logo
Delhi Gears Up to Launch New Electric Vehicle Policy Next Month

Delhi Gears Up to Launch New Electric Vehicle Policy Next Month

Arabian Post04-06-2025

Delhi's government is set to introduce an updated Electric Vehicle Policy next month, aiming to enhance sustainable transport options and aggressively combat the city's longstanding pollution challenges. The forthcoming policy update builds on the foundation laid by the original EV Policy, which has been instrumental in accelerating the adoption of electric vehicles across the capital. This next iteration emerges following a comprehensive review by an expert committee tasked with assessing the policy's effectiveness and identifying areas for refinement.
The city's persistent struggle with hazardous air quality has propelled the administration to double down on measures that reduce emissions, with electric vehicles representing a critical component of the broader environmental strategy. The new policy framework is expected to focus on improving public and private transport through increased incentives, infrastructure development, and regulatory support. The objective is to not only facilitate the switch from conventional fossil fuel vehicles to EVs but also to ensure a seamless ecosystem that supports electric mobility for consumers and manufacturers alike.
One of the central features under consideration is the expansion of subsidies and financial incentives for buyers of electric two-wheelers, three-wheelers, and cars. Since the initial policy launch, Delhi has witnessed a steady rise in EV sales, spurred by subsidies, easier registration processes, and preferential parking privileges. The new policy aims to amplify these benefits, possibly increasing the subsidy amounts to align with technological advancements and market trends. The government is also exploring differentiated incentives to encourage the uptake of electric commercial vehicles and public transport fleets, recognising their substantial contribution to urban emissions.
ADVERTISEMENT
Charging infrastructure remains a pivotal challenge in the EV transition. To address this, the updated policy will emphasise the accelerated deployment of charging stations across the city, including residential complexes, commercial hubs, and public spaces. The government plans to partner with private players and utility providers to establish a robust network, minimising range anxiety among potential EV users. Additionally, the policy will advocate for streamlined permitting processes to facilitate rapid infrastructure rollout. These measures aim to create a user-friendly environment that supports daily electric vehicle operations without hindrance.
Delhi's EV Policy 2.0 is also expected to incorporate measures aimed at fostering local manufacturing and innovation. The capital's position as a key market and production hub in India for electric vehicles offers significant economic potential. The government is likely to introduce incentives for companies investing in research and development, battery manufacturing, and vehicle assembly within the city. This approach is designed to generate employment, encourage technological advancement, and reduce dependency on imports, especially in critical components such as lithium-ion batteries.
Environmental experts have welcomed the policy update, highlighting its potential to drastically reduce the city's vehicular pollution, which accounts for a significant share of Delhi's air quality problems. Dr. Anita Sharma, an environmental scientist based in Delhi, notes that 'an effective EV policy not only addresses tailpipe emissions but also signals a shift towards sustainable urban planning and cleaner energy use.' She points out that integrating renewable energy sources into the charging infrastructure could further enhance the policy's impact by ensuring that electric vehicles operate on green electricity rather than fossil-fuel-based power.
However, some challenges remain. The affordability of electric vehicles, despite subsidies, continues to be a barrier for many consumers. While the policy aims to widen access, the upfront cost of EVs compared to traditional petrol or diesel vehicles can deter lower-income buyers. Analysts suggest that targeted financing options and longer-term incentives could help bridge this gap. Moreover, the sustainability of the electric vehicle supply chain, including the ethical sourcing of battery materials, is gaining attention among policymakers and activists alike.
Delhi's transport department has reiterated its commitment to transparency and public consultation throughout the policy finalisation process. Public workshops and stakeholder meetings have been conducted to gather feedback from industry experts, civil society groups, and consumer representatives. This collaborative approach aims to ensure that the policy is balanced, practical, and aligned with the city's unique mobility landscape.
ADVERTISEMENT
The new policy comes amid increasing competition among Indian cities to become leaders in electric mobility. Metropolitan areas like Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad have also been rolling out ambitious EV incentives and infrastructure projects. Delhi's updated framework is expected to set a benchmark in terms of scale and ambition, potentially serving as a model for other regions seeking to tackle urban pollution through cleaner transportation alternatives.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Insurers Pledge to Ease Controversial Prior Approvals for Medical Care
Insurers Pledge to Ease Controversial Prior Approvals for Medical Care

New York Times

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Insurers Pledge to Ease Controversial Prior Approvals for Medical Care

Facing regulatory crackdowns and intensifying criticism from patients and doctors, the nation's biggest health insurers said on Friday that they would retreat from tactics that have delayed medical care and led at times to denials for necessary treatments. For years, the widespread practice known as prior authorization has vexed patients who might not have been notified until the day of surgery whether a procedure would be covered by their insurance or if a prescription medicine would be denied for no clear reason. Insurers often send unintelligible form letters, leaving patients to puzzle out the basis for the denial or what their next steps should be. Patients may delay or even abandon necessary medical care because they may not even be aware that they can appeal the decisions. Lawmakers, regulators and public outrage have drawn attention to abuses of the system, leading to mounting calls for reforms. Insurers have also been the target of myriad lawsuits, some of which attributed patient deaths to those denials and delays. The murder of Brian Thompson, a UnitedHealthcare executive, last December renewed criticisms of the tactic, unleashing a barrage of complaints that the practice was deployed to avoid covering care. 'Prior authorization is a huge issue for people who are in managed care plans because it is one of the ways plans use to control their costs,' said David A. Lipschutz, co-director for the Center for Medicare Advocacy. He pointed to several studies showing that insurers may have inappropriately denied care, particularly in private Medicare plans. Various reports from federal regulators and researchers show that the vast majority of appeals are successful. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Royal Mail boss jumps ship after Czech takeover
Royal Mail boss jumps ship after Czech takeover

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Royal Mail boss jumps ship after Czech takeover

Royal Mail's boss has quit weeks after the postal service fell into foreign hands for the first time in its 509-year history. In a move that caught the business world by surprise, Emma Gilthorpe left having been appointed chief executive a little over a year ago. The former Heathrow director will be replaced on an interim basis by chief operating officer Alistair Cochrane. Her departure comes after Royal Mail's parent company International Distribution Services (IDS) was bought by Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky for £3.6billion. The energy tycoon nicknamed the 'Czech Sphinx' for his inscrutable approach to business decisions swooped on the firm last year in a move that prompted outrage from politicians and businesses. The controversial deal, which was approved by 80 per cent of shareholders, saw the postal service fall into overseas ownership for the first time since it was established by Henry VIII in 1516. IDS chairman Keith Williams and the rest of the board stepped down as planned when the firm delisted from the London Stock Exchange in May. But IDS chief executive Martin Seidenberg and finance chief Michael Snape will stay in their roles. The company had not publicly confirmed whether Gilthorpe, 55, would continue to lead Royal Mail under its new owner. Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell, said: 'A new owner means a different way of thinking and that normally includes a fresh sweep in the boardroom. 'Daniel Kretinsky is a brave man for wanting to own Royal Mail as it comes with a multitude of challenges. He'll already have a firm idea how to fix it and he'll want to parachute his own choice of leader into the company. 'Gilthorpe might have come to the conclusion that if she did not leave of her own free will now, it was inevitable that she would have been pushed out later on.' As part of the deal, Kretinsky agreed to a series of conditions to secure approval from ministers. The Government will retain a 'golden share' in the business. This means any changes to Royal Mail's ownership, tax residency or where its headquarters are based will need ministers' approval. Kretinsky, 49, must also retain the Universal Service Obligation (USO), which guarantees a first-class postal service to anywhere in the UK for a fixed price six days a week. But these rules are set to be changed by the regulator Ofcom, which has proposed cutting second-class deliveries to every other working day. Gilthorpe said yesterday she 'will always be incredibly proud to have led Royal Mail', adding: 'I look forward to seeing Royal Mail continue to transform in the years ahead.'

Walmart to pay $10 million to settle US FTC lawsuit over money transfer fraud
Walmart to pay $10 million to settle US FTC lawsuit over money transfer fraud

Reuters

time20 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Walmart to pay $10 million to settle US FTC lawsuit over money transfer fraud

June 20 (Reuters) - Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab has agreed to pay $10 million to settle a U.S. Federal Trade Commission civil lawsuit accusing the world's largest retailer of ignoring warning signs that fraudsters used its money transfer services to fleece consumers out of hundreds of millions of dollars. The settlement was filed on Friday in Chicago federal court, and requires approval by U.S. District Judge Manish Shah. Walmart also agreed not to process money transfers it suspects are fraudulent, or help sellers and telemarketers it believes are using its services to commit fraud. "Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it's sent, it's gone for good," said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC consumer protection bureau. "Companies that provide these services must train their employees to comply with the law and work to protect consumers." The Bentonville, Arkansas-based retailer did not admit or deny wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. Walmart did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In its June 2022 complaint, the FTC accused Walmart of turning a blind eye to fraudsters who used its money transfer services to cash out at its stores. Walmart acts as an agent for money transfers by companies such as MoneyGram, Ria (EEFT.O), opens new tab and Western Union (WU.N), opens new tab. Money can be hard to trace once delivered. The FTC said fraudsters used many schemes that included impersonating Internal Revenue Service agents, impersonating family members who needed money from grandparents to avoid jail, and telling victims they won lotteries or sweepstakes but owed fees to collect their winnings. Shah dismissed part of the FTC case last July but let the regulator pursue the remainder. Walmart appealed from that decision. Friday's settlement would end the appeal. The case is Federal Trade Commission v Walmart Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 22-03372.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store