Osborne Naval Shipyard: Incredible transformation of SA's subs hub
First steel will be cut for Adelaide's nuclear-powered submarine project in buildings to be erected later this year after a top-level Osborne shipyard meeting kickstarted the project.
In the first major on-site work for the $368bn AUKUS submarine venture, a demonstration facility at Osborne Naval Shipyard will test steel cutting, welding and other key procedures.
In a further boost for the program, Defence Minister Richard Marles declared the complicated life extension to the Osborne-built Collins class submarines was 'a challenge that I think we can meet'.
Australian Submarine Agency director-general Jonathan Mead said he had chaired a May 29 meeting at Osborne involving UK officials, including Defence Procurement and Industry Minister Maria Eagle.
The meeting also included chiefs of all major players, including ASC, BAE Systems Australia, Australia Naval Infrastructure and AUKUS nuclear reactor supplier Rolls-Royce.
'We worked through some of the complex matters. This was not just an information gathering session. We made decisions on facilities down there. We intend to commence build on some of the production demonstration buildings by the end of this year,' Vice Admiral Mead said.
'Investing early into these demonstration facilities will give us confidence that when we commence the build proper, that when we're doing it for the first time, we'll be doing it correctly.'
Vice Admiral Mead said this was designed to prevent time being lost during construction if parts, or modules, of the submarines were not fit for purpose.
'We'll cut steel. We'll test out the steel. We'll make sure that the dimensions are exact. We'll build valves, pumps, and other systems, plus piping and welding,' he said.
'We want to make sure that when we when we do our welding proper, that our welds are correct. The demonstration facilities will test out a range of skills and a range of capabilities that we will need in order to commence build proper of the submarine.'
Vice Admiral Mead in March outlined plans for a $2bn Osborne transformation into the world's 'most advanced manufacturing centre' for the AUKUS program. Work started in March on a $500m Skills and Training Academy.
Mr Marles, who in February labelled the Collins class life extensions a 'technically challenging thing', said up to $5bn would be pumped into the program over the next decade.
He said this would 'ensure there is no capability gap until Australia's conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines are in service'.
The Collins class sustainment program, conducted by ASC at Osborne Naval Shipyard, last December was listed by Defence as a Product of Concern 'to enable enhanced ministerial oversight of this critical capability'.
Mr Marles accused the Coalition of ripping money from the Collins class sustainment program run at Osborne by ASC, which he argued 'left Australia with the risk of a significant gap in respect of our submarine capability'.
This funding had been restored, he said, to ensure the ageing Collins class submarines remained 'a potent and credible platform for the Australian Defence Force'.
'As I've said previously, there is a challenge in relation to making sure that we are able to properly extend the life of the Collins class. But it is a challenge that I think we can meet,' he said.
Mr Marles said more than 150 ASC workers were already training at the United States Pearl Harbor navy base on maintenance of Virginia class nuclear-powered submarines, with this expected to grow to about 200 people by the end of the year.
The first ASC workers, from the firm's SA and WA operations, left for Pearl Harbor in mid-2024.
Key roles in leading the sustainment of US and UK nuclear-powered submarines at Garden Island naval base, near Perth, are expected to start from as early as 2027.
'The fact that we've got 150 tradespeople in Pearl Harbor right now working on US Virginia class submarines is a proof point that we are investing the resources we need to make sure that we get the skilled workforce required to build and maintain our submarines in the future,' Mr Marles said.
Originally published as Osborne again: Adelaide's defence precinct transformed from industrial wasteland to a hi-tech home of ships, subs and steel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
Michaelia Cash: Australia must stand up for its interests in the wake of US Iran strikes
The old adage that 'a week is a long time in politics' has been starkly demonstrated as an enduring truth with the significant world events that have unfolded recently. Israel has further exercised its sovereign right to defend its people and ensure the security of future generations. The Unites States strongly backed Israel with a series of precision strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran. It appears the US strikes will end Iran's nuclear capacity for now. The Coalition supports actions taken by the US to ensure that the Iranian regime is stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons. We can never allow the Iranian regime the capacity to enact its objectives of the destruction of the US and Israel. The world can never accept a nuclear-armed Iran and acting now to ensure that is the case is the right thing to do. These events are a long way from Australia but have implications for us and the rest of the world. President Donald Trump left the G7 meeting in Canada early to deal with the situation in the Middle East. For Australia this meant a planned meeting between the President and our Prime Minister on the sidelines of the G7 was cancelled. Given the situation in the Middle East, the decision by the President to cancel the meeting is completely understandable but to the detriment of Australia. This was an important opportunity for the Prime Minister to seek assurances on AUKUS and protect Australia from tariffs. Given global volatility and the growing list of issues in our relationship with the US, this underscores that the Prime Minister should not have merely relied on meeting with the President on the sidelines of international summits. The Prime Minister should have been more proactive in seeking to strengthen this relationship — Australia's most important — and we encourage him to change his approach to advance our national interest. As Australians we must step up our engagement across the board with the US. President Trump won the US election more than 200 days ago and has held meetings with leaders from the UK, Canada, Germany, Ireland, France, Japan, Norway and South Africa. Our Prime Minister has only spoken to the President on the phone. On the international stage, Australia needs its leader to stand up for our interests so we can build a stronger Australian economy. President Trump's tariffs on our steelmakers are not in the spirit of our century-old partnership, nor in line with our 20-year-old free trade agreement. We urge the US administration to give Australia a fair go and remove the tariffs, as they have done for the UK. And we urge the Albanese Government not to compromise on policies that ensure affordable healthcare, bio-security, and a fair economic landscape for Australian businesses and families. It must not sell out our Australian farmers and producers. Success can not be achieved through putting our world-class agriculture at risk. In regard to AUKUS, the Coalition put it in place and we want it to succeed. But the fact AUKUS is under review by the Pentagon is concerning because any delay or downgrade in the US commitment will impact our future defence capability. The Prime Minister must seek assurances from President Trump to safeguard the AUKUS agreement. AUKUS is the most important strategic initiative Australia has entered into in decades. It provides the nuclear-powered submarines and technological edge we need to deter conflict and defend our sovereignty in a more contested Indo-Pacific. This is not business as usual. The Prime Minister cannot afford to be a bystander in our relationship with the US. Anthony Albanese must put Australia's case clearly and secure the commitments we were promised. We will always support bipartisan co-operation on national security, but that co-operation cannot mask inaction from the Government. The Coalition wants the Government to succeed here because that is in our national interest. Michaelia Cash is the shadow minister for foreign affairs
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Final decision': How Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer unfolded
Sky News host Sharri Markson unpacks how the United States' Operation Midnight Hammer unfolded. 'Trump was on Marine One, flying over New Jersey when he took a call from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, he said it was time for a final decision on the strikes,' Ms Markson said. 'Once the president gave Hegseth the go ahead he then returned to Washington and called his closest advisers to the White House situation room.'
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
Our fates lie in the hands of these three men
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. WAR It seems that the fate of the world is in the hands of three people, the president of the United States, the president of Russia and the prime minister of Israel. At the push of a button, they can cause so much death and destruction. No matter how many bystanders are killed or injured due to their decisions, they are doing what they believe their constituents are calling for. Australia was right to take time to decide on its position as far as the bombing of alleged nuclear sites in Iran (' US acted alone, Albanese declares, but abandons neutral stance to back in Trump ', 23/6), and it was no credit to the Coalition to rush in its decision, which seems to remind us of the decision to join the US in the war in Iraq. It is so hard to believe that while so much effort and funds are being devoted to space travel, that this planet has so many issues yet to resolve. The tragedies taking place in Sudan, Myanmar and elsewhere seem to have been forgotten by those in pursuit of establishing their own greatness and place in history. Bruce MacKenzie, South Kingsville Controlling rogue states There may be question marks over the inclination of Russian, American and Israeli leaders to 'exercise self-control in their use of unbridled warfare' (' Self-interested despots and unfettered crimes ', Letters, 23/6). However, unlike those who lead Iran, they don't talk about 'annihilation' and 'eradication' of their enemies as Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has done on a number of occasions. In the 1990s Bill Clinton failed to stop another rogue state, North Korea, from developing nuclear weapons. Now Kim Jong-un is in a position to use his considerable nuclear arsenal to attack Japan and other nearby Asian countries. Donald Trump quite rightly has acted to prevent the same mistake from occurring in the Middle East. Ivan Glynn, Vermont Independence lost under AUKUS I note with concern Australia's shifting response overnight to the US bombing of Iran from a neutral call for diplomacy to one of endorsement. The reason for the shift is AUKUS, and its current review by the US, which inextricably links our foreign policy to that of America's. We must abandon AUKUS not only for its absurd cost and strategic obsolescence but in order to adopt neutrality, uphold international law and maintain decency in our foreign policy. Stuart Garrow, Brighton Making which nation great? MIGA could also stand for Make Iraq Great Again but history shows that US liberation with a permanent military presence protecting the oil wells after it eliminated the heinous Saddam Hussein leadership has left a country in which poverty has grown. Graham Borrell, Campbells Creek War spreads but what of the hostages? Your correspondent contributes a refreshingly balanced letter (23/6) on the US Massive Ordnance Penetrator strikes on Iran's underground nuclear enrichment facilities. Her reference to the hostages, still held captive after more than 600 days, is a sobering reminder of what, apart from the original Hamas attack and slaughter of civilians, was a driving force behind the Israeli response and continuing escalation of violence, death and destruction – the return of all the hostages. A return that allegedly would have ended the Israeli retaliation and begun the rebuilding of Gaza. What now of those hostages – those who may be alive – deep within the underground Hamas tunnels of Gaza? The focus of the world is now on very different underground facilities, and the potential global repercussions of their destruction. The 2023 Hamas attack, like a stone thrown into a pond, has generated ripples which continue to extend, potentially engulfing all around and beyond in an apocalyptic deluge. Once the dogs of war have been unleashed, they and their havoc are virtually impossible to predict or corral. Deborah Morrison, Malvern East THE FORUM Indigenous treaty Your correspondent (Letters, 23/6) contends that a treaty with Australia's Indigenous people is unnecessary, however each argument ignores important realities. Firstly, that treaties are entered into between nation states. While that is correct, it ignores that treaties have allowed other nations (e.g. US, Canada, New Zealand) to acknowledge and move forward from the complex issues surrounding European colonisation of Indigenous-held lands, with differing levels of success. Secondly, that there are already three strands of bureaucracy responsible for these issues. Again, this is true. However, it ignores the limited progress that has been made in the Closing the Gap initiatives, nearly 20 years after they were first implemented. For example, the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous life expectancy has worsened, and is now over eight years. Thirdly, that Indigenous people have responsibility for overcoming these issues. Again, this is true. However, it ignores complex historical realities, such as wholesale displacement from lands, the Frontier Wars, and decades/centuries of exclusion from opportunities (e.g. from education, voting rights and the census). These have caused traumas and barriers that must be acknowledged, alongside the important issue of personal responsibility. Michael Radywonik, Moonee Ponds
