Diplomatic tightrope on Iran just got more precarious for Starmer

Sir Keir Starmer has been treading a delicate diplomatic tightrope all week on the issue of Iran.Last night's airstrikes by the US mean the challenges facing the prime minister could now continue for months.Sir Keir's repeated calls for de-escalation have clearly not been heeded by the White House.Yet he has avoided direct UK involvement in military action and has sought to maintain what British diplomats claim is a solid and valuable relationship with US president Donald Trump.
The response from ministers appears to be it was not the means they wanted, but they supported the outcome.The UK has not explicitly endorsed the method, but the result - a delay in Iran getting nuclear weapons - is, they argue, in the UK's national interest.Sir Keir's position has shifted since Tuesday, when he seemed confident Trump would not intervene, after sitting next to him at a G7 dinner in Canada."I was sitting right next to President Trump, so I've no doubt, in my mind, the level of agreement there was," he said.Just four days later the president intervened. Did the prime minister misread Trump? Or did the president - whose unpredictability is central to his foreign policy approach - just change his mind?
No 10 has told us it was given advanced warning of the US action, but the UK was not asked to take part. We do not know why.There had been speculation that US B-2 stealth bombers could have used the UK's Diego Garcia airbase in the Indian Ocean as a waypoint en route to Iran.Instead, "Operation Midnight Hammer" involved B-2s flying non-stop for 18 hours to reach their targets, according to the Pentagon.Follow latest on US strikes on IranIran's secretive nuclear site that only a US bomb could hitWhat we know about US strikes on IranIt is possible the UK was not asked for assistance because it would have been a difficult request to grant.There have been debates at the top of government in recent days about the legality of any UK involvement, with the attorney general, Lord Hermer, providing advice on a range of scenarios.With the next steps in the conflict unclear, the US could end up requesting military support from the UK in the coming weeks - prompting further difficult decisions for the prime minister.
So, what next?
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth has responded to concerns the US attacks could prompt the start of a long conflict by insisting: "This is most certainly not open-ended".Yet the actions of both the The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) suggest they fear retaliation from Iran.This is why British diplomats have been planning a flight early next week to help "vulnerable British nationals and their dependents wanting to leave Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories".Defence sources have told me measures to protect British armed forces in the Middle East have been strengthened in the past few hours, with additional fighter jets already in the region and at "high readiness".One UK diplomat told me UK-US relations remain strong, as demonstrated by Foreign Secretary David Lammy's long meeting with secretary of state Marco Rubio and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff on Friday.However, we do not know if - or how - Iran might respond, or whether the UK or its military could be targeted. Starmer's high-wire act has just become even more dangerous.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

41 minutes ago

• The Independent

Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton suffers lower right leg injury in Game 7 of NBA Finals

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

The Guardian

an hour ago

• The Guardian

Israel-Iran war live: Trump floats regime change to ‘make Iran great again' as region braces for Iranian response to US strikes

Update: Date: 2025-06-23T00:32:00.000Z Title: Opening summary Content: Hello and welcome to our live coverage of the US and Israeli war on Iran. US president Donald Trump has brought up the possibility of regime change in Iran following US military strikes against key Iran military sites over the weekend, even as top members of his administration insisted the US was not seeking to topple the Iranian leadership. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform Truth Social. Earlier, vice-president JD Vance had insisted the US was 'not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear programme' while US secretary of state Marco Rubio said that that the US was 'not looking for war in Iran'. The world was meanwhile braced for Iran's response after to the US attacks, which saw it joining Israel in the biggest western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. Speaking in Istanbul, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses. There would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated, he said. 'The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force,' he said. He later flew to Moscow to discuss 'common threats' with President Vladimir Putin. In other key developments: Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel is very close to meeting its goals in Iran of removing the threats of ballistic missiles and the nuclear programme. Speaking to Israeli reporters, he said: 'We won't pursue our actions beyond what is needed to achieve them, but we also won't finish too soon. When the objectives are achieved, then the operation is complete and the fighting will stop.' The UK, France and Germany have released a joint statement following American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, saying that they call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear program. The three countries also urged Iran 'not to take any further action that could destabilize the region', adding: 'We have consistently been clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and can no longer pose a threat to regional security.' Iran's health ministry said that the US strikes on its nuclear facilities had wounded an unspecified number of people but that none 'showed any signs of radioactive contamination'. 'For years, the ministry of health has set up nuclear emergency units in the nearest medical facilities to nuclear sites,' ministry spokesperson Hossein Kermanpour said on X. Israel said that its fighter jets had struck 'dozens' of targets across Iran on Sunday, including a long-range missile site in Yazd in the centre of the country for the first time, Agence France Presse reports. A military statement said that 'approximately 30 IAF (air force) fighter jets struck dozens of military targets throughout Iran' - including 'the 'Imam Hussein' Strategic Missile Command Center in the Yazd area, where long-range Khorramshahr missiles were stored'. US secretary of state Marco Rubio said that 'there are no planned military operations right now against Iran.' In a new interview with CBS, Rubio added that 'no one will know for days' whether Iran had moved some of its nuclear materials prior to the strikes. Iran's parliament has reportedly approved the closing of the key strait of Hormuz shipping lane. Reuters reported Iran's supreme national security council will make the final decision on the move, which could hamstring global trade by shutting the narrow passage between Iran and Oman. Pete Hegseth, the US secretary of defence, said the impact of the air strikes was still being assessed, but that the bombing had hit the areas that had been identified in the planning of the operation. Hegseth said: 'The battle damage assessment is ongoing, but our initial assessment as the chairman said is that all of our precision munitions struck where we wanted them to strike, and had the desired effect.' Pete Hegseth praised Donald Trump's leadership, and said he had overseen the 'obliteration' of Iran's nuclear ambitions. Hegseth said: 'Many presidents have dreamed of delivering the final blow to Iran's nuclear program, and none could until President Trump.'

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Anthony Albanese's excuse is revealed for disappearing when Trump bombed Iran - as he's mocked: 'Right to disconnect'

Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has slammed Anthony Albanese for failing to speak publicly for almost 24 hours on the US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. The former Liberal leader said Australia's allies 'need to know where it stands' after US President Donald Trump unleashed a fleet of B-2 bombers to 'obliterate' three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites on Sunday. 'We've heard from (UK Prime Minister) Keir Starmer, we've heard from (French President) Emmanuel Macron, we've heard from many,' Morrison told 2GB. 'I think it's very important that Australia makes it very clear where we stand. 'I think on the Middle East issue more broadly, particularly going back to October 7th, there's been an absolute fog of ambiguity when it comes to where the government stands on this issue, and in this case, particularly with our strongest ally. 'Now I think this has been a courageous action by President Trump.' The Prime Minister told 2GB host Ben Fordham that he would speak after the National Security Cabinet (NSC) convened a meeting on Monday morning. But Morrison insisted that an NSC meeting could have taken place on Sunday and that Albanese should have spoken on the 6pm news last night. 'Clarity requires timeliness, and so I look forward to a positive statement from the Prime Minister and the government and an acknowledgement of the right actions which have been taken by the US President,' Morrison added. One 2GB listener quipped that Albanese had been silent because he was 'just using his right to disconnect'. The right to disconnect law, which the Albanese government introduced last year, allows employees to refuse work-related contact outside of their working hours. It comes after the Albanese government shifted its tone on the US strikes on Monday morning. On Sunday, a government spokesperson offered no endorsement of the US decision to target Iranian nuclear facilities, instead calling 'de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy'. But after the Coalition offered its full support for the 'proactive action', Foreign Minister Penny Wong came out in support of Trump's military intervention. 'The world has agreed Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon. So yes, we support action to prevent that. And that is what this is,' Senator Wong told ABC's News Breakfast. 'The big question is, now what? And Australia says, like so many other countries, we do not want escalation and a full-scale war and we continue to call for dialogue and diplomacy.' When asked about the legality of the strikes, Senator Wong said: 'I think we are all clear that Iran… cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon. So yes, the government does support action to prevent that.' Following crisis talks with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Sunday, Trump took to social media claim that the current Islamic regime 'is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN'. 'Why wouldn't there be a regime change,' Trump asked, rhetorically - even as he and Starmer urged Ayatollah Khameini to 'return to the negotiating table as soon as possible'. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country was close to achieving its goals of destroying Iran's nuclear program. 'We won't pursue our actions beyond what is needed to achieve them, but we also won't finish too soon,' Netanyahu said on Monday. 'When the objectives are achieved, then the operation is complete and the fighting will stop,' Following an emergency session of the UN Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres warned that the conflict risks 'descending into a rathole of retaliation'. 'W e now risk descending into a rathole of retaliation after retaliation,' he said. 'To avoid it, diplomacy must prevail, civilians must be protected, safe maritime navigation must be guaranteed.'