DHS Collecting DNA as Part of Larger 'Massive Surveillance' Effort: Lawsuit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alleges a failure to respond to numerous Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking details on how the agency collects, stores and uses the DNA of noncitizens taken into custody as part of a larger "mass surveillance" effort on behalf of the Trump administration, plaintiffs claim.
Newsweek reached out to DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), for comment.
Why It Matters
The lawsuit comes amid a widespread illegal immigration crackdown by the administration that has extended beyond arrests and deportations to stripping humanitarian parole protections from over 500,000 immigrants and preventing student visa holders from attending some American colleges.
What To Know
The lawsuit was filed June 2 by the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology, the Amica Center for Immigrants Rights, and Americans for Immigrant Justice.
They allege that DHS has not been transparent about its rapidly expanding program of genetic data collection from migrants, including children. The FOIA suit expresses mounting concerns about both the scale and oversight of these DNA practices.
"It is a mistake to think of DHS's DNA collection program as 'immigration enforcement,'" Emily Tucker, executive director at the Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law, said in a statement. "Trump is using immigration powers to justify the activities of his militarized federal police force because there is so little institutional or judicial oversight or accountability for executive enforcement actions that invoke 'immigration authority.'
"This program is one part of a massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone. They will use it for deportation, but they will also use it to intimidate, silence and target anyone they perceive as the enemy."
The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief due to the multiple federal agencies purportedly failing to respond to FOIA requests in a timely fashion, combined with a failure to disclose requested documents within the time prescribed by FOIA.
A police employee tests Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) on a saliva sample for criminal analysis.
A police employee tests Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) on a saliva sample for criminal analysis.
Getty Images
The case stems back to August 2024, when a FOIA request was made to ICE—under the purview of DHS—regarding its practices and procedures pertaining to DNA collection of noncitizens.
Back-and-forth email exchanges between the groups and ICE, with a lack of information allegedly provided by the government, concluded last October with ICE failing to respond and make a required initial "determination" within 20 business days of its receipt.
Between October and January, similar exchanges occurred between the groups and CBP—which is alleged to have not provided a response after more than 30 working days.
A report published on May 21, Raiding the Genome: How the United States Government Is Abusing Its Immigration Powers to Amass DNA for Future Policing, shed light on the dramatic increase of DNA profiles collected from migrants and shared with federal law enforcement.
More than 1.5 million migrant DNA profiles have been added to the FBI's Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) since 2020, representing a 5,000 percent in three years. That genetic data is then made searchable by law enforcement across the country, with samples kept indefinitely.
That report also claims that DHS "misleads and intimidates people to collect their DNA," and primarily collects DNA from people of color.
Stevie Glaberson, director of research & advocacy at the Georgetown University Law Center and co-author of the genome report, told Newsweek on Monday that the Trump administration claims to prioritize transparency but continues to collect DNA "in relative obscurity."
"Little remains known about where and how ICE is collecting DNA, even as we have seen numerous examples of the agency grabbing people off the street with masks on and without identifying insignia, and detaining and even deporting US citizens and individuals with a right to remain in the country," Glaberson said. "We filed this suit in the hopes of chipping away at the obscurity in which the administration is carrying out some of its most dangerous programs.
"The country deserves to know the details of DHS's DNA collection program."
A 2021 report published by the California Law Review cites a disproportionate impact of DNA collection on immigrant and minority communities, sparking significant privacy concerns with little public scrutiny or official explanation.
The report followed a 2019 rule change under the Trump administration that removed earlier exemptions for collecting DNA from some noncitizens. It also required regular DNA swabbing in federal immigration detention, including among asylum seekers at legal U.S. ports of entry.
What People Are Saying
Daniel Melo, Immigration Impact Lab Attorney, Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, in a statement: "As immigration enforcement agencies continue to deploy sophisticated tools to target, surveil, and arbitrarily detain non-citizens, the community most impacted by these policy choices has a right to know how, when, and why genetic material is being taken, stored, and used against non-citizens—potentially indefinitely—simply because they were not born in the United States."
Hilton Beckham, assistant commissioner of public affairs at CBP, said in a statement to Wired: "In order to secure our borders, CBP is devoting every resource available to identify who is entering our country. We are not letting human smugglers, child sex traffickers, and other criminals enter American communities... CBP collects DNA samples for submission to the FBI's Combined DNA Index System ... from persons in CBP custody who are arrested on federal criminal charges, and from aliens detained under CBP's authority who are subject to fingerprinting and not otherwise exempt from the collection requirement."
What Happens Next
The suit claims that the government agencies failed to respond within a timely manner; failed to conduct an adequate search based on the information provided for the FOIA requests; and were "wrongly withholding agency records by failing to produce nonexempt records."
The lawsuit seeks a court order compelling DHS to release records related to protocols for DNA collection, storage, access controls and data sharing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
35 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Trolls Iran With Post About 'Regime Change'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump asked on Sunday why there "wouldn't" be "regime change" in Iran if the country's government isn't able to "MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN." The U.S. president mused about the possibility on his social media website, Truth Social, writing: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Trump's comments came after multiple top Trump administration officials said that regime change was not the U.S.'s goal in launching a series of strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities this weekend. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon on Sunday morning. Vice President JD Vance told NBC's Kristen Welker in a "Meet The Press" interview that the U.S. was not at war with Iran but rather with its nuclear program. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Wall Street Journal
39 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Welcome Expansion at the EPA
Kudos to President Trump and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin. The EPA announced last month that it will reassign more than 130 agency scientists to clear the backlog of new chemicals and pesticides that need review before they can be sold. It's a giant step to protect the environment and human health—and there's more to do. Even as the White House pushes to reduce the size of government, some agencies need additional workers to get vital jobs done. That's certainly true at the EPA, which does more than try to keep air and water clean. It also evaluates chemicals in commercial and household products that prevent contamination in kitchens, infections in hospitals, public-health threats in pests and invasive species in nature.
Newsweek
40 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Exclusive: Israel's Herzog Reacts to US Strikes—'Have to Defend Ourselves'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The international community ignored Iran's major underground nuclear facility of Fordow for years, Israeli President Isaac Herzog told Newsweek in an exclusive interview following U.S. strikes against three nuclear sites in central Iran overnight. The Fordow nuclear facility, roughly 60 miles south of Tehran, was secret until 2009. Then-U.S. President Barack Obama said at the time it had jointly told the United Nations' (U.N.) nuclear watchdog that Iran had for years secretly built up a nuclear site near the city of Qom. Referencing the former president's words more than a decade-and-a-half ago, Herzog said Obama "exposed" the existence of Fordow, "but then the world let it happen." "It's ridiculous," Herzog said. "The IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] declared that they're non-compliant, and they're lying," the Israeli president added. "And the world says, 'Okay, what? What do we do about it?'" Referring to Israel, he continued: "Well, we have to defend ourselves, and we remove it." The U.S. launched strikes on Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz—three of Iran's most significant nuclear sites—early Sunday local time, dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer." Major U.S. allies expressed support for the American strikes on Sunday while urging Iran not to respond. Tehran had promised retaliation and "irreparable damage" if the U.S. attacked its nuclear facilities prior to the strikes. Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, on Sunday warned of "everlasting consequences" for what he termed "outrageous" U.S. attacks. The U.S. entry into the war came after Israel carried out what it called a "pre-emptive" campaign against Tehran's nuclear sites and personnel, as well as its ballistic missile and other military sites. Israel said Iran was getting close to having a nuclear weapon, which the U.S., and many of America's allies, have said is unacceptable. However, Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes—not for weapons. Israeli President Isaac Herzog visits a residential building struck by a missile launched from Iran, in Petah Tikva, Israel, on June 16. Israeli President Isaac Herzog visits a residential building struck by a missile launched from Iran, in Petah Tikva, Israel, on June 16. Associated Press Iran launched waves of drone and missiles at Israel shortly after. Both Israel and Iran continued their attacks following U.S. strikes. President Donald Trump hailed the strikes on Fordow, as well as the facilities at Natanz and Isfahan, as a "spectacular military success." "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated," he added. Israel, while not pursuing Fordow, has for over a week carried out extensive airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites, including Isfahan and Natanz, and killed a litany of senior nuclear scientists and generals. The U.S. military's B-2 Spirit bombers, equipped with "bunker busting" GBU-57/B bombs weighing in at 30,000 pounds, were widely considered the only pairing able to take Fordow, buried deep under a mountain, out of the equation. A U.S. submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles against the aboveground facilities at Isfahan around 5 p.m. ET on Saturday, just before U.S. aircraft entered Iranian airspace, General Dan Caine, the chairman of the U.S. joint chiefs of staff, said on Sunday. Washington used deception tactics and a host of fourth- and fifth-generation aircraft traveling ahead of B-2 heavy bombers to sweep for Iranian fighter jets and air defenses, Caine added. At 6:40 p.m. ET, the first B-2 dropped two GBU-57/B bombs at Fordow, followed by another site, the top general said. The rest of the munitions were dropped in the following 25 minutes, and Iran did not fire at U.S. aircraft traveling in or out of Iran, Caine added. Experts and officials said on Sunday it was too early to tell exactly how much damage has been done to Iran's network of nuclear sites. Preliminary assessments indicate all three facilities sustained "extremely severe damage," Caine said. In a Sunday afternoon Truth Social post, Trump pushed back against criticism from Republican lawmaker Thomas Massie of Kentucky, asserting that the U.S. had effectively "taken the 'bomb'" away from Iran by targeting the three nuclear sites. Massie has said that Trump needed congressional approval to launch the aerial attack. During an emergency U.N. Security Council meeting requested by Iran, Secretary-General António Guterres appealed for urgent action to halt the violence and revive negotiations over Iran's nuclear program. "We cannot—and must not—give up on peace," Guterres said, calling for a verifiable agreement with full access for U.N. nuclear inspectors to rebuild trust. Stressing the stakes, he warned that the world faces a clear choice between the path of escalation and that of diplomacy. "We know which path is right," he declared.
