Israel seeks swift action on Iran, sources say, with a split US administration
US President Donald Trump (centre) Vice-President J. D. Vance (left) and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly took part in a tense June 19 call with Israel's leaders over Mr Trump's two-week deadline on possibly striking Iran. PHOTO: REUTERS
Israel seeks swift action on Iran, sources say, with a split US administration
WASHINGTON/DUBAI/JERUSALEM - Israeli officials have told the Trump administration they do not want to wait two weeks for Iran to reach a deal to dismantle key parts of its nuclear programme and Israel could act alone before the deadline is up, two sources said, amid a continuing debate on Mr Trump's team about whether the US should get involved.
The two sources familiar with the matter said Israel had communicated their concerns to Trump administration officials on June 19 in what they described as a tense phone call.
The Israeli officials said they do not want to wait the two weeks that US President Donald Trump presented on June 19 as a deadline for deciding whether the US will get involved in the Israel-Iran war, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The Israeli participants on the call included Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defence Minister Israel Katz and military chief Eyal Zamir, according to a security source.
The Israelis believe they have a limited window of opportunity to move against the deeply buried site at Fordow, the crown jewel of Iran's nuclear programme, said the sources.
The US is the only country with the bunker-busting bombs powerful enough to reach the facility, which is dug into the side of a mountain.
Reuters reported on June 21 that the US is moving B-2 bombers to the Pacific island of Guam, reinforcing the possibility that the US could participate directly in an attack.
The B-2 can be equipped to carry America's 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, designed to destroy targets deep underground, such as the one at Fordow.
A person in Washington familiar with the matter said Israel has communicated to the US administration that it believes Mr Trump's window of up to two weeks is too long and that more urgent action is needed.
The person did not say whether the Israelis made that point during the high-level call.
During the call, Vice-President J.D. Vance pushed back, saying the US shouldn't be directly involved and suggesting that the Israelis were going to drag the country into war, said the sources.
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also participated in the call, said a security source.
Reuters could not determine who else took part in the call.
The Jerusalem Post reported earlier that a phone call had taken place on June 19.
During the phone call, US Vice-President J.D. Vance reportedly pushed back against Israeli efforts to get the US involved in striking Iran.
PHOTO: AFP
The prospect of a US strike against Iran has exposed divisions in the coalition of supporters that brought Mr Trump to power, with some prominent members of his base urging him not to get the country involved in a new Middle East war.
Mr Vance has frequently criticised past US involvement in conflicts, including Iraq and Afghanistan, but has lately defended Mr Trump against Republican critics who urge the administration to stay out of the Iran conflict.
Other Republicans, including Trump ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, have said they hope Mr Trump will help Israel finish destroying Iran's nuclear programme.
Mr Trump, who campaigned on a promise to keep the US out of what he called 'stupid' foreign wars, has himself seemed conflicted at times about whether to join the Israeli attack on Iran or focus on diplomatic efforts to end Tehran's nuclear programme. But his rhetoric in recent days has become increasingly aggressive towards Iran.
Iran insists that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.
The White House declined to comment for this story.
The Israeli Prime Minister's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Iran's mission to the United Nations also did not immediately respond.
Fordow strike likely
Publicly, Mr Netanyahu has not ruled out Israel attacking Fordow alone, though officials have not provided any details on how that would be achieved.
Four sources said it is now increasingly likely that the country will launch a solo military operation. Israeli air superiority over much of Iran makes an operation more feasible, though still risky, said two of the sources.
The Israelis feel they have the momentum and have limited time given the costs of the war, one source added.
'I don't see them waiting much longer,' said the source.
A June 14 Maxar satellite image showing the site of Iran's deeply buried Fordow nuclear facility.
PHOTO: EPA-EFE
It is not clear whether such an operation would involve bombing, ground forces, or both. Two of the sources said that rather than attempting to destroy the entire site Israel could instead do significant damage to it.
That could mean focusing on destroying what is inside the site rather than the site itself, said one of the sources, declining to elaborate.
Some analysts have speculated that Israel could use special forces to enter Fordow and blow it up from inside.
Another scenario being considered, according to a source familiar with the matter, would be to drop a series of munitions in rapid succession in an attempt to breach the fortified site, similar to how the Israeli military killed Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in 2024.
Such a strike could be followed by an incursion by special forces, the source said.
It is not clear that Israel has munitions powerful enough to penetrate the fortified facility. It is widely believed that to have a high chance of success, US intervention would be needed.
But even with the massive firepower of a joint US-Israeli military action, military and nuclear experts believe that a military operation would probably only temporarily set back a programme the West fears is already aimed at producing atomic bombs one day, although Iran denies it. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
World leaders react to US attack on Iran
Patrons of the Chapel Street Cafe watch as U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, in Chicago, Illinois, U.S. June 21, 2025. REUTERS/Dylan Martinez The reaction of world leaders after U.S. forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday Iran time ranged from Israel lauding President Donald Trump's decision to the U.N. calling for de-escalation and some countries condemning the attacks. ISRAEL PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, RECORDED STATEMENT: "Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history... History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons." U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTONIO GUTERRES, STATEMENT "I am gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States against Iran today. This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security. There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control – with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world. I call on Member States to de-escalate and to uphold their obligations under the UN Charter and other rules of international law. At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace." VENEZUELA FOREIGN MINISTER YVAN GIL, ON TELEGRAM: "Venezuela Condemns U.S. Military Aggression Against Iran and Demands an Immediate Cessation of Hostilities. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela firmly and categorically condemns the bombing carried out by the United States military, at the request of the State of Israel, against nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan complexes." MEXICO FOREIGN MINISTRY, ON X: "The ministry urgently calls for diplomatic dialogue for peace between the parties involved in the Middle East conflict. In keeping with our constitutional principles of foreign policy and our country's pacifist conviction, we reiterate our call to de-escalate tensions in the region. The restoration of peaceful coexistence among the states of the region is the highest priority." CUBA PRESIDENT MIGUEL DIAZ-CANEL, ON X: "We strongly condemn the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, which constitutes a dangerous escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. The aggression seriously violates the UN Charter and international law and plunges humanity into a crisis with irreversible consequences." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
19 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Congress members split over US attack on Iran
Mr Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, said the move to declare war on foreign countries is not constitutional. PHOTO: REUTERS Congress members split over US attack on Iran WASHINGTON - Republican and Democratic members of the US Congress delivered swift reactions to US bombings of Iranian nuclear facilities early on June 22 . The following are statements from key lawmakers: Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker The Republican from Mississippi applauded the operation but cautioned that the United States now faced 'very serious choices ahead'. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch 'This war is Israel's war, not our war, but Israel is one of our strongest allies and is disarming Iran for the good of the world,' said the Republican from Idaho. 'This is not the start of a forever war. There will not be American boots on the ground in Iran.' Thomas Massie, Republican from Kentucky 'This is not constitutional,' Mr Massie said on social media. He was referring to the power of Congress to declare war on foreign countries. US House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson 'The president gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement,' said the Republican from Louisiana. 'The president's decisive action prevents the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants 'Death to America,' from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune The South Dakota Republican said: 'I stand with President Trump.' Rashida Tlaib, Democrat from Michigan A daughter of Palestinian immigrants, Ms Tlaib said President Trump sending US troops to bomb Iran without the consent of Congress is a blatant violation of the US Constitution. 'The American people do not want another forever war. We have seen where decades of endless war in the Middle East gets us - all based on the lie of 'weapons of mass destruction,' she added. Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat from Virginia Mr Kaine said the US public 'is overwhelmingly opposed to the US waging war on Iran' and said Mr Trump displayed 'horrible judgment'. Max Rose, former member of Congress, Democrat Now a senior adviser to the progressive veterans' group 'VoteVets', Mr Rose said Mr Trump's decision to launch direct strikes against Iran without congressional authorisation is illegal. He added: 'This conflict is his and the Republicans who have abrogated all their responsibilities.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- Straits Times
As Iran and Israel battle, the rest of the Mideast fears what's next
On June 21, President Donald Trump granted Israel's request that the United States intervene by having US forces attack three nuclear sites in Iran. PHOTO: AFP As Iran and Israel battle, the rest of the Mideast fears what's next Follow our live coverage here. ISTANBUL – Across a swath of the Middle East, fighter jets and missiles regularly streak across the sky. The newest war in the region, this time between Israel and Iran, has once again put millions of people in the crossfire of a conflict that they want nothing to do with. The war has embroiled two well-armed, long-time enemies who are ethnic and political outliers in the region but whose fight, many of their neighbors worry, could swiftly spill beyond their borders. 'We are constantly afraid, and the psychological toll has been heavy,' said Ms Rawan Muhaidat, 28, a mother of two in the town of Kafr Asad in northern Jordan. The sight of Iranian missiles overhead, and the booms of air defences shooting them down before they reach Israel, have terrified her children, who cower between her and her husband as they worry that their home could be struck. 'Every time a rocket passes and explodes, we think, 'This is the one,'' Ms Muhaidat said. On June 21 , President Donald Trump granted Israel's request that the United States intervene by having US forces attack three nuclear sites in Iran, he said, including a nuclear enrichment facility buried deep underground. Such a move, experts say, could push Iran to retaliate against US military bases or allies across the Middle East, or to activate proxy forces, like the Houthis in Yemen, to snarl trade routes or damage oil infrastructure, harming the global economy. 'We're opening a Pandora's box,' Dr Narges Bajoghli, an associate professor of Middle East studies at Johns Hopkins University, said before Mr Trump's announcement. 'Iran is not going to raise the white flag of surrender.' The war highlights how significantly the power structure across the Middle East has shifted in recent years. Just over a half-decade ago, Israel largely focused on its conflict with the Palestinians while waging a shadow war with Iran through occasional assassinations and other covert attacks. But it avoided direct confrontation, partly for fear of retaliation from the network of militias that Iran supported in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. At that time, most Arab countries shunned Israel, a Jewish-majority democracy, for its treatment of the Palestinians, and many resented the predominantly Persian Iran for what they considered its destructive meddling in the Arab world. But a few Arab states began to see Israel as a potential partner in dealing with their own concerns about Iran and established formal diplomatic relations. That picture has now changed. The deadly surprise attack by the Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023 heightened Israel's sense of vulnerability, and the country has become increasingly aggressive in striking out against perceived threats far beyond its borders. For Iran, the wars in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon, and the ouster last year of President Bashar Assad of Syria, decimated its regional proxy network and left it even more isolated. Powerful Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, pursued their own diplomatic tracks with Tehran to decrease tensions. Now they also hope to avoid a war in their neighbourhood that could put them in the crosshairs because of their partnerships with the United States. The current conflict began June 13, at a bad time for the international institutions that were established to try to contain such hostilities. Israel's war in Gaza, which began after Hamas' Oct 7, 2023, attack, has killed more than 50,000 people and caused widespread destruction and hunger in Gaza. Few seem to expect that the warring parties in the new conflict will be held accountable for killing civilians or striking hospitals, as Israel has done repeatedly in Gaza – sometimes because Hamas has built tunnels beneath them – and as Iran did in Israel on June 19 . Expectations are low that action by the UN Security Council will stop the war, not least because the United States would almost certainly veto any measure that called for its end. And Iran's foreign minister, Mr Abbas Araghchi, told senior European officials during talks in Geneva on June 20 that Iran would not negotiate under fire. Mr Trump dismissed the European efforts anyway, saying, 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us.' The lack of international action to stop the war has left Mr Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel free to proceed as they choose, Dr Bajoghli said. 'We're entering a new international era, a new world order, and it seems to in some ways be an old world order of force and the law of the jungle, but with 21st-century technology and weaponry,' she said. Israel initiated the war with a multi-pronged surprise attack that damaged Iranian military and nuclear sites, largely destroyed air defences and killed top nuclear scientists and military officials in their homes, as well as a number of civilians. Iran has responded by firing barrages of ballistic missiles at Israel, some of which have struck civilian apartment towers. At least 224 people have been killed in Iran and 24 in Israel. Mr Netanyahu has said that Israel launched the attack to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon, which Israel would consider an existential threat. He has also suggested the more expansive goals of regional transformation and regime change. 'We are changing the face of the Middle East, and that can lead to radical changes inside Iran itself,' he said on June 16 . Iran insists its nuclear programme is peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Iran has not decided to seek a nuclear weapon, although that could change if the United States bombs Iran's underground enrichment facility in Fordo or if Israel kills Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. For his part, Ayatollah Khamenei has threatened to retaliate if the United States strikes Iran. 'The harm the US will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily,' he said in a televised address on June 18 . The war is hugely unwelcome in the rest of the Middle East, where other governments would prefer to put the region's conflicts behind them so they can rebuild what has been destroyed and focus on strengthening their economies. There is little affinity for either of the warring parties. Most Arab states shun Israel, and even governments that have established diplomatic relations with it have condemned how it has fought in Gaza and its attack on Iran. But that does not mean they support Iran. In a predominantly Sunni Muslim region, most Arab governments see Iran's revolutionary Shiite theocracy as anathema, and many people in Yemen, Syria, Lebanon and elsewhere resent Iran's interventions in their countries. Many Middle East leaders have complicated reactions to the war, said Dr Dina Esfandiary, the lead Middle East analyst at Bloomberg Economics, a research group. 'Officials in the region are quietly glad that Iran's top brass is being taken out bit by bit, that Iranian proxies and their leaderships are being taken out bit by bit,' she said. 'That, from their perspective, gets rid of one of the real threats in the region for them.' But many also fear an expanded role in the Middle East for Israel, she added, given the tremendous military and diplomatic support it receives from the United States. That leaves other countries wondering, she said, 'Where is Israel going to go next?' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
