President Higgins leads ceremony at Arbour Hill to commemorate executed Easter Rising leaders
PRESIDENT OF IRELAND Michael D. Higgins has led the annual State ceremony at Arbour Hill to commemorate the Easter Rising and the leaders of 1916.
The president was joined by his wife, Sabina, as well as Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris at Arbour Hill. the final resting place of 14 of the executed Rising leaders, including the seven signatories of the Proclamation of the Republic.
The annual commemoration at the Dublin site is the longest-running State ceremony to commemorate the Rising, with this year marking the 101st time the event has been held.
"Today marks over 100 years of this State Commemoration of the Arbour Hill Ceremony as we remember those who died for Ireland in 1916 and in particular, those 14 executed leaders of 1916 who are buried here at Arbour Hill," said Mr Harris.
Arbour Hill is the final resting place of 14 of the executed Easter Rising leaders, including the seven signatories of the Proclamation of the Republic (Image: Maxwells Photography)
"It is an honour and privilege for me, as Minister for Defence, to host this traditional commemorative event in the company of relatives of the executed leaders."
Following the event, the Taoiseach said: "I was honoured to take part in today's ceremony at Arbour Hill. We remember those who fought and died for Ireland in 1916."
As well as a Requiem Mass and a ceremony at the grave for the leaders of the Easter Rising, President Higgins laid a wreath to commemorate those who died in 1916.
It is now more than 100 years since the commemoration at Arbour Hill began in 1923, shortly after the end of the Civil War, with the first State commemoration event taking place in 1924.
A commemoration event has been held each year since and over 800 invitations were issued for this year's ceremony.
The commemoration takes place at the Church of the Sacred Heart, the church for the Defence Forces, on the first Wednesday on or after May 3 each year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Germany floats return to conscription if volunteer plan fails
Germany will bring back conscription to boost its armed forces if a plan to use volunteers fails to deliver enough recruits, the country's defence minister has said. Boris Pistorius said he would begin with a voluntary model to attract young people, supporting the Bundeswehr's goal of more than doubling its reserve forces in response to Vladimir Putin 's full-scale invasion of Ukraine . But he said Berlin would not shy away from a return to full conscription if the armed forces had spare training capacity – and would include such a provision in a Bill that will be presented to parliament after the summer break. 'My goal is that the law contains two regulations,' he told German broadcaster ARD, referring to a voluntary option and a compulsory one. The latter, he said, would have to be activated 'if the numbers are not sufficient'. READ MORE The fallback option would avoid a whole new legislative process if the voluntary enlistment numbers fall short. 'We don't have time for that,' he said. 'If we have a mechanism that is already in place, then it won't be a problem.' Germany's chancellor Friedrich Merz said he wants his country to have the 'strongest conventional army in Europe', vowing to play a greater role in the continent's defence. Mr Merz scrapped Germany's strict government debt rules to allow unlimited borrowing for defence spending after his victory in February's parliamentary elections. He aims to overhaul the country's long-neglected armed forces in response to fears of Russian aggression. With money no longer a problem, the biggest issue confronting military planners is personnel shortages. Senior defence officials say the armed forces must expand to include about 80,000 more professional soldiers over the next 10 years to meet Germany's Nato commitments. The country also needs to increase its number of active reservists who can be called upon in times of crisis, with the figure rising from about 60,000 today to 200,000 by the end of the decade. Germany, where young people were compelled until 2011 to either do military service or a civilian alternative, has lost contact with many former conscripts who could serve as reservists due to data protection issues. Mr Pistorius told ARD that the situation was a 'scandal' because 'it means that in an emergency, ie if we were attacked, we could not call up our reservists because we don't have their names or addresses'. He said Germany was working to rebuild its reserves, starting with asking young people turning 18 to complete a survey about their willingness to do voluntary military training and then continue the commitment by being a part of the reserves. The scheme is expected to initially accept 5,000 people a year. Senior figures in Mr Merz's Christian Democratic Union have criticised the plan. They argue Germany needs compulsory enlistment immediately to confront the security challenges facing Europe. But Mr Pistorius has said the military does not yet have the barracks and manpower to train hundreds of thousands of young conscripts each year. Instead, he has insisted on following a voluntary model inspired by a similar system in Sweden. Germany would simultaneously build up its training facilities, he said, and would return to conscription if there was spare capacity. At the same time, Mr Pistorius said, the Bundeswehr would strive to recruit more professional soldiers to increase the standing army from about 183,000 people to about 260,000 by 2035 as part of its Nato targets. 'We have to do that by improving attractiveness, pay and other things,' he said. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
We like to romanticise Ireland's past, but too much remembering could be bad for us
There is no comparison between the Provisional IRA and the Irish Volunteers who staged the Easter Rising in 1916. Patrick Pearse's generation of republicans never set off bombs in crowded pubs or on shopping streets , indiscriminately murdering civilians. They never pulled people out of vehicles and shot them dead because they were Protestants . But there is one parallel that Gerry Adams was able to point to at his successful defamation case against the BBC : the Rising had no democratic legitimacy. When the issue of the Provisional movement's lack of electoral mandate for 'atrocities' was mentioned in court, Adams replied : 'Pádraig Pearse. James Connolly. The men and women who went out in 1916, they had no mandate for what they were doing.' Adams has a point, but it doesn't reflect well on the IRA of which he has always denied being a part. It reflects poorly on an ill-thought-out insurrection that the State now publicly reveres above any other episode in Ireland's journey to independence. Twenty years ago, then-taoiseach Bertie Ahern announced the reinstatement of an Easter Monday military parade at the General Post Office in Dublin. He said there was a need to 'reclaim' 1916 from hardline nationalists. But two decades on, has the move backfired? READ MORE Fr Séamus Murphy, who teaches philosophy at Loyola University Chicago, believes so. 'I don't demand that the State disown the men of 1916. But it has to stop praising them and calling their action the foundation of the State,' Murphy says. The Jesuit priest explores the question further in a new book Confronting the Irish Past: The 1912-1923 Decade in Light of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement. It is an unusual work in that it tries to bring philosophical insights to bear on Irish history. Murphy, who has written extensively on just war theory and Irish neutrality, asks some deep questions about the ethics of commemoration: What duties do we have to our ancestors? How much commemoration is too much? Is there a hierarchy of 'emotional hurt' from historical events? Murphy examines the work of the German Jewish political philosopher Hannah Arendt , who believed history 'needed not so much to be explained as to be confronted'. This meant, among other things, acknowledging the 'ongoing impact' of events – and how political violence leaves a scar on society that can be unpicked in the future. Too much remembering can have negative effects on a population. In Northern Ireland , people were horrified at the recent clashes with police officers during street protests. But the thuggery was not entirely surprising in a province where two communities have been glorifying acts of violence for decades. Elsewhere in the world, commemoration of historical victimhood can be weaponised to commit crimes against humanity. 'It's a human thing. We remember our people's sufferings, while being indifferent to those of others, including the sufferings our tribe or nation inflict on the others. In the latter case, we can be inclined to say: they had it coming, they deserved it,' says Murphy. Ultimately, the question arises: who is history meant to serve – the living or the dead? 'It is bad for us to behave in the present as if our ancestors, dead grandparents, etc, no longer mattered in any sense. It would be treating them with contempt. Same goes for how we behave in the present with respect to how it would likely affect future generations,' says Murphy. But we should not be afraid to adapt history 'for the needs of the living'. That includes foregrounding the celebration of those events that pave the way for the future we wish to see. 'The nationalist side – our people – has to acknowledge that, just as Sinn Féin /IRA's political enemy in Northern Ireland from the 1970s to today was the SDLP – or any other party with a significant nationalist following – so the political target of the 1916 Rising was not the British government or the Ulster unionists but the Home Rule party,' says Murphy. ' John Redmond and the Home Rule party were moving, slowly, to doing a Bertie Ahern and signing a Good Friday Agreement, recognising that unionists couldn't be compelled into a united Ireland. The Rising is the scream of rage against that. We can't – without engaging in massive pretence – claim to endorse the Rising and the Good Friday Agreement with no qualification: they contradict each other at several points.' Here lies a test for all of us. To create a shared future on this island, and internationally, we must move beyond uncritically celebrating the actions of any particular tribe. Standing in our way is an imagined moral duty to people who are long dead and who had their own flaws. Surely our overriding moral duty is for the living? [ How Tuam, synonymous with a dark side of Irish history, can finally 'do the right thing' Opens in new window ] WB Yeats 's line 'Was it for this ... that all that blood was shed?' has an emotional force in debates on Ireland's future. But, says Murphy, 'just as you shouldn't feel compelled by your dead parents' wish that you should become a neurosurgeon – or a priest – so a political agenda of a previous generation cannot compel today's political action. Your parents have no right to say – adapting Yeats – to you, if you choose to be a journalist rather than what they wanted: was it for this that we made all those sacrifices?'
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Spotify founder bets big on Europe's war economy as defence stocks surge
Daniel Ek isn't known for military manoeuvres. However, the Spotify founder's bet on Helsing, an AI defence start-up, has made him an unlikely figurehead in Europe's arms race. His investment vehicle is leading a €600 million round that values the German group at €12 billion, more than double last year's mark. It's not the only thing surging. European defence stocks have soared this year, fuelled by war in Ukraine, threats from Russia and a new UK-EU security pact. Germany's Rheinmetall is up 190 per cent; German tank maker Renk 270 per cent; France's Thales 80 per cent; British multinationals BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce some 70 and 50 per cent, respectively. The Stoxx Europe Aerospace and Defence index has jumped 45 per cent. The bullish case? A decades-long rearmament, led by NATO states eyeing up to 5 per cent of GDP for defence. The bear case? Patchy procurement, political bottlenecks, and increasingly elevated valuations in a defence bull market now over three years old. READ MORE Still, investor appetite is ravenous. Morningstar notes a new defence ETF has gathered €2.5 billion in just three months. Even peace in Ukraine, analysts agree, wouldn't end the boom – just shift it to replenishment and deterrence. As Helsing's soaring valuation suggests, the war economy may be just getting started.
