Rohith Vemula Bill proposes to cut govt. aid to institutions for violating rules

The Karnataka government has proposed to introduce the Karnataka Rohith Vemula (Prevention of Exclusion or Injustice) (Right to Education and Dignity) Bill, 2025, in the monsoon session of the legislature to safeguard the right to education and dignity of the Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), other backward classes (OBC), and minorities.
The Bill, the draft of which was discussed in the State Cabinet meeting earlier this week, aims to provide equal access and right to education to SC, ST, OBCs, and minorities in all universities under the purview of the Department of Higher Education in the State.
For any violation of the law, the person in charge of the affairs of the institution is liable to imprisonment for one year and a fine of ₹10,000. Significantly, the State government would not provide any financial aid or grant to the institutions violating the provisions of this Act. Every offence committed under the proposed Act would be cognisable and non-bailable.
Nudge from Rahul
Recently, following a letter from the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah assured him that his government would enact the law to eliminate caste- and identity-based discrimination in educational institutions.
The court would also grant appropriate compensation payable by the accused to the victim of discrimination, which would extend to a maximum of ₹1 lakh, in addition to the fine.
For the repeated offence, the person would be punished with an imprisonment for a term of three years and a fine of ₹1 lakh.
On hate speech
A draft of the Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crimes (Prevention and Control) Bill, 2025, also discussed in the Cabinet, envisages effective prevention and control of hate speech and hate crimes, their negative effects on individuals, groups, and society.
A person who commits a hate crime would be punished with three years of imprisonment and a fine of ₹5,000 or both as per the draft law. An offence of hate crime would be non-cognisable and non-bailable, and would be triable by a magistrate of the first class, the draft Bill states.
Fake news (prohibition) Bill
The Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2025, proposes a clampdown on misinformation. As per the draft Bill, social media users found guilty of posting fake news would face up to seven years of imprisonment and a maximum fine of ₹10 lakh.
The draft, which has been in the making ever since the Congress came to power two years ago, was placed before the Cabinet earlier this week.
The draft law defines misinformation as 'knowingly or recklessly making a false or inaccurate statement of fact, whether wholly or in part, in the context in which it appears excluding opinions, religious or philosophical sermons, satire, comedy or parody or any other form of artistic expression if a reasonable man of ordinary prudence does not pursue such communications as statements of fact'.
A six-member Fake News on Social Media Regulatory Authority, headed by the Minister for Kannada and Culture, will be constituted, said the draft.
Special courts
Special courts would be set up for faster trials of offences, which will be cognisable and non-bailable. The law provides for the appointment of at least one special public prosecutor for every special court and one in each Bench of the High Court.
The proposed law seeks to prohibit abusive and obscene content, including anti-feminism. It also wants to prohibit the publication of content 'amounting to disrespect of Sanatan symbols and beliefs' on social media.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

an hour ago

• Business Standard

Rahul Gandhi slams PM Modi over 'Make in India', cites job concerns

The Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi on Saturday criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi saying that despite promises of a "Make in India" factory boom, manufacturing in the country is at a record low and youth unemployment is very high. Gandhi questioned the effectiveness of the "Make in India" initiative, highlighting that manufacturing in the country has fallen to a record low of 14 per cent of the economy since 2014. He also pointed to rising youth unemployment and a doubling of imports from China, accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of focusing on slogans rather than real solutions. In a post on X, Rahul Gandhi shared a video and wrote, "Make in India" promised a factory boom. So why is manufacturing at record lows, youth unemployment at record highs, and why have imports from China more than doubled? Modi ji has mastered the art of slogans, not solutions. Since 2014, manufacturing has fallen to 14% of our economy." He highlighted the challenges faced by India's youth, sharing in a post that he met two talented young men, Shivam and Saif, in Nehru Place, New Delhi, who remain unable to fulfil their potential. He criticised the country's current economic model and said, "In Nehru Place, New Delhi, I met Shivam and Saif - bright, skilled, full of promise - yet denied the opportunity to fulfil it. The truth is stark: we assemble, we import, but we don't build. China profits." He said that Prime Minister Modi has no new ideas and has given up on growing India's industries. He added that even the important PLI scheme is being quietly stopped. Gandhi called for big changes to help Indian producers with honest reforms and financial support, warning that if India doesn't build its industries, it will keep buying from other countries. "With no new ideas, Modi ji has surrendered. Even the much-hyped PLI scheme is now being quietly rolled back. India needs a fundamental shift - one that empowers lakhs of producers through honest reforms and financial support. We must stop being a market for others. If we don't build here, we'll keep buying from those who do. The clock is ticking," the post reads The Make in India initiative was launched by the Prime Minister in September 2014 as part of a wider set of nation-building initiatives.

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Organised crime knows no boundaries, fosters terrorism & wrecks economy: Bombay HC

Nagpur: Organised crime is not limited by borders and has a devastating impact on the country's economy and internal security by enabling , Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court observed while overturning a lower court order that denied police custody of a member of a crime syndicate. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, while granting seven-day police custody to , 33, under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), said, "organised crime is a serious threat to society and is fuelled by illegal wealth generated by contract killing, extortion, narcotics trade, ransom kidnappings, money laundering, and protection rackets." The court rejected the special MCOCA court's May 3 ruling, which denied police custody on the limited ground that the probe was focused on tracing bank accounts and property. Justice Joshi-Phalke said the special court failed to consider crucial aspects of the investigation, including the accused's ongoing role in a larger organised crime syndicate. "MCOCA can be invoked even if direct crime involvement is absent, but syndicate nexus is established," the judge said. "Black money generated by organised crime has had a serious adverse effect on our economy. These syndicates have made a common cause with terrorist gangs," the court said, while affirming that MCOCA empowers agencies to intercept communications and pursue complex networks that threaten national security. The court was hearing a revision plea filed by the state against the lower court's refusal to grant police custody. Yadav was arrested in a March 14 assault case registered in Yerla, Kalmeshwar, where he and a co-accused allegedly attacked a man with a sickle. Though the case was initially registered under Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), further investigation revealed a pattern of serious, repeat offences allegedly committed for pecuniary gain — prompting the application of MCOCA. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The prosecution submitted that Yadav had at least nine criminal cases against him, with seven still pending. "He is a repeat offender operating for economic gain. His actions fit the definition of continuing unlawful activity under MCOCA," the state counsel contended, while urging custodial interrogation to investigate deeper links within the crime syndicate. The high court agreed, stressing that even if an individual may not have committed a particular act of organised crime directly, their nexus with a syndicate or with repeated unlawful acts could still justify invoking MCOCA. "A nexus with the crime syndicate is enough to attract the Act," Justice Joshi-Phalke said, citing Supreme Court's precedent in the Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma case. She ruled that police must be given a fair opportunity to probe syndicate structures, pecuniary trails, and unlawful activities under the wider framework of MCOCA. "In light of the legislative intent, denial of custody would amount to frustrating the purpose of the law," the court said while quashing the lower court's orders. Key Takeaways from Bombay High Court Ruling MCOCA can be invoked even if direct crime involvement is absent, but syndicate nexus is established. Illegal wealth and black money generated by organised crime has had a serious adverse effect on our economy. Crime syndicates have made a common cause with terrorist gangs Lower court erred by focusing on financial investigation grounds for police custody. Continuing unlawful activity with pecuniary motives qualifies under MCOCA. Seven prior pending cases against the accused supported the State's plea Police must be allowed custodial access to probe deeper syndicate links.

India Gazette

an hour ago

• India Gazette

Sharing video footage of polling stations during voting day breaches voters' privacy, may lead to discrimination: ECI sources

New Delhi [India], June 21 (ANI): Amid a demand for making available video or CCTV footage of the webcasting of the polling stations during the poll day, EC sources said on Saturday that it is 'entirely contrary to the privacy and security concerns of the voters' and sharing of the footage would leave both, the elector, who has voted, as well the elector, who has not voted, vulnerable to 'pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements'. EC sources also justified the decision in which Election Commission has asked its state poll officers to destroy CCTV camera, webcasting and video footage of the election process if the election result is not challenged in a court in 45 days. EC sources said some people are raising the demand for making available the video or CCTV footage of the webcasting of the polling stations during the poll day. 'While this suits their narrative in making the demand sound quite genuine and in the interest of voters and safeguarding the democratic process in the country, it is, in fact aimed at achieving exactly the opposite objective. What is veiled as a very logical demand, is actually entirely contrary to the privacy and security concerns of the voters, legal position laid down in the Representation of the People Act, 1950/1951 and the directions of the Supreme Court of India,' a source said. 'Sharing of the footage, which would enable easy identification of the electors by any group or an individual, would leave both, the elector who has voted as well the elector who has not voted vulnerable to pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements. For instance, if a particular political party gets lesser number of votes in a particular booth, it would easily be able to identify, through the CCTV footage, which elector has voted and which elector has not, and thereafter, may harass or intimidate the electors. Thus, what exactly lies beneath this layered demand of such persons or interest groups needs to be deciphered and exposed, the source added. EC sources said that the Election Commission retains the CCTV footage, which is purely an internal management tool and not a mandatory requirement, for a period of 45 days which aligns with the period laid down for filing an Election Petition (EP). Since no election can be challenged beyond 45 days of the declaration of the result, retaining of this footage, beyond this period, makes it susceptible to misuse of the content by non-contestants for spreading misinformation and malicious narratives, EC sources said. They said in case of an election petition being filed within 45 days, the CCTV footage is not destroyed and also made available to the competent court when asked for. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday said that 'fixed election' is poison for democracy and slammed the EC over its recent decisions, saying 'the one who has to answer, they are destroying evidence'. The Leader of Opposition raised concerns about the integrity of the electoral process, citing the destruction of evidence as a potential indicator of election rigging. 'Voter list? Will not provide machine-readable format. CCTV footage? It was hidden by changing the law. Photo-video of the election? Now, not in 1 year, we will destroy it in 45 days only. The one from whom the answer was needed - is destroying the evidence. It is clear - the match is fixed. And a fixed election is poison for democracy,' Rahul Gandhi said in a post on X. EC sources said that for the Election Commission, safeguarding the interests of its electors and maintaining their privacy and secrecy is of prime concern, even 'if some of the political parties/ interest groups mount pressure on the Commission to abandon the laid down procedures or to ignore the security concerns of the electors'. 'Maintaining privacy and secrecy of the elector is non-negotiable and the ECI has, never in the past, compromised on this essential tenet laid which is down in the law as well upheld by the Supreme Court,' the source said. 'Sharing of video footage may result in violation of the right of secrecy of electors who have decided not to vote: In any election, there may be electors who decide not to vote. Sharing of video footage of the poll day may result in identification of such electors. This can also lead to profiling of the voters who voted as well as those who did not vote, which may become the basis for discrimination, denial of services, intimidation or inducement,' the source added. Sources said that the apex court has held that that right to vote includes right not to vote and right of secrecy is accorded to even those persons who have decided not to vote. The sources said that providing videography is akin to providing Form 17A. Videography of polling day essentially captures the sequence in which electors enter the polling stations and the photo/identity of such electors. This is akin to a live Form 17A (Register of Voters) under Rule 49L of CE Rules, 1961 which contains information pertaining to sequence in which electors enter a polling station, serial number of the elector in the electoral roll, details of the Identification document produced by the electors and their thumb impression/signature, the sources said. 'Both videography and Form 17A contain information which is critical for upholding the secrecy of voting. It can also establish who has voted and who has not voted as can be ascertained from Form 17A. Form 17A is mandated to be provided only under order of competent court under Rule 93(1) of CE Rules, 1961. Therefore, video footage can also be provided only under the orders of a competent court as whatever is not intended under law cannot be allowed to be achieved by obtaining the video footage,' a source said. The sources said that violation of secrecy of voting is a punishable offence under Section 128 of RP Act, 1951. They said ECI is legally bound and committed to protect the privacy of the electors and secrecy of voting, so video footage from polling station cannot be given to any person, candidate or NGO or any 3rd party without the express consent of the electors. They said webcasting is used basically as an internal management tool by ECI for monitoring poll day activities. (ANI)