Rising valuations, cloudy earnings view confronts US stocks after tariff rebound

Summary
S&P 500 edges back after erasing post-April 2 losses
Solid Q1 results help stocks, outlook dims for rest of 2025
S&P 500 P/E ratio back around level on April 2
NEW YORK, May 7 (Reuters) - After a round-trip for U.S. stocks following their tariff-fueled swoon, investors are wary of obstacles that will prevent the market from more significant gains in the near term.
A stronger-than-expected first-quarter earnings season and optimism that worst-case trade fears will not come to pass underpinned the stock market's recent gains, after President Donald Trump's April 2 announcement of sweeping tariffs unleashed a burst of severe volatility.
The roller-coaster nature of developments in reaching deals with the top U.S. trade partners - most notably China - was seen in stark relief on Tuesday, with sentiment largely depressed during regular Wall Street trading only to reverse course in the evening on news that top U.S. officials will meet with a top China official in Switzerland later in the week.
Even so, stocks may struggle as they trade at loftier valuations than they did after recent declines, while companies still face a murky earnings and economic outlook because of the fluctuating trade backdrop, investors said. The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab has pulled back to start the week after the benchmark index as of Friday had erased its losses since April 2.
"We've been surprised on the magnitude and just how quickly the market has rebounded," said Michael Reynolds, vice president of investment strategy at Glenmede. "We think to some extent the markets are probably a little overly optimistic relative to where we sit through negotiations and just the fact that there's still so much unknown."
Progress on trade, such as deals with key trading partners, could be one catalyst to drive stocks higher. Focus is also on Wednesday's Federal Reserve monetary policy meeting and whether the central bank will signal openness to resuming interest rate cuts.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will meet with China's vice premier, He Lifeng, in Switzerland later this week. Bessent said that, at least for now, he sees the meeting as "about de-escalation."
Even with the recent rebound, which included a nine-session streak of gains that ended Friday, the S&P 500 remains down over 8% from its February record high.
Here's a look at several factors investors are watching after the S&P 500 erased its "Liberation Day" losses:
STRONG Q1 EARNINGS, OUTLOOK MURKIER
Investors have pointed to a solid first-quarter earnings season helping to soothe stocks in the wake of the tariff-driven declines. With over 70% of the S&P 500 having reported, earnings overall are on pace to have climbed 13.6% in the quarter from a year ago, according to LSEG IBES. That compares to an estimate of an 8% rise as of April 1.
However, in a reflection of the murky outlook, consensus analyst estimates for profit growth in the next three quarters of 2025 have all come down.
In a note on Friday, Goldman Sachs strategists said 56% of companies had issued guidance below consensus estimates, compared to the historical average of 51%.
Current visibility on the ultimate tariff landscape remains very low, said Allen Bond, portfolio manager at Jensen Investment Management.
"To the extent that we start to see some idea of how these policies take shape, companies are going to have to come out and reevaluate what that means for their businesses," Bond said.
VALUATIONS RISING AGAIN
The forward price-to-earnings ratio as of Monday stood at 20.6 times earnings estimates for the next 12 months, according to LSEG Datastream, which is the same P/E ratio where it stood on April 2. The level is well above the index's 10-year average P/E of 18.5 and long-term average of 15.8.
Several factors could make the valuation look more expensive. The yield on the 10-year Treasury is around 4.3%, over 10 basis points higher than on April 2. Higher Treasury yields tend to weigh on equities in several ways, including indicating higher borrowing costs for companies and consumers and greater investment competition from fixed income.
Analysts also expect earnings estimates could fall even further because of the tariff fallout, which could mean current valuations are factoring an overly rosy outlook for companies.
"The market is starting to embed a lot of good news and is vulnerable to bad news now, which is the opposite to where we were at the lows," said Keith Lerner, "If something goes wrong, you don't have much of a buffer for negative news."
NEARING A KEY TREND LINE
Investors said the stock market had been due to bounce after its steep decline in April, and its recent streak of gains could bode well.
Of 12 times since 1991 that the S&P 500 has gained for at least eight straight sessions, the index posted a positive performance in the next six months in 11 of those times, according to Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide.
Investors are now focusing on whether the S&P 500 can surpass its 200-day moving average, which is a closely watched long-term trend line. That trend line is about 2% above the S&P 500's current level and may provide resistance against further gains.
Unless something significantly positive occurs on the trade front or another catalyst emerges, "we're going to be hard-pressed to push through" that level, said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital.
PEAK UNCERTAINTY?
A belief that "peak uncertainty" when it comes to the tariff situation is in the past also has been driving stocks higher, investors said.
The Cboe Volatility index (.VIX), opens new tab, an options-based gauge of investor anxiety, has moderated. After spiking to 52.33 on April 8, its highest closing level in five years, the VIX index has come down to around 25. But that is still above its long-term median level of 17.6, according to LSEG Datastream.
"We do think we're through this period of max uncertainty," Reynolds said. "But to call a direction from here I think is really difficult because we could get a news release out of the White House tomorrow on new tariffs and that could completely change the game."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

NBC News

an hour ago

• NBC News

Oil prices jump following U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities

Oil prices jumped and stock futures slipped Sunday evening, indicating concern among investors about the possibility of economic fallout from the ongoing unrest in the Middle East following U.S. strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities. The major focus is on oil. Iran remains a major international oil supplier, and it also sits on the Strait of Hormuz, a heavily trafficked waterway in the Persian Gulf that is a key transit channel for about one-fifth of the world's oil supply. Concerns centered on whether Iran would begin limiting or shutting down access to the strait. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement that closing the strait would be tantamount to 'economic suicide' for Iran and called on China, Iran's top trading partner, to head off any attempt by Iran to affect traffic. U.S. and global oil benchmark prices opened up 4% Sunday evening, underscoring the concerns about what the conflict means for the world's oil supplies. Oil prices already gained about 3% last week in the wake of Israel's initial strikes against Iranian targets and Iran's retaliatory missile attacks. Stocks also slid Sunday. S&P 500 futures contracts declined about 0.6% in the first hour of trading, while Dow Jones Industrial Average futures fell about 250 points, or 0.6%. Nasdaq 100 futures dropped 0.7%. U.S. markets officially open at 9:30 a.m. ET Monday. 'Should oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz be affected, we could easily see $100 oil' or an increase in U.S. gas prices by 75 cents per gallon, Andy Lipow, president of the consulting firm Lipow Oil Associates, said in a note to clients Sunday. In a worst-case scenario in which oil prices rose to at least $120 a barrel, U.S. gas prices would increase as much as $1.25 per gallon, Lipow said. In a follow-up email, Lipow said that even if the strait does not officially close, any action by a tanker company to pre-emptively reduce its footprint there represents 'a de facto supply disruption.' Iran's state-owned media reported that Iran's parliament backed closing the strait — but that the final decision lies with Iran's national security council, according to the report. Any move by Iran to alter traffic in the strait could also hurt its own economy — particularly commerce with China. On Sunday, a department of the U.K. Royal Navy said it observed 'electronic interference in the Strait of Hormuz.' At least two massive supertankers that had entered the strait were reported to have made U-turns. Marine tracking websites also showed the vessels turning about halfway through the strait. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' Rubio said in an interview on Fox News. China is Iran's most important oil customer, and they maintain friendly relations. Iran may still be assessing the ultimate damage to its nuclear facilities as it contemplates its next move. The International Atomic Energy Agency said Sunday that while it had confirmed that the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites had been hit, it was not immediately possible to assess the damage at the Fordo site. Until last week, U.S. stocks had been enjoying a substantial, if volatile, recovery from the lows following President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs announcement in April. That momentum reversed after Israel announced last weekend it had struck key Iranian military and nuclear targets, prompting retaliatory missile strikes on Israeli targets by Iran. JPMorgan analysts said Sunday that investors had voiced concerns to them last week that the Iran-Israel conflict would spread, 'and those concerns have been materialized.' 'Trump's statement that this might be the only US attack or might begin a series of attacks brought us little certainty,' the analysts added in a note to clients. 'Moreover, we do not see an obvious route to a political settlement to the military conflict, which makes us think the conflict, like the one in Gaza, could last longer than many investors think.'

Telegraph

4 hours ago

• Telegraph

Spain exempt from Nato's 5pc spending target

Spain will be exempt from spending 5 per cent of its GDP on defence after striking a deal with Nato, the country's prime minister said. Speaking ahead of this week's Nato summit in The Hague, Pedro Sanchez said he had achieved a 'success' for his country by securing an exception from the new spending target, which had been billed as a strict requirement for all 32 Nato members. It puts Madrid at odds with Donald Trump, the US president, who has called for a significant increase in defence spending and cast doubt on his willingness to defend Nato allies 'if they don't pay'. Mr Sanchez said Spain could fulfil its existing commitments to Nato with a defence budget of 2.1 per cent of GDP. 'We fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defence investment, but we are not going to do so,' the Spanish prime minister said in a televised address on Sunday. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, warned members earlier this month that they must commit to spending 5 per cent on defence spending or 'better learn to speak Russian'. It came after he had warned that Vladimir Putin could attack Nato by 2030. According to Nato estimates, Spain spent only 1.24 per cent of GDP on defence last year. In April, Mr Sanchez pledged to increase defence spending to 2 per cent by the end of this year. Target in doubt But Spain's Left-wing government is divided on the need to increase military spending and a think-tank linked to the administration has cast doubt on whether the 2 per cent target for this year is feasible. Mr Sanchez wrote to Mr Rutte last week to say that 5 per cent of GDP was 'unreasonable and counter-productive', arguing that such a commitment would impact the country's social spending and undermine EU plans for technological growth. On Sunday, it emerged that the agreement Nato leaders will sign at The Hague on Wednesday has been altered to accommodate Spain's objections. The text on the spending pledge has been changed from 'we commit' to 'allies commit', allowing Mr Sanchez to claim the commitment would not apply to Spain. Under the plan, countries are meant to reach 5 per cent of GDP by boosting their core defence spending goal from 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent, and adding a further 1.5 per cent on related items such as cyber security and adapting roads and bridges for military vehicles. Mr Sanchez said that Spain needs only to spend 2.1 per cent of GDP to meet its Nato capability targets – the personnel, equipment and infrastructure requirements set by the alliance The announcement comes at a time of political difficulty for Mr Sanchez, who is under enormous pressure over a corruption scandal within his Socialist party.

Sky News

5 hours ago

• Sky News

UK and NATO allies agree to boost spending on defence and related areas to 5% of GDP by 2035

The UK and its NATO allies have agreed to increase spending on defence and related areas to 5% of GDP by 2035, two diplomatic sources with knowledge of the deal have told Sky News. Ambassadors of all 32 alliance member states signed off on the new spending pledge ahead of a major summit of leaders, including Donald Trump, this week, they said. The boost - up from a current goal of 2% of GDP - is as much about keeping the US president onside as it is about responding to what is regarded by the allies as a growing threat from Vladimir Putin and the challenge posed by China. The target will be formally rubber stamped when the heads of state and government meet in The Hague on Tuesday and Wednesday. The ambitious spending goal - secured following a huge amount of persuasion by Mark Rutte, the NATO secretary general - is broken down into 3.5% of GDP spent on pure defence and 1.5% of GDP spence on related areas, which can include infrastructure and cyber security. Spain had been the last to agree. The UK had also been slow to sign up but is understood to have been pushing for the 2035 timeframe, which would mean it is pushed beyond the next parliament. Sir Keir Starmer has said he has an ambition to increase UK defence spending to 3% of GDP from 2.3% by 2034. The new 5% spending goal is the kind of level of defence spending invested by NATO allies during the Cold War.