Is this proof we're living in a ‘simulated universe'? Scientist's theory points to possible clue
Are we living in 'The Matrix' in real life?
In the 1999 science-fiction film, Neo discovers that the universe is a simulation — but one scientist believes that the idea isn't all fiction.
Dr. Melvin Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth in the UK, believes that gravity is a sign that we are living in a virtual simulation and the universe is the 'ultimate computer,' he alleged in a new paper.
Advertisement
4 Dr. Melvin Vopson believes that the concept in 'The Matrix' isn't all fiction.
Warner Bros/Village Roadshow Pictures/Kobal / Shutterstock
In the research, published in AIP Advances, Vopson proposes the idea that gravity isn't just a 'pull' — it's actually something that occurs when the universe is trying to keep its data organized.
Forcing objects with mass to be pulled toward the Earth's core is similar to how computers compress code, Vopson claimed.
Advertisement
4 Keanu Reeves in 'The Matrix.'
Everett Collection
He added in the paper that gravitational pull is an 'example of data compression and computational optimization in our universe, which supports the possibility of a simulated or computational universe.'
'The universe evolves in a way that the information content in it is compressed, optimized and organized – just as computers and computer code do,' he told the Daily Mail. 'Hence, gravity appears to be another process of data compression in a possibly simulated universe.'
The gravitational attraction helps reduce 'information entropy,' which essentially means how much information there is in an object in any given space, the study alleges.
Advertisement
4 In the 1999 science-fiction film, Neo discovers that the universe is a simulation.
Warner Bros/Village Roadshow Pictures/Kobal / Shutterstock
Gravity plays many roles in space, including the building of galaxies, putting planets into orbit around stars and influencing the motion of nearby objects. So, in Vopson's theory, these objects may be pulled together because the universe is simply trying to keep everything clean and compressed.
'To put it simply, it is easier to compute all the properties and characteristics of a single object in space, rather than multiple objects,' he told the Daily Mail. 'That is why objects in space are pulled together.'
4 The typical evolution of matter in the universe under gravitational attraction.
AIP Advances
Advertisement
His belief stems from the concept of entropy in information theory, which he has argued in a previous paper.
'A super complex universe like ours, if it were a simulation, would require a built-in data optimization and compression in order to reduce the computational power and the data storage requirements to run the simulation,' he explained in a piece for The Conversation in 2023.
'This is exactly what we are observing all around us, including in digital data, biological systems, mathematical symmetries and the entire universe.'
This time, rather, Vopson focused on gravity rather than biological systems.
'My findings in this study fit with the thought that the universe might work like a giant computer, or our reality is a simulated construct,' Vopson explained in a statement.
'Just like computers try to save space and run more efficiently, the universe might be doing the same. It's a new way to think about gravity – not just as a pull, but as something that happens when the universe is trying to stay organized.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
5 days ago
- Forbes
A Huge Update On ‘The Pitt' Season 2's Unusual Release Date On HBO Max
The Pitt The Pitt is on course to land a bunch of Emmys, most likely, after its stellar run on Max (soon to be HBO Max). Now, WB wants to take advantage of this lightning in a bottle, and use it to create an entire thunderstorm on its service with rapid-fire, lengthy seasons like broadcast TV of old (I am told broadcast TV still exists). We have a big update about The Pitt season 2 from Max itself. They released a 'filming has begun' video on social media that confirms season 2 is not just written, it's already in motion. And yes, it's confirmed that The Pitt season 2's release date will be in January of 2026, one year after the January 9, 2025 release of the stunning 15-episode season 1. Stunning because the show was good, but also stunning because of the fact it was 15 episodes. And it's likely that season 2 will match that as it continues its 'single shift' concept, channeling 24 and Jack Bauer from years past. We know more than just the date, and here's a roundup of the information that we have about season 2: The Pitt More information will emerge in time, but it's crazy to think that with this announcement, we are already seven months away from a new season of the show. I cannot think of a single streaming show that produces 15, 45+ minute episodes once a year. Even ones that manage yearly releases are things like six-episode seasons of Slow Horses or shorter, fewer episodes like The Bear or Only Murders in the Building. The Pitt is something special, and hopefully, season 2 will retain season 1's quality. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Edinburgh residents baffled as streets become 'dystopian future' for film set
Edinburgh residents opened their windows to find themselves in the future, after a film set transformed the city streets. Those in the old town will have spotted cast and crew on set, with several spots in the area taken over for filming. The Warner Bros set is understood to be JJ Abrams upcoming movie, Ghostwriter. It's rumoured to have a cast including the likes of Samuel L Jackson, Glen Powell, Jenna Ortega and Emma Mackey. While details have been kept under wraps, the film is said to be a sci-fi story that tells of a writer whose fictional, futuristic world turns out to be very much real. READ MORE: Edinburgh resident makes disturbing discovery after noticing 'gate left open' READ MORE: Popular Edinburgh Old Town pub transformed as filming gets underway in capital Production is also said to be happening in London. Spots in Edinburgh such as West College Street, Merchant Street, and Chambers Street are being used as filming locations. On Tuesday, Candlemaker Row was transformed into a dystopian set, with residents impressed One posted to TikTok: "POV - you're walking around Edinburgh and enter a dystopian future." Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox Another resident responded: "Warner Bros trucks have been seen in the city along with a couple of big actors." A second asked: "Most important question, will this affect Greggs opening time?" Locals first spotted the cast and crew setting up in Holyrood Park. It's understood that the film is set for release in 2026, though this is yet to be confirmed. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. One lifelong Samuel L Jackson fan claims to have had an interaction with his hero while the star is here filming in Edinburgh. Matt's partner, Rosie, told Edinburgh Live: "Matt finally had his dream come true this week when the legendary actor was spotted filming scenes for his new movie Ghostwriter in the city. "Determined not to miss his hero, Matt camped out for 15 hours near the filming location with snacks, a fold-up chair, and unshakable optimism. Armed with only hope and a homemade sign that read 'I've had it with these motherlovin' waits!' he finally got the moment he'd waited a lifetime for."
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Yahoo
A bottlenose dolphin? Or Tursiops truncatus? Why biologists give organisms those strange, unpronounceable names
Most people would call it a 'field mouse,' but a scientist would ask, 'Was it Peromyscus maniculatus? Or Peromyscus leucopus?' Scientists use a system of complicated-sounding names to refer to everyday creatures, a practice heavily lampooned in the Warner Bros. cartoons featuring the Road Runner and Wile E. Coyote – or, respectively, Accelleratii incredibus and Carnivorous vulgaris. As a biologist, I use these seemingly odd names myself and help my students learn them. For most people it's a huge effort, like learning a second language. That's because it is. The science of naming and classifying organisms is called taxonomy. Scientists do this so they can be as precise as possible when discussing living things. The first word in an organism's name is its genus, which is a group of related species, such as Panthera for lions, tigers and leopards. The second word is the specific name identifying the species, usually defined as a population that can reproduce only with each other, such as Panthera leo for lion. Every two-word combination must be unique. Called binomial nomenclature, this naming system was popularized by Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus in the 1700s. So, humans are Homo sapiens, the red maple Acer rubrum, garlic Allium sativum, and the eastern spotted skunk Spilogale putorius. Today, biologists maintain huge databases containing the taxonomic names of plants, animals, fungi and other organisms. For instance, one of these databases – the Open Tree of Life project – includes over 2.3 million species. The scientist who discovers a species usually names it by publishing a formal description in a peer-reviewed journal. From there, the name makes its way into the databases. From then on, scientists always use that name for the organism, even if it turns out to be misleading. For example, many fossils were originally given names containing the Greek root 'saur,' which means lizard – even though paleontologists later realized dinosaurs were not lizards. To most people, these names sound inscrutable. Particularly nowadays, as science becomes more open and accessible to everyone, such arcane vocabulary can come across as old-fashioned and elitist. Given the current backlash against 'elites' and 'experts' in every field, that's a serious charge. But in a roundabout way, this seemingly exclusive practice is really a story of inclusiveness. As modern science began taking shape in Europe during the 1600s, scientists had a problem. They wanted to read and be read by others, but language got in the way. French scientists couldn't read Swedish, Swedes couldn't read Italian, and Italians couldn't read German. Also, writing about plants and animals posed a particular challenge: Many species had common names that could vary from place to place, and some common names might apply to multiple species. Scientists needed a way to be precise and consistent when referring to species, so that everyone could understand each other. To sidestep the language issue, scientists of the era mostly published their work in classical Latin. Back then, everyone learned it – at least every European man wealthy enough to attend school and become a scientist. Others published in classical Greek, also widely taught. By sticking with these more universally known languages, early scientists made sure that science was accessible to as many of their peers as possible. By the late 1700s and 1800s, translation services were broadly available, so naturalists such as Georges Cuvier could write in his native French, and Charles Darwin in his native English. Today, English has become the de facto language for science, so most scientists publish in English regardless of their native tongue. So why continue to use Latin and Greek names today? Taxonomists do it partly out of tradition, but partly because the terminology is still useful. Even without seeing a photo of the animal, a biologist might work out that Geomys bursarius – 'earth-mouse with a pouch' – was a pocket gopher. Or that Reithrodontomys fulvescens – 'groove-toothed mouse that is yellow' – is a yellow mouse with grooves on its incisors. Although taxonomists still largely adhere to the naming principles of Linnaeus, new scientific names are more and more frequently derived from non-European languages. For example, a chicken-size dinosaur discovered and named in China is called Yi qi, meaning 'strange wing' in Mandarin. Some of the more recent names are touched by whimsy, with a few honoring politicians and celebrities. Etheostoma obama is a spangled darter named after the 44th U.S. president; the Swift twisted-claw millipede – Nannaria swiftae – is named after pop star Taylor Swift. With so much of Earth's biodiversity yet to be discovered and named, remember that names are just names. What we call these species often reflects our own values and perspectives. In the future, another language – or no language at all – might rise to dominance. Artificial intelligence may act as a universal translator. This possibility would let everyone publish and read science in their own language. Predicting how technology will change our relationship with terminology is challenging, but the need for precise scientific language, including the names of species, will never go away. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Nicholas Green, Kennesaw State University Read more: How many types of insects are there in the world? Thousands of undiscovered mammal species may be hidden in plain sight, new research finds Scientists discover five new species of black corals living thousands of feet below the ocean surface near the Great Barrier Reef Nicholas Green does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
