K-P is abandoning children
The writer is a Lecturer in English at the Higher Education Department, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Email him at namdar057@gmail.com
Listen to article
Let's call it what it is: K-P is abandoning its children. Not metaphorically, not in the way people toss around, 'Oh, the system is broken.' No. The system isn't broken; it's functioning exactly as it's allowed to, with chilling indifference to the rights of the most vulnerable.
A recent report by the provincial Education Department pulls no punches. Legions of children enrolled in over 10,000 public schools across K-P arrive each day at buildings as bare as unfinished construction sites. No boundary walls. No electricity. No washrooms. Not even drinking water.
Over 5,000 schools in K-P operate without a single watt of electricity. In more than 2,000 schools, safe drinking water is a rarity. Thousands more lack washrooms or a protective wall around them. In Peshawar — the provincial capital itself — 21 schools are in the dark, 15 can't offer clean water, 17 lack even a toilet and eight stand exposed, wall-less, to the city's sprawl. Peshawar, not some remote hillside village!
Think about that for a second. We send our children off to elite schools in cars, armed with water bottles, packed lunches and backpacks stuffed with textbooks. Meanwhile, countless children in this country walk into schools that don't even have a toilet. Is this the dignity we promise every child under the Constitution?
Yet, millions don't even get this indignity because they never enter a school at all. Thirty-seven per cent of children in K-P are out of school altogether. That's millions of futures we're snuffing out before they even begin. Nearly eight out of every 10 children in Lower and Upper Kohistan never even make it into a classroom. In Peshawar alone, over half a million are out of school — of those, 319,000 are girls. It's not a gender gap anymore; it's a gulf.
And if you thought the ones lucky enough to be enrolled were at least getting a decent education, think again. Because unable to fund enough textbooks, the province now prints half and asks schools to source the rest from promotees, turning scarcity into strategy.
The hand-me-down model might sound thrifty, but in practice, it's a debacle. Most old books either fall apart, go missing or are defaced with scribbles, tears and tea stains. And let's be honest: a lot of students just don't return them. So expecting this to work as a long-term plan isn't just lazy or absurd; it's negligent!
What all this adds up to is a blatant violation of Article 25-A of the Constitution which guarantees every child the right to free and compulsory education. It also tramples all over the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Free Compulsory Primary and Secondary Education Act, 2017. Laws on paper, like fire alarms in buildings no one checks.
Turning this around requires the provincial government to act decisively across several fronts.
First, it needs to stop pretending its job is done at enrolment. Children need functioning schools, not just roll numbers. Fixing basic infrastructure — electricity, toilets, clean water, boundary walls — isn't some high-minded reform; it's the minimum standard of decency.
Second, launch a real plan - not just window dressing - to bring out-of-school children (OOSC) into the system. This must include targeted efforts in high-need areas like Kohistan — even Peshawar — and the tribal districts, especially for girls left behind in droves.
Third, stop slashing textbook budgets and start facing reality. If the government wants students to reuse books, it must put in place a real system to collect and track them. Or better yet, fund a full print run, because this isn't where we should be paisa-pinching.
This isn't a resource issue; it's a priority issue. And so far, our priorities are glaringly apparent in every broken classroom, every empty desk and every torn-up textbook.
K-P is failing its children. And if this doesn't set off alarms, maybe we've failed too. Because at the very least, K-P's children deserve better. That shouldn't be a radical thing to say.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
16 hours ago
- Express Tribune
SHC orders opening of Governor House for acting governor
The Constitutional Bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC), comprising Justice K.K. Agha and Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, heard Acting Governor Owais Qadir Shah's petition challenging the locking of Governor House offices. The court ordered the immediate reopening of these offices and directed the principal secretary to submit a compliance report by June 23. During the urgent hearing, the bench granted acting governor immediate access to the Sindh Governor's official residence. The court specifically ordered the unlocking of all offices (excluding private residential quarters) and restrained the principal secretary from obstructing the acting governor's access. The court also directed that a copy of the judicial order be transmitted to the President of Pakistan and the Principal Secretary of the Governor's House, Sindh. In the petition, it was averred that since assuming charge, the Acting Governor, Owais Qadir Shah, has been denied entry to the Governor's House for official duties which is a violation of Article 104 of the Constitution. Governor Kamran Tessori has been abroad since June 2. Acting Governor of Sindh, Owais Qadir Shah, informed the court that a meeting on law and order in the was scheduled for today, specifically to discuss matters related to Muharram. The home minister, secretary, IG Sindh, and other officials reached for the meeting. However, the principal secretary stated that the governor had taken the office keys with him. Owais Qadir Shah stated that this was an act of considering the Governor's House as their personal lounge. He cited the Constitution, which clearly states that in the absence of the governor, the acting governor can perform duties. Owais Qadir Shah said, he would write to the chief minister, highlighting that this was a mockery of the Constitution.
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Acting governor be given full access to Governor's House: SHC
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has directed the Principal Secretary of the Governor of Sindh to grant full access to the Acting Governor, Syed Awais Qadir Shah, to all official rooms, offices, and chambers within the Governor House. In a constitutional petition, Syed Awais Qadir Shah, who is also the Speaker of the Sindh Assembly, pleaded that despite Governor Sindh Kamran Tessori being abroad, and as per Article 104 of the Constitution, which mandates the Speaker to perform the Governor's functions, he was being denied access to the Governor House and its associated offices. The petitioner's counsels, Barrister Azain Memon and Zubair Ali Butt, argued that the Principal Secretary had repeatedly refused the petitioner and his staff access to the Governor House, despite formal requests; this denial hindered the Acting Governor's ability to perform his official duties. The court was informed that the denial of access was not an isolated incident but had occurred multiple times, including on the day of the hearing. The petitioner sought immediate and unobstructed access to the Governor House and its resources to discharge his duties as Acting Governor. The Advocate General Sindh, Jawad Dero, stated that the Acting Governor was legally entitled to use the Governor House for official business. The court, after interpreting Article 104, concluded that the petitioner could not be denied access to the Governor House to carry out his official duties. The court directed the Principal Secretary to provide immediate access to the Acting Governor to all rooms, offices, and chambers in the Governor House, except the residential portion, to enable him to perform his official duties. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
20 hours ago
- Express Tribune
CB mulls SC powers for 'complete justice'
Some members of a constitutional bench (CB) of the Supreme Court raised a number of questions with regard to the SC's powers to ensure "complete justice". They also asked how non allocations of reserved seats to the PTI could be called a violation of fundamental rights. PTI leader Kanwal Shauzab's counsel Salman Akram Raja on Friday resumed his arguments in support of the SC's July 12 majority order in the reserved seats case before the 11-member CB led by Justice Aminuddin Khan that is hearing review petitions against the verdict. Raja, in his arguments, stated that it is the responsibility of this court to protect fundamental rights and this responsibility is assigned to it by the Constitution. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail asked Raja as to how Article 187 applies in this case. Article 187(1) gives the Supreme Court the power to issue any order or direction necessary for doing complete justice in any case pending before it while Article 187(2) gives it the powers as a civil court to enforce its decisions, including issuing orders to any person or authority. Raja replied that he would explain this in detail later. He said the Supreme Court has broader authority and can use Article 187 together with Article 184 to deliver complete justice. Justice Mandokhail asked whether Article 184(3) is used in public interest cases. Salman Akram Raja responded in the affirmative. He said the SC can use Article 184(3) for public interest and fundamental rights. "When there is destruction or crisis, one does not ask which article appliesthen the Supreme Court must step forward and do what is necessary." Justice Mandokhail asked whether, if a constitutional violation occurs but no specific article applies, the SC should still take action. The lawyer said in such a situation, the SC should do whatever is necessary. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar noted that Article 199 cannot be read together with Article 187. He remarked that under Article 199, the high court has powers that even the Supreme Court does not possess. Article 199 of the Constitution outlines the writ jurisdiction of the high courts. It empowers high courts to issue various writs (orders) to enforce fundamental rights and ensure lawful conduct by authorities. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar asked what, in his view, are the limits of the Supreme Court's powers. Justice Jamal Mandokhail said, "My brother judge suggests that there must be some limit to the powers. Does the Supreme Court have unlimited powers in every case?" He then asked whether any constitutional or legal violation occurred in the majority decision of the reserved seats case. Salman Akram Raja said, "There was no overreach in the Supreme Court's decision." Justice Mandokhail remarked that the Constitution itself gives parties the right to join within three days. Justice Aminuddin Khan interjected.
