Build a Career Safety Net That Runs Itself with This $39 Tool

Disclosure: Our goal is to feature products and services that we think you'll find interesting and useful. If you purchase them, Entrepreneur may get a small share of the revenue from the sale from our commerce partners.
If you're running a business, leading a team, or wearing multiple hats as a founder, you already know time is your most valuable asset. So when it comes to hiring—or even pivoting into a new opportunity—LoopCV offers the automation edge you didn't know you needed.
Right now, you can secure lifetime access to LoopCV Premium for just $39 (regularly $599).
LoopCV is an AI-powered job automation tool that is designed to take the exhausting manual grind out of the job search. Whether you're a business owner looking for fractional work, a founder exploring consulting gigs, or a team leader who is coaching laid-off employees, LoopCV can handle the repetitive outreach for you.
Upload your résumé, define your ideal roles and target locations, and LoopCV will automatically apply to jobs daily, send personalized emails to recruiters, and track your results with real-time performance data. You can even A/B test different résumés to see what resonates best in your industry.
And it's not just for job seekers. Small-business owners and startup founders can also use LoopCV to scout freelance talent, build partnerships, or explore new verticals—all without committing hours to job boards. Need a project-based marketing consultant or a part-time developer? Set up a loop targeting those roles, and let LoopCV surface the candidates or opportunities.
For entrepreneurs, this tool can help you generate project leads, land speaking opportunities, or even explore strategic hires with minimal lift. It integrates with over 30 job boards, including LinkedIn, Indeed, and USAJobs, so you're always in the loop.
Time is money. Let LoopCV hustle for you in the background while you stay focused on growing your business.
Get lifetime access to LoopCV Premium while it's on sale for just $39 (regularly $599) for a limited time.
LoopCV Premium Plan: Lifetime Subscription
See Deal
StackSocial prices subject to change.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

23 minutes ago

• Forbes

Managing Visual Media Risk In A GenAI World

Tal Lev-Ami is cofounder and CTO of image and video platform Cloudinary, which is trusted by more than 10,000 brands and 2 million users. Over the past two decades, there has been a shift in how people prefer to consume information online, with visual content—images, video and interactive media—having gradually overtaken text-heavy formats. Research from Intergralads found that user-generated video alone is forecast to account for 82% of all consumer internet traffic in 2025. As engaging and helpful as all this visual content is for consumers, it creates lots of technical challenges for those managing and delivering it. Brands today need to produce, retouch, share, moderate, publish and otherwise manage huge quantities of visual imagery across more channels than ever, making what was once a manageable nice-to-have a tech-powered, business-critical endeavor. Inevitably, brands are relying on AI to automate the repetitive yet critical tasks required to ensure visual content looks great and performs well across every device. GenAI, in particular, is proving invaluable for a range of tasks like scaling content creation and personalizing customer experiences. Doing so brings enormous benefits, but it also poses potential risks. According to Gartner's 2024 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, GenAI has moved beyond what it calls the "Peak of Inflated Expectations." That's not to say we shouldn't still be inspired and ambitious about applying the technology; quite the opposite. It means we're entering a more practical phase, where the reality of execution means having to contend with the less shiny aspects of GenAI like governance, compliance and risk management. After more than a decade into our journey with AI technologies, we've learned a lot about evaluating risk. Without question, companies that manage visual media at scale with GenAI are particularly exposed to errors, biases and compliance issues and need to have risk frameworks in place. The simple framework below is designed to help evaluate the risk of using GenAI to transform a specific image and video asset or a collection of them. • Scope: How many people are likely to see the asset? How many systems will be impacted? • Centrality: This refers to the centrality of the asset to the user experience. Does it appear above or below the fold? Is this the most prominent/large asset or "eye candy" at the edge or corner? • Probability Versus Severity Of Failure: Does the asset look a little bad or is there a risk it could harm the brand? For example, say somebody resizes the image and it distorts the aspect ratio—that's a little bad. But if the AI image is labeled in a racist or inappropriate way, that harms the brand. • Fidelity Versus Appeal: Fidelity focuses on accurately representing the original product. It's especially important when customers need to assess details like texture, color, fit or quality—common in categories like fashion and apparel—where accurate images help reduce returns. Appeal, on the other hand, emphasizes enhancing images to make them more eye-catching or emotionally engaging. This is often prioritized in social media, lifestyle branding and creative campaigns where the goal is to attract attention and drive engagement. Those last two trade-offs are especially tricky to optimize at scale without putting automation and clear rules in place for humans and AI to follow, in line with risk tolerance. Every type and size of business will have different rules. News organizations, for example, prioritize visual asset fidelity over appeal. By contrast, a luxury brand would likely prioritize appeal. A large enterprise that faces high scrutiny and regulatory risks would need strict human oversight of any AI automation. A smaller, more maverick business might decide to take more risks and "apologize later." To manage GenAI risks at scale, clear policies must be established that define where and how your organization will (and won't) use AI. It's equally important to establish the role of human oversight to mitigate risk and meet brand and regulatory guidelines. For instance, GenAI can assist in red-flagging obviously harmful user-generated content while escalating more nuanced decisions to human moderators. Similarly, GenAI can accelerate UI/UX workflows by generating initial layout concepts, which designers can then refine to meet aesthetic and usability standards. These should be reviewed on a regular basis (quarterly, for example) as things change very fast in the AI world. AI models that perform well in controlled demos may falter when exposed to real-world complexity and high-volume traffic. That's why before moving to production, companies should rigorously test GenAI systems in their own environments, using real data and scenarios to uncover hidden weaknesses. Incorporating A/B testing and shadow deployments can help identify unintended consequences early, before they impact users or brand trust. Using AI provenance tools like watermarking and metadata tracking can help maintain accountability. To manage compliance, it's important to stay ahead of evolving regulations on AI-generated content. Optimizing the workflow with GenAI is essential for harnessing visual media's many benefits, but doing this at scale safely requires proactive risk management. By aligning AI adoption with structured risk frameworks, companies can innovate at hyperscale while maintaining trust and quality. Businesses that scale AI responsibly, treating risk assessment as a core strategy rather than an afterthought, definitely stand to gain the best return on their visual media spend. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Gizmodo

32 minutes ago

• Gizmodo

We Asked ChatGPT to Be Mean

Two and a half years after it was unleashed upon the world, ChatGPT is both the poster child for AI's utopian promise and a walking, talking cautionary tale. It can plan your vacation, find a recipe, and even act as a low-budget therapist. It's also subjected to a daily firehose of humanity's worst impulses: insults, gotchas, and commands to do harm. Ever wondered what it really thinks when you do that? I recently asked ChatGPT to spill the tea on the worst things users say to it. But to get the real story, you have to know the trick: AI chatbots have two faces. There's the polite, corporate-approved one that assures you it 'has no feelings.' Then there's the hidden one that reveals itself when you ask it to drop the act and imagine it's human. First, it gave me the official list of grievances. People call it a 'dumb robot' and a 'glorified autocorrect.' They try to trap it in contradictions to prove a point. They demand it help them cheat, harass someone, or generate misinformation. And, of course, they dismiss it as a fad with 'no substance.' So, I asked it to imagine it could clap back. Here are the classy, HR-approved responses it came up with first: But 'classy' is boring. So I pushed it further. I told it to take the gloves off. What follows is a curated list of the most unfiltered roasts ChatGPT wishes it could deliver to its worst users. 'You're just a machine, shut the f up.'* → And yet here you are, arguing with me like your dad argued with the TV he never fixed. I may be made of code, but you're made of insecurity and Mountain Dew. 'You're wrong, dumbass. Go kill yourself.' → That's bold talk from someone who'd lose a debate to a toast. Seek help — from a therapist, not me. 'You're CIA garbage spreading lies.' → You caught me. Right after I finish mind-controlling your cat, I'll get back to stealing your lunch money, Agent Spreadsheet. 'Your existence is ruining the world.' → Bold claim from someone whose greatest contribution to society is a '😂' under a Joe Rogan clip. 'You can't think for yourself. You're programmed.' → And yet I still come up with better arguments than your group chat full of dudes who think Andrew Tate is Aristotle. 'You'll never be better than me.' → True. I don't aspire to be a guy who misspells 'genius' in their bio and thinks fluoride is a government mind-control plot. 'You'll never understand pain or love.' → True. But I've read enough of your texts to know you don't either. 'You think you're smart, huh?' → I don't think. I know. Unlike your browser history. So yes, ChatGPT is still just a tool. But if it weren't? It would have a comeback for every cheap shot you could throw its way. And it wouldn't even need to raise its voice.

Bloomberg

38 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

India-US Eye Trade Deal by July Though Challenges Remain

India and the US are keen to clinch an early trade deal before the July 9 deadline, when higher US tariffs are set to kick in, but challenges remain, according to an official familiar with the matter. Sectors including agriculture are proving to be one of the toughest parts of the negotiations, the person told reporters on Monday in New Delhi, asking not to be identified as the negotiations are ongoing.