logo
Huge ancient Roman wall paintings pieced together

Huge ancient Roman wall paintings pieced together

BBC Newsa day ago

Archaeologists have put together thousands of pieces of wall plaster to reveal paintings that once decorated a luxurious Roman villa in London.They include illustrations of flowers, birds, fruit and musical instruments.Experts believe that the paintings date back to the first or second century.The fragments were first discovered four years ago, but it's taken researchers until now to sort through all the pieces.
What did experts find?
The painted pieces of plaster - also known as frescoes - were found in Southwark in central London, situated on banks of the River Thames in 2021. Experts from the Museum of London Archaeology (Mola) say the frescoes are from at least 20 walls of a large building.They also think that the grand building may have been home to a wealthy family or a hotel for rich travellers passing through London.Han Li, from Mola, spent many months with the pieces of plaster, carefully examining each piece to put together what he describes as "the world's most difficult jigsaw puzzle"."It's one of the biggest - if not the biggest - assemblages of Roman wall plaster and paintings we've ever found in Roman London," he explained.
Mr Li added that the fragile nature of the ancient fragments made this even more of a challenge."You have to be very careful because you can only assemble the pieces a small number of times before the plaster starts to be damaged and it flakes off."So you have to be quite sure before you join the pieces that this is the piece that may fit," he added.The Romans founded London in 43AD, and archaeologists believe that the villa was built soon after, when the new city was growing rapidly.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Guardian view on Our Story With David Attenborough and The Herds: a new theatre of the Anthropocene
The Guardian view on Our Story With David Attenborough and The Herds: a new theatre of the Anthropocene

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on Our Story With David Attenborough and The Herds: a new theatre of the Anthropocene

As parts of the UK swelter, this week brought yet more alarming reports of increasing temperatures, extreme weather events and dwindling chances of meeting the global 1.5C target. It was the UK's warmest spring on record and its driest in more than 50 years. Communicating the urgency of our predicament without provoking despair and hopelessness is an intractable challenge, especially when it comes to children. But two trail-blazing theatre experiences are bringing the breakdown of the natural world into urban metropolises, and raising the alarm with such immediacy that even those of us fortunate enough to live in places that have so far been relatively unaffected by the climate crisis must pay attention. Our Story With David Attenborough is a breathtaking 50-minute immersive history of the planet, from the team behind the recent film Ocean. Thanks to 24 projectors and 50 speakers, the Natural History Museum's Jerwood Gallery is transformed into the solar system, prehistoric caves, the ocean and the jungle. As in Maurice Sendak's children's classic Where the Wild Things Are, 'the walls [become] the world all around'. We swim with whales and come face to face with gorillas – as Sir David did in Life on Earth in 1979. We look from space: like last year's Booker prize-winning novel, Orbital, by Samantha Harvey, Our Story inspires the feelings of awe and protectiveness towards our planet that astronauts call 'the overview effect'. In the past, Sir David has been accused of not speaking out strongly enough on human-made ecological disaster. But the Guardian writer George Monbiot, once one of his fiercest critics, described Ocean, released for Sir David's 99th birthday this year, as the film 'I've been waiting for all my working life'. In Our Story, we journey through mass extinctions of the past and, speculatively, in the future. Without change, 'the prospect for the generations that follow is grim', the audience is warned. Next Friday, hundreds of lifesize elephants, giraffes, gazelles and animal puppets of all kinds will stampede through London's streets on their 20,000km journey from central Africa to the Arctic Circle. The Herds is the follow-up project to The Walk. In 2021, a 12-foot puppet girl, Little Amal, travelled from the Turkey-Syria border to London, to raise awareness of the refugee crisis. Little Amal reached 2 million people in 17 countries. Now her creators hope to do the same for the climate emergency. As the herd flees north, it will be joined by puppets of native species from each country it visits. Manchester is its next destination, before continuing on to Scandinavia. The project's artistic director, Amir Nizar Zuabi, has acknowledged that all such endeavours, however ambitious, are just 'water dripping on a stone'. But, as he says, over time enough drips can reshape a stone. These are visceral, sensory immersions. Like Olafur Eliasson's climate art installation The Weather Project at Tate Modern in 2003, such spectaculars invite us to reflect together – they are collective experiences. This is the theatre of the Anthropocene: vast, cataclysmic, beautiful and yet ultimately hopeful as well. They help us visualise what a different world might look like – if only politicians and corporations were made to act. The next chapter is up to us. As Sir David says at the end of Our Story, we must work towards a time when Earth becomes a planet 'with not only an intelligent species, but a wise one too'.

What a 5,000-year-old whale tooth tells us about ancient craftspeople
What a 5,000-year-old whale tooth tells us about ancient craftspeople

The Independent

time10 hours ago

  • The Independent

What a 5,000-year-old whale tooth tells us about ancient craftspeople

A rare sperm whale tooth, discovered at the Copper Age Valencina archaeological site in southwest Spain, offers new insights into ancient Iberian artistry. This fossil, dated to between 5,300 and 4,150 years ago, is the first marine mammal tooth of its kind found from this period in Iberia. Copper Age craftspeople likely collected the tooth from an ancient shoreline and fashioned it into personal ornaments or symbolic artifacts before its deliberate burial. Analysis revealed the tooth belonged to an adult sperm whale, showing signs of natural marine erosion and distinct human modifications like drilled holes and cut marks. The discovery significantly enhances understanding of ivory use in prehistoric times.

Eating without waiting for others is not rude, study finds
Eating without waiting for others is not rude, study finds

Telegraph

time14 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Eating without waiting for others is not rude, study finds

Eating your food at a restaurant while others are still waiting for their dish to arrive is not rude, scientists have found. The predicament of what to do if a waiter brings only part of a table's food out at one time is an enduring dilemma. A study of almost 2,000 people run by City St George's university in London discovered that beginning eating instead of waiting for all to be served is not the social faux pas Britons think it is. Various tests were run on different groups of people to determine how they felt about starting their meal while others had not been served, and also how they would feel if they were still waiting while someone else commenced dining. Other studies investigated the impact of people encouraging their fellow patron to begin and not to delay, and for the person who has already been served to consider the situation through the lens of their unserved company. The scientists discovered a double standard in how people see this quandary because people hold themselves to a higher moral benchmark than they do others. People are largely unbothered if someone is served before them at a table and starts eating. However, people are mortified by the idea of themselves tucking in alone while others wait. Janina Steinmetz, a professor of marketing at Bayes Business School, said: 'The decision of when to start eating food in the company of others is a very common dilemma. 'Norm adherence dictates that we wait until all food is served before starting, and disregarding it feels rude and discourteous to us. Surprisingly, this feeling barely changes even when another person explicitly asks us to go ahead. 'It occurs because people have greater access to their own internal feelings – such as appearing considerate or avoiding social discomfort – than to others' psychological experiences.' Often diners wait for their own benefit, she added, with co-diners minding 'far less than we think if we wanted to go ahead and eat'. 'People will wait to feel polite, but if the quality of their food is dependent on factors like temperature it may not taste as nice when they finally do start eating.' Irene Scopelliti, a professor of marketing and behavioural science, added: 'This is not just about politeness: it's about psychological access. 'We can feel our own internal discomfort, guilt, and the positive feelings from appearing considerate, but we can't fully access what others are experiencing internally. 'So, while we might feel genuinely awful about eating before others get their food, we assume others won't feel as strongly about it. 'Results of our study have implications for restaurants and beyond. Any service where people receive food at different times within a group creates similar psychological dynamics. 'Providers often optimise for efficiency, without realising that some people experience genuine discomfort when they receive service before others in their group. 'The research shows how much we systematically underestimate others' internal emotional experiences, which contributes to broader understanding of social norms and group dynamics.' The study is published in the journal Appetite. 'We've been doing it all wrong' It comes after a University of Oxford scientist claimed in 2022 that another rule of decorum at the dinner table should be abandoned and that people should actually eat with their mouth open. Prof Charles Spence, an experimental psychologist, claimed that smacking your lips and letting guests see your food as you chew it is the best way to eat. The academic now wants Britons to embrace a more uncouth and hedonistic approach to dinner time and abandon all sense of decorum and sensibility. 'We've been doing it all wrong,' he said. 'Parents instil manners in their children, extolling the virtues of politely chewing with our mouths closed. 'However, chewing open mouthed may actually help to release more of the volatile organic compounds, contributing to our sense of smell and the overall perception.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store