Who is IAF's Niketa Pandey? Supreme Court directs Centre to not release officer involved in Operation Sindoor, Balakot

The Supreme Court on Thursday, May 22, directed the Central government and the Indian Air Force (IAF) not to release from service a woman officer, Niketa Pandey, who was part of Operation Sindoor and Balakot. In her plea to the Supreme Court, the Wing Commander had alleged that she was denied a permanent commission afetr 13.5 years of service and claimed 'discrimination'.
Hearing the woman officer's plea, the Supreme Court said uncertainty on service was 'not good' for such officers. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh also sought responses from the Centre and the IAF on the plea of Wing Commander Nikita Pandey.
Justice Kant said, 'Our Air Force is one of the best organisations in the world. Officers are very commendable. Quality of coordination they have exhibited, I think it's unparalleled. Therefore, we always salute them. They are a big asset for the nation. They are the nation, in a way. Because of them, we are able to sleep at night.'
'That sense of uncertainty may not be good for the Armed Forces. It's a layman's suggestion, because we are not experts. On minimum benchmarks, there can't be a compromise,' Justice Kant said.
Wing Commander Niketa Pandey is an Indian Air Force (IAF) officer. According to the reports, Niketa Pandey joined through the Short Service Commission (SSC) route in 2011.
She has played a crucial role in the air force for more than 13 and a half years.
During her tenure, Niketa Pandey worked as a fighter controller.
She was also instrumental in major operations against terror like Operation Balakot and Operation Sindoor.
She has undergone multiple rounds of evaluation for a permanent commission and is now awaiting a final opportunity to be assessed by a third selection board.
According to PTI, the woman officer also ranked second in the merit list of expert air fighter controllers in the country.
Niketa Pandey has become the first Short Service Commission (SSC) officer from the Indian Air Force to secure a stay on her release. Earlier, on May 9, the Supreme Court granted similar relief to more than 50 women SSC officers in the Indian Army.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

an hour ago

• News18

EC Cites Privacy, Legal Concerns After Congress Demands Polling Booth CCTV Footage

Last Updated: The Election Commission cited privacy and legal issues in response to Rahul Gandhi's demand for CCTV footage of polling stations. Gandhi urged publishing digital voter rolls. Following a demand made by Congress MP and Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi, the Election Commission on Saturday cited privacy and legal hurdles while sharing the CCTV footage of webcasting of the polling stations. This comes after Rahul Gandhi has called upon the Election Commission to publish consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra, saying that 'telling the truth" will protect the poll panel's credibility. ECI said that the seemingly legitimate appeal of releasing the videos or CCTV footage from polling stations on election day undermines voter privacy and security, contradicting the Representation of the People Act and Supreme Court guidelines. 'What is veiled as a very logical demand is actually entirely contrary to the privacy and security concerns of the voters, legal position laid down in the Representation of the People Act, 1950/1951 and the directions of the Supreme Court of India," it said. 'Sharing of the footage, which would enable easy identification of the electors by any group or an individual, would leave both the elector who has voted as well as the elector who has not voted vulnerable to pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements," the poll body added. It said that if a particular political party gets a lesser number of votes in a particular booth, it would easily be able to identify, through the CCTV footage, which elector has voted and which elector has not, and thereafter, may harass or intimidate the electors. The Election Commission further issued a point-by-point rebuttal to the Congress MP. . In any election, there may be electors who decide not to vote. Sharing of video footage of the poll day may result in the identification of such electors. This can also lead to profiling of the voters who voted as well as those who did not vote, which may become the basis for discrimination, denial of services, intimidation or inducement. Supreme Court order: The Supreme Court held that the right to vote includes the right not to vote, and the right of secrecy is accorded to even those persons who have decided not to vote. Video footage: Polling day videography records the sequence of voters entering the polling station and their identities, similar to Form 17A, which contains sensitive information about voters, including their ID details and signatures. Both pose a risk to voting secrecy. Violation of secrecy of voting is a punishable offence under Section 128 of RP Act, 1951 for – Any person who contravenes the provisions of this section is punishable with imprisonment for a term expending up to 3 months or fine or both.

Hans India

an hour ago

• Hans India

Congress sees weakness, but India's diplomacy stands strong in chaotic world

As the world moves from one local war to another, it now seems so right that India stopped the battle with Pakistan at the perfect time. Even though the decision came as a shock to Indians, as each wanted the neighbour to suffer more. However, two months after the April 22 terror attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor, the understanding for effecting a ceasefire was the perfect move towards the yet-to-come climax. The ceasefire understanding is not an end, as India has stated firmly that Operation Sindoor has not ended, and any act of terror emanating from Pakistan will be treated as an act of war. The end is open, and all depends upon Pakistan's conduct. Given the situation created by the wars happening in other places, the pause is complementary. Russia attacked Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and after three years, the two are still fighting. Several countries have tried to broker peace between the two, but every time the murmur happens, the two enter a virulent phase. Nobody knows what the actual number of dead is in both countries, and nobody knows the extent of destruction. Wars are only about death and destruction, and the two have been facing both. If Russia and Ukraine are hiding their pain, the war between Israel and Hamas is well televised and covered, with information flowing instantly. The conflict started on October 7, 2023, when Hamas and several other Palestinian militant groups launched coordinated armed incursions from the Gaza Strip into southern Israel. The barbarity of the attack shocked the world, and Israel rightly launched a counteroffensive. The counterattack has devastated Gaza and continues unabated, even as countries want Israel to stop. However, the conflict has now added a new dimension, which is an attack on Iran. Israel launched the airstrikes on Iran on June 13, and each passing day is witnessing an increase in intensity, and now the US has also entered the scene. The Israeli attack on Iran came unexpectedly as Iran-US talks were ongoing. Israel's midnight attack shocked the Iranians, and the casualties were significant and striking. After the initial shock, Iran has been fighting back, causing huge losses to Israel. With the US bombing three nuclear sites in Iran and threatening to attack more, the war scenario in the Middle East has completely changed. It can worsen, or Iran can just stop, which seems unlikely now. After US strikes, Iran again launched fresh missile attacks on Israel, and the latter also pounded back. Prospects for an immediate end to the Israel-Iran-US conflict appear dim, with all sides in a belligerent attitude. Though European countries and some Muslim-majority countries are trying to get Iran and Israel to stop, things now seem to be difficult. Thousands of people have been displaced, hundreds have died, and infrastructure in places has been badly affected in both Iran and Israel. The war continues, and even if it is halted, it will be a long way from peace and difficult terrain for rehabilitation for those directly affected. Besides, the loss in the economy for Israel, Russia, Ukraine, Iran and all those involved in wars and battles is huge. The lessons are stark, and India did right to halt Operation Sindoor. Wars are no longer about guns and powder. They have gone beyond and involve narrative setting and diplomacy dominance, with the former involving social media vibrancy. India launched Operation Sindoor against terror targets on May 7 in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and struck deep in Pakistan on May 10 after it tried to terrorise with a barrage of drone and missile attacks. Along with this, another fight was initiated, and this was of narrative and diplomacy. India did well in both, but on the internal front, the narrative was getting punctured as the Congress-led opposition has been consistently trying to demean the operation's success and the political decision. The statements of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and his party leaders were lapped up by Pakistan, which has been using these to counter New Delhi's claims. The Congress party has also questioned India's decision to halt Operation Sindoor and has attacked every action taken by the Centre, including diplomatic moves. It has even launched a social media campaign -- "Narendra Surrender" -- and is discrediting the Modi government for agreeing to a ceasefire understanding with Pakistan. The Congress leaders have also slammed the Centre for its diplomatic stance -- or perceived silence -- on international crises, particularly the humanitarian fallout in Gaza and now in Iran. Sonia Gandhi, former Congress president, penned an article criticising New Delhi's silence as a "disturbing departure" from India's moral and diplomatic traditions, urging stronger and more vocal leadership in West Asia. However, such rhetoric, especially when echoed by adversaries like Pakistan, risks undermining India's strategic credibility. In global diplomacy, every public statement is a signal -- not just to the domestic electorate but to allies, adversaries, and neutral observers. Foreign policy should be navigated with caution and consensus, not caught in the crossfire of electoral combat. India's diplomatic posture has traditionally been subtle, working behind the scenes, avoiding knee-jerk reactions, and projecting calm strength. New Delhi's diplomatic approach is often likened to the "duck policy", calm on the surface but paddling hard underneath. In a world ablaze with conflict, India's choice to pause its military campaign was not an act of surrender -- it was a reaffirmation of control. Operation Sindoor remains active in intent, and India's military remains on alert. But wisdom lies not just in launching a war but in knowing when to stop. The larger message is clear: restraint is not a sign of weakness; it is a sign of strategy.

NDTV

an hour ago

• NDTV

Video: Israel Destroys Iranian F-5 Fighter Jets At Airport

The Israeli forces on Saturday struck a dozen of military targets in Iran, including two F-5 fighter jets at the Dezful Airport, in the Islamic country's Khuzestan province. The F-5s are part of Iran's aging fleet of fighter jets from the era of the shah. Black-and-white footage released by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) on Sunday showed the forces destroying one of the aircraft at the airport. Besides, eight launchers, including six that were ready to fire missiles toward Israeli territory, were destroyed, the forces said. The IDF said around 20 IAF fighter jets struck dozens of military targets in Iran on Saturday. Among the targets struck were a military site containing components to produce explosive materials, weapons storage, and production facilities, and Iranian aerial defense systems. The Israeli forces also struck military infrastructure sites at the Isfahan airport, in order to prevent the Iranian Air Force's use of the military infrastructure, they said. Tensions between Israel and Iran escalated on Sunday after the US joined the Israeli military's campaign and targeted three nuclear sites in Iran. The attack on Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan sites came after days of deliberation and long before US President Donald Trump's self-imposed two-week deadline to take a call. US B-2 Spirit bombers flew non-stop for about 37 hours from Missouri to deliver what Mr Trump called a "very successful attack" on Iran's nuclear programme. The strikes, carried out with a combination of bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles, were the most direct US military action against Iran in years. Trump said six bunker-buster bombs were dropped on Fordow, and around 30 Tomahawk missiles targeted other nuclear installations. He warned Tehran of "far greater" consequences if it did not end its conflict with Israel.