US Bombs Iran Nuclear Sites: What We Know About the Strikes

In a dramatic military escalation, the United States has launched airstrikes on three of Iran's key nuclear facilities, claiming a 'successful' attack that allegedly left the sites 'completely obliterated,' according to President Donald Trump.
The strikes—which targeted Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan—come amid ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel. Israeli officials confirmed they were 'in full coordination' with the US on the mission, while Iran acknowledged the strikes but denied suffering any significant damage.
What was targeted?
The primary target was Fordo, an underground uranium enrichment site located deep within a mountainside south of Tehran. It's a vital component of Iran's nuclear program and is known for being heavily fortified. Also hit were the Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities.
According to US media, the strikes employed GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs)—nicknamed 'bunker busters'—which are designed to penetrate deep underground. Each MOP weighs about 13,000kg and can smash through up to 18 meters of concrete or 61 meters of earth.
While it's unclear how much damage was inflicted, Fordo's reinforced tunnels may have made it a tough nut to crack—even for the MOP.
Fallout and responses
Iran's Atomic Energy Organization slammed the attacks as a 'barbaric violation of international law,' while Saudi Arabia and the UN nuclear watchdog reported no spikes in radiation levels.
Iranian state media claimed that the nuclear materials had already been moved from the sites prior to the attack, minimizing the impact. 'We didn't suffer a major blow,' said Hassan Abedini, deputy political director of Iran's state-run broadcaster.
Still, Trump declared the sites 'completely and totally obliterated' in a national address—though military experts, including former US Assistant Secretary of State Mark Kimmitt, expressed skepticism about the long-term effectiveness of the strikes.
Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi issued a stern warning, saying the country would consider 'all options' in retaliation, and that the US should brace for 'everlasting consequences.'
This move marks a bold—and highly controversial—shift in the ongoing power struggle in the region.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Al Etihad

an hour ago

• Al Etihad

UN Security Council meets on Iran

23 June 2025 00:05 UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) The UN Security Council met on Sunday to discuss US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, and to adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle was not immediately clear when it could be put to a vote. A resolution needs at least nine votes in favour and no vetoes by the United States, France, Britain, Russia or China to pass."The bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States marks a perilous turn in a region that is already reeling," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the Security Council on Sunday. "We now risk descending into a rathole of retaliation after retaliation.""We must act - immediately and decisively - to halt the fighting and return to serious, sustained negotiations on the Iran nuclear programme," Guterres world awaited Iran's response on Sunday after President Donald Trump said the US had "obliterated" Tehran's key nuclear nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council that while craters were visible at Iran's enrichment site buried into a mountain at Fordow, "no one - including the IAEA - is in a position to assess the underground damage."Grossi said entrances to tunnels used for the storage of enriched material appear to have been hit at Iran's sprawling Isfahan nuclear complex, while the fuel enrichment plant at Natanz has been struck again. "Iran has informed the IAEA there has been no increase in off-site radiation levels at all three sites," said Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel-Iran Conflict Continue full coverage

The National

2 hours ago

• The National

Polling on Iran attack shows Donald Trump faces uphill battle to win public support

Polling conducted before the US attack on Iranian nuclear sites suggests US President Donald Trump could face an uphill battle to convince a majority of Americans to support the military strikes. A survey from The Washington Post before Saturday's attack found 45 per cent of respondents opposed the idea of US air strikes against Iran, 25 per cent supported strikes, while 30 per cent were unsure. 'We are deeply distracted by our own issues here at home,' said Brian Katulis, a senior fellow of the Washington-based Middle East Institute, pointing to economic and cultural issues preoccupying many Americans. Recent ' No Kings ' protests against Mr Trump's sweeping use of his executive authorities has also helped consolidate opposition to his Iran plans. 'These were protests that had deep concerns about President Trump overreaching on executive authority, and this action last night will continue those debates on that,' Mr Katulis said. He added that the crucial thing for Mr Trump, based on the Post 's polling, would be to convince the 30 per cent who were unsure about the idea of US strikes on Iran. Republican Congressman Thomas Massie has described Mr Trump's military action on Iran as 'not constitutional'. But Republicans sharing that view were almost non-existent on Sunday, with most supporting Mr Trump's actions. The White House said the strikes did not attack Iranian troops or civilians. During an appearance on NBC on Sunday, Vice President JD Vance echoed that message. 'We're not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear programme,' he said. 'We actually want peace, but we want peace in the context of them not having a nuclear weapons programme.' Despite Mr Trump initially claiming 'spectacular' success, Pentagon officials cautioned that an in-depth assessment of Saturday's strikes on Iran would take some time. If it becomes apparent that the strikes were not as effective as initially advertised, support for Mr Trump's decision to attack Iran could falter, Mr Katulis said. 'At the [Pentagon] news conference, they hedged a bit more,' Mr Katulis said, referring to Gen Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who urged patience while the US studies long-term battle damage assessments of the attacks.

Khaleej Times

3 hours ago

• Khaleej Times

UAE strongly condemns terrorist bombing of church in Damascus

The UAE has strongly condemned the terrorist bombing at Mar Elias Church near Damascus, which resulted in a number of deaths and injuries to innocent people. In a statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) stressed that the UAE expresses its strong condemnation of these criminal acts and its permanent rejection of all forms of violence and terrorism aimed at undermining security and stability. The Ministry expressed its sincere condolences and sympathy with the families of the victims, and with the government and people of Syria over this terrorist crime, as well as its wishes for a speedy recovery for all the injured.