Egypt faces prospect of Iran defeat further empowering Israel in region
Egypt has strongly criticised Israel over its war on Iran, while Cairo will know that a defeated, or significantly weakened, Tehran could allow Israel to project its power more emphatically across the Middle East.
Now the US has joined Israel in the war, calls for Egypt – once the region's political and cultural engine – to prepare for the prospect of a dominant Israel have taken on added significance.
The challenge has already stirred a national conversation on what needs to be done. 'It's not just Iran. The fate of the entire region is now on the line," political analyst and author Abdalla Senawy warned.
"We are at a historic juncture. If Iran is defeated … Egypt's turn will eventually follow. This is the time of reckoning for Egypt before anyone else. Either it rises and makes its own fate or enters and stays in darkness for many decades to come."
Egypt's backing for Iran has mostly been shaped by Cairo's opposition to Israel's war in Gaza, as well as US President Donald Trump 's support for Israel. Cairo has also rejected Washington's proposal to resettle Gazans in Egypt.
In contrast, Egypt's ties with Iran have been improving rapidly, with the two nation forging closer relations, including on energy and military co-operation.
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El Sisi has not spoken publicly about the Iran-Israel conflict since it began on June 13. But he has strongly condemned Israel for initiating the conflict in calls and meetings with world leaders and foreign diplomats, according to official statements.
The latest of those talks took place on Saturday night, when Mr El Sisi spoke by phone with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, just hours before the US struck three key nuclear sites in Iran. Mr El Sisi condemned Israel's escalation with Iran and warned that the war posed a threat to regional security and stability.
Deeper concerns
On Sunday, Egypt said it was 'deeply worried about the latest developments' in Iran, without mentioning the US or its attacks. But concerns in Egypt about the consequences of the war are much greater than public statements suggest.
Cairo fears the US and Israel will next turn their attention to carrying out Mr Trump's proposal to force Palestinians to leave Gaza and resettle elsewhere, including in Egypt's Sinai Peninsula.
Egypt has repeatedly warned that this would undermine its national security, damage the Palestinian cause and weaken the argument for two-state solution.
Pro-government media figures, including popular talk show hosts, have criticised Israel and assured Egyptians that Mr El Sisi and the country's military are there to stymie Israel's efforts to change the region's political landscape.
Separately, the Grand Imam of Cairo's Al Azhar Mosque, Dr Ahmed Al Tayeb, has supported Iran against Israel, condemning Israel's attacks in a Farsi-language Facebook post. As the head of the world's foremost seat of Sunni Islam learning, his words carry significant weight given that Iran is predominantly Shiite.
Egypt and Israel signed a US-sponsored peace treaty in 1979 that is widely viewed as a cornerstone of regional stability. But Egypt's military doctrine continues to present Israel as the nation's chief adversary.
Egyptian military drills are largely focused on the Sinai Peninsula being the most probable theatre of future hostilities, just as the mainly desert territory was in the wars with Israel in 1948, 1956, 1967 and 1973.
Egypt currently faces chronic economic woes, while losing much of its allure as a regional cultural and arts centre. Paradoxically, Egypt has the region's largest army, equipped with cutting-edge weapons procured from the US, Russia, western Europe and China.
'Egypt needs smart partnerships with rational regional powers … that will create a 'crescent of stability' based on interests not ideology,' US-based political scientist and commentator Mamoun Fandy wrote in an open letter to Mr El Sisi.
'We don't need a military confrontation to prove our presence but rather economic and political engineering that convinces the region and the world that Egypt remains the ultimate cornerstone of the Middle East. Mr President, history is not written through neutrality but is made with courageous and conscious positions.'
Amr Hashem Radia, another Egyptian commentator, has made similar points about Egypt's foreign policy. He urged authorities to 'open up the public space" and enable more freedom of expression. That will help the government should it need to make 'unilateral decisions' to deal with the effects of the Israel-Iran conflict, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
22 minutes ago
- Zawya
Oil rises in choppy session as investors weigh up US strikes on Iran
LONDON - Oil prices rose on Monday in a volatile session following the United States' weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities, as investors weigh the potential risks to oil supply disruptions as a result of the escalating conflict. Brent crude futures were up 78 cents, or 1.01%, to $77.79 a barrel as of 1000 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude rose by 76 cents, or 1.03%, to $74.60. U.S. President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Israel carried out fresh strikes on Iran on Monday including on capital Tehran, and Iran's nuclear facility of Fordow which was also a target of the U.S. attack. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Iran said on Monday that the U.S. attack on its nuclear sites expanded the range of legitimate targets for its armed forces and called U.S. President Donald Trump a "gambler" for joining Israel's military campaign against the Islamic Republic. China meanwhile said the U.S. attack had damaged Washington's credibility and warned that the situation "may go out of control." Price were volatile in Monday's session. Both contracts touched fresh five-month highs earlier in the session of $81.40 and $78.40 respectively, before giving up their gains to turn negative during the European morning session and then recovering to a 1% gain. Prices have risen since the start of the conflict on June 13 amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. However, investors are weighing up the extent of the geopolitical risk premium in oil markets given the Middle Eastern crisis is yet to impact on supply. "The geopolitical risk premium is fading, as so far there has been no supply disruptions. But as it's unclear how the conflict might evolve, market participants are likely to maintain a risk premium for now. So prices are set to stay volatile in the near term," UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said. The geopolitical risk premium includes fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. "All eyes remain on the Strait of Hormuz ... and whether Iran will seek to disrupt tanker traffic," Saxo Bank analyst Ole Hansen said. Prices could spike in the short term even without full-scale disruption, if the threat of interference alone is enough to delay shipments through the Strait, Hansen added. Goldman Sachs said in a Sunday report that Brent could briefly peak at $110 per barrel if oil flows through the critical waterway were halved for a month, and remain down by 10% for the following 11 months. The bank still assumed no significant disruption to oil and natural gas supply, citing global incentives to try to prevent a sustained and very large disruption. Given the Strait of Hormuz is indispensable for Iran's own oil exports, which are a vital source of its national revenues, a sustained closure would inflict severe economic damage on Iran itself, making it a double-edged sword, said Sugandha Sachdeva, from research firm SS WealthStreet.
Al Etihad
37 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Tehran hit by Israeli attacks
23 June 2025 14:46 TEHRAN (AFP)Loud explosions rocked Tehran on Monday as Israel said it struck targets in the city, escalating tensions a day after US air strikes on Iran's nuclear in turn, fired missile barrages at Israel and vowed retaliation against the US, as both sides intensified attacks on the conflict's 11th Iranian news agency said Israel struck Fordow -- a key nuclear enrichment facility buried deep in the mountains south of Tehran. The previous day, the US hit the site with "bunker buster" Israeli military said it had struck missile sites in western Iran, and unspecified "military targets" in the media said Israel's strikes hit a power supply system in Tehran, triggering Israel, the national electricity company reported "damage near a strategic infrastructure facility" in the south that disrupted power supply, without naming the location or specifying the were sounded across Israel and blasts were heard over strikes on Iran have killed more than 400 people, Iran's health ministry said. Iran's attacks on Israel have killed 24 people, according to official figures. Israel-Iran Conflict Continue full coverage
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Iran-Israel war: UAE oil pipeline offers safe alternative in case of Hormuz closure
The conflict between Iran and Israel has escalated significantly, with the United States now directly involved. This has triggered fears of a closure or harassment of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 20 per cent of global oil passes daily. Iran has already threatened to block the strait, and its parliament has reportedly approved such a move. In this volatile environment, the Habshan–Fujairah pipeline offers the UAE — and by extension, global markets — a secure and uninterrupted export route for up to 1.5 million barrels per day of crude oil. Its outlet at Fujairah, on the Gulf of Oman, lies outside the Strait of Hormuz, making it one of the few viable alternatives for Gulf oil exports if the strait is compromised. Key strategic advantages 1. Bypassing the Strait of Hormuz: The pipeline allows the UAE to continue exports even if the strait is blocked or becomes unsafe. 2. Market Stability: It provides a buffer against extreme oil price shocks by ensuring a steady flow of oil to global markets. 3. Geopolitical Leverage: The UAE gains strategic autonomy and resilience, reducing its vulnerability to regional tensions. 4. Support for Allies: It can serve as a critical supply route for allied nations dependent on Gulf oil, especially during maritime disruptions. The Habshan–Fujairah Oil Pipeline, also known as the Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline (ADCOP), is a landmark infrastructure project that underscores the UAE's strategic foresight in energy security and global oil logistics. The conceptual design of the pipeline was completed in 2006, with construction commencing in March 2008. The project was spearheaded by the International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC), with engineering and construction carried out by China Petroleum Engineering and Construction Corporation, a subsidiary of China National Petroleum Corporation. The pipeline was officially commissioned in June 2012 and inaugurated on 15 July 2012, when it delivered its first shipment of Murban crude to the Pak-Arab Refinery. The 360-km pipeline (which inlcudes 14km offshore facilities) starts from Habshan in Abu Dhabi, passing through Sweihan, and terminating at Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman. It has a capacity of 1.5 million barrels per day (bpd) and includes three major pumping stations located at Habshan, Sweihan, and Fujairah. The approximate cost of construction was $3.3 billion As of the latest available data, the pipeline is operational and functioning near or at full capacity, transporting up to 1.5 million bpd of crude oil. It plays a vital role in ADNOC's export strategy, particularly in light of the current geopolitical tensions in the region. The Habshan–Fujairah Oil Pipeline has become strategically indispensable amid the ongoing US-Iran-Israel war, particularly due to the heightened risk of disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments. With oil prices already spiking, the pipeline's role is not just regional but global. It helps mitigate the risk of a full-blown energy crisis, especially if the Strait of Hormuz is closed for an extended period.
