Whistleblowers Raise Concerns Over Air India Safety Standards, Airline Says 'No Wrongdoing'

Last Updated:
In a letter dated June 19, two former Air India cabin crew members have alleged that they warned the airline of safety lapses but were terminated for speaking up
Amid multiple flight cancellations or delays over technical glitches, post the Dreamliner crash in Ahmedabad on June 12, whistleblowers have raised concerns over Air India's safety standards.
The whistleblowers told News18 that they were silenced with terminations when they flagged safety lapses to Air India, but the airline service denied the allegations and said there was 'no wrongdoing", as determined by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), on its part and passenger safety was its highest priority.
WHAT ARE THE ALLEGATIONS?
In a letter dated June 19 (Thursday), two former Air India cabin crew members alleged that they warned the airline of safety lapses but were terminated for speaking up.
According to the letter, they raised a specific incident on May 14, 2024, when a door number L4's slide raft opened in manual mode. This was confirmed in writing by the pilot.
The whistleblowers said the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) conducted only an 'informal discussion", but there was no formal probe into the incident.
The key allegations are that Air India ignored their warnings on aircraft defects and overlooked multiple complaints regarding technical glitches with the Boeing 787/8 Dreamliner, the same model type of the crashed flight 171. They said there was pressure on them by the airline to alter their statements, which they refused.
They alleged that after they refused to change their statements, they were terminated without any proper inquiry.
Kanani said the aircraft were not fit for the route from San Francisco to any place in India as they passed over high maintenance terrain, where depressurisation can happen.
'It means that passengers and crew would need oxygen or they'll pass out. So, in these cases pilots start descending to reach an altitude of 10,000 feet that is not safe but acceptable. Pressurisation happens at 13,500 feet. It is at 10,000 feet that the aircraft systems raise warnings. The Delta 777 aircraft were carrying 12 minutes of oxygen and the law states 10 minutes of oxygen is fine, but only in certain conditions. This route violated those conditions," Kanani said.
He said the airline was endangering the lives of thousands by flying on this route for years.
WHAT DO EXPERTS SAY?
An expert told News18 that technical snag or glitch in an aircraft is an umbrella term. While these are common, after the Dreamliner crash, airlines and aircraft operators were being more cautious and even the tiniest glitch is being addressed with seriousness.
'Technical snag or glitch in an aircraft is an umbrella term that may mean any system malfunction including issues with various aircraft systems like the engine, hydraulics, electrical, fuel, or flight control systems. It may also be sensors related or issues with instruments in the cockpit," the expert said.
The expert added: 'This also is a reason why we are seeing an increase in flights being grounded or called back following technical issues."
WHAT DID AIR INDIA SAY?
Kanani apparently won the case against his termination before the high court, which observed: 'We are of the view this is not a matter of bilateral dispute between two parties, but a matter that involves issues of a wider social impact involving flight safety and passenger safety."
Responding to Kanani's remarks, Air India said he has raised alarms with limited basis even before the privatisation of the airline.
'…This particular matter in question is multi-dimensional and has already been examined by Air India and external experts. It is entirely incorrect to say Capt Kanani won the case in the Bombay High Court," a spokesperson said.
The spokesperson said the high court stressed that it was not expressing a view on the merits of the matter and, owing to its technical nature, referred the question to the DGCA.
'The DGCA considered the matter and found that there was no wrongdoing on Air India's part, as alleged by Kanani before the court," the spokesperson added. 'Capt Kanani repeatedly refused to comply with legitimate company requests and was accordingly terminated from service."
Air India reiterated that passenger and crew safety was its 'foremost priority and there is no compromise on the same".
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Ahmedabad Plane Crash Air India
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 19, 2025, 22:42 IST
News india Whistleblowers Raise Concerns Over Air India Safety Standards, Airline Says 'No Wrongdoing'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

NDTV

4 hours ago

• NDTV

Pics: Air India Cabin Crew Member's Funeral In Manipur, Thousands Mourn

The body of Air India cabin crew Lamnunthem Singson reached her hometown in Manipur's Kangpokpi district on Thursday night, after being flown to Dimapur airport in Nagaland. The 26-year-old was among the 241 passengers and crew aboard Air India Flight AI 171, which crashed just seconds after takeoff in Ahmedabad last week. Thousands gathered in her home town to pay tribute and their final respects. Originally from Old Lambulane colony in Imphal, Singson's family relocated to Kangpokpi in 2023 following ethnic violence between the Meitei and Kuki communities in the state.

First Post

4 hours ago

• First Post

Bengaluru doctor threatened to crash Air India Express plane. Here's why

Dr Vyas Hiral Mohanbhai, a 36-year-old female doctor, has been charged with allegedly threatening to crash an Air India Express flight bound for Surat in Gujarat. Officials said the incident began when she asked the cabin crew to bring her hand baggage, which she had left near the front row, to her assigned seat at 20F. The situation escalated when she allegedly threatened to 'crash the plane', leading the crew to alert the pilot read more A 36-year-old woman doctor has been booked for creating a disturbance and allegedly threatening to crash an Air India Express flight heading to Gujarat's Surat. The incident happened earlier this week on Tuesday afternoon in Bengaluru. The woman has been identified as Dr Vyas Hiral Mohanbhai, a 36-year-old resident of Yelahanka. ALSO READ | Air India black box damaged: Is this a setback to the probe? What happens now? This comes just days after the deadly crash of Air India flight AI 171, which claimed the lives of 241 people on board and around 29 others on the ground. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what led the doctor to make such a threat? And what are the consequences of making such claims? Let's find out: What happened? A female doctor allegedly threatened to crash an Air India Express flight. Dr Vyas Hiral Mohanbhai, 36, from Yelahanka, was taken off the flight after the incident, according to The Indian Express. But what led to the disturbance? Officials said the trouble began when Dr Mohanbhai asked cabin crew to carry her hand baggage, which she had left near the front row, to her assigned seat at 20F. When asked about why her bag was placed there, she reportedly became upset. The incident happened earlier this week on Tuesday afternoon in Bengaluru. Pixabay/Representational Image The situation got worse when she allegedly threatened to 'crash the plane,' leading the cabin crew to inform the pilot. Despite several attempts by the crew and the pilot to calm her down, she reportedly refused to cooperate. She also shouted at other passengers who tried to speak to her, NDTV reported. The pilot and crew then called airport security and CISF personnel, who removed her from the aircraft. According to the complaint, the incident went on from around 2.45 pm to 5.30 pm on June 17. Police added that her aggressive behaviour continued at the KIA police station, where she allegedly abused and assaulted officers. 'This was the first time we heard such abusive language in the station,' a senior officer told Business Standard. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Her husband, who works at an educational institute in Bengaluru and is originally from Odisha, told police she had stopped working as a doctor and was travelling to Gujarat to visit family. He also told the publication that she had caused similar public disturbances in the past. What is the punishment for such behaviour? The Bengaluru International Airport Limited (BIAL) police booked Dr Mohanbhai under sections 351(4) (criminal intimidation by anonymous communication) and 353(1)(b) (statements causing public mischief) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and under section 3(1)(a) of the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, which covers acts of violence on board that may put the flight's safety at risk. In a separate case on the same day, Sadaad Mohammad Baba, 22, from Srinagar, reportedly tried to force his way through departure gate 8 at Terminal 1 of the airport. When CISF personnel stopped him, he allegedly pushed a security officer. Police booked him under sections 132 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 221 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), and 329(2) (criminal trespass) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. ALSO READ | Emergency landings, U-turn, tech glitches… What's going on with Air India? Disruptions continue post Air India crash This incident took place after the recent crash of Air India flight AI 171 in Ahmedabad, which killed 241 of the 242 people on board. The London-bound flight crashed soon after taking off from Ahmedabad airport. It struck the BJ Medical College Hostel near the airport, leading to the deaths of around 29 people on the ground. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Since the crash, multiple Air India flights have been either cancelled or diverted. The airline has announced that it will cut down services on 16 international routes linking cities in North America, Europe, Australia, and the Far East. It will also suspend three routes between June 21 and July 15.

New Indian Express

4 hours ago

• New Indian Express

DGCA warned Air India for violation of safety protocols in Airbus planes days before AI171 crash: Report

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) had warned Air India of safety protocol violations after three of its Airbus planes continued operations despite pending security checks of emergency systems, Reuters reported, citing government documents. Air India has come under fire after its AI171 aircraft- a Boeing 787 -8 Dreamliner- crashed during takeoff from the Sardar Vallabhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad, killing all but one of the 242 people on board in addition to at least 28 people on the ground. According to the DGCA report cited by Reuters, the aviation watchdog found that three Air India Airbus planes were being operated despite mandatory inspections being overdue on the "critical emergency equipment" of escape slides, during spot checks last month. In one case, an Airbus A320 jet was found to have flown to international destinations such as Dubai, Riyadh and Jeddah, despite an over one-month delay in carrying out inspections.