Hooch tragedy: MP Aujla seeks inquiry by sitting HC judge
Congress MP from Amritsar, Gurjeet Singh Aujla, on Friday, sought an inquiry by a sitting high court judge into the hooch tragedy in Majitha as well as other deaths due to drugs and spurious liquor in the state.
Addressing a press conference here, Aujla said that chief minister Bhagwant Mann should take responsibility for the hooch tragedy, and direct the government officials, who were in charge and accountable, to tender their resignations. He also urged the central government to send a high-powered delegation to look into the drug and spurious liquor trade in Punjab.
The Congress MP claimed that the state government's 'war on drugs' was completely disconnected from the ground reality, otherwise, this tragedy would not have happened. 'Five years ago, 120 deaths were reported due to spurious liquor in Amritsar, Batala, and Tarn Taran. Then, in March 2024, another 20 people lost their lives in Sangrur. No one knows what action was taken against the culprits, which is why there is no fear of the law. Now, it has happened again in my constituency,' lamented Aujla.
Aujla said the recent hooch deaths exposed the claims of the current government's 'Nasha Mukt Punjab' campaign. 'I have been raising the alarm by writing to the DGP and government officials, highlighting the worsening drug crisis, particularly in Amritsar and the border areas, but all my missives were ignored,' he alleged, strongly urging the formation of a high-level committee under the supervision of a sitting high court judge to investigate the number of drug and liquor-related deaths over the years and to dismantle this dangerous network.
Aujla urged the state government to reduce the price of country liquor so that poor people do not buy cheap and spurious liquor. 'The Punjab government is only focusing on revenue collection. Good quality liquor is not being sold at the actual price but at a higher rate; due to which the poor class is being forced to buy cheap and spurious liquor,' he claimed. On Monday, Aujla, in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, had urged him to declare cross-border smuggling of drugs arms as 'acts of terrorism.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Fifty years on, we should recall how Indian democracy was tested by the Emergency
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,' warned philosopher George Santayana in his 1905 work, The Life of Reason. Public memory is woefully short; that is why it is rekindled through anniversaries and other periodic events. One historic occasion that we must never forget is the Emergency, imposed by the regime led by Indira Gandhi in 1975. June 25 this year marks 50 years of the event that shook the foundations of our democracy. India is the world's largest democracy. It can also claim to be a successful democracy, except for those 22 months when its democratic credentials were subjected to scrutiny. Two generations have passed since that dark phase. India has learnt enough lessons. Yet, to ensure that Santayana's warnings don't come true, we must keep reminding new generations about that sordid past. Indians waged battles for decades to secure freedom from the British in 1947. B R Ambedkar, while drafting the Constitution, warned the Constituent Assembly that more than foreigners, we were responsible for the loss of independence. 'It perturbs me deeply to acknowledge that India has lost its independence multiple times… due to betrayal and treachery by its own people,' he said on November 25, 1949, poignantly asking, 'Will history repeat itself?? He was categorical that if political parties fail to raise above partisan interests, 'Indian independence will once again be in jeopardy'. His message to his countrymen was that they must resolve to fight 'to the last drop of our blood' to protect our independence. It did not take even two decades for the country to come face to face with that dangerous reality. It may be worthwhile to recall those tragic events. The Indian National Congress was split in 1969 and one faction under Morarji Desai became Congress (O-Organisation) while the other under the leadership of Indira Gandhi called itself Congress (R-Requisitionists). When elections were held to the Lok Sabha in 1971, the PM Gandhi-led Congress (R) secured a resounding victory with 352 out of 518 seats. A few months into that government came the victory in the Bangladesh War that catapulted PM Gandhi into a cult figure. The next few years saw PM Gandhi transforming from a democrat into an authoritarian and arrogant leader. With no Opposition in Parliament, PM Gandhi went about governing in a ruthless and dictatorial manner. Corruption and sycophancy became the hallmark of her governance. Then came two successive challenges to the regime, first in the form of popular agitations in Gujarat and Bihar in 1974 against corrupt Congress regimes, and an Allahabad High Court judgement in June 1975 setting aside PM Gandhi's election in 1971 on the grounds of electoral malpractices. She was disqualified not only from ruling but also from contesting elections for the next six years. With no relief from the Supreme Court and with Opposition parties, united under the leadership of Jayaprakash Narayan, leading a massive popular movement against her rule, PM Gandhi was left with two options: Follow democratic dharma and step down, or use the emergency provisions available under Article 352 of the Constitution to impose a dictatorship and continue to rule. She chose the latter. She cited a 'threat to internal security' as the reason. How was a challenge to her regime a national security challenge? The answer can be gleaned from the Congress party's mindset — its president, D K Barooah, had said 'Indira is India'. At midnight on June 25/26, 1975, PM Gandhi had emergency orders proclaimed by then-President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed. Her government suspended fundamental rights, arrested all the Opposition leaders and gagged the media. The courts were declared ineligible to hear petitions from citizens demanding the restoration of their rights. The saddest day was when the SC upheld the draconian law denying citizens the right to move a habeas corpus petition in its shameful verdict in ADM Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla (1976). Like all dictators, PM Gandhi, too, believed that she was invincible. 'To be human is to be free', Desmond Tutu, key to South Africa's freedom movement, once said. The people of the country reminded PM Gandhi of that profound urge when they went to the polls in 1977. While senior politicians languished in jail, a silent, leaderless movement, led by cadres of the RSS and other organisations, spread across the country to restore democracy. Not only was Congress defeated at the hustings, PM Gandhi and her son Sanjay Gandhi couldn't even win in their seats. The Emergency years saw dictatorship in its worst form. A year later, the J C Shah Commission, appointed by the Janata party government in 1977, submitted its report highlighting the excesses of the Emergency including abuse of power, violation of civil liberties, forced sterilisation, the compulsory retirement of 25,000 government employees over their alleged political affiliations and the arrests of more than 1,10,000 people. Many of those who fought that second freedom struggle against the Emergency five decades ago are in power today. They are committed to protecting the 'freedom, equality and fraternity' that summarised the spirit of our independence. Yet countrymen should always be alert to the warnings given by American jurist Joseph Story: 'Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people in order to betray them.' The writer, president, India Foundation, is with the BJP. Views are personal
News18
an hour ago
- News18
After Odisha, Chandigarh Police Issue SOP On Dealing With Army Personnel For Legal Requirements
The SOP, released by the Chandigarh DGP, outlines detailed instructions on how police officers must conduct themselves when interacting with military personnel After Odisha, Chandigarh police have issued a standard operating procedure for dealing with defence personnel in a legal or procedural context. The SOP, released by the director general of police (DGP) of the union territory of Chandigarh, outlines detailed instructions on how police officers must conduct themselves when interacting with military personnel—whether they are complainants, accused, witnesses, or mediators. 'This SOP has been established to ensure that all interactions with Army personnel are conducted in a lawful, professional, respectful, impartial, and transparent manner," stated the DGP's official order. 'Maintaining a respectful and courteous demeanor, ensuring prompt attention to grievances, and providing necessary legal and logistical support is key to this protocol." A key highlight of the SOP is the clause that serving Army personnel cannot be arrested without prior permission from the central government unless involved in serious crimes such as rape, murder, or kidnapping unrelated to official duties. In such cases, immediate intimation must be sent to the nearest military station headquarters with all details of the arrest. 'All actions must remain fair, lawful, and transparent to foster trust and cooperation between the two institutions," the order emphasised. The DGP has given various key provisions while dealing with Army personnel in different situations. Army personnel lodging complaints are to be given priority and treated with confidentiality and dignity. In case of arrest, strict adherence to Sections 42 and 43 of BNSS is required, and military authorities must be informed immediately. The SOP says witnesses or mediators from the Army should be engaged respectfully, with preference for remote communications unless physical presence is absolutely necessary. As per the SOP, a dedicated desk under a DSP-rank officer will handle all Army-related matters to ensure seamless communication and coordination. High-profile or sensitive cases may involve the formation of a special investigation team (SIT). Any police misconduct involving defence personnel will be dealt with in a strict and transparent manner. The SOP also mandates that Army property, such as weapons, vehicles, and equipment, must be handled carefully and reported promptly. Media disclosures involving Army personnel are restricted without official clearance to safeguard sensitive information. To further reinforce coordination, the SOP calls for the establishment of a Military Coordination Branch and joint workshops to improve mutual respect and understanding between the forces. top videos View all Concluding the document, the DGP directed 'all concerned to ensure meticulous compliance accordingly". This initiative is expected to build greater mutual respect and trust between the Chandigarh police and the Indian Army, fostering a harmonious civil-military relationship and upholding the rule of law. About the Author Ankur Sharma With over 15 years of journalistic experience, Ankur Sharma, Associate Editor, specializes in internal security and is tasked with providing comprehensive coverage from the Ministry of Home Affairs, More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : army Chandigarh defence Odisha police Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 21, 2025, 06:30 IST News india After Odisha, Chandigarh Police Issue SOP On Dealing With Army Personnel For Legal Requirements
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Govt not releasing relief funds for rain damage: MLA Kamath
Mangaluru: Mangaluru City South MLA D Vedavyas Kamath conducted an emergency meeting with officials of Mangaluru City Corporation (MCC) regarding several issues related to his constituency on Friday. The MLA accused the govt of not releasing relief for emergency repairs of houses damaged due to heavy rains. Speaking at the meeting, the legislator noted that many people within the corporation's jurisdiction are facing severe difficulties due to rain damage. Previously, under BJP rule, a decision was made to allocate up to Rs 40,000 in relief funds for emergency repairs to homes in all 60 wards, with 10 homes per ward, during natural disasters. However, now that the BJP's term ended and the corporation is under the state Congress govt's control through district administration, it is inexcusable that no relief funds have been distributed, said Kamath. No one has the authority to block the previous council's decision, and relief funds should be distributed to the people immediately, he demanded. The MLA directed officials that areas damaged by rain should be repaired immediately, measures should be taken to prevent rainwater from entering homes in the future, and issues related to garbage and drinking water should be resolved quickly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo "Additionally, talented athletes, who participated in various sports were previously given encouragement funds by the city corporation, and aid was provided for cultural activities and sports by various organisations. The Congress has also unlawfully obstructed this," he alleged. The MLA strongly criticised the current administration for not properly utilising the funds allocated in the previous BJP budget, thus doing an injustice to the common people. Since the corporation's administration came under the state govt's purview, the administrative system has become chaotic, he added. Kamath said that the commissioner of MCC, Ravichandra Naik, has assured to initiate actions systematically without any lapses. MCC executive engineer Naresh Shenoy was present.
