Defence spending to rise by £11 billion to 2.6per cent of GDP over next two years, Rachel Reeves announces
Defence spending will rise by £11 billion to 2.6per cent of GDP over the next two years, the Chancellor announced today.
Rachel Reeves said Britain will become a 'defence industrial superpower' with the extra spending boosting jobs across the UK.
In the face of 'a new era' of threats, chiefly Russia, Ms Reeves said there must be 'a new era for defence and security'.
But she did not say when the target of spending 3per cent of GDP on defence will be achieved.
She told MPs: 'That's why we took the decision to prioritise our defence spending by reducing Overseas Development Aid so that defence spending will now rise to 2.6per cent of GDP by April 2027 including the contribution of our intelligence agencies.
'That uplift provides funding for the Defence Secretary, with a £11bn increase in defence spending and a £600m uplift for our security and intelligence agencies.
'That investment will deliver not only security, but also renewal in Aldermaston and Lincoln; Portsmouth and Filton; On the Clyde and in Rosyth. Investment in Scotland. Jobs in Scotland. Defence for the United Kingdom, opposed by the Scottish National Party delivered by Labour.'
Ms Reeves said £4.5 billion would be invested in munitions in Glasgow, Glascoed, Stevenage and Radway Green.
Some £6 billion will be spent on upgrading nuclear submarine production in Barrow, Derby and Sheffield.
She added: 'We will make Britain a defence industrial superpower. With the jobs, the skills and the pride that comes with that.'
Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride criticised the Chancellor for not providing a timeline to reach 3per cent.
This is made up of an £11 billion increase in
spending and a £600 million uplift for the security and intelligence agencies.
He said: 'We will always welcome any additional investment in our Armed Forces and capabilities.
'Though I note that nothing was said about when 3per cent will be achieved.
'All we heard was that in the intelligence service, spending was to be included in defence spending to flatter the numbers.
'We left the party opposite a fully funded plan which they dithered over for a year, but now what we get is the Chancellor's own black hole on defence spending, the lack of a timeline on when we will achieve the 3per cent.
'Instead, we get a £30bn bill for the Chagos surrender – money which should go to our brave Armed Forces rather than, as is being reported, funding lower taxation in Mauritius.'
The uplift comes after the head of Nato, Mark Rutte, warned countries that do not ramp up defence spending should ' learn to speak Russian '.
On Monday, he said the UK's goals to spend 2.5per cent on defence from April 2027 and then aim to get to 3per cent over the next parliament were not at odds with his own proposed target for the bloc.
He has proposed members of the bloc spend 5per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence as part of a strengthened investment plan for the alliance.
The target would require nations to raise core defence spending to 3.5per cent of GDP, while the remaining 1.5per cent is to be made up of 'defence-related expenditure'.
Mr Rutte said every country is 'working in cycles' and that he was 'really impressed' with the UK's plans under the strategic defence review unveiled last week.
The Strategic Defence Review published last week recommended a greater focus on new technology, including drones and artificial intelligence.
The Ministry of Defence announced a £5 billion investment in the 'kit of the future'.
The funding includes £4 billion for drones and autonomous systems, and an extra £1 billion for lasers to protect British ships and soldiers.
In addition to investment in drones and AI, the Government has announced an additional £1 billion for the development of 'directed energy weapons' (DEWs) during the current Parliament.
This includes the DragonFire laser scheduled to be fitted to the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers from 2027, with a similar system provided for the Army by the end of the decade.
DragonFire and other DEWs are intended to provide a lower-cost form of air defence against targets including drones, costing just £10 per shot compared with the thousands of pounds it costs to fire existing weapons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
No more hesitation – Starmer must do these five things now
The despotic and authoritarian Iranian regime has posed a serious threat to regional and global security for far too long. The recent actions by the US and Israel to degrade Iran's nuclear weapons programme and military capabilities were necessary. But now the Government must urgently clarify its role – protecting British nationals, securing our interests and influencing the outcome of this escalating conflict. Earlier this month, the International Atomic Energy Agency left no doubt about the scale and acceleration of Iran's nuclear programme. Hundreds of kilograms of highly enriched uranium are being produced – far beyond civilian energy needs. The IAEA noted Iran's failure to co-operate with inspections and suggested that the regime may have enough material for nine nuclear weapons. This is not just a theoretical threat. Iran has explicitly stated its aim to annihilate Israel, the world's only Jewish state, and continues to fund and arm terrorist groups like Hamas, which are responsible for widespread bloodshed. Iran's malign activities reach beyond the Middle East, posing direct threats to Britain as well. Inaction would be reckless – a nuclear-armed Iran would endanger global stability. That said, military action carries obvious consequences. We need to know what the UK Government is doing to manage these risks. British nationals in the region may now be in danger, our military assets are exposed, and Iranian proxies will be looking to retaliate, possibly even on British soil. Urgency and clarity As His Majesty's Opposition, the Conservative Party will always put the defence and security of our nation first. In moments of international crisis, we will support the Government when it takes the right steps – but we will also press for greater urgency and clarity when required. There are five key areas where the Government must act. First, it must facilitate the safe and swift repatriation of British nationals in the region. Thousands are seeking to return home, yet with airspace closed, action is slow. The UK must work with allies to open land, sea, or air routes to ensure evacuations. The United States and European partners have already acted. The UK, however, has only just begun conversations – a dangerous delay. Second, the Government must clarify its position on recent military actions by the US and Israel. While the Prime Minister has commented on the situation, he has failed to say whether he supports these targeted strikes. Reports suggest the UK's Attorney General has questioned the legal basis for involvement, possibly affecting allied operations such as those based out of Diego Garcia. The public deserves transparency. Will the UK support future strikes? Will we offer operational or intelligence support? Another dangerous chapter for the world Third, whether or not Britain joins any direct military operations, our forces and assets in the region must be protected. Iran retains the capacity to strike, and their proxies – particularly the Houthis – may increase attacks on British and allied interests. Defensive readiness is essential. Fourth, the Government must ensure our homeland is secure. Iranian agents are known to operate on British soil, with multiple plots disrupted by our intelligence services. This week, a British national was arrested in Cyprus for suspected terrorism and espionage linked to Iran. The risk is real. The Government must reassure the public that law enforcement and security agencies are resourced and prepared to meet this heightened threat. Finally, we must ask: where is Britain's global influence? As the US and Israel lead, the UK has appeared hesitant and peripheral. Ministers talk tough on Iran but have spent the past year straining relations with Israel, our key regional ally. We should be helping shape the international response, not reacting late from the sidelines. The world is entering another dangerous chapter. The Government must step up, working with partners to ensure Iran no longer threatens our security, sponsors terrorism, or destabilises the Middle East. Conservatives will keep pressing for the answers and action that Britain needs.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tony Blair to help Scottish Labour beat SNP
Sir Tony Blair has been enlisted to help Scottish Labour oust the SNP from power in next year's Holyrood election. The former prime minister's Institute for Global Change has been asked to help the party develop new health policies. They have been earmarked for Scottish Labour's manifesto for next May's Holyrood election, with the SNP's record on running the NHS expected to be one of the key issues. The Sunday Times reported that the institute is working for no fee on proposals for how to improve access to GPs and measures to prevent illness. It is also expected to make proposals about how 'more effective use of technology solutions' will help drive down record waiting lists for operations. Sir Tony's not-for-profit institute works in more than 40 countries and focusses on harnessing new technologies and artificial intelligence to reform how governments are run and public services delivered. But the former prime minister, who won three general elections, remains a controversial figure within and outside the Labour Party. A review by Audit Scotland has warned that 'difficult decisions' may be needed about whether some NHS services can continue, with major reform 'urgently needed' to cope with growing demand. First Minister John Swinney unveiled his NHS recovery blueprint in January and admitted there were crises in parts of the health service. But unions and professional bodies representing Scotland's NHS medics attacked the plan's lack of detail, and questioned where the funding and staff would come from. SNP ministers have also faced heavy criticism for failing to develop an NHS app, which has been available to patients in England since 2019. It is hoped that a trial of the Scottish app will be launched by the end of this year, but it will have limited functionality compared with its English equivalent. A Tony Blair Institute spokesman said: 'We are always happy to talk to any and all political parties who are interested in our work, all of which is published and publicly available. 'The conversations we have had with Scottish Labour are specifically around how our health policy proposals could apply to healthcare in Scotland. We intend to publish this work regardless of the outcome of the election.' Dame Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's health spokeswoman, said: 'Our NHS is stretched to breaking point and technology is a way to ease that pressure — but the SNP is squandering the opportunity. 'From GP practices using fax machines to doctors relying on pagers, the SNP is running an analogue health service in a digital age. GPs have been sounding the alarm about how a woeful lack of basic IT is holding them back — it's time we have a government that will listen. 'A Scottish Labour government will put Scotland on the cutting edge of medical innovation and modernise our NHS so it is fit for the future.' At the end of March, there were 63,403 people waiting for outpatient treatment that had been continuing for more than a year, an increase of 34 per cent compared with 12 months previously. They included 5,262 cases waiting two years or more for treatment, a record high. Angus Robertson, chair of the SNP's campaign committee, said: 'It speaks volumes that Scottish Labour are relying on the advice of the man to led us into a disastrous, illegal war in Iraq to tell them what is best for Scotland. 'Keir Starmer and Anas Sarwar have no vision for Scotland's future and rather than listening to the people of Scotland, they can only look backwards at a discredited, unpopular figure like Tony Blair. 'Only the SNP is offering people a positive, ambitious vision for Scotland's future — improving our NHS, tackling the cost of living and ensuring Scotland reaches its full potential with the powers of independence.'
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
US does not seek war, says Pentagon after bombing Iran's nuclear sites
America 'does not seek war' with Iran, Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth has said in the aftermath of a surprise US attack on three of Tehran's key nuclear sites. The mission, called Operation Midnight Hammer, involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance, Mr Hegseth and US Air Force General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a Pentagon news conference on Sunday. Mr Hegseth said it is important to note the US strikes did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people, a veiled effort to indicate to Tehran they do not want retaliation on American targets in the region. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Mr Hegseth added. Mr Caine said the goal of the operation – destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan – had been achieved. US President Donald Trump earlier claimed the facilities had been 'completely and fully obliterated'. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Mr Caine said. Speaking later, US Vice-President JD Vance said Washington 'didn't blow up' diplomacy with the attack. He told NBC's Meet The Press that talks over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme were never given a real chance by Tehran. 'Our hope… is that this maybe can reset here,' he said. 'The Iranians can go down the path of peace or they can go down the path of this ridiculous brinksmanship of funding terrorism, of trying to build a nuclear weapon, and that's just not something the United States can accept.' He reiterated the US is not at war with Iran, and has no interest in a protracted conflict or boots on the ground. Mr Vance said he feels 'very confident that we've substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon' and it will be 'many, many years' before Iran can develop one. The operation inserted the United States into Israel's war aimed at destroying Iran's nuclear programme, though the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran insisted the programme will not be stopped. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has condemned the US attacks, while foreign minister Abbas Araghchi warned diplomacy is no longer an option. 'This aggression showed that the United States is the primary instigator of the Zionist regime's hostile actions against the Islamic Republic of Iran,' Mr Pezeshkian said on Sunday. 'Although they initially tried to deny their role, after our armed forces' decisive and deterrent response and the Zionist regime's clear incapacity, they were inevitably forced to enter the field themselves.' Mr Araghchi meanwhile declared that while the 'door to diplomacy' should always be open, 'this is not the case right now'. He added: 'The warmongering, lawless administration in Washington is solely and fully responsible for the dangerous consequences and far reaching implications of its act of aggression.' Satellite images taken on Sunday show damage to the mountainside at the underground site at Fordo. The images, by Planet Labs PBC, show the once-brown mountain now has parts turned grey and its contours appear slightly different than in previous images, suggesting a blast threw up debris around the site. That suggests the use of specialised American bunker-buster bombs on the facility. Light grey smoke also hung in the air. Iran and the UN nuclear watchdog said there were no immediate signs of radioactive contamination at the three locations following the strikes. It is not clear whether the US will continue attacking Iran alongside its ally Israel, which has been engaged in a nine-day war with Iran. Mr Trump acted without congressional authorisation, and he warned there will be additional strikes if Tehran retaliates against US forces. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' he said. Iran's foreign ministry said Washington had 'betrayed diplomacy' with the military strikes, and that 'the US has itself launched a dangerous war against Iran'. Its statement added: 'The Islamic Republic of Iran reserves its right to resist with full force against US military aggression and the crimes committed by this rogue regime, and to defend Iran's security and national interests.' Hours after the American attacks, Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard said it launched a barrage of 40 missiles at Israel, including its Khorramshahr-4, which can carry multiple warheads. Israeli authorities reported that more than 80 people suffered mostly minor injuries, though one multi-storey building in Tel Aviv was significantly damaged, with its entire facade torn away to expose the apartments inside. Houses across the street were almost completely destroyed. Following the Iranian barrage, Israel's military said it had 'swiftly neutralised' the Iranian missile launchers that had fired, and that it had begun a series of strikes towards military targets in western Iran. Iran has maintained its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Mr Trump and Israeli leaders have argued Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon, making it an imminent threat. The decision to directly involve the US in the war comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel that significantly degraded Iran's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, and damaged its nuclear enrichment facilities. But US and Israeli officials have said American B-2 stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb that only they have been configured to carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear programme buried deep underground. Mr Trump appears to have made the calculation – at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republicans – that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear programme, perhaps permanently. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordo, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Mr Trump said in a post on social media. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordo. All planes are safely on their way home.' — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 21, 2025 Mr Trump later added: 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!' Israel announced on Sunday that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks. US officials said the attack used bunker-buster bombs on Iran's Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, while submarines launched about 30 Tomahawk missiles. The decision to attack was a risky one for Mr Trump, who won the White House partially on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism.
