Despite Fatal Crashes Chinese Carmakers Battling To Build Autonomous Driving Aid
China:
Intelligent driving features are the new battleground in China's merciless car market, with competition spurring brands to world-leading advances -- but a recent fatal crash has seen the government intervene to put the brakes on runaway enthusiasm.
Advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) help with tasks ranging from cruise control to parking and collision avoidance, with the ultimate aim being a fully self-driving car.
Automakers are pouring investment into their development, especially in the world's biggest car market China, which skews young and tech-savvy.
"Ten years ago, only 15 percent of customers said they would change car because of an intelligent cockpit -- today it's 54 percent," Giovanni Lanfranchi of EV firm Zeekr said.
Almost 60 percent of cars sold in China last year had level-two ADAS features -- where the driver is still in control but there is continuous assistance -- or above, according to an AlixPartners report released last week.
The features "are emerging as a key competitive tool", said the consultancy's Yvette Zhang.
Some firms use their own proprietary technology, like start-up Xpeng and consumer electronics-turned-car company Xiaomi, while others are cooperating with tech giants such as Huawei.
Such software is being developed in Europe and North America too.
But in a survey of hundreds of global auto executives surveyed by AlixPartners, two-thirds said they believed China led the world in the field.
"The collection and processing of data, and the availability of software and machine-learning talent" is difficult to replicate, the report said.
The technology is not immune from the price wars that are a key feature of the Chinese market.
In February, domestic EV giant BYD announced it would release its "God's Eye" driving system on nearly all its cars, including on some models priced below $10,000.
- Over-promising? -
Then came a fatal accident in March involving a Xiaomi SU7 that had been in assisted driving mode just before it crashed.
The accident, in which three college students died, raised concerns over safety and the advertising of cars as being capable of "autonomous driving".
The issue is an industry-wide one -- Tesla's US-released "Full Self-Driving" capability, for example, is still meant to be used under driver supervision.
"The price war has just been so brutal, companies are desperate to find any way to set themselves apart," said Tom Nunlist, associate director for tech and data policy at Trivium China.
"So the question is have they been over-promising on features and releasing things as quickly as possible, for the purposes of fighting this commercial battle."
China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology seems to share those concerns.
After the crash, it held a meeting with leading automakers and other key players in which it made clear that safety rules would be more tightly enforced.
It warned automakers to test systems rigorously, "define system functional boundaries... and refrain from exaggerated or false advertising".
Reports said it will also crack down on the practice of improving ADAS via remote software updates.
- 'Sharp U-turn' -
As the massive industry show Auto Shanghai kicked off last week, the shift in gear was obvious.
"In a sharp U-turn from just two months ago, carmakers have taken a low profile in terms of autonomous driving functions, but are emphasising safety instead," said UBS' Paul Gong in a note.
"Safety is the ultimate premium of new energy vehicles," a sign at BYD's booth read.
At the bustling Xiaomi booth, information boards touted the SU7's colour choices, chassis and hardware -- but AFP saw no mention of ADAS at all.
"The autonomous driving function marketing race seems to have halted, at least temporarily," wrote Gong.
Zhang Yu, managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight, told AFP that he thought the crash was "only a setback in marketing terms, which is helpful for a healthy development" of the area.
"This accident was not related to tech or the system itself, it more concerns the ignorance of ADAS and boundary of autonomous driving," he added.
The technology itself continues to progress.
"That's why this is becoming a pressing issue because car companies are going to be wanting to release these features," Trivium's Nunlist said.
However, a truly autonomous car -- level five on the scale -- is "certainly not imminent", he added, predicting "very hard last-mile problems".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency
The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap , he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Marco Rubio warns Iran against closing Strait of Hormuz, calls it ‘economic suicide'; urges China to intervene\
US Secretary of State on Sunday cautioned Iran against closing the Strait of Hormuz, calling it 'economic suicide,' and urged China to use its influence to dissuade Tehran amid rising tensions in the region. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now His remarks followed reports that Iran's parliament had approved a proposal to shut the vital waterway. 'If Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it and we retain options to deal with that,' Rubio said on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo. He added, 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil.' The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints, with around 20% of global oil and gas supplies flowing through it. Its closure, Rubio warned, would be a 'massive escalation' and 'would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours.' Iran's Press TV reported earlier that while the parliament has passed the measure, the final decision rests with the Supreme National Security Council. Revolutionary Guards commander and lawmaker Esmail Kosari said, 'The closure of the strait is on the agenda and will be done whenever necessary.' The proposal comes amid heightened hostilities between Iran, Israel, and the US, with Washington recently launching airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Energy analysts warn that any disruption in the strait could trigger a sharp rise in global oil prices and worsen geopolitical instability. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In a related comment on Iran's nuclear programme, Rubio said the US is still open to negotiations. 'The Iranian regime should wake up and say 'OK, if we really want nuclear energy in our country, there's a way to do it.' That offer's still there, we're prepared to talk to them tomorrow,' he said. Rubio reiterated that the US is willing to support Iran's civilian nuclear power ambitions, provided it does not enrich its own fuel. 'Ultimately, they have to make a decision... there are many countries that have nuclear reactors without enriching uranium,' he said.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Not US, NATO, Israel, G7, BRICS, or EU; Iran is most scared of THIS group due to..., the group consists...
(File) Israel-Iran war: Iran has shown unprecedented resilience despite being pummeled by US-backed Israel, and now the US itself, in the ongoing Israel-Iran war. Tehran has proven it does not fear any country or grouping, including the United States, Israel, G7, European Union, or NATO. However, there is one important grouping that impacts Iran's decisions, at least to some extent, the OPEC+, which includes Iran and 22 other crude oil-producing nations, most of them located in the Middle East. According to estimates, OPEC+ produces more than half of the world's total oil crude oil, with Iran being one of the largest oil-producing countries in the group. What is OPEC+ and how it influences Iran? Unlike the EU, NATO, BRICS, or G7, OPEC+ is not political, diplomatic or military alliance, but an economic grouping of major oil-producing nations, especially the oil-rich Gulf states of the Middle East. OPEC+ produces more than half of the world's crude oil, and essentially controls global oil prices, making it a powerful entity that can put pressure on nations by weaponizing oil prices. Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), are the arguably the most influential countries in the OPEC+. Other oil-producing nations which are part of the group include Iraq, Kuwait, Venezuela, Nigeria, Libya, Algeria, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Congo, Gabon, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Malaysia, South Sudan, Sudan and Oman. All these nations have vast reserves of oil and natural gas worth billions, if not trillions of dollars, and oil-production is a major contributor to their economies. How much oil is produced by Iran? Iran's daily oil production was an estimated 2.5 million barrels in March 2023, but this has increased to 3.3 million barrels, as per a recent Reuters report. More importantly, Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, through which more than half of the global supply of oil is shipped. Iran can trigger a global crisis if it decides to blockade this strategic shipping lane. Can the OPEC+ stop the Israel-Iran war? While Iran is not 'scared' of any country or alliance, the OPEC+ countries, most of whom have assured their tacit support to Tehran in the Israel-Iran war, hold some influence on the decisions made by the Islamic Republic. Experts believe Iran would not brush aside any mediation efforts or advice, and can play a key role in resolving the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict. Among non-OPEC countries, Iran also has the support of Russia, China, and Pakistan in the current conflict. Recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin told OPEC+ that the Israel-Iran is the major reason behind rising crude oil prices, while Iraq's Deputy PM warned that crude oil price would soon breach $200 per barrel if the war continues. The OPEC+ is not a diplomatic or political grouping, but has some power to act as a mediator to help de-escalate the current tensions between Iran and Israel. Putin recently talked about mediating between the two enemy nations, while several other countries have also made similar statements.
