ICE denies oversight of crowded detention facilities, lawmakers say
ICE denies oversight of crowded detention facilities, lawmakers say Their attempted visits come amid protests over sweeping raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other agencies.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
See how Los Angeles protests intensified over one weekend
What started as a small protest over immigration raids on Friday ballooned into large demonstrations throughout the weekend. Here's what happened.
Federal officials are keeping lawmakers from inspecting increasingly crowded detention facilities.
In at least three instances in California and New York, nine members of Congress have been denied entry, lawmakers told USA TODAY. Their attempted visits as part of congressional oversight come amid protests over sweeping raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other agencies. Advocates and lawmakers have raised concerns about detainees having little access to food, water or medicine in crowded conditions.
As the Trump administration increases quotas to detain thousands of migrants each day, Democratic lawmakers have sought entry to view conditions where people are held inside detention centers, skyscrapers and basements.
'People are going in and they're not coming out,' Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-New York, told reporters June 10.
Two days earlier, on Sunday, June 8, Espaillat and Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-New York, went to 26 Federal Plaza, a Manhattan skyscraper housing immigration court and ICE offices where they believe migrants are being held. Agents kept them from inspecting the building.
In recent days, people have attended immigration court hearings, had their cases dismissed, and were quickly apprehended by ICE, Espaillat said. While the two officials entered the lobby, Espaillat said officials told them they couldn't go up because it was a sensitive location.
The same day across the country, in California's Mojave Desert, lawmakers stood outside the privately-run Adelanto ICE Processing Center, which has faced years of scandal over treatment of detainees. They were barred at the facility by locked gates.
'It's a complete mystery,' Rep. Judy Chu, D-California, one of three elected officials denied entry, said in an interview. 'This is why we have to go.'
Families hadn't heard from the people detained in militarized immigration raids in recent days in Los Angeles County, prompting lawmakers' visit to the facility, Chu said.
ICE and the Department of Homeland Security didn't respond to email requests for comment.
NJ lawmaker indicted after ICE facility visit resulted in confrontation
The apparent denials of congressional inspections comes after three New Jersey congressmembers in May visited a newly opened private detention center in Newark. After lawmakers' visit, a tense confrontation ensued with agents at the entrance. Agents arrested Newark Mayor Ras Baraka but a federal trespassing charge was dropped.
In a statement posted on its website, DHS said members of Congress simply had to schedule a visit. But experts told USA TODAY federal law doesn't require representatives to schedule visits. Conversely, unannounced visits provide the opportunity to view conditions without giving officials the opportunity to hide facility issues or conditions.
Federal prosecutors charged one of the lawmakers, Rep. LaMonica McIver, for her involvement in the confrontation. On June 10, a grand jury indicted McIver on three criminal counts related to forcibly impeding and interfering with federal officers. McIver called the case a "brazen act of political intimidation" from conducting her oversight role.
ICE data indicates substantial increases in detainees. Over 51,000 people are in custody as of June 1, an increase of more than 30% since Jan. 12, data shows. The agency is currently funded to house around 41,500 detainees, according to Reuters.
What does the law say about oversight of ICE facilities?
Members of Congress can conduct unannounced inspections of ICE facilities under federal law.
The 2024 Further Consolidated Appropriations Act said funds made available to DHS can't be used to prevent members of Congress 'from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens.'
Additionally, the statute said, 'Nothing in this section may be construed to require a Member of Congress to provide prior notice of the intent to enter a facility.'
Experts said such oversight, especially by inspecting conditions without notice, is key to ensuring safe conditions with DHS and ICE.
'This is an agency and a subagency that, over time, has overstepped its authority and has been unresponsive to pushback by members of Congress,' Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council, said. 'The Trump administration is taking that increasing level of impunity to an all new level.'
Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-California, invoked the oversight statutes in a letter dated June 8 to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. 'This is black letter law—and your department broke it," Gomez wrote.
Days earlier, migrants, including asylum seekers, had gone to ICE check-ins at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, in downtown Los Angeles, and placed into custody in the basement, CBS News reported.
In a separate incident, on June 7, Gomez and three members of Congress, all Southern California Democrats, tried to enter the building, where many detained during recent raids had also been taken. The representatives were denied entry, but not before a speaker on the intercom asked, 'Who are you guys?'
This statutory oversight includes anywhere were the agency is holding people in custody, whether at a detention center or temporarily in a federal building, experts said.
'To close off the ability for there to be oversight and transparency is going to put these facilities essentially in an unfettered operating position,' Greg Chen, senior director for government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said. 'It's going to mean that there's going to be no guardrails to ensure safe conditions for people that are detained there.'
Lawmakers search for migrants detained in LA sweeps at desert facility
Federal agents detained dozens of people in days of raids around Los Angeles worksites beginning June 6.
The militarized action in the United States' most populous county has triggered days of protests. In response, President Donald Trump deployed Marines and the National Guard, against the wishes of state and local leaders.
Many people detained in sweeping raids across Los Angeles were believed to have been transferred to the Adelanto facility, about 90 miles away, according to Chu, the Southern California congresswoman.
Chu had visited Adelanto several times before before due to its conditions, including after Raul Ernesto Morales-Ramos, a Salvadoran man, died in 2015 from liver and kidney failure after complaints of medical issues in detention.
During their latest visit, Chu and other lawmakers yelled at officials from behind the locked gate, videos showed.
A driver in a surgical mask could be seen in a car parked less than 100 feet beyond the gate. The group, which included legal advocates, received no responses. GEO Group, which operates Adelanto, referred USA TODAY's questions to ICE, which didn't respond to questions.
A family had been there at the same time as the representatives, Chu said. They had been searching for their son for three days.
Data as of May 27, more than a week before the raids, showed around 140 people held at Adelanto. The facility has capacity for 1,940 people.
Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Reach him by email at emcuevas1@usatoday.com or on Signal at emcuevas.01.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
10 minutes ago
- CNBC
The Israel-Iran conflict and the other big thing that drove the stock market this week
It's been a tense and dynamic week for the world at large. The market action on Wall Street over the past four sessions was been anything but that. For the week, the S & P 500 lost 0.15%, the tech-heavy Nasdaq ticked up 0.21%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average was basically flat, up a mere 0.02%. Beneath the surface, though, there was plenty of news for investors to digest. Here's a closer look at the biggest market themes during the holiday-shortened trading week. 1. Geopolitics: The major news story was — and still is — the intensifying war between Israel and Iran. The big question on everyone's mind is whether the U.S. will get involved. As of Friday, reports indicate that while President Donald Trump is actively reviewing options to attack Iran, nothing has been authorized. The White House has said Trump he will make a decision in the "next two weeks". As a result of the Israel-Iran conflict, investors spent the week keeping an extra close eye on the movement in safe-haven assets like gold and the dollar, as well as risk assets such as oil. Gold prices pulled back this week after their initial spike last Friday, which is when Israel's first attack on Iranian nuclear infrastructure jolted markets. The U.S. dollar index , meanwhile, strengthened this week but still remains near multiyear lows. Oil rose again for the week, with international benchmark Brent crude climbing nearly 4%. For those looking to gauge what the market thinks will happen with Iran, look to oil. The commodity is currently acting as something of proxy on the odds of the conflict intensifying and America directly entering the fray. 2. Fed updates: The other big theme of the week centered on the health of the U.S. economy in the lead up to Wednesday afternoon, when we got the Federal Reserve's latest interest rate decision and revised economic projections. Ultimately, the Fed kept its benchmark lending rate unchanged on Wednesday following its two-day policy meeting. The decision followed lackluster updates on the state of the consumer and the housing market , along with lower-than-expected inflation readings the week prior. As we outlined earlier this week , the Fed is in a tough spot when it comes to abiding by its dual mandate of ensuring price stability and low unemployment. The state of play requires nuance. On the one hand, there is evidence in support of rate cuts, namely some cracks in the consumer — even if the consumer has remained largely and impressively resilient — and the Fed's own updated outlook for lower real GDP growth and higher unemployment this year. On the other hand, the Fed is now expecting higher inflation this year than it did in March, which would support the need for higher interest rates. Given these dueling dynamics and the uncertainty around tariff impacts, the central bank's decision to keep interest rates steady makes sense. While the Fed certainly doesn't want to wait too long and make the same mistake we saw coming out of the Covid-19 pandemic, we must acknowledge that the causes of a potential rebound in inflation are different this time around. Tariffs will likely push up prices, but that may be a one-time increase, as opposed to the sustained inflation we saw exiting the pandemic, which was driven by massive supply chain disruptions and shifts in consumer behavior. As a result, we believe the apparent bias to be more worried about the job market and overall economic growth — and therefore cut rates later this year — makes sense, too. Indeed, the Fed's updated projections still pencil in two rate cuts in 2025, the same as in March despite the aforementioned revisions to its inflation and growth outlook. Fed Governor Christopher Waller made the case Friday that the cuts should start as early as July, arguing that the inflation risk posed by tariffs is not significant and ensuring resiliency in the labor market should be a higher priority. Waller's argument is basically that it's better to move now than wait for a jump in unemployment. Our biggest focus at the Club is staying nimble, given the highly volatile nature of geopolitics at the moment. No doubt, rate decisions are important to think about, but they're only one small part of the investing puzzle to navigate each day. For this reason, we continue to focus more on individual company fundamentals and industry trends rather than higher-level dynamics, important as they are to shaping our worldview. Cybersecurity stocks are one example that we highlighted this week. Another example would be the news we got from Club names Meta Platforms and Amazon this week on their artificial intelligence efforts. We think the implications that AI will have on the cost structures, revenue opportunities and efficiency gains should weigh far more heavily in the minds' of long-term investors than whether the Fed will cut in July or September. (Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust is long META, AMZN. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
B-2 bombers head across the Pacific and Trump is scheduled to return to the White House as he considers strike on Iran.
Multiple U.S. Air Force B-2 bombers appeared to be airborne and heading west from the United States across the Pacific, and President Trump is scheduled to return to the White House late on Saturday afternoon from New Jersey as he deliberates about whether to join Israel's efforts to destroy Iran's nuclear sites. Air traffic control communications indicated that several B-2 aircraft — the planes that could be equipped to carry the 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs that Mr. Trump is considering deploying against Iran's underground nuclear facilities in Fordo — had taken off from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. Some flight trackers said on social media that the destination of the aircraft is Guam, the U.S. territory, which has several military installations, although that could not be independently confirmed. The bombers appeared to be accompanied by refueling tankers for portions of the journey, the flight tracking data showed. Moving planes does not mean a final decision has been made about whether to strike. It is not unusual to shift military assets into position to provide options to the president and military commanders even if they are not ultimately deployed. The White House schedule for the weekend said that Mr. Trump would return from his golf club in Bedminster, N.J., and would meet with his national security team at 6 p.m. on Saturday and again on Sunday. Mr. Trump typically spends both weekend days out of town at one of his properties. A White House spokeswoman declined to comment. Mr. Trump has made clear he is weighing whether to have the U.S. join Israel's effort to curtail Iran's ability to acquire a nuclear weapon, a line he has drawn repeatedly over the years. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Why tariffs are already driving some healthcare premiums higher
Related video above: How patients and doctors can reduce healthcare costs (NEXSTAR) – Despite the focus on the price of cars, iPhones and other consumer goods, the Trump administration's tariffs are starting to drive up prices in an entirely different industry – healthcare. On Monday, Matt McGough, with nonprofit health policy organization KFF, wrote that several individual insurance companies have already notified state regulators that they will be raising premiums to offset the potential impact of tariffs on pharmaceuticals. Trump hasn't yet targeted pharmaceuticals with tariffs, but has repeatedly brought it up, including on Monday aboard Air Force One. 'We're going to be doing pharmaceuticals very soon,' Trump said, according to Reuters. 'That's going to bring all the companies back, into America.' In a May filing, the Independent Health Benefits Corporation (IHBC) said it was submitting a premium rate change of 38.4% for 2026, 'primarily due to increased costs due to inflation and tariffs, and changes in risk adjustment.' An IHBC spokesperson told Axios that roughly 3% of that increase was to directly account for the impact of tariffs, specifically on drug prices. McGough notes that there are other insurers who either haven't specifically mentioned the potential effect of tariffs or who declined to include an offsetting increase in 2026 premium rates. 'A large proportion of medical goods currently comes from international sources, including pharmaceuticals, medical devices and personal protective equipment, as well as other low-margin, high-use essentials like syringes, needles and blood pressure cuffs,' Tina Freese Decker, board chair of the American Hospital Association, wrote in a May post. 'Tariffs on these items could impact patient care by jeopardizing the availability of vital medications and essential health care devices. They also could raise costs for hospitals and heighten shortages and supply chain disruptions.' Meantime, millions of Affordable Care Act (ACA) enrollees could see an over 75% average increase in premiums if Biden-era subsidies aren't extended by Congress before they expire at the end of the year, according to KFF estimates. How much tariffs are weighing on the calculations of insurers will become a bit more clear on Aug. 1, Axios notes, when proposed 2026 premium rates are posted.
