logo
AOC humiliates Pete Hegseth after tweet congratulating him on not leaking Iran attack information

AOC humiliates Pete Hegseth after tweet congratulating him on not leaking Iran attack information

Independent3 hours ago

Praise poured in for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after he didn't leak U.S. plans to bomb Iranian nuclear sites – a low standard Democrats were quick to mock.
Newsmax host Todd Starnes applauded Hegseth's efforts on X, writing, Not a single leak. Well done, @SecDef' seemingly referencing the so-called 'Signal-gate' scandal.
The incident saw the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic added to a group chat with national security officials, including Hegseth, as a drone strike got underway against Houthi rebels in Yemen.
Critics of President Donald Trump's administration, led by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, held back any praise for the embattled Defense Secretary.
'This is like applauding a grown man for being able to wipe their behind,' the New York Democrat wrote on X. 'Not exactly a vote of confidence.'
Other X users were quick to join in on the mocking, with one person adding, 'LOL. He didn't pee himself either! WHAT A BIG BOY!'
'The signal app was down,' another social media user joked.
'This is such an embarrassing new standard to try to celebrate,' another person said.
Another user quipped: 'MAGA praising Pete for not leaking war plans again is like giving a toddler a medal for not eating glue – congratulations, he finally did the bare minimum.'
Hegseth described the U.S. strikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites as an 'incredible and overwhelming success,' adding that they 'devastated the Iranian nuclear program.'
The strikes have also drawn swift threats of retaliation from some Iranian leaders, including the country's army chief, who warned the strikes have given Tehran a 'free hand' to 'act against U.S. interests and its army.'
UN officials on Monday said 'very significant damage' was caused in the U.S. bombardment, which followed strikes from Israel just days before.
Israel launched airstrikes on Iran earlier this month on June 13, after accusing it of being days way from developing a nuclear weapon. The attack kicked off a long-feared war that the U.S. directly entered over the weekend.
Ocasio-Cortez also called the strikes ' grounds for impeachment, ' which sparked backlash from the likes of former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani and Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Miscalculated Iran revenge move on US could spark all-out war in Middle East'
'Miscalculated Iran revenge move on US could spark all-out war in Middle East'

Daily Mirror

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Miscalculated Iran revenge move on US could spark all-out war in Middle East'

As the world braces for an escalation in the Middle East war and hopes US strikes on Iran will not spark a bigger conflict nobody can predict the outcome. An escalation is likely before diplomacy prevails but it is certain that the US attacks will affect the region for years. And that escalation is when world leaders become nervous, desperately trying to hold back the tit-fot-tat march towards all out war and trying to stop other countries joining. Here we examine the possible outcomes of this latest outbreak between the US and Iran, as Israel continues to hammer Israel and threatens revenge against the US. The worst possible outcome is least likely and that involves Iran declaring all-out war on America and Israel. This would happen if the Iranian regime miscalculated and goes too far when it makes a revenge gesture of reply to the United States. The problem is that US President Donald Trump has warned Tehran will be hit by far worse if it does hit US interests so that starts a cycle of escalating violence. I believe if Iran does something below the threshold for war then America may be forced to let it pass and give Iran that off-ramp, saving face and avoiding all-out war. That would involve a much wider conflict, sucking in US allies such as the UK and Europe, leaving Iran to persuade China, North Korea and Russia to come to its aid. The best possible outcome is Iran backing off and starting negotiations again, relative peace even though it means Iran would continue its occasional campaign of terror against America. Extremely careful diplomatic handling could mean Iran makes a gesture of defiance against the US, perhaps hitting a building or a site and not killing anyone. This would play to the nationalists screaming for revenge back home and if no American is killed then Iran may get away with it. But it is unthinkable that Iran will let the US strikes pass without a gesture of violence in return - and precisely what that will be will determine the next few years for the Middle East. There is a tsunami of back-channel negotiations buzzing away in the background between the US, Israel and Iran and the wider region. This may include Iran learning what it can and cannot get away with. Iran could opt to let this costly conflict rumble on for months even though each side is rapidly running out of missiles. I believe this is a possible outcome and will mean escalating Mossad assassinations and other covert operations against Iran, with Tehran hitting back with terror. Despite a huge security clampdown Israel could be badly-hit with terror attacks such as suicide bombs, other terror attacks and even kidnappings. This could involve mass casualty incidents and very easily could spread towards Israel's allikes such as the US and UK. This is perhaps a grey zone war fought in the shadows and would be terrifying for civilians in the west. Iran is very experienced at exporting terror on the orders of the shadowy Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. And it is equally good at persuading third parties to act on their behalf.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store