3 Ways ‘Game Theory' Could Benefit You At Work, By A Psychologist
I recently had a revealing conversation with a friend — a game developer — who admitted, almost sheepishly, that while he was fluent in the mechanics of game theory, he rarely applied it outside of code. That got me thinking.
For most people, game theory lives in two corners of life: economics classrooms and video games. It's a phrase that evokes images of Cold War negotiations or player-versus-player showdowns. And to their credit, that's grounded.
At its core, game theory studies how people make decisions when outcomes hinge not just on their choices, but on others' choices too. Originally a mathematical model developed to analyze strategic interactions, it's now applied to everything from dating apps to corporate strategy.
But in real life, nobody is perfectly rational. We don't just calculate; we feel, too. That's where the brain kicks in.
According to the 'Expected Value of Control' framework from cognitive neuroscience, we calibrate our effort by asking two questions:
When both answers are high, motivation spikes. When either drops, we disengage. Research shows this pattern in real time — the brain works harder when success feels attainable.
This mirrors game theory's central question: not just what the outcomes are, but whether it's worth trying at all. Using a game theory lens in a professional setting, then, can be messy and sometimes bring unwanted emotional repercussions. The saving grace, however, is that it's somewhat intuitively patterned and, arguably, predictable.
So should you actually apply game theory to your professional life? Yes, but not as gospel, and not all the time. Being too focused on identifying, labeling and trying to 'win' every interaction can backfire.
It can make you seem cold and calculating, even when you're not, and it can open the door to misunderstandings or quiet resentment. Put simply, it's important to be aware of how your choices affect others and how theirs affect yours, but it's also dangerously easy for that awareness to tip over into an unproductive state of hyperawareness.
Game theory is a legitimately powerful lens — but like any lens, it should be used sparingly and with the right intentions. Pick your battles, and if you're curious how to apply it in your own career, start with clarity, empathy and a telescope and compass. Use these not to dominate the game, but to understand it and play it to the best of your abilities, so everyone wins.
There's a popular saying in hustle culture: work smarter, not harder. At first glance, it makes sense — but in elite professional environments, it's a rather reductive and presumptuous approach.
The phrase can carry the implication that others aren't working smart or that they aren't capable of working smart. But in high-performing teams, where stakes are real and decisions have impact, most people are smart. Most are optimizers. And that means 'working smart' will only take you so far before everyone's doing the same. After that, the only edge left is consistent, high-quality production — what we generalize as hard work.
From a game theory lens, this type of hard work essentially increases your odds. Overdelivering, consistently and visibly, skews the probability curve in your favor. You either become impossible to ignore, or highly valuable. Ideally, aim for both.
And here's where the real move comes in: assume the same of others. In most multiplayer games, especially online ones, expecting competence from your opponents forces you to play better. It raises the floor of your expectations, improves collaboration and protects you from the trap of underestimating the consequences of your actions.
Take chess, for example. In a large study of tournament players, researchers found that serious solo study was the strongest predictor of performance, even more than formal coaching or tournament experience.
Grandmasters, on average, had put in nearly 5,000 hours of deliberate study in their first decade of serious play. This is about five times more than intermediate players. This is why in a game of chess between one grandmaster and another, neither player underestimates the other.
FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™
Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase
Pinpoint By Linkedin
Guess The Category
Queens By Linkedin
Crown Each Region
Crossclimb By Linkedin
Unlock A Trivia Ladder
My friend told me he rarely applies game theory outside of code. But the more he talked about his work, the more obvious it became that the man lives it. He's been into video games since he was a child, and now, as an adult, he gets paid to build what he used to dream about.
Sure, he has deadlines, targets and a minimum number of hours to log every week — but to him, those are just constraints on paper. What actually drives him is the intuitive thrill of creation. Everything else is background noise that requires calibration, not deference.
This is where game theory can intersect with psychology in an actionable way. If you can identify aspects of your work that you uniquely enjoy — and that others may see as tedious, difficult or draining — you may have found an edge. Because in competitive environments, advantage is often about doing the same amount with less psychological cost.
In game theory terms, you're exploiting an asymmetric payoff structure, where your internal reward is higher than that of your peers for the same action. When others see effort, you feel flow. That makes you highly resilient and harder to outlast.
It's also how you avoid falling into the trap of accepting a Nash equilibrium. This is a state where each person settles on a strategy that feels rational given everyone else's, even if the group as a whole is stuck in mediocrity. No one deviates, because no one has an incentive to, unless someone changes the underlying payoff structure.
For example, imagine a team project where everyone quietly agrees to put in just enough effort to get by, no more, no less. It feels fair, and no one wants to overextend. But if even one person realizes they could stand to gain by going above that baseline, they have an incentive to break the agreement. The moment they do, the equilibrium collapses, because now others are pressured to step up or risk falling behind.
In a true equilibrium, each person's strategy is the best possible response to what everyone else is doing. No one gains by changing course. However, when your internal motivation shifts the reward equation, you may begin to question the basis of the equilibrium itself.
Be aware, in any case, that this is a tricky situation to navigate, especially if we contextualize this from the point of view of the stereotypical kid in class who reminds their teacher about homework. Even if the child acts in earnest, they may unintentionally invite isolation both from their peers and, sometimes, from the teachers themselves.
This is why the advice to 'follow your passion' often misfires. Unless there's a clear definition of what constitutes passion, the advice lands as too vague. A more precise version is this: find and hone a valuable skill that energizes you, but might drain most others.
There's a certain kind of professional who doesn't chase money for money's sake. Maybe he writes code for a game studio as a day job, writes blogs on the side and even mentors high school kids on their computer science projects. But this isn't so much about padding his lifestyle or building a mountain of cash.
What he's really doing is looking for games: intellectually engaging challenges, satisfying loops and rewarding feedback. In a sense, he's always gaming, not because he's avoiding work, but because he's designed his life around what feels like play. This mindset flips the usual money narrative on its head.
And ironically, that's often what leads to sustainable financial success: finding personal fulfillment that makes consistent effort easier for you and everyone around you.
In game theory, this is a self-reinforcing loop: the more the game rewards you internally, the less you need external motivation to keep showing up.
So instead of asking, 'What's the highest-paying path?' — ask, 'Which games would I play even if I didn't have to?' Then, work backward to find ways to monetize them. This does two incredibly valuable things in tandem: It respects the system you're in, and it respects the goals you personally hold dear.
While game theory maps workplace social behavior reasonably well, constantly remaining in a heightened state of awareness can backfire. Take the Self-Awareness Outcomes Questionnaire to better understand if yours is a blessing or a curse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
15 sets of twins set to graduate from one Long Island high school
A graduation ceremony at a Long Island high school this weekend is shaping up to be a double-take affair, with 15 sets of twins expected to cross the stage, receive their diplomas and mark the start of a new chapter. Among the nearly 500 students graduating from Plainview-Old Bethpage John F. Kennedy High School in Nassau County, 30 of them are twins. That means approximately 6% of the graduating class consists of twin siblings — far higher than the world average. According to a 2021 study, about 3.2 million twins (or 1.6 million pairs) are born each year, making up roughly 2.3% of all births globally. Some of the graduating sets of twins — all fraternal, not identical — have known each other since kindergarten, after their parents met through a local twins club. Overall, the 30 twins form a tight-knit group united by their shared experiences and similarities. 'Honestly, when we're together, the room is electric,' Sydney Monka said at a graduation rehearsal earlier this week. 'We all have these shared experiences, so we're all bouncing off each other.' After their graduation, which will take place at Hofstra University in Hempstead on Sunday, most of the twins are heading off to different colleges across the U.S. Aiden and Chloe Manzo, however, are both attending the University of Florida to study business — though with different majors. 'We're going to see each other a lot,' Chloe said. 'Deep down, my mom knew it would be easier if we went to the same school,' she added. 'You know, like moving in, graduation, going to sports games.' With News Wire Services
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
‘Good Awkward' Can Actually Make You More Credible
. For some people, it's easier to floss with barbed wire than to navigate their way through a moment of awkwardness. It doesn't have to be that way, and Henna Pryor offers a bounty of smart advice in her wonderfully readable book Good Awkward: How to Embrace the Embarrassing and Celebrate the Cringe to Become the Bravest You. Pryor flips the script on awkwardness and shows how those uncomfortable, cringe-worthy moments can actually be powerful catalysts for personal and professional success. She cites a study she led showing that 30% of employees would rather scrub a toilet than ask for help. The purpose of the study was to explore what she calls 'social muscle atrophy.' She says people's social skills have been declining for decades, and the decline accelerated during the pandemic. Surprising to some, the decline is seen in all generations, not just among younger people. Pryor's research also uncovers what she calls 'false self-sufficiency' where 43% of executives feel they must handle everything alone. Apparently, they regard collaboration as awkward. So, what's the difference between being awkward and being inept? Henna Pryor 'Awkwardness is a social emotion of discomfort,' Pryor says, 'while ineptitude implies a deep lack of competence or skill. It's possible to be highly competent and still experience moments of awkwardness.' Pryor talks about the cost of avoiding awkwardness. 'Sometimes in our quest to be seen as credible and professional and sophisticated we forget the value of our humanity,' she says. 'Today, especially in this age of AI, humans are fatigued by the overly polished, blurred, perfected versions of other people. When we try to avoid awkwardness, we actually lose the very thing that makes us relatable and trustworthy. That's our human edge.' Despite an assumption some may draw from her book title, Pryor is not talking about introversion. She describes herself as 'a textbook extrovert' and underscores that the struggle with declining social muscles can affect any personality. Another surprising point made by Pryor: empathy is an awkwardness accelerator. 'I'm certainly not suggesting that empathy is a bad thing,' Pryor says. 'But there's a specific type of empathy that can cause problems for people who are trying to take more risks and be more bold or put themselves out there more. It's called EEE—a phenomenon referred to as easily empathetically embarrassed. Other terms for it are vicarious embarrassment or secondhand embarrassment.' . What does that look like? Picture someone stepping to a podium to give a speech. They mispronounce someone's name and, even though you're not the one speaking at the podium, you feel embarrassed on the speaker's behalf. Why is that a problem in excess? First, the speaker may not be feeling embarrassment at all. Secondly, if you are so easily empathetically embarrassed for someone else, it's going to be hard for you to take chances yourself. Rehearsal and repetition, Pryor says, can help people deal with a potentially awkward situation. 'Social muscles are like any muscles,' she says. 'Rehearsal and repetition are the sort of proverbial push-ups for social moments, especially an awkward situation. If you practice for awkward situations like difficult conversations, you're building that social and mental muscle memory. That helps you feel more prepared and less flustered when one of those real moments inevitably hits.' If you're like many people, you spend a good deal of time in meetings. One tip Pryor offers is starting a meeting with a 'bad idea brainstorm.' 'Sure, that sounds crazy at first,' Pryor says. 'But innovation often emerges when people feel safe to put ideas on the table that may initially seem unrealistic.' Sort of like suggesting that a wireless device that fits in your pocket could serve as a telephone, a music and video player, a camera, and much more. A bad idea brainstorm, Pryor says, helps mentally rewire people to value contribution. It also helps them realize that 'good awkward' is a treasured moment, not an oxymoron.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump doubles down on two-week deadline for decision on Iran
All times eastern The Journal Editorial Report Fox Report with Jon Scott Fox Report with Jon Scott FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage
