Tan Kin Lian slams Trump's Tariff policies in blistering Facebook post

SINGAPORE: Former presidential candidate and businessman Tan Kin Lian took to Facebook on May 31 to sharply criticise U.S. President Donald Trump, describing his tariff policies as economically damaging and politically reckless.
In a post titled ' Wrecking Ball Trump,' Tan warned that the tariffs imposed during Trump's administration were backfiring on American businesses, making them less competitive both at home and abroad. Tariffs backfiring on U.S. businesses
Tan argued that by taxing imported components, American manufacturers were forced to pay more for the parts they needed to assemble their final products. These higher input costs, he said, had a knock-on effect: companies either raised prices for U.S. consumers, contributing to inflation, or struggled to sell competitively on the export market.
'This made U.S. manufacturers uncompetitive when they export… [and] more expensive to U.S. buyers,' Tan wrote.
He cited online videos, claiming that many U.S. factories had shut down and some major companies had relocated operations overseas to escape the rising costs caused by tariffs. See also Open letter to the new CEO of SMRT Job losses and delayed promises
The knock-on effect, according to Tan, is widespread job loss across affected states, contradicting Trump's promise that tariffs would bring jobs back to America.
'The new jobs that were supposed to be created in the U.S., due to the tariffs, may take several years to realize,' he noted.
Tan echoed critics who liken Trump's approach to a 'wrecking ball'—a blunt-force strategy that damages everything in its path without building anything lasting in its wake. Strong language, sharper criticism
Tan did not mince words when addressing Trump's decision-making, stating bluntly that many people consider Trump to be 'insane and incredibly stupid'—an assessment he openly said he shared. Tourism slump paints bleak picture of U.S. soft power
In a separate post, Tan commented on the sharp decline in international tourism to the U.S. since Trump returned to office in January 2025. He noted that international arrivals fell year-on-year in March, with even steeper declines from key regions like Western Europe and Central America.
He attributed the drop to a mix of political and policy-driven deterrents—among them, aggressive immigration enforcement, border detentions, and controversial rhetoric, including Trump's threat to annex Canada. Countries such as Germany and Canada experienced booking cancellations of over 30%.
Cities like New York and Los Angeles have felt the brunt of this shift, with ticket sales to tourist attractions and hotel occupancy rates falling significantly. Canadian flight bookings to the U.S. have reportedly plunged by over 70%.
Tan remarked that these developments signal a larger erosion of the U.S.'s global appeal, not just economically but diplomatically. A pattern of self-inflicted harm
From shrinking global market share to waning tourism dollars, Tan Kin Lian's posts paint a picture of an America under Trump that is isolating itself—economically, diplomatically, and culturally.
'The U.S. position risks being perceived as unreasonable because it simultaneously escalates tech restrictions while demanding concessions on unrelated issues,' he wrote.
Tan concluded that unless the U.S. adopts a more balanced and reciprocal approach, particularly in its dealings with China and the global economy, it risks long-term strategic losses that no short-term posturing can undo.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Straits Times

15 minutes ago

• Straits Times

World leaders react to US attack on Iran

Patrons of the Chapel Street Cafe watch as U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, in Chicago, Illinois, U.S. June 21, 2025. REUTERS/Dylan Martinez The reaction of world leaders after U.S. forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday Iran time ranged from Israel lauding President Donald Trump's decision to the U.N. calling for de-escalation and some countries condemning the attacks. ISRAEL PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, RECORDED STATEMENT: "Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history... History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons." U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTONIO GUTERRES, STATEMENT "I am gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States against Iran today. This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security. There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control – with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world. I call on Member States to de-escalate and to uphold their obligations under the UN Charter and other rules of international law. At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace." VENEZUELA FOREIGN MINISTER YVAN GIL, ON TELEGRAM: "Venezuela Condemns U.S. Military Aggression Against Iran and Demands an Immediate Cessation of Hostilities. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela firmly and categorically condemns the bombing carried out by the United States military, at the request of the State of Israel, against nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan complexes." MEXICO FOREIGN MINISTRY, ON X: "The ministry urgently calls for diplomatic dialogue for peace between the parties involved in the Middle East conflict. In keeping with our constitutional principles of foreign policy and our country's pacifist conviction, we reiterate our call to de-escalate tensions in the region. The restoration of peaceful coexistence among the states of the region is the highest priority." CUBA PRESIDENT MIGUEL DIAZ-CANEL, ON X: "We strongly condemn the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, which constitutes a dangerous escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. The aggression seriously violates the UN Charter and international law and plunges humanity into a crisis with irreversible consequences." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times

34 minutes ago

• Straits Times

As Iran and Israel battle, the rest of the Mideast fears what's next

On June 21, President Donald Trump granted Israel's request that the United States intervene by having US forces attack three nuclear sites in Iran. PHOTO: AFP As Iran and Israel battle, the rest of the Mideast fears what's next Follow our live coverage here. ISTANBUL – Across a swath of the Middle East, fighter jets and missiles regularly streak across the sky. The newest war in the region, this time between Israel and Iran, has once again put millions of people in the crossfire of a conflict that they want nothing to do with. The war has embroiled two well-armed, long-time enemies who are ethnic and political outliers in the region but whose fight, many of their neighbors worry, could swiftly spill beyond their borders. 'We are constantly afraid, and the psychological toll has been heavy,' said Ms Rawan Muhaidat, 28, a mother of two in the town of Kafr Asad in northern Jordan. The sight of Iranian missiles overhead, and the booms of air defences shooting them down before they reach Israel, have terrified her children, who cower between her and her husband as they worry that their home could be struck. 'Every time a rocket passes and explodes, we think, 'This is the one,'' Ms Muhaidat said. On June 21 , President Donald Trump granted Israel's request that the United States intervene by having US forces attack three nuclear sites in Iran, he said, including a nuclear enrichment facility buried deep underground. Such a move, experts say, could push Iran to retaliate against US military bases or allies across the Middle East, or to activate proxy forces, like the Houthis in Yemen, to snarl trade routes or damage oil infrastructure, harming the global economy. 'We're opening a Pandora's box,' Dr Narges Bajoghli, an associate professor of Middle East studies at Johns Hopkins University, said before Mr Trump's announcement. 'Iran is not going to raise the white flag of surrender.' The war highlights how significantly the power structure across the Middle East has shifted in recent years. Just over a half-decade ago, Israel largely focused on its conflict with the Palestinians while waging a shadow war with Iran through occasional assassinations and other covert attacks. But it avoided direct confrontation, partly for fear of retaliation from the network of militias that Iran supported in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. At that time, most Arab countries shunned Israel, a Jewish-majority democracy, for its treatment of the Palestinians, and many resented the predominantly Persian Iran for what they considered its destructive meddling in the Arab world. But a few Arab states began to see Israel as a potential partner in dealing with their own concerns about Iran and established formal diplomatic relations. That picture has now changed. The deadly surprise attack by the Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023 heightened Israel's sense of vulnerability, and the country has become increasingly aggressive in striking out against perceived threats far beyond its borders. For Iran, the wars in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon, and the ouster last year of President Bashar Assad of Syria, decimated its regional proxy network and left it even more isolated. Powerful Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, pursued their own diplomatic tracks with Tehran to decrease tensions. Now they also hope to avoid a war in their neighbourhood that could put them in the crosshairs because of their partnerships with the United States. The current conflict began June 13, at a bad time for the international institutions that were established to try to contain such hostilities. Israel's war in Gaza, which began after Hamas' Oct 7, 2023, attack, has killed more than 50,000 people and caused widespread destruction and hunger in Gaza. Few seem to expect that the warring parties in the new conflict will be held accountable for killing civilians or striking hospitals, as Israel has done repeatedly in Gaza – sometimes because Hamas has built tunnels beneath them – and as Iran did in Israel on June 19 . Expectations are low that action by the UN Security Council will stop the war, not least because the United States would almost certainly veto any measure that called for its end. And Iran's foreign minister, Mr Abbas Araghchi, told senior European officials during talks in Geneva on June 20 that Iran would not negotiate under fire. Mr Trump dismissed the European efforts anyway, saying, 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us.' The lack of international action to stop the war has left Mr Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel free to proceed as they choose, Dr Bajoghli said. 'We're entering a new international era, a new world order, and it seems to in some ways be an old world order of force and the law of the jungle, but with 21st-century technology and weaponry,' she said. Israel initiated the war with a multi-pronged surprise attack that damaged Iranian military and nuclear sites, largely destroyed air defences and killed top nuclear scientists and military officials in their homes, as well as a number of civilians. Iran has responded by firing barrages of ballistic missiles at Israel, some of which have struck civilian apartment towers. At least 224 people have been killed in Iran and 24 in Israel. Mr Netanyahu has said that Israel launched the attack to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon, which Israel would consider an existential threat. He has also suggested the more expansive goals of regional transformation and regime change. 'We are changing the face of the Middle East, and that can lead to radical changes inside Iran itself,' he said on June 16 . Iran insists its nuclear programme is peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Iran has not decided to seek a nuclear weapon, although that could change if the United States bombs Iran's underground enrichment facility in Fordo or if Israel kills Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. For his part, Ayatollah Khamenei has threatened to retaliate if the United States strikes Iran. 'The harm the US will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily,' he said in a televised address on June 18 . The war is hugely unwelcome in the rest of the Middle East, where other governments would prefer to put the region's conflicts behind them so they can rebuild what has been destroyed and focus on strengthening their economies. There is little affinity for either of the warring parties. Most Arab states shun Israel, and even governments that have established diplomatic relations with it have condemned how it has fought in Gaza and its attack on Iran. But that does not mean they support Iran. In a predominantly Sunni Muslim region, most Arab governments see Iran's revolutionary Shiite theocracy as anathema, and many people in Yemen, Syria, Lebanon and elsewhere resent Iran's interventions in their countries. Many Middle East leaders have complicated reactions to the war, said Dr Dina Esfandiary, the lead Middle East analyst at Bloomberg Economics, a research group. 'Officials in the region are quietly glad that Iran's top brass is being taken out bit by bit, that Iranian proxies and their leaderships are being taken out bit by bit,' she said. 'That, from their perspective, gets rid of one of the real threats in the region for them.' But many also fear an expanded role in the Middle East for Israel, she added, given the tremendous military and diplomatic support it receives from the United States. That leaves other countries wondering, she said, 'Where is Israel going to go next?' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

CNA

an hour ago

• CNA

US forces strike Iran nuclear sites, Trump says Fordow gone

WASHINGTON: US forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites in a "very successful attack", President Donald Trump said on Saturday (Jun 21), adding that the crown jewel of Tehran's nuclear program, Fordow, is gone. After days of deliberation and two weeks before his self-imposed deadline, Trump's decision to join Israel's military campaign against its major rival Iran represents a major escalation of the conflict. "This was an amazing success tonight," Trump told Reuters in a telephone interview. "They should make peace immediately or they'll get hit again." He had earlier posted on Truth Social that all US planes were safely on their way home, and he congratulated "our great American Warriors." He was due to deliver a televised Oval Office address at 10pm local time (10am Singapore time, Sunday). CBS News reported that the US reached out to Iran diplomatically on Saturday to say the strikes are all the U.S. plans and it does not aim for regime change. In his late-night address, NBC News said, Trump is expected to say he is not currently planning more strikes inside Iran. Trump said U.S. forces struck Iran's three principal nuclear sites: Natanz, Esfahan and Fordow. He told Fox News six bunker-buster bombs were dropped on Fordow, while 30 Tomahawk missiles were fired against other nuclear sites. US B-2 bombers were involved in the strikes, a US official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity. "A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow," Trump posted. "Fordow is gone." "IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR," he added. Reuters had reported earlier on Saturday the movement of the B-2 bombers, which can be equipped to carry massive bombs that experts say would be needed to strike Fordow, which is buried under a mountain south of Tehran. An Iranian official, cited by Tasnim news agency, confirmed that part of the Fordow site was attacked by "enemy airstrikes". Israel's public broadcaster Kan cited an Israeli official saying the country was "in full coordination" with Washington on the US attack. A White House official said Trump spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after the strikes. The strikes came as Israel and Iran have been engaged in more than a week of aerial combat that has resulted in deaths and injuries in both countries. DIPLOMACY UNSUCCESSFUL Israel launched the attacks on Iran saying that it wanted to remove any chance of Tehran developing nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. Diplomatic efforts by Western nations to stop the hostilities have been unsuccessful. In recent days, Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans have argued that Trump must receive permission from the US Congress before committing the US military to any combat against Iran. Republican Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi applauded the operation but cautioned that the US now faced "very serious choices ahead." Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch, a Republican, said that despite the heavy U.S. bombings over Iran, "This war is Israel's war not our war." He added, "There will not be American boots on the ground in Iran." One Republican lawmaker, Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, simply said, "This is not constitutional." Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said the US public "is overwhelmingly opposed to the US waging war on Iran" and accused Trump of displaying "horrible judgment". Israel launched attacks on Jun 13, saying Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons, which it neither confirms nor denies. At least 430 people have been killed and 3,500 injured in Iran since Israel began its attacks, Iranian state-run Nour News said, citing the health ministry. In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed by Iranian missile attacks, according to local authorities, in the worst conflict between the longtime enemies. More than 450 Iranian missiles have been fired towards Israel, according to the Israeli prime minister's office.