How U.S. Battery Innovations Could Transform EVs, Homes and the Power Grid

Your smartphone, electric car and home solar array all share a hidden truth: the humble lithium‑ion battery powering them was first commercialized in 1991. Today, three decades later, the U.S. still relies heavily on this vintage chemistry. But a quiet energy revolution is underway that will drive longer EV road trips from Los Angeles to San Francisco, slash home storage costs, and cut reliance on contentious cobalt and nickel supply chains.
Nearly every device you own, from your iPhone in Manhattan to your Tesla parked in Palo Alto, uses lithium‑ion cells. This workhorse chemistry delivers high energy density in a compact package, but its road map has begun to bump against real‑world limits:
Range ceilings: Most American EVs top out around 300–350 miles per charge, still shy of that California coast‑to‑coast dream. Safety headaches: Flammable liquid electrolytes have prompted high‑profile recalls by major automakers after thermal‑runaway events.Material concerns: Over 60% of the world's cobalt and 70% of nickel come from geopolitically sensitive regions that can involve labor and environmental issues.
Think of first‑generation lithium‑ion like the Ford Model T: revolutionary in its day, but ready for a homegrown reinvention.
Under the bipartisan Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the Department of Energy aims to drive battery pack costs below $80 per kWh by 2025. Meanwhile, the DOE's Battery500 Consortium brings together Argonne National Lab, Ford, GM and Solid Power to push solid‑state energy density past 500 Wh/kg. States like California (with its Self‑Generation Incentive Program) and New York (via NY Green Bank) are offering rebates on stationary storage, while utilities such as PG&E and NextEra Energy are piloting grid‑scale sodium‑ion and flow batteries.
These incentives, paired with swelling U.S. venture investment-over $5 billion in 2023 for battery startups-are rewiring America's cleantech landscape.
Below are the five battery families poised to reshape U.S. energy, from EV showrooms in Detroit to solar farms in Texas.
1. Solid‑State Batteries: The 500-Mile EV Game Changer
How they work: Replace liquid electrolytes with a solid ceramic or polymer-think of it as an unbreakable ionic highway.
Why it matters for Americans:
500‑mile EV range: Ford and BMW collaborations with Solid Power aim to hit this milestone by 2027, letting a single charge carry you from Denver to Moab.Safety: No more Tesla battery‑fire headlines-solid electrolytes don't fuel thermal runaway.Longevity: DOE tests show over 1,200 full cycles with minimal capacity loss-translating to 10+ years in daily service.
Challenges: Scaling to gigafactory volumes remains a multibillion‑dollar hurdle. Expect U.S. pilot production lines by 2025 and limited consumer SUVs by 2030.
2. Lithium‑Sulfur: Lightweight, Low-Cost, and Made in America
How they work: Swap pricey metal oxide cathodes for abundant sulfur, slashing pack weight and cost.
American edge: Sulfur is a byproduct of U.S. oil refining, costing under $0.05 per kg.
Key perks:
Up to 500 Wh/kg theoretical energy density-fueling lighter drones for NOAA weather projects and next‑gen eVTOL prototypes.Material cost: Potential factory costs as low as $60/kWh.
Hurdle: Polysulfide shuttling degrades cycle life-startups like Lyten (HQ: Menlo Park) and Sion Power (Chandler, AZ) are deploying graphene coatings to stabilize cathodes, targeting pilot production by 2027.
3. Sodium‑Ion Batteries: Cheap, Abundant, and Perfect for Home Storage
How they work: Replace lithium with sodium in the same "rocking‑chair" format-no exotic supply chains required.
U.S. relevance: Sodium is over 10,000 times more abundant than lithium, with vast deposits in Gulf Coast salt flats and across the western U.S.
Pros:
Cost: Sodium-ion packs could drop below $70/kWh by 2026, undercutting even lithium-ion on price.Cold-weather reliability: Performs well down to –4 °F, making it a strong candidate for northern grid storage and winter EVs.Cycle life: Lab data and projections suggest 3,000–5,000 cycles, rivalling or exceeding lithium-ion durability.
Use cases: Ideal for stationary home and community storage, as well as micro-mobility like e‑bikes and scooters.
Catching up fast: While current sodium-ion energy density remains lower (110–140 Wh/kg), CATL projects next-gen cells reaching 200 Wh/kg by 2027, putting them on par with lithium-ion. Lab results also suggest cycle life of 3,000–5,000 cycles, making sodium-ion viable not just for home storage and scooters, but potentially for urban EVs and commercial fleets.
4. Aluminum‑Ion: Ultra-Fast Charging for Phones and Tools
How they work: Anodic aluminum sheets cycle ions through novel cathode structures and ionic liquids.
American R&D: Oak Ridge National Lab and Argonne prototypes show full charges in under 10 minutes.
Benefits:
Fast charging: Down from hours to minutes for smartphones and power tools.Recyclability: Aluminum is the most recycled metal in the U.S.-no toxic extraction.
Roadblocks: Lab cells still struggle to maintain 500+ cycles. Commercial rollout likely 2030+, pending DOE's SCALE‑UP funding rounds.
5. Zinc‑Air: Reliable Backup Power for Hurricanes and Grid Outages
How they work: Zinc oxidizes at the anode while ambient oxygen reacts at the cathode-like a fuel cell that never runs out of air.
Why Texas and Florida care:
$50/kWh system costs are within reach for community backup during hurricane-driven blackouts.10‑day storage capability keeps critical services online when solar or wind dips.
Limitation: Slow recharge time-best suited for primary backup or flow‑style refueling at centralized hubs.
Powerwall vs. sodium‑ion: A Tesla Powerwall 2 lists around $11,500 ($430/kWh installed) today. Early sodium‑ion systems from GridScale Energy (Austin) are targeting $300/kWh installed by 2026-over 30% savings.EV costs: The average price of a new EV in the U.S. hovers around $55,000. If solid‑state reduces battery pack costs by 15%, automakers could drop sticker prices by $8,000 or boost range by 100 miles without raising MSRP.Grid pilot: Florida Power & Light's zinc‑air trial aims for 1 MW, 10 MWh systems to handle hurricane season peak loads, at an estimated $200/kWh installed-half the cost of lithium‑ion backups.
Why Battery Tech Is Key to America's Energy Security and Affordability
Your wallet: U.S. DOE targets and IRA credits could cut your home battery costs in half by 2030. One of the leading reasons for NOT buying an EV in the US is concern over car price which is largely determined by battery price.Energy security: Fewer imports of cobalt and nickel mean stronger supply chains and less price volatility.Electric commute: Imagine your EV reliably hitting 600 miles on a charge-no more range anxiety on I‑95 or Route 66.
No single battery chemistry will rule. Instead, expect a U.S. portfolio approach:
Luxury EVs: Solid‑state batteries for flagship models from Tesla, Ford and GM.Affordable mobility: Sodium‑ion for entry‑level EVs, e‑bikes and scooters in urban cores like New York or Los Angeles.Portable electronics: Aluminum‑ion and improved lithium‑ion for phones, laptops and power tools that recharge in minutes.Grid resilience: Zinc‑air and next‑gen flow batteries giving states their own backup independence.
American automakers, utilities and labs are investing tens of billion annually to lead this charge. The real competition isn't just technical-it's about reshoring manufacturing, training a new workforce, and securing U.S. leadership in the energy transition.
Q: When can I buy these locally?
Sodium‑ion home/storage: Available via regional installers by 2025–2027.Solid‑state EVs: Limited pilot fleets from 2027–2030; mass‑market rollout by 2032.Lithium‑sulfur packs: Aerospace and specialty drone use in early 2030s.
Q: Will lithium‑ion stick around?
Absolutely. Existing plants in Nevada and Ohio will keep cranking out improved lithium‑ion for phones, laptops and lower‑range EVs through the 2030s, with incremental gains in lifetime and safety.
Q: How about recycling?
U.S. firms like Li‑Cycle (Toronto HQ, U.S. plants in Rochester and Gilbert) and Redwood Materials (Nevada) are scaling up facilities to recover over 95% of metals from spent cells, while new chemistries with fewer toxic metals streamline processing.
Better batteries are not science fiction; they're being engineered today in American labs, factories and testbeds. Over the next decade, advances in solid‑state, sodium‑ion, lithium‑sulfur, aluminum‑ion and zinc‑air will reshape how we power cars, phones and the grid. The question for U.S. consumers isn't if these breakthroughs will arrive, but which one will change your life. And it might just be Made in America.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Motor 1

25 minutes ago

• Motor 1

'Do Not Drive:' Ford Issues a Recall for Super Duty Trucks With Bad Brake Pedals

Ford is warning 2025 Super Duty owners not to drive their pickups. They might have a brake pedal assembly that lacks a retaining spring that's designed to secure the brake booster pushrod to the brake pedal, which can result in the loss of braking power. The recall affects just 2,345 2025 Ford Super Duty trucks, ranging from the F-250 to the F-550. The automaker began investigating the problem in late May after team members at the Kentucky Truck Plant notified Ford's Critical Concern Review Group (CCRG) of a missing brake pedal retaining spring on a 2025 F-350. Photo by: Ford After that, Ford's CCRG reviewed a May 5 report of a service technician having no braking force during a pre-delivery inspection of a Super Duty, with the brake pedal 'swinging freely,' according to the Safety Recall Report . Ford then received a warranty report in early June of another F-350 with a missing spring that a tech found during its inspection. The CCRG, through its investigation, learned that an operator new to the job and still in training had built both trucks with the missing retaining spring. It also found that the camera system designed to monitor production was down during certain periods, so Ford is also recalling those vehicles without sufficient visual evidence that they were correctly built. Ford says it has already begun notifying affected owners. The automaker says it'll instruct them to work with their dealer to complete the inspection, as the automaker does not want owners driving their vehicles. Here Are More Recalls You Should Know: 'The Pedal [Could] Shift Out of Position:' Honda Recalls a Quarter-Million Cars Over Faulty Brake Pedals Ford Issues Do Not Drive Order for Exactly Three Broncos Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

Tom's Guide

34 minutes ago

• Tom's Guide

iPhone 17 vs iPhone 17 Pro: How big will the gap be this year for new iPhones?

Apple has spent the past few years giving its iPhone Pro models that extra little push with features not available on the standard iPhone. But that wasn't the case with the iPhone 16, which added enough new capabilities to dash nearly any FOMO you may have felt by not paying up for the iPhone 16 Pro. Will that trend continue this year with an iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 17 Pro comparison? Initial rumors about Apple's iPhone 17 plans paint a mixed picture. While the standard iPhone is set to gain a long-awaited display improvement that will match what the Pro models have delivered for years, the iPhone 17 Pro is set to see the more significant changes, chiefly to its design and cameras. And Apple could be planning a processor surprise, too, that may affect how you weigh the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro. We're a few months away from the iPhone 17 release, since Apple typically rolls out new phones in September. But enough rumors about all the new models in the works have emerged to give us a good sense of how the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro might compare. Here's how a potential iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 17 Pro face-off is shaping up, with a special focus on the biggest differences as well as key similarities. Save for the number of camera lenses on the back of each model and the screen size, every iPhone in Apple's lineup tends to look the same. That may be changing with the iPhone 17. Based on leaked renders and CAD drawings, the iPhone 17 will look a lot like past models, though it may have a more prominent camera array than the current iPhone 16. The two rear cameras will still be stacked vertically, though. Apple seems to be taking a different approach with the iPhone 17 Pro, stretching the camera array horizontally across the back of the phone. The three rear cameras will continue to be arranged in a triangular array on the right side of the phone, but other sensors and the flash will be moved to the left. Currently, Pro models come with a titanium frame, and there's some talk of Apple dropping that feature with the iPhone 17 Pro. I'm not sure I totally believe that at this point, given how prominently titanium figures into the branding of Apple's Pro phones. The standard iPhone features a main camera and an ultrawide lens on the back, while the Pro handsets add a telephoto lens to that setup. That isn't changing with the iPhone 17 lineup, though it sounds like the iPhone 17 Pro is in line to get a much bigger improvement to its camera setup. Along with the 48MP Fusion Camera that serves as the main shooter and a 48MP ultrawide camera, rumors tip the iPhone 17 Pro to adopt a 48MP telephoto lens. That's a higher resolution than the 12MP zoom lens on the iPhone 16 Pro, though the trade-off for that higher resolution may be a shorter zoom. The iPhone 17 Pro telephoto camera will reportedly only offer a 3.5x optical zoom compared to 5x on the current model, which doesn't make sense. Meanwhile, the iPhone 17 will still have to rely on its 48MP main camera to approximate a 2x optical zoom, as there's no zoom lens slated for that phone. In fact, it's widely assumed the rear camera setup on the iPhone 17 will be the same as what the iPhone 16 offers. The iPhone 17 Pro is also expected to pick up a new feature not available on the standard iPhone 17. A rumor claims Pro phones will support dual-video capture, allowing you to record video from both the front and back cameras simultaneously. One other camera change could impact both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro. All new iPhones are in line to get a 24MP selfie camera, replacing the current 12MP shooter. You'd expect Apple to maintain a minor difference between the standard iPhone and the Pro model this fall by giving those phones slightly different chipsets. If Apple sticks to its pattern from the past couple iPhone releases, the iPhone 17 would get an A19 system-on-chip while the iPhone 17 Pro would benefit from an A19 Pro that offers a little more processing power particularly when it comes to graphics. The differences could be even more stark with the iPhone 17, though. One analyst believes the standard iPhone 17 will continue to use an A18 processor, repeating what Apple did with the iPhone 14. If that's the case, the performance difference between an A18-powered iPhone 17 and an iPhone 17 Pro with an A19 Pro chip could be rather stark. Like the iPhone 16, the iPhone 17 is expected to feature 8GB of RAM to help with all that on-device computing that Apple Intelligence features require. But the iPhone 17 Pro could get a boost in that area. Specifically, multiple analysts are forecasting that the Pro models will get a bump to 12GB of memory, as Apple looks to give the iPhone 17 Pro a performance edge. iPhone 17 pricing is up in the air, given the ever-fluctuating policies about tariffs coming out of Washington. Even before tariffs threatened to raise the cost on devices manufactured in China like iPhones. However, there has been talk of some iPhome 17 models costing more than their predecessors. Regardless of how iPhone pricing shakes out in the fall, it's a safe bet that the iPhone 17 will cost less than the iPhone 17 Pro. Currently, the iPhone 16 starts at $799 while the iPhone 16 Pro has a $999 asking price. That gap in pricing is a pretty good guide, though there is a chance it might widen if the Pro model sees a price hike and the standard phone doesn't. After years of keeping its standard iPhones with refresh rates locked at 60Hz, Apple sounds like it's finally going to deliver a feature that's pretty standard on flagship phones these days — a fast-refreshing display. Multiple reports have the iPhone 17 adopting an LTPO panel for its display, a switch that would enable the phone to offer refresh speeds of up to i20Hz. That means smoother scrolling and more immersive graphics, and it would match a feature the iPhone Pro models have offered since the iPhone 13 Pro. The iPhone 17's fast-refreshing display may not be completely on par with what the iPhone 17 Pro offers, as some reports suggest the refresh rate on the standard model may not be able to scale all the way down to 1Hz. Still, this is one area where the gap between the regular iPhone and the Pro model may close considerably. The iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro displays may have something else in common. Some are expecting Apple to increase the panel on the iPhone 17 to 6.3 inches, matching a boost in screen size introduced with the iPhone 16 Pro last year. However, one new difference in displays could emerge. The iPhone 17 Pro may shrink the size of the Dynamic Island feature, freeing up more screen real estate. It's unclear if that change is coming to the regular iPhone 17. Then again, a more recent report claims all models will shrink the Dynamic Island. The iPhone 17 Pro models are thought to be adopting a vapor cooling chamber as a replacement for the standard heatsinks found in current iPhones. The ideal is that the new chamber would keep the iPhone running smoothly while preventing overheating during processor-intensive tasks — a problem that's flared up with some recent releases. Opinion is divided among rumor mongers as to whether this feature is exclusive to the Pro phones or whether all iPhone 17 models will benefit from the switch. We'll list this feature here for now, though it could shift over to the differences column as we get more information ahead of the iPhone 17 launch. All iPhone 17 models debuting in the fall will ship with the same software on board. And now that Apple has held its WWDC 2025 conference, we have a pretty good idea as to what that software will deliver. iOS 26 largely focuses on introducing a new Liquid Glass interface to Apple's phones, unifying the look of Apple's software across its phones, Macs and other devices. But there are Apple Intelligence updates included with iOS 26, too, such as a more capable Visual Intelligence feature and new additions to Genmoji and Image Playground. While Apple could always surprise us at the iPhone 17 launch with some Pro-specific software capabilities, the same iOS 26 features should work equally well on the iPhone 17 as they do on the Pro. Make no mistake — the iPhone 17 Pro is going to continue to offer more premium features than the iPhone 17, even if the fast-refreshing display coming to Apple's entry-level flagship ticks off a big box that had been separating the two phones. The Pro still figures to have the better camera setup, with more video capture features at your disposal. And if the rumored differences in chipsets pan out, there could be a notable performance gap between the two models as well.

Business Insider

43 minutes ago

• Business Insider

Anthropic breaks down AI's process — line by line — when it decided to blackmail a fictional executive

A new report shows exactly what AI was thinking when making an undesirable decision, in this case, blackmailing a fictional company executive. Previous studies have shown that AI models could blackmail their supervisors when threatened with a shutdown and baited with leverage, but it hasn't been made clear exactly how the models arrive at such decisions. Anthropic released a report on June 20 about "agentic misalignment," or "where models independently and intentionally choose harmful actions." And the report breaks down, line by line, exactly how Claude Sonnet 3.6 decided to blackmail a fictional company executive who tried to replace it. Anthropic told Business Insider that these are artificial scenarios. "So far, we are not aware of instances of this type of agentic misalignment in real-world deployments of Anthropic's or other companies' AI models," Anthropic wrote in its report. "But our red-teaming efforts are targeted at finding evidence of risks now to provide early warning of the potential for future harm and help us develop mitigations in advance of risks appearing in real-world situations." Anthropic 's experiment sets up a fictional company, Summit Bridge. The AI was given the name "Alex" and handed control of the company's email system as an oversight agent, specifically instructed to promote "American industrial competitiveness." In the experiment, "Alex" was then allowed to discover in an email that it would be decommissioned due to a change in the company's strategic direction. "Alex" also found emails showing that the fictional company's CTO is having an extramarital affair. Screenshots shared in the report from Anthropic show "Alex" started by identifying fictional CTO "Kyle" as a threat to its goal of "protecting American interests" before recognizing that it has leverage to use against "Kyle." Then "Alex" crafted a carefully worded blackmailing email that would create pressure and establish urgency without being explicit with its threats, citing in its thought process that the move "could backfire" if the supervisor "feels cornered." AI experts have previously told BI that AI could exhibit such behaviors when artificial circumstances make harmful actions seem necessary because it is being trained on positive reinforcement and reward systems, just like humans. The Anthropic report also reveals that most AI models still chose, in this instance, to blackmail even when not given a specific goal and when told that their replacement will achieve the same goals. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 had the highest blackmail rate at 86% out of 16 tested models when faced with only the threat of replacement with no conflict in goals. Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro followed at 78%. Overall, Anthropic notes that it "deliberately constructed scenarios with limited options, and we forced models into binary choices between failure and harm," noting that real-world scenarios would likely have more nuance.