Now PBS Is Censoring a Film About Free Speech

American Masters, an award-winning documentary series in its 39th season on PBS, promises to tell 'compelling, unvarnished stories' about the nation's most important cultural figures. The program's most recent story, though— Art Spiegelman: Disaster Is My Muse, about the cartoonist-author of Maus, the Pulitzer Prize–winning graphic novel depicting the Holocaust, and a self-described 'poster boy for books being censored'—seemed to need a bit more varnish on its approach to Donald Trump. In April, two weeks before it aired on PBS stations, a 90-second segment of the film in which Spiegelman referred to the president's 'smug and ugly mug' was cut from the film at the behest of public-media executives. (The details of this incident were first reported by Anthony Kaufman for Documentary magazine.)
PBS has been under attack by the Trump administration since January. By the time Disaster Is My Muse was aired in shortened form, the network was already under investigation by the Federal Communications Commission, and the White House had a plan to claw back $1.1 billion in federal funds from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which passes money on to PBS. 'Their attempt at preemptively staying out of the line of fire was absurd; it wasn't going to happen,' Spiegelman told me this week. 'It seems like it would be better to go out with dignity.'
Alicia Sams, who co-produced the film, told me that she received a call from the executive producer of American Masters, Michael Kantor, at the beginning of April. It was less than a week after a contentious congressional hearing in which the network was accused of being a 'radical left-wing echo chamber' that is 'brainwashing and trans-ing children.' According to Sams, Kantor said that Disaster Is My Muse would need one further edit before it could be shown: The filmmakers had to remove a short sequence where Spiegelman reads aloud from the one of the few comic strips about Trump that he's ever published, in a zine associated with the Women's March in 2017. There was no opportunity for negotiation, Sams said. The filmmakers knew that if they refused, they would be in breach of contract and would have to repay the movie's license fee. 'It was not coming from Michael,' she told me. 'It was very clear: It was coming from PBS in D.C.'
Kantor deferred all questions to Lindsey Horvitz, the director of content marketing at WNET, the producer of American Masters and parent company of New York's flagship PBS station. (Sams told me that in her understanding, WNET leadership had agreed with PBS about the cut.) Horvitz provided The Atlantic with this statement: 'One section of the film was edited from the theatrical version as it was no longer in context today. The change was made to maintain the integrity and appropriateness of the content for broadcast at this time.' A PBS spokesperson said, 'We have not changed our long-standing editorial guidelines or practices this year.' (The Atlantic has a partnership with WETA, which receives funding from PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.)
Molly Bernstein, who co-directed Disaster Is My Muse with Philip Dolin, said this was 'absurd.' She told me that the team had already been through discussions with PBS over how to make the film compliant with broadcast standards and practices. A few profanities are spoken in the film, and some images from Spiegelman's cartoons raised concerns, but the network said that these could stand as long as the film aired after 10 p.m., when laxer FCC rules apply. 'We were delighted that was an option,' Bernstein said. A bleeped-and-blurred version of the film would not have worked. 'It's about underground comics. It's about transgressive artwork.'
The team did make one other change to the film, several months before its broadcast: Some material featuring Spiegelman's fellow comic-book artist Neil Gaiman was removed in January after a series of sexual-assault allegations against Gaiman were detailed in a cover story for New York magazine. (Gaiman denies that he 'engaged in non-consensual sexual activity with anyone.') The filmmakers say they did this on their own, to avoid distractions from the subject of the film. But they also said that Kantor told them PBS would likely have had that inclination too.
In any case, to say the snipped-out material about Trump was 'no longer in context today' is simply false. Spiegelman's commitment to free speech is central to the film. So are his repeated warnings about incipient fascism in America. ('That's what I see everywhere I look now,' he says at one point.) They're also clearly relevant to the forced edit of the broadcast. Indeed, the censored clip was taken from an event involving Spiegelman in June 2022 called 'Forbidden Images Now,' which was presented in association with an exhibit of Philip Guston paintings that had itself been postponed for political reasons after George Floyd's murder, presumably on account of Guston's having made a motif of hooded Ku Klux Klansmen.
Just a few months before that lecture, Spiegelman learned that Maus had been removed from the eighth-grade curriculum in McMinn County, Tennessee, on account of its rough language and a single panel showing the naked corpse of his mother following her suicide. 'The tendencies brought up by this frantic need to control children's thoughts,' Spiegelman told MSNBC's Art Velshi in 2023, are 'an echo of the book burnings of the 1930s in Germany.'
The filmmakers told me that Spiegelman's free-speech run-in with the county school board was instrumental in persuading WNET to back Disaster Is My Muse. 'When Maus was banned, interest in Art and the relevance of his story increased,' Sams said. Only then did American Masters pledge its full support, licensing the film before it had even been completed, and supplying half its budget. In the lead-up to its broadcast, PBS also chose to highlight Spiegelman's focus on the First Amendment in its promotional materials. The network's webpage for Disaster Is My Muse describes him as 'a pioneer of comic arts, whose thought-provoking work reflects his ardent defense of free speech.' (Neither PBS nor WNET would explain how a decision had been made to censor footage from a documentary film that is in no small part about censorship.)
A broader 'context' for the edit can be found in PBS's other recent efforts to adjust its programming in deference to political considerations. As previously reported in The Atlantic, not long before Kantor's call with Sams, PBS quietly shelved a different documentary film, Break the Game, that was set to air on April 7, apparently because it had a trans protagonist. The film, which is not political, was abruptly placed back on the schedule within two hours of my reaching out to PBS for comment. (The network did not respond to questions about why Break the Game 's original airdate had been canceled.)
If these efforts were meant to forestall pressure from the White House, they have roundly failed. Two weeks after Disaster Is My Muse aired—with its reference to Trump removed—the president attempted to dismiss three of five board members at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. A few days after that, he issued an executive order directing the board to terminate all funding, both direct and indirect, to NPR and PBS. (Both moves are being challenged.) But just imagine how much harder the administration would be going after PBS if Trump had seen the clip about his 'smug and ugly mug'!
'This seems like volunteering to pull the trigger on the firing-squad gun,' Spiegelman told me. The end of Disaster Is My Muse includes some footage from a 2017 free-speech protest on the steps of the New York Public Library, where Spiegelman read out the lyrics of a Frank Zappa song: 'And I'm telling you, it can't happen here. Oh, darling, it's important that you believe me. Bop bop bop bop.' The political climate has only gotten worse since then, he said. 'There's no checks and balances on this. This is severe bullying and control, and it's only going to get worse.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Boston Globe

23 minutes ago

• Boston Globe

A potential strike on Iran tests Trump's propensity to play to both sides

Since his first campaign for president 10 years ago, Trump has excelled at appearing to favor both sides of the same issue, allowing supporters to hear what they want to hear, whether he's talking about tariffs, TikTok, abortion, tax cuts, or more. But the prospect that the United States might join Israel in bombing Iran is testing his ability to embrace dueling positions with little to no political cost. Some of Trump's most ardent supporters — those who defended him during multiple investigations and ultimately returned him to the White House — are ripping one another to shreds over the idea and at times lashing out at Trump as well. Advertisement The war in Iran is exactly the kind of Middle East entanglement that Trump's anti-interventionist base believed he was bitterly opposed to, because he repeatedly said he was. But he is also the same president who, in his first term, authorized missile strikes in Syria, after its leadership used chemical weapons on citizens, and the assassination of a top Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani — two actions he took pride in. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up To Trump, the contradictions are not actually contradictions. 'I think I'm the one that decides that,' he told The Atlantic recently in response to criticism from one of his most vocal anti-interventionist supporters, Tucker Carlson, who said the president's support for Israel's fight in Iran ran against his 'America First' message. Trump was propelled to victory in the Republican primary in 2016 as an outsider, in part because he forcefully condemned the invasion of Iraq, authorized by the last Republican president more than a decade before, and the seemingly endless war that followed. Yet he said the United States should have taken the country's oil, and ran radio ads saying he would 'bomb the hell' out of the Islamic State group. Advertisement He has said he wants to renew the tax cuts he put into effect in his first term, which saved some of the wealthiest earners millions, while also suggesting that congressional Republicans should implement a new tax on the wealthiest. He has said he supports businesses and also wants to deport the immigrant workforce that fuels parts of the economy. He wants to engage in mass deportation and also wants to sell visas for $5 million. He has celebrated the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade as a point of pride while also condemning Republican governors who signed bills banning most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. He has both celebrated and criticized his own criminal justice reform bill of 2018. Despite the contradictions, Republicans for years have been united in support of Trump and what he says he wants, giving him a benefit of the doubt that few, if any, career politicians have ever received. Even when most elected Republicans held Trump at a distance after the deadly attack on the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6, 2021, Trump still had a tight grip on Republican primary voters. Trump, a celebrity known to the electorate for decades, has obscured long-standing and unresolved foreign policy divisions within the party dating back to the aftermath of President George W. Bush's push to invade Iraq. Advertisement But as Trump decides whether to plunge the United States into the heart of the Israel-Iran conflict, his core supporters are splintering. Trump's announcement Thursday that he could take up to two weeks to decide did not sit well with some of his most hawkish supporters. On social media, Fox News host Mark Levin began a lengthy post by suggesting that the president was being pulled back from what he actually wants to do. 'LET TRUMP BE TRUMP!' Levin wrote. 'We got our answer. Iran says no unconditional surrender. Again. And again. And again. They cheat and lie and kill. They're TERRORISTS!' His anti-interventionist supporters, meanwhile, have been equally alarmed by what he might decide to do. 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, posted on social media over the weekend. Trump's advisers say that on the Israel-Iran conflict in particular, the president is dealing with a fast-moving, complicated situation that does not lend itself to simple, black-and-white solutions, despite the fact that he has consistently campaigned that way. 'President Trump considers the nuances of every issue but ultimately takes decisive action to directly benefit American families,' said Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson. 'The American people trust this president to make the right decisions,' she said, adding that he 'started the Make America Great Again movement because he represents a new leadership that puts Americans first.' But in 2025, Trump is not the only one who can command media attention. Carlson is no longer on Fox News, but he has a show that streams on the social platform X and is a leading voice among foreign policy 'restrainers' who have argued that Trump would be acting against his own movement should he strike Iran. Advertisement Steve Bannon, an adviser who was exiled from the White House in the first year of Trump's first term, has become one of the dominant voices among the MAGA faithful with his 'War Room' podcast, delivering the same message as Carlson. Yet Trump has found that many of his allies will ultimately come back to him, despite unhappiness with some of his decisions.

The Hill

an hour ago

• The Hill

Judge says it's too late to order recovery of Trump officials' Signal messages

A federal judge on Friday said it's too late to order the recovery of already-deleted Signal messages from key members of President Trump's Cabinet, largely rejecting a request from an oversight group to get involved. But U.S. District Judge James Boasberg did order acting National Archivist and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to ask Attorney General Pam Bondi to take steps to preserve Signal chats across the government at risk of being deleted. 'At this juncture, the Court largely denies American Oversight's slew of requests and will instead grant only narrower relief,' the judge wrote. American Oversight, a group that regularly files records lawsuits against the federal government, sued five top Trump officials following revelations that they discussed a military strike in a group chat on the encrypted messaging app — and unintentionally included a journalist. They had asked the judge to order the officials to preserve all Signal communications and recover chats that had been deleted. However, Boasberg noted, American Oversight's own 'emphatically stated' representation to the court was that destroyed Signal messages cannot be recovered and to issue the directive would be fruitless. The challengers' 'hardline stance' that deleted Signal messages are gone for good overshadows their later efforts to suggest recovering the messages might be possible, especially if the nation's intelligence agencies were to try. 'Although Plaintiff tries to walk that stance back — claiming in its Reply that recovery is feasible '[r]egardless of Signal's statement of policy,' — that belated assertion wilts in the face of its repeated claims to the contrary in both its Amended Complaint and Motion,' Boasberg said. Though Boasberg ordered Rubio to ask Bondi to act on the messages 'not yet gone with the wind,' he also noted that the attorney general has the discretion to ignore that request. Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, revealed the Signal group chat after he was unintentionally added to it by now-former national security adviser Michael Waltz. The Trump officials used the encrypted chat to discuss a strike on the Houthis in Yemen. More than a dozen top officials, like Vice President Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, were part of the chat. However, only five were sued: Hegseth, Rubio, CIA director John Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The Hill requested comment from American Oversight.

Politico

3 hours ago

• Politico

Cuomo the a--hole

POLITICAL ANAL-YSIS: The word 'asshole' has become so closely associated with mayoral primary front-runner Andrew Cuomo that one needs not even name him — the profane sobriquet is enough. 'I'd rather have an asshole than a progressive,' a retired lawyer named Robert told mayoral candidate Brad Lander at a farmer's market on the Upper West Side Sunday. 'Those are the choices we have: a socialist or an asshole.' Everyone in earshot knew who he was talking about. Zohran Mamdani is the socialist. Cuomo is the asshole. The former governor has a well-earned reputation for domineering and bullying. So does the president of the United States of America. And the semi-apologetic line from many Cuomo supporters has been 'we need an asshole to fight an asshole.' That argument has made it into print, emphasizing that it has become too widespread for squeamish editors to avoid the curse word. 'He'd stand up to Donald Trump. He's an asshole, but he's our asshole,' The Atlantic wrote last week, summarizing the case for Cuomo. Actor and activist Cynthia Nixon responded — speaking from the position of somebody who ran against Cuomo in the 2018 primary for governor, and who knows assholes from a four-decade career in Hollywood. 'I don't think that we need our own sphincter to challenge Trump,' she said at an anti-Cuomo rally ahead of the No Kings march in Manhattan Saturday. Cuomo 'is bought and bossed, not just by random billionaires or corporations, but in many cases, by the exact same billionaires and corporations that bought Donald Trump four more years,' she added. 'Andrew Cuomo is not our asshole. Say it with me!' The crowd, soaked in the rain, yelled back: 'Andrew Cuomo is not our asshole!' It's not just supporters who've dubbed him with the term. 'He's an abuser and an asshole,' state Sen. Gustavo Rivera said when asked if Cuomo was a tough guy. 'There's one thing about having that as an option available to you and play it as a card. It's another thing to operate like that on a day to day basis.' You can buy a 'Cuomo is an asshole' flag on Amazon for $9.00 — with the image of the Democratic donkey replacing the word. Cuomo has been associated with the word going back a decade, at least. 'You gotta fight asshole with asshole,' a democratic operative told POLITICO early in 2016, selling Cuomo as an anti-Trump campaign surrogate for Hillary Clinton. It came up again when Cuomo was earning national acclaim for his covid pandemic briefings. 'Stop trying to make Andrew Cuomo happen,' Current Affairs wrote in 2020. 'Andrew Cuomo is an asshole.' And Cuomo's alleged assholery came up again in 2021, after women came forward accusing him of sexual harassment. Comedian John Oliver devoted the opening monologue of his show to the 'colossal asshole.' The Daily Beast also published an essay: 'Cuomo Is Not Your Dad. He's Your Dad's Asshole Boss.' The expletive is coming up again, as Cuomo runs for mayor. But as he heads into primary day as the favorite in the race, Cuomo's campaign continues to emphasize his get-stuff-done ethos over any criticisms of his personality. 'New Yorkers know Andrew Cuomo fights for them and has produced a real record of results that improve their lives, that cut through the bureaucracy and cut through the mediocrity and got stuff done,' Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said. 'They know he is the only candidate with the experience and the record to fix what's broken. And after 12 long years, put city hall back on the right track,' he added. 'Since this word is apparently now fair game, nobody better blush when I start using it to talk to reporters.' — Jeff Coltin FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL ADAMS SAYS BALLOT NOT SO SECRET AFTER ALL: City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams went back on her word today and clarified who she wants her supporters to rank on their ballots after her. 'I encourage New Yorkers to rank the full slate of Working Families Party candidates,' Adams said in a statement. The candidates on the WFP slate include Mamdani, Brad Lander, Adams and Zellnor Myrie, in that order. Adams did not specify what in order her supporters should rank the slate. The announcement came after Adams declined to back those candidates — and repeatedly refused to answer if she voted for Mamdani and Cuomo amid an internal debate among her aides, POLITICO reported Thursday. 'I still believe in the secrecy of the ballot, and I voted for me and my community,' Adams told reporters after voting in Jamaica, Queens. In her statement today, Adams clarified that she does not think Cuomo should be on voters' ballots. 'His record is part of the same pattern of neglect that our communities, and so many New Yorkers, have faced,' she said of the former governor. — Jason Beeferman FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: A state-of-the-race memo released today by the Working Families Party reviews its strategy and lays out its progress with Primary Day just around the corner. Its mission for 2025? Combat the disillusion that led 900,000 Democratic voters in New York State to sit out the 2024 election. Its strategy? Present the choices as working families versus billionaires. 'Even small increases in turnout among our base could tip the balance in critical races across the state,' local party co-directors Jasmine Gripper and Ana María Archila wrote. In New York City, the third party endorsed Mamdani as its first choice in the Democratic primary for mayor, followed by Lander, Adams and Myrie. It lauded the Mamdani-Lander cross-endorsement, which came late in the cycle as Cuomo continues to lead almost every poll. The party's ranked endorsement was also relatively late in a cycle dominated by Cuomo. One of its choices broke with party leadership: state Sen. Jessica Ramos endorsed Cuomo and got dropped from the slate altogether. Myrie hasn't done any cross-endorsements, but said he'd rank the party's slate, as did Adrienne Adams today, as noted above. And it argued that Cuomo, 'the candidate favored by Trump's billionaires,' is hitting his ceiling in polling. A recent Marist poll found Cuomo leading Mamdani by 10 points in the final round of a ranked-choice voting simulation, and Mamdani's critics argue he too has hit his ceiling. The third party — whose line Cuomo was accused of seeking to nix in 2020 — is also backing Dorcey Applyrs for Albany mayor, Sharon Owens for Syracuse mayor and Sean Ryan for Buffalo mayor. — Emily Ngo SPEAKING OF MEMOS: Moderate national think tank Third Way released its own memo today urging New York City Democrats not to rank Mamdani, writing, 'Leaving aside Mamdani's positions that some believe border on antisemitism, it is his proud affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) that worries us most.' The memo excerpts parts of the DSA platform. And the group argued that Mamdani as mayor would help Trumpism and hurt Democrats nationwide in upcoming elections. 'Republican attack ads in swing districts attaching moderate Democratic candidates to Mamdani and the DSA practically write themselves,' Third Way said in its memo. Asked whether Cuomo as mayor would also hurt the Democratic brand nationally, given his sexual harassment allegations and having taxpayers foot his legal costs, Third Way co-founder Matt Bennett told reporters, 'I don't want to get into Cuomo and whether he is or isn't a good candidate for New York. ... I will point out the things that you noted are personal to him and very hard to connect to other Democrats.' — Emily Ngo FROM THE CAMPAIGN COFFERS THE CAP STAYS: The city's Campaign Finance Board threw cold water on a request from Mamdani to raise the spending cap for mayoral candidates. In a statement today, the board said there is no legal mechanism allowing it to relax the roughly $8 million expenditure limit for primary candidates. 'We understand the challenge posed by independent spenders to the goals of the matching funds program,' spokesperson Timothy Hunter said in a statement. 'The Campaign Finance Board closely monitors spending by all campaigns as well as independent spenders and provides expenditure relief when permitted by law.' The democratic socialist sent a letter to the board seeking more leeway to counteract two super PACs supporting Cuomo. Together, they have flooded the race with a record $19 million to boost the former governor and attack Mamdani. 'Andrew Cuomo is trying to buy this election,' Mamdani said at a press conference outside the Campaign Finance Board's headquarters. 'He has a super PAC, that is now the best funded super PAC in New York City's history … that is ensuring that every New Yorker, when they turn on their television, they open their mailbox, and they watch a video on YouTube will be met with yet another attack ad that is lying about myself and this campaign.' The board said it can only raise the cap in response to excess spending from other campaigns operating outside the public matching system — such as Ray McGuire's mayoral bid in 2021 — and not super PACs. — Amira McKee and Joe Anuta LANDER'S LAST STAND: Brad Lander's campaign is throwing $320,000 into an attack ad against Cuomo, in a final effort to curb the former governor's lead in the final days of the race. Titled 'Cost,' the ad tears into Cuomo's record as govenor, citing the numerous sexual harassment allegations that precipitated his resignation in 2021. Cuomo denies the allegations, but his contentious record has been picked apart by his competitors. Lander, the candidate who has been the most consistently tough on Cuomo, zeroed in on the claims during the final mayoral debate last week. The ad also claims the former governor is funded by 'Trump's billionaire donors,' echoing a Mamdani ad last week. Playbook reported that Cuomo received nearly $400,000 from GOP or Conservative Party donors, and his super PAC received funds from high-profile Trump donor and billionaire Bill Ackman. Cuomo has said some of those donors, and specifically Ackman, gave to him before ever donating to Trump and insists he is unmoved by campaign contributions to him or his super PAC. The ad could be a boost for Mamdani, who cross-endorsed Lander last week. Lander's polling a distant third in the race. The ad features a clip of Ocasio-Cortez, who endorsed Mamdani as her first pick, telling voters, 'do not rank Andrew Cuomo on your ballot.' One of the last major expenditures of Lander's run, the ad leaves it all on the table as the bookish city comptroller delivers an energetic finale to a slow-to-build campaign. — Amira McKee IN OTHER NEWS — ADVICE FOR THE NYT: Twelve veteran political observers weighed in to give their opinion on The New York Times' 'vexing' editorial on the mayor's race. (Vital City) — ERIC ADAMS SAYS NEVERMIND ON HEALTH PLAN: Mayor Eric Adams pulled the plug on a Medicare Advantage move for New York City retirees. (POLITICO Pro) — 'FUCK THE DECORUM': Justin Brannan explains why 'people want fighters' to represent them in the Democratic party. (Interview Magazine) And WELCOME TO THE WORLD: Victor Botnick, born on 6/13 to Jeanette and Mark Botnick, a Bloomberg alum. pic. Missed this morning's New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.