Student's sick trophies after raping 10 women - polar bear sock and hair

Chinese PhD student Zhenhao Zou, 28, who was found guilty of raping and drugging 10 women and filming several of the disgusting attacks, kept 'trophies' belonging to his victims
A serial rapist Chinese PhD student who was found guilty of drugging and raping 10 women has been handed a life sentence for his crimes.
On Thursday, Zhenhao Zou, 28, was jailed at Inner London Crown Court for life with a minimum term of 22 years after being found guilty of drugging and raping 10 women in London and China between 2019 and 2023.
The court heard Zou 'presents as a smart and charming young man' but is 'also a persistent sexual predator; a voyeur and a rapist'.
Judge Rosina Cottage branded him a "dangerous and predatory sexual offender" after he was found guilty on March 5.
During the four-week trial, the court was told Zou lured young Chinese women back to his plush properties, plied them with a cocktail of drink and drugs before attacking them and filming it on hidden spy cameras. In one video shown to the jury, which reduced some to tears, a semi-conscious unknown woman begged Zou to stop raping her.
He was convicted of the harrowing attacks involving two women who have been identified and another eight who have yet to be traced. He filmed nine of the attacks as 'souvenirs', and kept a trophy box of women's belongings, jurors in his trial were told.
Police discovered a yellow Fendi box in a wardrobe at his luxury apartment which contained jewellery, clothing and even lipstick thought to have been taken from his victims.
An image of belongings found in Zou's apartment also showed several hair bands, a key, and a magnet.
Commander Kevin Southworth, from the Metropolitan Police, had told the BBC: "Zou is plainly a depraved and cowardly individual who's preyed on his victim survivors in the most despicable manner."
Giving evidence in his defence, Zou spoke through a Mandarin interpreter and told jurors that he watched 'specialist timestop' pornography more than other genres. Prosecutors previously said Zou filmed nine of the alleged victims, footage of which was played in court.
Catherine Farrelly KC, prosecuting, told jurors: 'The police reviewed over 700,000 artefacts which included 1,277 videos. The police found absolutely no trace whatsoever of such an interest (in timestop pornography) when they went through that material.'
Asked by his lawyer Mark Cotter KC why that particular genre appealed to him, Zou said: 'I like it because the girl appears to be still and quiet when they are having sex.' Mr Cotter then asked Zou: 'What about being asleep?' The student replied: 'Yes, that's my favourite type. But I could not find that.'
The student, who moved to Belfast in 2017 to study at Queen's University before coming to London in 2019 to do a master's degree and then a PhD at UCL, faced a total of 35 counts. The mechanical engineering student was found guilty of 10 counts of rape and was also convicted of three counts of voyeurism, 10 of possession of an extreme pornographic image, one of false imprisonment and three of possession of a controlled drug with intent to commit a sexual offence, namely butanediol.
He was cleared of two further counts of possession of an extreme pornographic image and one of possession of MDMA with intent to commit a sexual offence.
Police believe Zou may have been responsible for around 50 more rapes and are appealing for women to come forward. The Met said he is "the most substantial and prolific offender that we've come across in recent times".

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

3 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

GP who posed as nurse to kill mum's partner with poisoned jab cut off by family

Once-respected GP Thomas Kwan was jailed for 31 years and five months in November after admitting attempted murder, he is unable to apply for parole for 20 years. A once-respected doctor who tried to kill his mum's partner while disguised as a nurse has been cut off by his own family, it has been revealed. Thomas Kwan has been ostracised by his own family after trying to kill his mum's partner with a poison 'Covid jab' while disguised as a nurse. The once respected doctor disguised himself in a wooly hat, tinted glasses and surgical mask to administer a fake Covid jab to his mum's partner. In reality, it contained the highly toxic iodomethane, a fumigant pesticide. Thomas Kwan was jailed for 31 years and five months in November after admitting attempted murder. ‌ ‌ "His relationship with his brothers and sisters has been severed for years," said a source close to the case. "His mother has disowned him." Kwan is also facing potential legal action to confiscate his near £1m NHS pension, which will devastate his finances. Only his Chinese-born wife is still standing by him. His victim Patrick O'Hara, 72, still suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder due to his horrific ordeal on January 22 last year, Newcastle crown court heard. On that day, Kwan travelled from his £500,000 property in Ingleby Barwick, to his mum Jenny Leung's home. Kwan's mother had taken £1m out of a joint back account before she divorced Kwan's late father, who died around 30 years ago, aged 60, while Kwan was studying at Newcastle University. Kwan considered that he had not been fairly treated with his father's will as he did not receive the greatest share of his estate, which he felt was 'his right'. His mother had updated her will to allow Patrick to live in her home in St Thomas St, Newcastle in the event of her death, delaying Kwan's inheritance, with Kwan plotting to kill Patrick to get his hands on his mum's inheritence. Kwan arranged an appointment in advance using fake NHS letterheads to give Patrick a 'Covid jab', which was actually laced with poison. It was later revealed that Kwan experimented with a series of noxious substances, including ingredients to make ricin, in his garage after the row over his mum's will. ‌ The court had heard Kwan became "obsessed" with ricin, arsenic, cyanide, and nerve agents. He had "10 poisons used to kill people" among guides found after the attack. He told how Kwan sent Mr O'Hara two bogus NHS letters from a "community nurse" called Raj Patel, one of Kwan's former colleagues, and even produced a fake ID in a wig, moustache, specs and goatee beard. There, he injected Patrick with the lethan concoction, with Patrick later asking his GP about the jab after the injection site became inflamed. He was sent home with antibiotics, but his condition worsened and he was rushed to hospital where he was diagnosed with necrotising fasciitis, a life-threatening flesh-eating disease. Patrick was kept in intensive care and had to have skin on his left arm and shoulder removed due to the flesh eating bug. Five days after the attack, Patrick received another NHS-style letter detailing the results of his blood tests before the jab was given, the jury heard. A package meant for Patrick was then intercepted by police containing over-the-counter iron supplements which the prosecution say had been sent by the defendant. Detectives also interviewed him just days after the attack. ‌ Patrick became suspicious after Jenny made a comment about the nurse being "about the same height" as her son. Sentencing Kwan to 31 years and five months behind bars, Mrs Justice Lambert tol Kwan: "Your intention of visiting the home was to administer a lethal injection of poison to Mr O'Hara on the pretence of administering a Covid booster. It was an audacious plan to murder a man in plain sight and you very nearly succeeded in your objection. "You were in the home of Mr O'Hara for 40 minutes and for some part of that your mother was also present and you took her blood pressure. Extraordinary though it seems, so trusting were they that neither recognised you under your disguise." ‌ Justice Lambert said financial gain was the motive behind the attempted killing and added: "You were certainly obsessed by money and more particularly by money which you considered yourself to be entitled. I have no doubt that the reason why you tried to kill Mr O'Hara was for financial gain. "You knew your mother had left the house to her children but you also knew she had changed her will to give Mr O'Hara a life interest in the house. By killing him you removed the obstacle which lay between you and your recovery of your share of the property following your mother's death." Patrick has separated from Kwan's mother, Jenny, after the ordeal, with Jenny now having disowned her son. After he was jailed in November, Kwan's wife told the Mirror that she did not believe that her husband intended to kill. She added: "In his heart he is very, very good. I don't blame him. I love him, trust him, and will be here for him until the end." Kwan is currenty serving his sentence and will be unable to apply for parole for 20 years.

Evening Standard

4 hours ago

• Evening Standard

Flamengo 3-1 Chelsea: Nicolas Jackson sent off as Blues collapse in Club World Cup clash

Chinese PhD student jailed for life after being exposed as serial rapist who filmed attacks as trophies PhD student jailed for life after being exposed as serial rapist

Daily Mail​

4 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

SFA hit back at Rangers statement as John Brown TV row takes fresh twist

The SFA have accused Rangers of issuing 'misleading comments' after the Ibrox club criticised the punishment they received for a remark made by former player John Brown on club media channels. Rangers were fined £3,000 following a disciplinary hearing after being charged with breaching rule 38, which states clubs should not allow any criticism of match officials 'calculated to indicate bias or incompetence' or to 'impinge upon his character'. While working as a pundit on Rangers TV, Brown claimed a decision not to award Rangers a goal at Easter Road on the final weekend of the league season was 'corrupt' amid a debate over whether the ball had crossed the line. This week Rangers claimed they had 'flagged numerous examples of similar incidents on club channels' during the hearing and questioned a 'lack of consistency' in the SFA's approach. In response, the governing body pointed out that Motherwell development coach Richard Foster was handed a six-match touchline ban for a similar breach last September after branding the SFA's explanation for a contentiously-awarded Rangers goal against St Johnstone as 'lies' while working as a pundit for the BBC. They also claimed that investigations were undertaken in other cases outlined by Rangers but the potential breaches were not considered serious enough to merit more than warnings. An SFA statement read: 'We note Rangers' response to the determination of a recent independent Judicial Panel Tribunal. In the interests of accuracy, we wish to address some of the misleading comments contained therein. 'The sanction imposed by an independent panel was entirely in keeping with the application of the rules. The most recent and relevant example of a similar breach, the sanction imposed on Richard Foster of Motherwell FC for comments of a similar nature in the media, attests to that. 'Furthermore, to address the comments regarding 'rationale behind differing outcomes', we wish to point to the fact that investigations were undertaken in previous cases outlined and that the compliance officers of the time saw fit to issue a censure by way of warning letter for potential breaches deemed insufficiently serious to be progressed to a notice of complaint. 'This system of proportionality has been adopted since the inception of the Judicial Panel Protocol in 2011. Indeed, such discretion was exercised last season when the compliance officer wrote to (Rangers) to warn of the future conduct of players following matters involving Vaclav Cerny, Dujon Sterling and Mohamed Diomande. 'We also note that Rangers intend to contact the association to seek clarity on the Judicial Panel Protocol and its application. The club is, in fact, already represented on the JPP Working Group. 'We have requested written reasons from the panel chair involved in the tribunal and in the interests of transparency will publish in due course. 'JPP Rule 38 was introduced in response to the referee strike of 2010, when match officials campaigned for greater protection after enduring sustained personal criticism from clubs and fans. Ahead of a new season, we remind clubs of their responsibilities in this regard.'