Gaurav Gogoi slams PM Modi's remarks on ‘Chinese' features

GUWAHATI
Gaurav Gogoi, one of three Congress Lok Sabha members from Assam, has criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for remarks concerning the physical features of Chinese people, asserting that such comments are deeply traumatic for individuals from the northeastern States, who face similar stereotyping across India.
Addressing media persons in New Delhi on Wednesday (May 28, 2025), Mr. Gogoi, who was recently appointed president of the Assam Pradesh Congress Committee, said the Prime Minister should direct his attention to pressing issues such as bilateral trade and the border situation with China, instead of making observations on physical appearance.
'Recently, while referring to China, the Prime Minister made light of the physical features of the Chinese, especially with respect to the shape of their eyes. When young men and women come from the northeast to different parts of India, they are often teased for the same physical features,' Mr. Gogoi said.
Also read: Gaurav Gogoi denies links with Pakistan; Himanta says he will provide proof by September
'Such language only perpetuates the harassment and is used to taunt and tease the people of the northeast,' he added, cautioning that remarks of this nature reinforce harmful stereotypes.
The Congress MP said that young people from the northeast routinely share their experiences of discrimination when they travel to metropolitan cities for education or employment. 'I must ask him to be also sensitive, as these (certain physical features) have caused a lot of trauma for young people of the northeast, who often complain to me when they come to Delhi, Bombay, or Pune for their studies,' he said.
Mr. Gogoi reiterated that national leaders have a responsibility to exercise restraint and empathy in their public discourse, particularly when referring to communities that have historically faced marginalisation.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

an hour ago

• Indian Express

US raises security concerns over China's planned London embassy

The United States has voiced concern over China's plan to build a new embassy in London, saying it could give Beijing access to sensitive communications near one of Britain's key financial centres. The comments, reported by The Guardian, have stirred uncertainty over whether the embassy project will go ahead. The site in question, Royal Mint Court, lies close to the City of London and Canary Wharf areas connected by underground data cables. Security officials fear the location could pose a risk, and the UK government is now reviewing the plan. Campaigners who have opposed the embassy for years say the issue has become more political since Washington got involved. 'They seem to be struggling to make the right decision,' Dave Lake, a local resident and head of the campaign against the embassy, told The Guardian. 'It was a straightforward inquiry but because of this, that and the other, particularly the Americans getting involved, it's made it all up in the air.' The UK government rejected planning permission for the embassy two years ago due to security concerns. But it has since taken over the decision from local authorities and is expected to make a final call by September 9. China bought the 2-hectare site in 2018 for £255 million. Demonstrations against the plan have continued, with fears that a Chinese embassy in the area would increase surveillance and draw further protests. Lake added: 'We know there are cables running underground, and we know the capabilities of the Chinese. In the early conversations, it was just about our security.' Former British diplomat Charles Parton, who advised Parliament's foreign affairs committee, said the matter depends on what kind of data passes through those cables. Speaking to The Guardian, he said: 'There are two ways to look at it. One is to say you can't use the site; the other is to say reroute the cables. How difficult is it to reroute them? I don't know.' Parton said embassy upgrades are normal in diplomacy, but added that 'if the security issue is resolved satisfactorily, then why shouldn't both countries go ahead and build new embassies?' The White House raised its concerns shortly after the US and UK signed a trade deal during the G7 summit in Canada this week. A US official told The Sunday Times, as quoted by The Guardian, 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' The Dutch parliament has also flagged worries over the site's location. Uyghur activist Rahima Mahmut, who lives in the UK, told The Guardian, 'It is really unbelievable when not only the US government but also the Dutch government express their concerns.' Simon Cheng, a former Hong Kong consulate worker now in the UK, said the site could increase surveillance risks for people in exile. 'The UK government needs to think twice,' Cheng said. 'It's not only the closest ally that has given a warning but also others. We have concerns about our security here.' The Chinese embassy defended its proposal, saying it had followed UK rules and listened to all stakeholders. A spokesperson told The Guardian the embassy would help China carry out its diplomatic duties and deepen cooperation. The spokesperson added, 'Anti-China forces are using security risks as an excuse to interfere with the British government's decision. This is a despicable move that is unpopular and will not succeed.'

First Post

an hour ago

• First Post

As Trump, Starmer lean towards Israel against Iran, Xi and Putin join hands in opposition

The Israel-Iran conflict has turned into a competition between the two global blocs as US President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer have put their weight behind Israel and Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin have rallied around Iran. read more As the United States and United Kingdom have leaned towards Israel and China and Russia have sided with Iran, the West Asia crisis appears to be turning into a confrontation between the two global blocs. But it is far from clear which side will come out on the top. Except for the United States, no other world power has offered to side with one side in the conflict militarily. Despite being allies, China and Russia have not offered indication that they would get militarily involved to save Ayatollah Khamenei's regime in Iran. The UK has indicated that it could join any US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities in at least a supporting role. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even though they cannot do much to help Iran, Xi Jinping of China and Vladimir Putin of Russia, are trying to make the most of the ongoing conflict. They are pitching themselves as the alternative to the US-led world order. They are also trying to portray the Israeli war on Iran as an extension of the war in the Gaza Strip — a conflict whose toll has garnered Israel worldwide criticism. In a telephonic call, Xi and Putin condemned the Israeli campaign against Iran and called it a breach of the United Nations Charter and international law. Xi & Putin join hands for Iran — but stay away from war Xi and Putin have indeed joined hands in support of Iran, but they have stood away from the war — unlike Trump who has indicated the US involvement in the war in support of Israel is imminent. In an apparent message for Trump, Xi said that 'major powers' that have a special influence on either side should work to 'cool the situation, not the opposite'. Russia has also asked the United States to not join Israel in the war on Iran. Ironically, even as Xi and Putin have asked Trump to stay out of the conflict, Putin is waging a war on Ukraine in which he is committed to the total subjugation of Ukraine and the destruction of Ukrainian nationhood. Xi is keeping the Russian war economy running. Xi himself has committed to the occupation and merger of the self-ruled island of Taiwan with China — forcefully if required. As Russia is bogged down in the war on Ukraine and China is way too far and not interested in a military confrontation with the West, Iran cannot expect any direct help from either of its main allies — even as both allies milk the situation by trying to shape public opinion and establish themselves as a voice of reason against what they call a Western-sponsored unfair war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Stakes are high for Russia & China While the stakes for Khamenei are definitely existential, the stakes are quite high for Russia and China as well. For a long time, Russia and China had formed an anti-Western bloc with North Korea and Iran. In West Asia, Iran was the fulcrum of the bloc in countering the influence of the United States and Israel. Iran had also been supported Russia in the war on Ukraine. As Iran has been reduced to a shadow of its former self, Russia and China have lost a counterweight to the West in West Asia. 'The collapse of the current regime would be a significant blow and would generate a lot of instability in the Middle East, ultimately undermining Chinese economic and energy interests,' Andrea Ghiselli, a scholar of China's relations in West Asia and North Africa, told The Daily Telegraph. As for Russia, the degradation of Khamenei's regime, even if short of an outright collapse, would mean the second setback within months in West Asia. Late last year, as opposition forces ousted longtime dictator Bashar al-Assad in Syria, Russia lost sway over the country. Russia had projected power along the southern flank of Nato through ports and airbases in Syria. With Assad's ouster, Russia lost those footholds. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Mint

2 hours ago

• Mint

U.S. prepares action targeting allies' chip plants in China

A U.S. official told top global semiconductor makers he wanted to revoke waivers they have used to access American technology in China, people familiar with the matter said, a move that could inflame trade tensions. Currently, South Korea's Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix as well as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing enjoy blanket waivers that allow them to ship American chip-making equipment to their factories in China without applying for a separate license each time. Jeffrey Kessler, head of the unit in charge of export controls at the Commerce Department, told the three companies this week he wanted to cancel those waivers, according to people familiar with the meetings. They said Kessler described the action as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on critical U.S. technology going to China. If carried out, the move could be disruptive both diplomatically and economically. Earlier this month, the U.S. and China agreed to a fragile trade truce in London. Part of the deal involved each country agreeing to hold off from introducing new export controls and other measures designed to hurt the other. The action isn't a new trade escalation but would be designed to make the licensing system for chip equipment similar to what China has in place for rare-earth materials, White House officials said. The U.S. and China continue to make progress on completing the agreement they reached in London and negotiating on trade, they said. 'Chip makers will still be able to operate in China. The new enforcement mechanisms on chips mirror licensing requirements that apply to other semiconductor companies that export to China and ensure the United States has an equal and reciprocal process," a Commerce Department spokesman said. A new step making it harder for global chip makers to operate in China might still strike Beijing as a betrayal of the London deal. It could also strain the relationship between Washington and friendly governments in South Korea and Taiwan, whose companies would be most affected and have promised large investments in the U.S. in recent years. The Chinese factories in question—including a Samsung memory-chip factory in the Chinese city of Xi'an—are part of the global supply chain for memory, logic and other chips. While they generally don't have the most advanced technology, the factories' output is widely used in cars, consumer electronics and the like. Industry officials said tighter curbs by Washington wouldn't immediately force the factories to shut down, but over time, they could find it harder to operate effectively. That would disrupt global industry as companies are dealing with other issues triggered by the U.S.-China trade war, such as China's limits on exports of rare-earth magnets. The chip makers would likely seek case-by-case licenses from the U.S. government to supply their Chinese factories, while looking to replace U.S. equipment with alternatives from Japan and Europe. People involved in the discussions said revoking the waivers isn't a done deal. They said Kessler's unit—the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security—hasn't secured buy-in from other parts of the U.S. government, such as the Defense Department. Opponents in the administration worry eliminating the waivers would ultimately end up boosting Chinese companies and give China control of the plants. Kessler and other national-security hawks have taken a hard line on cutting off China from American technologies, arguing that aggressive measures are needed to limit the country's advances in critical sectors and spur development of supply chains outside China. Those efforts have put them in conflict with pro-business officials. In recent weeks, the administration has halted sales to China of more high-end chips from Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. That has dented the U.S. companies' revenue by billions of dollars. Commerce also weighed broad restrictions on sales of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, although a White House official said that move was no longer under consideration. The South Korean and Taiwanese companies have notified authorities in their home regions about the waiver issue, hoping for help lobbying against the move, people familiar with the discussions said. Both South Korea and Taiwan are negotiating broader trade deals with Washington, part of a wave of agreements the Trump administration hopes to wrap up in the coming weeks. The companies see their Chinese factories as important for competing against Chinese rivals, which are looking to win more global business as chip suppliers. Samsung's current U.S. waiver has allowed its Xi'an plant to make some advanced products that compete against China's Yangtze Memory Technologies, among others. South Korea, a U.S. military ally, and Taiwan have worked with the U.S. in its technology race with China, including by limiting transfer of advanced technology to China. TSMC, Samsung and SK Hynix have all made multibillion-dollar investments in U.S. factories with backing from Washington. Write to Liza Lin at and Amrith Ramkumar at