Supermarket chain with 300 stores launching closing down sale ahead of shutting popular site this weekend

A POPULAR supermarket chain is launching a huge closing-down sale this weekend, as it shuts one of its 300 high street stores.
The budget foodstore has been providing shoppers with bargains in the busy shopping precinct for over two decades.
Advertisement
2
A budget foodstore is closing the doors to one of its stores this weekend
Credit: Getty
2
Farmfoods in Ilkeston is set to close after two decades
Credit: Alamy
Farmfoods, in Ilkeston, Derbyshire, is closing its doors for the final time this Sunday, June 22, with the remaining stock being sold off at a reduced price.
Shoppers have been left devastated by the news, which marks another blow for the high street.
Posting in the Ilkeston Life Facebook group, one person said of the Scottish store, which was founded in 1954.
"A blow for savvy Ilkeston shoppers - Farmfoods in the precinct is closing.
Advertisement
"It will be missed by many people, and the pleasant, helpful staff will be out of a job.
"Shops like this are a lifeline to many folk."
The post was flooded with comments from locals, sharing their sadness at the loss.
One person said: "Soon the precinct will be empty...."
Advertisement
A second person said: "It will be a sad day to see another shop closing.
"It always seems to be busy though so it makes no sense."
NatWest to close 53 bank branches in fresh blow to UK high street – see if your local is affected
A third person added: "Oh what a shame, it will be sorely missed."
This follows the news that Poundland has confirmed plans to shut 68 stores, with up to 150 at risk of closure.
Advertisement
The struggling discount chain was sold for just £1 last week and it was expected a major shake-up would be needed to rescue it.
Poundland has now announced a huge series of changes aimed at keeping itself afloat - although these will need to be approved by the High Court in August.
Why are retailers closing stores?
RETAILERS have been feeling the squeeze since the pandemic, while shoppers are cutting back on spending due to the soaring cost of living crisis.
High energy costs and a move to shopping online after the pandemic are also taking a toll, and many high street shops have struggled to keep going.
However, additional costs have added further pain to an already struggling sector.
The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs from April will cost the retail sector £2.3billion.
At the same time, the minimum wage will rise to £12.21 an hour from April, and the minimum wage for people aged 18-20 will rise to £10 an hour, an increase of £1.40.
The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.
It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year.
Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025."
It comes after almost 170,000 retail workers lost their jobs in 2024.
End-of-year figures compiled by the Centre for Retail Research showed the number of job losses spiked amid the collapse of major chains such as Homebase and Ted Baker.
It said its latest analysis showed that a total of 169,395 retail jobs were lost in the 2024 calendar year to date.
This was up 49,990 – an increase of 41.9% – compared with 2023.
It is the highest annual reading since more than 200,000 jobs were lost in 2020 in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced retailers to shut their stores during lockdowns.
The centre said 38 major retailers went into administration in 2024, including household names such as Lloyds Pharmacy, Homebase, The Body Shop, Carpetright and Ted Baker.
Around a third of all retail job losses in 2024, 33% or 55,914 in total, resulted from administrations.
Experts have said small high street shops could face a particularly challenging 2025 because of Budget tax and wage changes.
Professor Bamfield has warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector.
"By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."
They include ditching its frozen food items, getting rid of its loyalty scheme app and no longer selling products online.
The Original Factory Shop has also recently launched another closing-down sale as the brand pulls the shutters on another store.
Advertisement
The discount department store has slashed the prices on everything, from clothing to gardening tools to toys.
Clothing rails have been tagged with percentage-off signs as high as 30 per cent off.
And a major DIY retailer has launched a huge closing-down sale as it prepares to close one of its branches in weeks.
The Hobbycraft store in Imperial Park, Bristol, has confirmed that it will close its doors for good on June 21.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Edinburgh Reporter

5 hours ago

• Edinburgh Reporter

Senior Edinburgh councillors back giving themselves a pay hike

Senior Edinburgh councillors have backed giving themselves a pay hike, with only one member speaking out in opposition. In February, Edinburgh Council agreed to freeze pay for senior councillors – including political group leaders and committee conveners – at the previous year's levels. But at Thursday's meeting all political groups except the SNP voted in favour of raising pay for senior councillors, with most getting an uplift of £4,637 to their annual pay packets – an 11.6% jump. Council committee conveners, as well as the SNP, Conservative and Liberal Democrat group leaders, will all get £4,637 added to their annual pay, bringing them to £44,644 per year, up from £40,027 from the previous year. And the depute council leader, Labour's Mandy Watt, will also get a £4,637 pay hike, bringing her total compensation to £52,669, up from £48,032 before. A council spokesperson said the increase in pay for senior councillors was intended to match the pay hike given to non-senior councillors by the Scottish Government. While local authorities have the power to set the pay of senior councillors, the rates for all other councillors are set by the Scottish Government, including the council's leader and Lord Provost, based on the fidings of the Scottish Local Authorities Remuneration Committee (SLARC). Earlier this year, it mandated that the salary for most councillors be raised to £25,982 per year, up £4,637 from their previous pay of £21,345, which stood unchanged for several years. Labour councillor and council leader Jane Meagher is paid £71,519 per year, while Lord Provost Robert Aldridge is paid £53,640. Depute council leader, Labour councillor Mandy Watt, said: 'I sat down and read the guidance, and it does say that in your approach to this, you should be doing councillor remuneration from the bottom up, not the top down. 'I very much appreciate the support that I've had [from officers] to get all this together.' An SNP source said: 'Councillors have been chronically underpaid for decades, and normally I'd take the view that we remunerate the position held, rather than the individual holding it. 'But the current crop of administration conveners are so inept that we could not support them getting a pay hike.' A council spokesperson said: 'While we don't set the rates of pay for non-senior councillor roles it's appropriate that we publish them and provide elected members with the opportunity to scrutinise rates for full transparency. 'The increase in Senior Councillors' remuneration was agreed by Council yesterday, and now includes the increase to the Councillor basic pay set by the Scottish Government.' Only one member, Labour councillor Katrina Faccenda, spoke out against the pay hikes. She said: 'I think you should take note of which councillors are getting extra money, and you should work out whether you are getting value for money from those councillors. 'Since this is public money, and I don't think anyone in here would support the misuse of public money, I'd ask the public to have a look at that, and work out if they think that in Edinburgh Council, the extra money they have to spend to subsidise councillors is being used in the right way.' Cllr Faccenda, who will not financially benefit from the pay increase for senior councillors, voted to support the hike. Meanwhile, independent councillor Ross McKenzie voted with the SNP to oppose the pay hike. Green co-convener, councillor Chas Booth, said: 'Greens think it is right that people are paid appropriately for the work they do, and we welcomed the recommendations of the Scottish Local Authority Remuneration Committee around councillors' salaries. 'Pay is a significant barrier to people from marginalised groups entering politics, and if we want to see more diversity in our councillors to reflect the rich diversity of the communities we serve, then we need to ensure people without independent income can become elected representatives. 'However, we acknowledge that while so many people in Edinburgh continue to face a cost-of-living crisis caused by years of austerity which is now being continued by the Labour government at Westminster, the Labour council administration doesn't feel that big increases in senior councillor pay were not appropriate. 'Therefore Green councillors were happy to support their proposals around this.' By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

Edinburgh Reporter

5 hours ago

• Edinburgh Reporter

East Lothian Council gets red card over parking meter plans

Councillors behind plans to introduce parking charges in an East Lothian town centre have been given the red card by angry residents. More than 100 people attended a community meeting on Thursday to share their views on proposals to introduce meters as part of a county wide move by the local authority to manage parking in towns. The audience were handed green and red cards to hold up after questions were answered to show their support or rejections of the answers given. And Provost John McMillan, who made the case for the council's proposals found himself faced with a sea of red cards in response to his comments during the meeting. East Lothian MSP and former Scottish Housing Minister Paul McLennan addresses meeting about introduce parking charges in Haddington town centre It was claimed the charges would drive away customers from the town centre and penalise the sick. Former Housing Minister Paul McLennan MSP, who recently stepped down from the post to spend more time with his East Lothian constituents, told the meeting he could not support the parking charges plan for the town. He said the council had provided no evidence of the impact they would have on local shops and businesses and no costing for introducing the new system. He said: 'I can't support the current proposals when no impact assessment has been carried out and we don't know how much it is going to cost. We do not know how it will impact our high streets and trade.' The meeting heard from Garry Clark from the Federation of Small Businesses, who said its East Lothian members had raised concerns that the charges would drive away customers and were not fair. He pointed to similar schemes which had been introduced in Angus and Inverurie which he said had damaged town centres with councils having to go back to the drawing board. Mr Clark said: 'When you have retail parks on the edge of town with free parking and online shopping where people aren't having to park anywhere, it is unfair to charge customers who want to go into the town centre to shop.' Provost McMillan, who lives in Haddington and is the council administration's economic spokesperson, insisted the proposals, which have been included in a parking management scheme first put forward by the Labour administration in 2018, aimed to keep cars moving in the town centre with funds raised going back into the roads. However he drew criticism from members of the public who questioned why there was a free car park for East Lothian Council staff at the local authority's Haddington town centre headquarters. One resident asked: 'Whey are council staff able to park for free while everyone else has to pay?' Councillor McMillan also drew gasps from some members of the audience when he told them that it has, in his opinion, become 'inbred that you can park anywhere you want in Haddington'. Haddington and District Community Council, who organised the meeting in the town's Knox Academy, described a council survey carried out as part of the public consultation into the proposals as 'bias' saying it carried out its own questionnaire which received hundreds of responses for the town's residents, visitors and traders. They said when asked if there were parking problems in Haddington over 85% said no with the number who were against the introduction of meters rising to the high nineties. Mr McMillan stressed that the consultation was ongoing and the views of people in the town would be considered. He told the meeting: 'I am here to listen, I am here to answer questions and I am here to collaborate with you.' However his responses to questions about the staff car park in the town centre and explanations about trying to make people less dependent on cars to travel into the town saw red cards raised in response almost unanimously by the audience. The council proposes changing the town centre parking in Haddington, which currently offers 90 minutes before drivers have to move on, to 30 minutes free and then charges being introduced. However people at the meeting questioned whether it was possible for people, who travel into the town from outlying rural communities, to come into town and carry out appointments in the new 30 minute limit. East Lothian MSP Craig Hoy who has been a vocal opponent of the council's ongoing plans to introduce parking charges across the county, said it would mean charging the sick. He said: 'I have my constituency office in Haddington town centre and know how long a chat with a constituent who comes in to see me can take. 'What happens when they come in for GP appointments or have to collect prescriptions? This can't be done in 30 minutes so we are charging people who are sick to come and get help.' By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

Daily Record

8 hours ago

• Daily Record

Older windfarms won't increase East Ayrshire community benefit cash says council

East Ayrshire Council said that other benefits, such as job training support were getting developer support Attempts to increase the amount of money older wind farms give East Ayrshire's communities were met with a firm 'No' according to East Ayrshire Council's head of economic development. However, other moves around training and employment are being backed by developers and energy companies. ‌ The likes of Whitelee Wind Farm, once the biggest in Europe, agreed their level of community benefits before the introduction of guidance from the Scottish Government more than a decade ago. ‌ While there is no legal requirement to offer money to create renewable energy funds, it has become standard practice to offer £5,000 per MW of power produced, as recommended by the Scottish Government. However, this figure was suggested in 2014, with older windfarms often agreeing far less. Whitelee Wind Farm, the largest in the UK and formerly in Europe, agreed to pay just £1,000 per MW, with a subsequent extension application securing an increase to £2,500. Many residents and groups have argued that they should be getting more, especially in areas where there is a significant density of facilities, such as the south end of East Ayrshire. But, David McDowall, Head of Economic Growth at East Ayrshire Council told councillors that many developers were also facing financial struggles. At a meeting of East Ayrshire Cabinet this week, he recommended that no changes be made to the way renewable energy funds are distributed and applied for. ‌ Currently, wind farm funds are limited to communities within 10km of a facility for the first 10 years of operation, with half then being opened up to the whole of East Ayrshire after that period. However, an amendment last year, saw that, before broadening to the whole of the authority, a review to determine whether there was a greater need to maintain the 10km restriction. Whitelee reached that threshold in 2023 and now splits the funding for both the original £1,000 and the subsequent £2,500 for the extension. ‌ Mr McDowall explained: 'A review will be undertaken to assess whether parts of the fund should indeed be made available to a wider spatial area. 'This review will take account of the ongoing need and demand for funding within the 10km buffer and the wider funding landscape beyond the 10km buffer taking cognisance of what funding will be available to the the other relevant communities.' He said the disparity had been discussed with Scottish Power and that they were looking a number of areas to provide 'real opportunities' for communities. ‌ Mr McDowall continued: 'We've recently introduced the Whitelee skills fund which will deliver 30 apprentices and 30 interns along with pre employment training.' However, a push to increase the amount provided by those who had agreed the lower payments per MW has been unsuccessful. He said: 'One of the kind of asks has been, can we get the the the funding updated from the £1,000 or £2,500 to £5,000. ‌ 'We were given a resounding no initially, but discussions are ongoing and there's a proposal to meet between the leaders of East Ayrshire, East Renfrewshire and South Lanarkshire to take forward discussions directly with the Scottish Government. 'It is now common place across Scotland that developers work directly with community groups to agree community benefits rather than paying into the the fund so while the renewable energy fund for East Ayrshire remains a viable option for developers it is now one that's being used far less.' Mr McDowall set out the work undertaken by the Nine CC group, a coalition of nine communities in the south of the authority, who have come to together to make better, more strategic, use of the funds each was receiving from community benefits. ‌ However, he did acknowledge that 'several in farm developers are facing challenging financial circumstances and and obviously issues like grid connections as well and that's requiring them in some industries to reprofile their community benefit commitments.' Councillor Iain Linton, Cabinet member for resources and economy said: 'I think it sums up well where we are just now. 'Obviously we're anticipating the Nine CC fund getting up and running in the the near future and that will take a bit of the strain off the the the sharing of the the Whitelee money. ‌ 'I think they seem to be quite keen in the projects that we've supported in the past.' He also said that Scottish Power had showcased a number of the projects in East Ayrshire and hoped that the company would work with the council to promote and potentially expand the apprentice and intern programme. Mr McDowall responded: 'I think they nearly bit my hand off when we suggested it. ‌ 'So they do want, let's say, the accolades that go along with their funding going towards these apprenticeships. 'We're also working with Ayrshire College and and looking at trying to bring some of the pre-apprenticeship training that is delivered both centrally in Glasgow and Edinburgh towards Ayrshire College. 'Obviously we know that there's a a gap in the renewable sector.' He said that both companies were losing staff but also investing in work in East Ayrshire. He added: 'What we're trying to do is to get a lot of those vacancies filled with residents within East Ayrshire.' Cabinet approved the report.