With Rich Nations in Disarray, Barbados Calls for Climate Action in Global South
Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley called on developing countries to work together on climate as a way to counteract absent leadership and cuts in funding from rich countries.
Mottley urged dozens of heads of state and ministers from developing countries who gathered in Bridgetown, the capital of Barbados, for the Sustainable Energy for All Global Forum meeting on Wednesday to focus on ensuring universal access to clean, cheap and reliable energy. 'We need to create opportunities for each other, and I genuinely believe that that is entirely possible,' she said on stage in an interview with Bloomberg's Zero podcast.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Iranian Missiles Intercepted Over Tel Aviv
Iranian missiles intercepted over Tel Aviv in the early hours of Saturday, June 21, 2025. (Source: Bloomberg)
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
UK backs Nigerian trade goals with 99% duty-free export access
The United Kingdom has reaffirmed that 99% of goods exported from Nigeria will continue to enjoy duty-free access under its Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS), a move seen as vital for Nigeria's non-oil export ambitions and bilateral trade growth. The UK confirmed 99% of Nigerian exports will remain duty-free under the Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS). This scheme benefits Nigerian non-oil products, particularly in agriculture and raw materials, for UK's market access. Nigerian government aligns this opportunity with its Zero-Oil Plan to diversify economic exports and improve infrastructure. The confirmation was made during a courtesy visit by the British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Dr Richard Montgomery, to Nigeria's Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Jumoke Oduwole in Abuja. According to both parties, the DCTS remains a crucial pillar of trade relations between the two countries. The scheme, which came into force in June 2023, replaced the UK's Generalized System of Preferences. It aims to boost trade with 65 developing countries by simplifying trading rules and reducing import duties on a wide range of products. Under this arrangement, Nigerian exports especially agricultural products and raw materials will continue to access the UK market without tariffs, provided they meet the origin requirements and other scheme conditions. New trade deal supports Nigeria's efforts to grow non-oil exports Montgomery emphasized that the UK is committed to helping Nigeria fully benefit from the DCTS. He noted that while duty-free access is in place, more needs to be done to support Nigerian exporters in meeting UK market standards, including product quality, packaging, and regulatory compliance. He added that the British High Commission is actively engaging with Nigerian businesses and trade associations to create more awareness and provide technical assistance where needed. On her part, Minister Jumoke Oduwole described the UK's continued support as timely, particularly as Nigeria intensifies efforts to diversify its economy away from crude oil dependence. She reiterated that the DCTS aligns with Nigeria's national goals under the Zero-Oil Plan, which seeks to increase earnings from agriculture, manufacturing, and creative exports. She also revealed that the Federal Government is working closely with stakeholders to scale up export readiness across multiple sectors, including the removal of logistics barriers, improving port infrastructure, and ensuring that exporters are educated on documentation and compliance. With the UK standing as one of Nigeria's top trading partners, the decision to uphold duty-free treatment under the DCTS reinforces Britain's post-Brexit trade approach while providing Nigerian exporters with a stable and preferential gateway into a high-value international market.
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Why Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' is failing the migrant crisis
The violent anti-ICE riots that erupted in Los Angeles last week were the inevitable result of years of Washington's failure to enforce immigration law. As masked mobs torched government property and assaulted officers tasked with upholding the rule of law, one thing became clear: the border crisis isn't just at the border. 4 The US needs upwards of 1,000 additional immigration judges to tackle the migrant crisis effectively. But the funding is currently lacking. Bloomberg via Getty Images President Trump vowed to restore order through mass deportations — and he can, but only if Congress does its part. That means recognizing the core problem that's too often ignored: without a functioning immigration court system, no one can actually be deported. Right now, more than 4 million migrant cases are languishing in limbo, inviting new waves of illegal immigration. The message this sends is to cross the border and work freely for up to 10 years while waiting for a hearing until it is inhumane to be deported. Advertisement Congress is starting to notice. Buried in the House's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is $1.25 billion in funding to hire 250 immigration judges and their staff. Extra judges is welcome news, but the appropriation is insufficient. According to my estimates, we need 1,000 more immigration judges to eliminate the court backlog by the end of President Trump's term. Although the bill allocates over $100 billion for border security, it almost entirely ignores the greatest obstacle to deportations: the underfunded immigration court system. 4 President Trump has allocated $1.25 billion for new judges, but that number will barely dent the problem ALLISON DINNER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock What would it really cost to get the immigration court system back on track? Hiring 250 judges annually carries a price tag of $4.7 billion over five years, about three dollars per American. This would give every immigrant due process and help send home the millions who are legally deportable. That is scarcely a rounding error in the federal budget, yet it is the difference between enforcing the law and surrendering to chaos. The OBBB as it stands offers only a quarter of what is required. Yet immigration courts are only half the story. US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is sitting on 1.4 million affirmative asylum applications — cases filed by people who arrive in the US on a visa. Because asylum-seekers pay no filing fee, the backlog is funded almost entirely by jacking up costs on high-skilled immigrants, who now shoulder a $600 surcharge every time their employers file paperwork. This is unfair and insufficient. Advertisement 4 The Department of Homeland Security has offered illegal migrants $1,000 to help them 'self-deport.' Ron Sachs – CNP On this issue, Congress is doing exactly what it should and is proposing a $1,000 asylum filing fee. Under current conditions, such a fee would raise $400 million in annual revenue — enough to hire hundreds of asylum officers. Legitimate asylees already spend thousands on legal assistance, so costs are not a new barrier. Rather, the costs ensure that those who benefit from asylum bear the burden of processing applications, instead of other legal immigrants. The Republican-proposed fee also ensures that fraudulent asylum applications are a less attractive path for illegal immigrants. To further dissuade fraudulent asylum, Trump's USCIS and Executive Office for Immigration Review should revive the last-in, first-out rule they implemented in his first term. This rule would process the most recent asylum filings before older ones. The policy proved effective since would-be border crossers and visa overstayers learned that bogus asylum claims would be denied quickly, thus shrinking the inflow. Reinstated alongside a surge of judges and asylum officers, last-in-first-out would end future illegal immigration while working through the backlog of current illegal immigrants. 4 Until sufficient resources are provided to adequately process both new and backlogged migrant cases, protests such as the anti-ICE riots will continue. Advertisement Critics scoff that nearly $5 billion is too much and argue for scrapping the deportation court process in favor of broader executive authority. Yet one court ruling after another proves that any rewrite of asylum law still needs 60 votes in the Senate. The quickest and most practical solution is to hire more immigration judges and deport those ordered to leave. The president and the Department of Homeland Security also wisely help migrants self-deport by paying for their flight home and giving them $1,000, saving the much larger cost of deportation. President Trump has promised mass deportations; his allies in Congress say they want that. The irony is that the price tag for making good on that pledge is shockingly small, but only if lawmakers write a bigger number into the bill currently on the floor. If Republicans are serious about restoring order at the border and in the cities the radical left is rioting, they should prove it by signing the check and hiring immigration judges. Daniel Di Martino is a fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a PhD candidate in Economics at Columbia University.
