UN Security Council discusses situation in the Middle East
New York: The UN Security Council held its regular monthly briefing and closed consultations on "The Situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian Question."
Addressing the meeting, Permanent Representative of Palestine to the United Nations, Riyad Mansour, asserted that Israel's strategy in the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem and the broader West Bank is clear, which is to eradicate the Palestinian demographic presence and ultimately erase Palestinian geography.
Riyad emphasised that that the conflict cannot be resolved through military means, but only through a political solution. He underscored that the only way forward is to uphold the ceasefire in the Gaza Strip and ensure its full implementation in accordance with Security Council Resolution 2735, while also halting the escalation and aggression in the West Bank.
In turn, Ambassador Amar Bendjama, Algeria's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, stated that the Israeli occupation has killed approximately 18,000 children in the Gaza Strip, and this demands an independent investigation.
He emphasised the importance of fully implementing the ceasefire agreement, stressing that the ceasefire must be upheld in accordance with Security Council Resolution 2735.
He further added that reconstruction efforts in Gaza require a comprehensive plan to ensure the Palestinian people can remain on their land.
Bendjama noted that the occupation has adopted a scorched-earth policy in Gaza and is now extending its aggression to the West Bank.
He condemned the recent decision by the Israeli occupation to seize $90 million in Palestinian tax revenues, asserting that weakening the Palestinian Authority is a dangerous path that threatens the very foundation of the Palestinian national project.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
7 hours ago
- Observer
Trump's bombs on Iran blow up heat of Mideast war
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said US air strikes on Sunday "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites, with Tehran later accusing Washington of "blowing up" talks aimed at a deal on its nuclear programme. Following the attack — the United States' first large-scale strikes on Iran — Trump warned Washington would hit more targets if Tehran did not make peace. Hours later, Iran launched two waves of attacks against long-time foe Israel. "Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success," Trump said, adding the key underground enrichment site at Fordo was hit, along with facilities in Isfahan and Natanz. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran the bully of the Middle East must now make peace," he said, warning future attacks would be "far greater" unless a diplomatic solution was reached. "Remember, there are many targets left." Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi speaks during a press conference at the Lutfi Kirdar Congress Center, in Istanbul. — AFP Trump's intervention — despite his past pledges to avoid another "forever war" — threatens to dramatically widen the conflict, after Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign on Iran last week, with Tehran vowing to retaliate if Washington joined in. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused the United States of sabotaging diplomacy after talks with European powers. "This week, we held talks with the E3/EU when the US decided to blow up that diplomacy," he wrote on X. Aragchi later told reporters in Istanbul the United States and Israel had "crossed a very big red line", asserting Iran would continue to defend itself "by all means necessary". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the US strikes, saying Trump's decision to "target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history". In response to the US attack, Iran's armed forces said they targeted multiple sites in Israel including Ben Gurion Airport, the country's main international gateway near Tel Aviv. Israeli rescuers said at least 23 people were wounded. Police said at least three impacts were reported. One of them was the Ramat Aviv area of Tel Aviv, tearing holes in the facades of apartment blocks. "Houses here were hit very, very badly," said Tel Aviv mayor Ron Huldai. "Fortunately, one of them was slated for demolition and reconstruction, so there were no residents inside." In Jerusalem, Claudio Hazan, a 62-year-old software engineer, said he hoped the US intervention would hasten an end to the Iran-Israel war. "Israel by itself would not stop... and it would take longer," he said. Protesters hold placards condemning the US attacks on Iran during a protest, in Seoul. — AFP Israel said it had launched fresh strikes on western Iran and in Qom, south of Tehran. Iran's official IRNA news agency reported four Revolutionary Guard members were killed in strikes on a military base in the city's north. The Israeli military said it had "struck missile launchers ready to launch towards Israeli territory, soldiers in the Iranian Armed Forces, and swiftly neutralised the launchers that launched missiles towards Israeli territory a short while ago". In Tehran, journalists said the roar of aircraft flying over the city could be heard repeatedly for the first time since Israel's initial attacks. The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency said it had not detected any increase in radiation levels at key nuclear sites in Iran following the strikes and Tehran said on Sunday there were "no signs of contamination". The Iranian foreign minister said he would travel to Moscow for "serious consultations" with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday. US media reported the strikes were carried out by B-2 stealth bombers dropping bunker-buster bombs, as well as submarine-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles. Following his address, Trump warned Iran against "any retaliation". Iran and its proxies have previously attacked US military bases in Iraq and elsewhere in the region. The US president had stepped up his rhetoric against Iran since Israel first struck Iran on June 13, repeating his insistence it could never have nuclear weapons. Israel and Iran have traded wave after wave of devastating strikes since then. Tehran denies seeking an atomic bomb. On Saturday, President Masoud Pezeshkian said Iran's right to pursue a civilian nuclear programme "cannot be taken away... by threats or war". — AFP
Observer
7 hours ago
- Observer
Skilful negotiation is the need of the hour
Every student who has ever attended a mock United Nations knows this – negotiations are never zero-sum games with all or nothing gains and losses. As the word suggests, negotiation itself means to talk and arrive at the best possible outcome for the parties involved. In today's uncertain time of international and regional conflicts, negotiations are the need of the hour. The word 'negotiate' originates from the Latin word 'negotiari', meaning "to do business or trade', although the act of negotiation goes further back than its Latin roots. According to researcher John Graham, humans used 'collective imaginations and their long-term relationships to survive and develop even better ways to live'. An important early text on negotiation is the famous treatise 'The Art of War' by the Chinese Sun Tzu. In it, the skills of understanding the opposition, the art of listening, building rapport, and reaching a compromise are seen to be essential when interacting at a negotiating table. Later works of the Indian strategist Chanakya and the Italian Machiavelli similarly emphasised prioritising one's state above all, and maintaining open information corridors throughout any confrontation. In the 20th century, businesses have focused on conducting negotiations to get a better economic or trade deal. The impactful book 'Never Split the Difference' by Chris Voss outlines the various stages of negotiations and comments on important points of 'identifying the black swan' and 'creating the illusion of control' as central to this powerful conversation. In the geostrategic world, negotiation is key to sustaining relationships between nation-states. There are many historical examples where the right people have signed off on the right deal and saved the suffering of a mass of humanity. These include the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, which re-created the map of Europe, and the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which recognised the United States. The Korean Armistice of 1953 effectively ended the Korean War, and the Taif Agreement of 1989 united competing Lebanese factions. All of these agreements followed intense negotiations between warring parties but eventually introduced a peaceful era, however marred by sporadic violence. According to those in the business of political negotiations, there are crucial factors to consider before finalising a political treaty. Dr Kastner, a professor of international law, suggests that four factors are central to successful negotiation: having clear stakeholders, a trusted mediator, and identifying the right time when all parties concerned are ready. The fourth criterion is the most important. It clarifies that negotiators need to understand the concept of the peace to which they are aiming. Peace could be seen in different ways by all parties. While most of us understand it as the end of conflict, this is rarely the case. Most often, negotiations point to potential peace in the long run, but they set the stage for it. With Oman as a central negotiator in the current regional conflict, the complexities of negotiations need to be understood by even the layperson, so that the aspiration for peace is mutually understood by all stakeholders, which includes everybody who is impacted by regional political strife. Sandhya Rao Mehta The writer is an Associate Professor, Sultan Qaboos University
Observer
7 hours ago
- Observer
We have no idea where this war will go
After days of publicly mulling whether to join Israel in its military campaign against Iran, President Trump directed the US military on Saturday to execute a complex attack on three of the nation's nuclear sites with several American warplanes and submarines. Hours later, Trump declared the mission a 'spectacular military success," saying during a national address from the White House that US forces had 'completely and totally obliterated," Iran's nuclear programme. 'There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close,' he said, standing in front of Vice-President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. It may appear like a tactical victory less than four hours after the bombs began to fall, but projecting any sense of finality about this ordeal is wildly premature. The nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan may be lying in rubble. But whether Tehran will be unable to rehabilitate its nuclear programme remains an open question. And what will Iran do in return? If the more than 40,000 American troops and personnel in the Middle East are attacked, will the Trump administration try to topple the political establishment in Tehran? Any one of these questions could have complicated answers with disastrous consequences for the US and its allies throughout the Middle East. Trump doesn't see it that way. 'There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' he said, referring to Israeli air strikes. 'Remember, there are many targets left.' Trump's decision holds the potential to transform not only his presidency but US standing overseas as well. He was elected to the White House on a platform of turning away from foreign conflicts with nebulous goals. A little more than seven months later, he's brought the US military directly into conflict with Iran in an act of war that was meticulously planned and detailed but entirely unauthorised by Congress. The president chose to launch these attacks against Iran by choice, not necessity. Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, testified in March that Iran had a stock of enriched material but had not decided to make a nuclear weapon. (She has since said her comments were taken out of context and estimated Iran was 'weeks to months' away from producing nuclear weapons.) In his speech, delivered after he told Americans via social media that he had entered the war, Trump applauded the bombing operation, which took place using B-2 Stealth bombers along with missiles launched from submarines. 'I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world is not seen in many, many decades,' he said. It's true that the US Air Force had never used Stealth bombers in such a highly orchestrated, overwhelming strike operation. At about $2.1 billion apiece, the B-2 is the world's most expensive aircraft because of its onboard technology. It was engineered to slip behind Soviet air defences and obliterate hardened targets and has seen limited use during the wars in the Middle East. The world's eyes now shift to the American troops inside Iran's range of fire via missiles, drones or other kind of attack. A response may not come for days. When Trump issued the drone strike in January 2020 that killed Qassim Suleimani, it was five days before Iran launched salvos of missile strikes on US forces stationed at bases in neighbouring Iraq. Trump said he hopes that 'we will no longer need' the American military's services. This is wishful thinking. It's almost certain we haven't seen the end of US military action in this war. It might very well have just begun. — The New York Times WJ Hennigan writes about national security issues for Opinion from Washington
