CMF Phone 2 Pro Review: The bar for cheap phones just got higher

Nothing's been on a roll the past few years with its budget phone releases, including the the Nothing Phone 3a and 3a Pro models it launched earlier this year. While they're both solid best cheap phone contenders, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is shaping up to be yet another ultra-affordable Android phone. And this one is even cheaper.
A follow-up to last year's CMF Phone 1, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is an improvement in nearly every aspect. Not only does it have design upgrades, like a more durable IP54 rating, but it gains a triple camera system — complete with a dedicated telephone camera with 2x optical zoom.
Everyone knows how much I prefer budget phones to more expensive flagships, so I'll explain in my CMF Phone 2 Pro review if this cheap device can set the bar even higher for bargain handsets.
CMF Phone 2 Pro
Starting price
$279 / £219
Display
6.77-inch AMOLED (1080 x 2392)
Refresh rate
120Hz adaptive
Rear cameras
50MP main (f/1.88), 50MP 2x telephoto (f/1.85), 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2)
Front cameras
16MP selfie (f/2.45)
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro 5G
RAM
8GB
Storage
128GB / 256GB, expandable up to 2TB
Battery
5,000 mAh
Charging
33W wired
Operating system
Android 15 with Nothing OS 3.2
Water/dust resistance
IP54
Size
164 x 78 x 7.8mm / 6.46 x 3.0 x 0.31 inches
Weight
185 grams (6.53 ounces)
Colors
Black, white, orange, light green
Similar to its last phone release, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is available in the U.S. through a beta program, with only a $279 model offering 8GB RAM and 256GB. That's not too shabby given the $239 cost of the CMF Phone 1. In other markets, like the U.K., Nothing offers an 8GB RAM with 128GB storage option for £219.
While the price certainly is a big draw factor, the worst part about the CMF Phone 2 Pro is actually trying to get one.
The U.S. model comes in three colors: white, black, and orange. My review unit's in white, but it features a sandstone finish that gives a shimmery effect at the right angles.
While the price certainly is a big draw factor, the worst part about the CMF Phone 2 Pro is actually trying to get one. Hopefully it won't take long for the phone to land on Amazon or at other retailers.
Now that it's referred to as a "pro" model, the CMF Phone 2 Pro inevitably has a more premium finish than the previous version. Although the overall design language and style hasn't changed all that much, I do like how the new version has a more solid build quality.
Just as before, there are screws all around the back and a cap in the corner gives the CMF Phone a unique look among other handsets. What really amplifies its build quality is the metal trim bezel that wraps around the entire phone and the shimmering effect of the sandstone finish of the back. It also helps that the phone is pretty thin at 0.31 inches.
Considering its price, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is still a remarkable looking phone for under $280.
With the screw cap, I like how I'm able to install previous accessories for the CMF Phone 1, such as the lanyard attachment. I really like this ability to modify the phone's design, mainly because it gives me a bit of control to make it distinctive and not just conform to what the phone maker wants. Other small details, like the thicker lens covers that wrap around each camera, show off how the CMF Phone's design evolves to be a bit more premium.
And finally, it's nice knowing that it's better equipped with improved water resistance thanks to its IP54 rating. Considering its price, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is still a remarkable looking phone for under $280.
Even though it's hard to see side-by-side against the CMF Phone 1, Nothing manages to cram a larger 6.77-inch AMOLED with a 120Hz refresh rate into the CMF Phone 2 Pro — all without adding more length and depth to its size.
Again, I'm blown away by how sharp and iridescent the CMF Phone 2 screen looks while watching videos. Not only do the colors pop, but the screen doesn't distort like other budget phones at odd angles.
CMF Phone 2 Pro
CMF Phone 1
Max brightness
1,179 nits
1,129 nits
sRGB
125.2% (Standard) / 172.2% (Alive)
107.8% (Standard) / 152% (Alive)
DCI-P3
88.7% (Standard) / 122% (Alive)
76.4% (Standard) / 107.7% (Alive)
Delta-E (lower is better)
0.21 (Standard) / 0.3 (Alive)
0.2 (Standard) / 0.25 (Alive)
Nothing claims that the display is rated for up to 3,000-nit peak brightness. That's an ambitious mark, especially when the brightest screen that the Tom's Guide labs has recorded was the Pixel 9 Pro XL's mark of 2,469 nits. The CMF Phone 2 Pro peaks at 1,179 nits, which barely pushes past the 1,129 nits achieved by the CMF Phone 1.
Despite this, I can't complain too much because the CMF Phone 2 display remains visible in most situations outdoors, though it's still tough to make out under direct sunlight.
Overall, I wish the screen were brighter, but the rich color tones it produces combined with its smooth dynamic 120Hz makes it a visual feast that I'm not often exposed to with budget phones.
I can't believe there are still phones out there that have only a single rear camera, like the iPhone 16e. Most budget phones come with at least two, but one with three cameras is hard to find.
That's why I'm really stoked about the CMF Phone 2 Pro's setup: a triple camera system that consists of a 50MP main lens, 8MP ultrawide shooter, and a 50MP telephoto camera with 2x optical zoom. There's also a 16MP selfie cam around the front, which appears to be unchanged from the CMF Phone 1.
Nothing claims that the main sensor can draw in 64% more light than the one on the CMF Phone 1, so you'll see how it compares in the side-by-side snapshots I've captured with both phones. For a budget phone, there's a healthy set of controls and settings to choose from — including an expert mode that lets me dial in manual controls such as its shutter speed, ISO, white balance, and more.
First of all, the main camera of the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a wider field of view that lets me capture more of the Citibikes in the photos above. While this is fine and dandy, I don't see many differences between the two cameras as they capture the same amount of details all throughout the scene.
Despite the lack of a dedicated macro mode, the CMF Phone 2 Pro still lets me get close to subjects with its main camera. There's a lot of detail with the sunflower with the CMF Phone 2 Pro's snapshot, but the CMF Phone 1 does just as good of a job at capturing all the fine details — including the prickly parts of the center and its petals.
When I look at the produce shelves filled with all the different kinds of peppers, I do like how the CMF Phone 2 Pro casts a more accurate tone. That's because it doesn't wash out the red and green peppers compared to the CMF Phone 1.
The 16MP selfie camera of the CMF Phone 2 Pro is better equipped at handling high-contrast scenes, which is where the CMF Phone 1 really struggles in with the photos above.
Highlights in particular are blown out to the point that the details around my shirt are too irreversibly gone to make out, whereas the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers a better tone to the exposure.
Optical zoom is better than none at all, right? I think so, but there's a certain threshold where its advantage is more prevalent. At 2x zoom, it's hard to see how much better it is, but there's no arguing how the shot at 10x zoom above looks much sharper with the CMF Phone 2 Pro. In comparison to the CMF Phone 1 shot with its main camera, it's not as sharp or defined.
I'm not convinced that the main camera draws in 64% more light than what Nothing claims, evident in the night time snapshots I captured above using their respective night modes.
There are certain parts of the tree and surrounding branches that look a smidge brighter in the CMF Phone 2 shot, but they're not overwhelmingly brighter to convince me it's a big improvement.
When it comes to video recording, the CMF Phone 2's package isn't a tremendous boost when it tops out at 4K 30fps — just like the previous CMF Phone 1. However, I can tell from the video I recorded near Times Square above that there are a couple of improvements.
First of all, the CMF Phone 2 Pro footage looks a tiny bit sharper to the eye. The bigger improvement relates to its stabilization, which manages to mitigate the unintentional shake as I proceed to walk.
Overall, there's not an overwhelming improvement to the camera performance from one year to the next — which is a little bit of a letdown because this is the one area where I expect wider disparities. The best thing about this new setup is the introduction of a dedicated telephoto camera with optical zoom, along with a much improved stabilization for video recording.
Usually newer phones see at least some improvements around their processing performance, but synthetic benchmark tests show that's not really the case for the CMF Phone 2 Pro. It's powered by a Dimensity 7300 Pro 5G chipset, a follow up to the Dimensity 7300 in the CMF Phone 1.
Geekbench 6 single and multi-core scores are flat, reaching on average around 1,016 and 2,961 respectively. These scores are roughly the same as what I've tested with the CMF Phone 1, so I'm a bit at a loss because Nothing claims a 10% CPU performance boost.
In 3DMark's Wild Life Unlimited test to see how its GPU performance handles, the CMF Phone 2 reaches an average frame rate of 18.62 fps. This actually turns out to be less than what the CMF Phone 1 delivered.
Despite the lackluster benchmark scores, I can at least verify that the phone runs responsively with most everyday tasks. From browsing sites on Chrome to scrolling through my different social media apps, the CMF Phone 2 Pro handles them with finesse, including how animations have a fluid look throughout the interface.
CMF Phone 2 Pro
CMF Phone 1
Nothing Phone 2a
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro
Geekbench (single core/multicore)
1,016 / 2,961
1,028 / 2,971
1,103 / 2,586
WildLife Unlimited(fps)
18.62
18.84
25.46
Adobe Premiere Rush Transcode Time (Mins:Secs)
1:19
1:19
1:40
I even tried a couple of the games I play religiously, like Age of Origins, which maintains decent frame rates when there's moderate action. However, it does stutter every now and then when there's a lot of explosive effects happening with some of the battle sequences.
I know that benchmark tests aren't the definitive measure of a phone's real-world performance, but I was hoping to see the minimum improvements that the phone maker claims. That didn't happen, and it's a bit perplexing.
As the CMF Phone 2 keeps the same overall size as its predecessor, there's no change to the size of the 5,000 mAh battery powering the device. So battery improvements boils down to the power efficiency of the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro 5G chip.
In the Tom's Guide's battery benchmark test, the CMF Phone 2 pulls in an average time of 15 hours and 24 minutes in dynamic mode, where the refresh rate changes to deliver the most optimal results.
CMF Phone 2 Pro
CMF Phone 1
Battery size
5,000 mAh
5,000 mAh
Battery life (Hrs:Mins)
15:24
15:02
Wired Charging
33W
33W
Recharge percentage (15 mins)
28%
30%
Recharge percentage (30 mins)
55%
62%
This puts it slightly ahead of the CMF Phone 1, but our lab testing shows it's able to go for much longer at 16 hours when you set the refresh rate to standard mode. For a budget phone, nearly 15.5 hours is impressive endurance beating out other, more expensive models like the Pixel 9a.
While the CMF Phone 2 lacks wireless charging— an expected omission for a phone at this price— Nothing at least gives it 33W wired charging. After 15 minutes, the CMF Phone 2 gets up to 28%, while 30 minutes yields a 55% charge. Strangely, that's not as fast as the CMF Phone 1, but it's not a deal breaker in my opinion.
Just like the Nothing Phone 3a Pro, you'll find the CMF Phone 2 running Nothing OS 3.2 on top of Android 15. I've always been a fan of Nothing's custom skin, mainly for how it employs Nothing's bespoke icons and animations — which gives it a dot matrix style look that's so different from other Android skins. The only thing missing is the customization of the Glyph Interface, which you don't get here because it doesn't have the LED light strips around the back that's needed for it.
Despite this, there's still plenty of customization for anyone to make the CMF Phone 2 match their preference. Similar to the Nothing Phone 3a Pro, you get access to the Smart App Drawer, which I like for its ability to intelligently group apps together, making for yet another unique look to the app drawer.
There's also the Essential Key on the side of the phone, one of the CMF Phone 2's key AI features. Pressing it captures a screenshot of whatever I'm looking at, which then is archived into the Essential Space. There, it can use AI magic to pull details from my screenshots and present it to me in a meaningful way.
My only complaint about this feature is that it requires a lot on my part to "save" these screenshots for it to work effectively, instead of doing it all proactively without my intervention.
Compared to other Android phones I've tested, I like how Nothing OS 3.2 doesn't try to overwhelm me with too many features. It's clearly lacking AI features that make the best Android phones even more useful, but I can't complain too much here because the CMF Phone 2 Pro is a fraction of the cost of those phones.
While I've seen better support elsewhere, like the Pixel 9a's seven years of support, Nothing offers three years of Android updates and six years of security patch, which is fine for a phone of this caliber.
Only $40 separates last year's CMF Phone 1 and the new CMF Phone 2 Pro, which is peanuts when I think about the price difference between an iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro. There's a lot to like about the CMF Phone 2 Pro, like its more premium design, longer battery life, brilliant looking screen, and the addition of a telephoto camera.
However, I have higher expectations around any phone that's deemed a 'pro' model because it should present itself as a much improved version. There are aspects about the CMF Phone 2 Pro that I find underwhelming, namely its lackluster processing performance scores and how there's no big improvement to its camera performance. But at the same time, I can't neglect how this phone costs $279 — and good phones don't often come this cheap.
All things considered, I think CMF Phone 2 Pro is still a fantastic value for anyone on a tight budget and wants a phone that punches above its weight. And that's despite its 'pro' designation not quite living up to the performance hype.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fast Company

33 minutes ago

• Fast Company

Those security codes you ask to receive via text leave your accounts vulnerable. Do this instead

Do you receive login security codes for your online accounts via text message? These are the six- or seven-digit numbers sent via SMS that you need to enter along with your password when trying to access your bank accounts, health records, online photos, and more. This type of security is known as multifactor authentication (MFA) and is designed to keep your account secure even if someone knows your password. Without the additional security code, bad actors can't gain access to your data. Or at least that's the idea. It's increasingly becoming evident that security codes sent by text message may leave our data less secure than we thought. Fortunately, there are other, more secure ways to keep your accounts safe. Here's why it's probably a good idea to stop using SMS for your security codes, and what you can use instead. An opaque security code industry You may think that the text message you receive with the code you need to log into your account is coming from Amazon, Google, Meta, or whoever provides the service you are logging into. But it's probably not—and therein lies the security risk. Bloomberg and Lighthouse Reports just released an alarming report revealing that some of the most prominent tech companies recommending that users enable multifactor authentication—including Amazon, Google, and Meta—have used third-party companies to send their security codes to users via text. Some of these third-party companies have been linked to institutions in the surveillance industry and even government spy agencies. Additionally, some of the security codes that these third-party companies were responsible for transmitting have been associated with data breaches of individuals' accounts. Worse: the intermediaries operating in this space do so with little oversight from their tech giant clients or regulators. And Bloomberg and Lighthouse Reports' piece isn't the first to warn about the vulnerability that texted security codes expose users to. In December, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a warning to the public, urging people to migrate away from receiving security codes via text. 'Do not use SMS as a second factor for authentication,' the CISA's memo warned. 'SMS messages are not encrypted—a threat actor with access to a telecommunication provider's network who intercepts these messages can read them.' But this vulnerability in texted security codes doesn't mean you should revert to using merely a password to access your accounts. Instead, you should consider a superior form of multifactor authentication—or upgrade to passwordless logins entirely. Get your security codes from an authenticator app instead Some websites and services are stuck in the past when it comes to multifactor authentication. That is, these websites do offer their users MFA, but only give the option of receiving security codes via text message—something the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency now warns against. Thankfully, plenty of websites offer a more secure way to receive security codes: via an authenticator app. Simply put, an authenticator app is an application that resides on your phone or computer, storing all the various security codes for your online accounts that have multifactor authentication enabled. The code for each account in the authenticator app is unique, and it changes every 30 seconds. When you need to log in to a site that you have set up with multifactor authentication, you'll be prompted to enter your security code, which can be found in your authenticator app. And since these authenticator app codes always reside on your device, they can never be intercepted in transit, because they are never sent to you in the first place. Regardless of whether you use Windows, Mac, iPhone, or Android, you have numerous authenticator apps to choose from. These include Apple's own Passwords app, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, LastPass Authenticator, and more. Even better, start using passkeys While authenticator apps are vastly more secure than text messages for getting your security codes, the safest login method no longer relies on codes—or even passwords—at all. I'm referring to passkeys, the passwordless login technology spearheaded by the FIDO Alliance, a consortium of tech companies including Amazon, Apple, Dell, Google, Meta, Microsoft, NTT, Samsung, and others. Passkeys are cryptographically complex from a technology perspective, but easy to use from a consumer perspective. When you add a passkey for one of your online accounts, you get one digital key, saved to your device, and the website gets a matching key. When you log into that website, the passkeys must match; otherwise, you won't get access to the account. You verify that you are the true holder of your passkey by confirming your identity with your biometrics—a facial or fingerprint scan, right from your phone or laptop. Passkeys can't be phished or guessed. And if one of your passkeys were stolen and put on someone else's device, it wouldn't work either. That's because the thief couldn't fool the passkey into thinking they were you since they don't have your face or fingerprint. And because passkeys don't require any alphanumeric input authentication—such as security codes—there's no code you need to worry about either. Passkeys are also synced to the cloud via your device's password manager, so if you lose your device, you can quickly regain access to all your passkeys from your, for example, Apple or Google account. The only drawback to passkeys is that not all online accounts support them. Still, each month, more and more sites are offering users the option for passkey logins. However, if your accounts don't support passkeys yet, you should still enable multifactor authentication. Just remember to opt to receive your security codes via an authenticator app rather than a text message.

Android Authority

43 minutes ago

• Android Authority

Nothing Phone 3 specs leak: Big upgrades incoming despite sub-flagship chip

Nothing on X TL;DR Specs of the Nothing Phone 3 have leaked. The phone could get a serious upgrade when it comes to battery life, charging speeds, and camera performance. The source of the leak is not very well known, but they seem to have a decent track record. The Nothing Phone 3 is right around the corner, and a fresh leak suggests it could offer a solid flagship experience, even though the company has confirmed it won't use the top-tier Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset. While the leak appears credible, it's worth noting that we haven't previously covered many leaks from this particular source, so take this information with a grain of salt. According to Gadget Bits on X, the Nothing Phone 3 will feature a 6.7-inch 1.5K LTPO OLED display, an upgrade over the Nothing Phone 2's 1080p screen and the 3a Pro's slightly larger but lower resolution panel. That means the Nothing Phone 3 could deliver sharp visuals and a flagship-grade dynamic refresh rate. Camera specs also look robust. As per the leak, the Nothing Phone 3 could come with a triple 50MP setup, including a main lens, ultrawide lens, and a 3x periscope telephoto shooter. That's a big leap from the dual-camera setup on the Phone 2, but closer to the camera setup of the Nothing Phone 3a Pro, which also features 50MP main and periscope cameras, but an 8MP ultrawide shooter. The purported 50MP selfie camera on the Phone 3 is another nice touch, beating the 32MP front shooter on the Phone 2. Gadget Bits/X The battery also seems to be getting a boost, with a rumored 5,150mAh capacity. But the real standout is the 100W wired charging, which, if the leak is accurate, would be a huge jump from the 45W speed on the Phone 2 and 50W on the 3a Pro. Wireless and reverse wireless charging are still present, as per the leak, along with eSIM and NFC support. Elsewhere, the Nothing Phone 3 is expected to ship with Nothing OS 3.5 based on Android 15, and we already know that the company is upping its software support promise to five years of Android updates and seven years of security updates, outpacing the Phone 2's support window. Even without the absolute latest chipset, the Nothing Phone 3 is shaping up to be a solid all-rounder. With upgrades to the display, cameras, charging speeds, and software support, it could be the most impressive Nothing phone to date. However, the company is replacing its signature Glyph Interface with a new Glyph Matrix system, a change that might not sit well with all fans. The phone is set to launch on July 1.

Business Insider

4 hours ago

• Business Insider

Amazon Ditches Kia Trial and Goes Back to Gig Workers for Deliveries

Gig workers have got their gig back at U.S. tech giant Amazon (AMZN) after it ditched a two year long delivery experiment. Confident Investing Starts Here: Car Plan Scrapped Amazon has, according to Bloomberg, scrapped a trial where contract delivery firms in several US states deployed drivers for four- or five-hours shifts in boxy little Kia Corp. hatchback cars. Amazon hoped that the trial, which began to roll out in 2023 in Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Ohio, Texas and Washington, would give it more control of deliveries and reduce its reliance on Flex drivers. These are people who use their own cars to deliver orders to customers' homes. These gig economy workers will now once again get behind the wheel. Reportedly owners of the participating Delivery Service Partners, as Amazon calls its contract delivery firms, were recently notified that the quick-delivery program will be winding down over the next few months. 'After more than a year of gathering feedback from customers, DSPs, and teams at Same-Day Delivery facilities, we've determined that the DSP model isn't currently the right fit for Same-Day Delivery and we'll be moving away from it,' Amazon spokesperson Steve Kelly said. 'We appreciate the contributions from participating DSPs and their teams, and we'll provide support throughout this transition.' Speed Need Kelly said the affected DSPs can operate other Amazon routes. These DSPs lease blue Amazon Prime-branded vans and employ the drivers, who might deliver 200 or more packages a day. Flex drivers opt in via a smartphone app and typically deliver packages from Amazon's same-day delivery depots. (WMT) and Target (TGT). It recently announced plans to invest up to $4 billion to expand its rural delivery network by 2026. Is AMZN a Good Stock to Buy Now? On TipRanks, AMZN has a Strong Buy consensus based on 46 Buy and 1 Hold ratings. Its highest price target is $305. AMZN stock's consensus price target is $241.64 implying a 15.13% upside.