for Open and Lifelong Education (SCOLE) Kerala and the Nirmithi Kendras functioning across the State under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. In the first case, the applicant, Krishnan Kutty K. from Palakkad, had requested information from SCOLE Kerala, which operates under the General Education department. Denying information sought under the RTI Act, the institution claimed that it was not bound by the law. Considering the applicant's appeal, State Information Commissioner Sreekumar M. stated that SCOLE Kerala qualifies as a public institution under Section 2(h)(c) of the RTI Act. The commission also pointed out that the administration of SCOLE Kerala is governed by an Executive Council, which includes the Minister of General Education, an Additional Secretary, the Director of General Education and Finance Officer, as well as nominees from the public sector. Therefore, it was concluded that SCOLE Kerala falls under the full ownership and control of the government, as per Section 2(h)(i) of the RTI Act. Similarly, in another case, C. Pradeep Kumar from Adoor filed a petition regarding a denial of information from the Nirmithi Kendra in Thrissur. The Commission ruled that Nirmithi Kendras, which operate under government control, also fall under the RTI Act's jurisdiction. The governing body of these centres includes District Collectors, Sub-collectors, Project Officers, and other senior government officials, all of whom are responsible for overseeing the centres' administration. The Commission has instructed the authorities concerned in both cases to immediately appoint RTI officers in these institutions, and to provide the requested information to the petitioners within 15 days.

Mint

23 minutes ago

• Mint

Vijay Deverakonda in trouble AGAIN: Complaint filed under SC/ST Act for actor's comments during 'Retro' promo event

Vijay Deverakonda is in the legal hotseat and has been booked under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, a month after he allegedly made offensive remarks that hurt the sentiments of the tribal community. The complaint was lodged by Nenavath Ashok Kumar Naik, the State President of the Joint Action Committee of Tribal Communities. He accused Deverakonda of making insulting comments during a pre-release event for his upcoming film Retro. Last month another person had also filed a case against the actor for the same comments. A petitioner had alleged that Vijay Deverakonda in his speech about the Pahalgam terror attack remarked that the attacks were akin to clashes between tribal communities hundreds of years ago. During the 'Retro' event last month, Vijay Deverakonda had said:"The solution to what is happening in Kashmir is also to educate them (terrorists) and ensure they don't get brainwashed. What will they achieve? Kashmir belongs to India, and Kashmiris are ours. Two years ago, I shot for Kushi in Kashmir. I have such good memories with them (the locals)." He also said that the neighbouring country struggles to provide its citizens with basic necessities. "Pakistan can't even look after their own, who don't have proper electricity and water. What do they want to do here? India doesn't even need to attack Pakistan because Pakistanis themselves are fed up with their government and will attack them if this continues. They behave like tribals did 500 years ago with the way they fight. We should stand united as people and love each other. We always need to move forward as people and stay united. Education is super key. Let's all be happy and keep our parents happy; only then can we progress," the actor said. Vijay's comments drew massive outrage, prompting the actor to issue a public apology.

Hindustan Times

an hour ago

• Hindustan Times

Vijay Deverakonda booked under SC/ST Act over his remarks about tribal people during Retro pre-release event

Actor Vijay Deverakonda has found himself in trouble as a case has been registered against him under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for his remarks about tribal people during the pre-release event of Retro. The police confirmed the development to PTI on Sunday. Vijay Deverakonda faces trouble as police registers case against him for remarks against tribal people.(PTI) Case registered against Vijay Deverakonda Police stated that although the remarks, which likened the recent terror attack in Pahalgam to tribal conflicts from 500 years ago, were made in April, a case under the SC/ST Act was registered against the actor on 17 June following a complaint. "The actor made comments in April. However, based on a complaint, a case under the SC/ST Act was booked against him on 17 June,' a police official told PTI. The complaint was lodged by Nenavath Ashok Kumar Naik, also known as Ashok Rathod, who serves as the State President of the Joint Action Committee of Tribal Communities. He alleged that during the pre-release event of the film Retro, which stars actor Surya, the actor made statements that hurt the sentiments of tribal communities and caused serious offence. Rathod further claimed that the actor's comparison of tribal people to Pakistani terrorists was racially insensitive. What Vijay Deverakonda had said During the pre-release event of Surya's film Retro, Vijay addressed the Pahalgam terror attack and said, 'The solution to what is happening in Kashmir is also to educate them (terrorists) and ensure they don't get brainwashed. What will they achieve? Kashmir belongs to India, and Kashmiris are ours. India doesn't even need to attack Pakistan because Pakistanis themselves are fed up with their government and will attack them if this continues. Asalu 500 years back tribals kokkutunnatu, veelu buddi lekunda, minimum common sense lekunda chese panulu.' (They behave like tribals did 500 years ago, fighting without common sense). After facing backlash on social media for his comments, the actor expressed regret. He took to X and wrote, "It has come to my attention that a remark I made during the Retro audio launch event has caused concern among some members of the public. I wish to sincerely clarify: there was absolutely no intention to hurt or target any community, especially our Scheduled Tribes, who I deeply respect and consider an integral part of our country." The actor clarified that his intention was to promote unity, emphasising that India is one, its people are one, and the nation must progress together. He expressed disbelief at the idea that, while advocating for national solidarity, he would deliberately target or discriminate against any community, all of whom he considers part of his larger family. He concluded, "If any part of my message was misunderstood or hurtful, I express my sincere regret. My only aim was to speak of peace, progress, and togetherness. I remain committed to using my platform to uplift and unify — never to divide. Vijay Deverakonda."