Arrests for tax fraud: major changes made in sales tax law thru Finance Bill
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has introduced major changes in sales tax law through Finance Bill 2025 for the arrest of those involved in tax evasion or tax fraud.
According to a statement issued by the FBR on Friday, Finance bill is currently being discussed in the National Assembly and among various business circles.
An impression has been created that some of the amendments introduced in the Finance Bill are not understood well by the public at large.
Arrest for tax fraud: Senate panel for defining a threshold
For instance, the legal provisions for the arrest of those involved in a tax fraud have already been provided under Section 37A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 along with an elaborate procedure to be followed after the arrest which involves intimating the Special Judge immediately and the production of such person before Special Judge within 24 hours.
However, the proposed amendment now restricts the powers of the officer to arrest by making prior inquiry after approval of the Commissioner Inland Revenue (CIR).
Only on the basis of the findings of the inquiry CIR will authorise the investigation which would give the investigation officer the powers of an officer in charge of a police station under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act V of 1898). The arrest can only be made with the prior approval of CIR if the investigation officer has reasons to believe that a tax fraud may have been committed by a person.
The FBR further stated that the new legal provision further provides that if the arrest is malafide, the matter will be referred to the Chief Commissioner for fact finding inquiry. This shows that in contrast to the earlier provision where an Assistant CIR could arrest an offender, the new provisions bring transparency in the process by a mandatory prior inquiry and investigation and finally permission by the CIR.
Moreover, certain changes and amendments are also necessary to reassure the compliant taxpayers that those evading taxes or involved in tax fraud are dealt with by the state with an iron hand.
FBR Chairman Rashid Mahmood Langrial has expressed his willingness to discuss the recent changes made in the tax laws and introduce changes wherever needed, for example, the provisions related to arrest could be revised to mandate the permission of multiple senior officers before any arrest.
Furthermore, in order to ensure that these powers are not misused by the authorised tax officers against the compliant taxpayers and business community, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has formed a high-powered committee, which will be headed by Minister for Finance and Revenue, to re-evaluate the proposed amendments and suggest adequate safeguards to prevent potential misuse of powers.
The other members of the Committee will include Ministers of Law and Economic Affairs Division, Minister of State for Finance, SAPM Industries and Chairman FBR.
The Committee will also examine various options to ensure that legal economic activities are not stifled and propose additional protective measures against unlawful use of authority. The Committee will submit its recommendations to Prime Minister in three days.
FBR is committed to safeguard the legal rights of the compliant taxpayers and to increase the tax collection and state revenues by discouraging non-compliant taxpayers and acknowledging those who are paying their due share to the state, FBR added.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Taxman gets arrest powers
Listen to article A National Assembly panel on Saturday approved special powers for tax authorities to arrest individuals involved in tax fraud, while it deferred the approval of another fiscal law that would have suddenly deprived government entities of their cash surpluses. Meanwhile, teachers and researchers will now be subject to full income tax, as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) did not agree to the government's proposal to extend the 25% income tax rebate for another fiscal year. Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Chairman Rashid Langrial informed the National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance that the IMF had refused to extend the rebate. The committee, chaired by Syed Naveed Qamar, approved legal powers for the FBR to arrest taxpayers involved in tax fraud without prior court approval. However, additional safeguards were added to limit the discretionary use of these powers. At one point, Qamar remarked that the tax fraud "law has been borrowed from the National Accountability Bureau". The Senate Standing Committee on Finance had already cleared the controversial proposal. Now, following minor amendments by the National Assembly panel, the bill is expected to become law from July 1. Tax fraud has been defined as: "knowingly, intentionally or dishonestly doing any act or abets any action to cause loss of tax under this Act, including: using or preparing false, forged and fictitious documents including return, statements, annexures and invoices; false claim of input tax credit based on fictitious transactions; issuance of any tax invoice without supply of goods; tampering with or destroying of any material evidence or documents required to be maintained; generating fake input through manipulation of return filing system of the Board and making fake entries in the sales tax returns or in the annexures; and making fictitious compliance of section 73, including routing of payments back to the registered person, or for the benefit of the registered person, through a bank account held by a supplier or a purported supplier." Upon committing any of the above offences, the FBR will have the authority to arrest the individual without first seeking a warrant from any court of law. FBR Chairman Rashid Langrial said the criminality of tax fraud has been divided into two parts. In some cases, court permission will be required before an arrest is made. He explained that crimes such as suppression of taxable supplies under the Sales Tax Act, suppression or nonpayment of withholding tax for more than three months, dealing in goods liable to confiscation and making taxable supplies without registration will require court approval for arrest. According to the proposal, an Inland Revenue officer not below the rank of assistant commissioner – or any officer authorised by the board – may initiate an inquiry upon approval from the commissioner, if there is material evidence pointing to the commission of tax fraud or an offence warranting prosecution under the act. The inquiry officer shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, including summoning and enforcing attendance of any person, examining on oath, requiring discovery and production of documents and receiving evidence on affidavits. The inquiry officer must complete the inquiry within six months. During proceedings, the officer must provide the accused with a chance to be heard and confront them with details of the alleged fraud. A final report will then be submitted to the commissioner, who may either approve a full investigation, request further details, or close the matter. Upon approval, the investigation must be completed within three months. The board may authorise a commissioner — through a three-member committee notified by the chairman — to issue an arrest warrant if the tax loss exceeds Rs50 million. Arrests will only be made if the accused fails to respond to three notices, attempts to flee, or is likely to tamper with evidence. When asked, Langrial said the accused can also be arrested at the airport if there is suspicion of an escape attempt. Cash surplus The standing committee held an extended discussion on a government proposal to assert full rights over the cash surpluses held by state-owned enterprises. The proposed amendment to the Public Finance Management Act aimed to grant the federal government control over these surpluses. "The federal government's budget deficit would never end, and it now wants to bankrupt the public sector companies," Syed Naveed Qamar said. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb argued that the companies were acting like "states within a state" and were not cooperating. He added that even government-nominated board members were not being heeded, blaming bureaucrats for the lack of progress. Minister of State for Finance Bilal Kayani withdrew the bill from the agenda, saying the government would reintroduce it after incorporating the committee's recommendations to strike a balance between fiscal discipline and autonomy. One major state-owned company was reported to be sitting on a cash surplus of Rs253 billion.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Govt scrambles for oil backup plans
Listen to article Amid escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) has warned oil marketing companies (OMCs) to maintain a minimum of 20 days of oil stock in accordance with licensing requirements. The prime minister has already constituted a high-level committee to explore alternative options in the wake of the Iran-Israel conflict to pre-empt any potential oil shortages in the country. Oil Marketing Companies are obligated to maintain 20-day oil reserves under their licensing terms. Ogra has previously issued directives to this effect and has now reiterated its warning, stating that companies failing to comply will face penalties and fines. In a statement, the Ogra spokesperson said, "The Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) has confirmed that the country currently holds sufficient stocks of petroleum products to meet existing demand". However, in light of future needs and the volatile market environment, Ogra has formally advised all OMCs to adhere strictly to the mandatory 20-day stock levels, as stipulated in their respective licences. "OGRA remains committed to monitoring the situation closely and will continue to take proactive steps to ensure national energy security," the spokesperson added. In response to the evolving geopolitical situation following Israel's recent attack on Iran and the resulting fluctuations in global oil markets, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif constituted a high-level committee to oversee petroleum pricing and supply dynamics. The committee is headed by the finance minister and includes senior representatives from key federal ministries, regulatory bodies and energy sector experts. It has already held its first meeting and is scheduled to reconvene early next week to assess possible supply routes and contingency measures. During its initial meeting, the committee explored alternative oil supply routes from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), including pipeline transport, in case the Strait of Hormuz – a critical global oil supply route – is blocked due to escalating hostilities. The committee was informed that Saudi Arabia possesses an existing pipeline network, including the East-West Pipeline (Petroline), which transports crude from its eastern province to the Red Sea port of Yanbu. Similarly, the UAE's Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline (Adcop) to Fujairah is designed to bypass the Strait of Hormuz, ensuring uninterrupted exports. The Petroleum Division, in a submitted report, stated that the Strait of Hormuz handles 20% of global crude oil exports. Any closure of this route by Iran could severely impact global supply chains, including Pakistan's. Under a worst-case scenario, global oil prices could surge to $100$150 per barrel. While there is currently no immediate threat of a spike in prices, Pakistan is in discussions with international oil suppliers to ensure continuity of supply. At present, the country has access to up to one million tons of furnace oil storage capacity through abandoned power plants. Experts have recommended that the government utilise these facilities to store strategic oil reserves. It has also been proposed that the government purchase these storages, as the power sector plans to dispose of them as scrap.
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Govt urged to rethink new taxes
Listen to article E-commerce and chain store strategists have demanded the government rationalise the proposed taxes on online and registered businesses in order to maintain the pace of documentation in the retail sector and promote financial inclusion in the economy. They urged the government to refrain from burdening taxpayers with additional taxes and duties to encourage the formalisation of retail and online businesses, which will promote the generation of long-term and sustainable dividends for the economy. They also called on the government to pause the immediate enforcement of these policies, and instead initiate a structured dialogue with stakeholders to co-create pragmatic and growth-friendly tax policies. Pakistan E-Commerce Association (PEA) Karachi Chapter President Shoaib Bhatti said that the proposed tax measures in the financial bill will severely risk the e-commerce sector, disrupting both established and small businesses by imposing an excessive compliance burden all at once. He urged the government to avoid imposing the additional 2% withholding sales tax on e-commerce and retail sectors, which are already paying 18% general sales taxes. In comparison, informal retail segments in major shopping centres and bazaars are not paying taxes at all, he said. Pakistan's e-commerce sector has grown over 35% annually in the past five years, with over 100,000 small online sellers active as of today, supporting the incomes of over a million people nationwide, added Bhatti. Increasing the tax burden on this segment, he said, will be tantamount to slowing down its growth and contribution to the national economy. According to estimates, the total market size of the e-commerce sector is estimated to be Rs2.2 trillion ($7.7 billion), which is still under 2% of the national GDP and up to 4% of the retail segment. Chainstore Association of Pakistan (CAP) Chairman Hasan Javed remarked that the new tax will create an imbalance between documented and undocumented retail and online segments, as one pays an overall 20% GST and the second one will pay merely 2%, hence promoting a cash economy. "Established online and chain stores are already paying 15-16% provincial taxes to the government, and an additional 5% federal levy will increase their cost of doing business. Therefore, we appeal to the provincial government to reduce the tax rate at their end," he remarked. The proposed tax measures place heavier obligations on e-commerce than on the traditional retail and wholesale sectors. Rather than encouraging formalisation, these measures could push businesses back into informality — or out of operation entirely, he said. The Finance Bill introduces multiple taxes and complex procedures across all related businesses, with no stakeholder consultation or phased rollout, which could adversely hit the sector. What's more, a number of e-commerce stores shut down in the past two years due to tough competition among players and higher logistics and operating costs. Saad Shah, CEO Ucaaz, said established e-commerce and chain stores have been highly regulated with tax compliances and equipped with payment systems, however, increasing the burden of tax and levies on these stores will not be favourable for them. He pointed out that various online and chain stores not only offer high-quality branded products to customers, but also offer them handsome discounts on products due to their efficient business models which attract footfall and generate tax revenues for the government, unlike grocery shops in major retail and wholesale markets in big cities. The e-commerce sector is developing a growing and inclusive ecosystem that also generates jobs for the youth, and provides entrepreneurial and investment opportunities for the masses. Disrupting this sector will ultimately hurt all stakeholders, stated Shah.
