50. Runway

Founders: Cristóbal Valenzuela (CEO), Anastasis Germanidis, Alejandro Matamala OrtizLaunched: 2018Headquarters: New York CityFunding: $545 millionValuation: $3.5 billion (PitchBook)Key Technologies: Artificial intelligence, generative AIIndustry: Enterprise technology, mediaPrevious appearances on Disruptor 50 list: 0
Many in Hollywood and the broader creative community feel like they are under attack from AI. It was only months after ChatGPT's introduction when the major Hollywood unions representing writers and actors both voted to go on strike. But generative AI research and media company Runway says the future of filmmaking, incorporating a wider range of views and stories, will require focusing a generative AI lens on it.
Runway's three founders, Cristóbal Valenzuela, Anastasis Germanidis and Alejandro Matamala Ortiz, met while studying for their master's in interactive telecommunications at New York University's Tisch School of the Arts. Combining their backgrounds in art and engineering, the three went on to launch Runway the same year that they graduated.
"Runway is an invitation to artists, and others, to learn about and explore machine learning through more accessible tools. Machine learning is a complex field that will likely continue to impact our society for years to come, and we need more ways to give more people access," Valenzuela said in a statement.
The company offers a variety of content creation tools designed to be used by students and Hollywood directors alike. Just this May, the company released its newest tool called Gen-4, which allows users to generate consistent characters, locations and styles throughout their photographs or videos. By uploading just a single reference image, Gen-4 gives users access to tweak lighting scenarios, recast a character, switch camera angles or even change locations.
It's not just for movies, with multimedia storytelling created by Gen-4 used by brands across industries, enabling customers to virtually try on clothing, create new assets in video games, or virtually design their homes.
The AI video generation company's tools include Act-One, which streamlines the traditional process for facial animation and use of a video of an actor performing, and can preserve actors' facial expressions and realistically depict performances in live action or animated characters. Its Frames tools can help artists maintain a specific style with a simple set of written prompts — and extend to subject, scene, lighting and color.
Despite the time-saving tools and creative assist offered, the backlash from creators over AI has been significant. One study commissioned by creator unions and advocate groups found that 75% of executives in the industry whose divisions has used gen AI said it had already contributed to the elimination, reduction or consolidation of jobs.
Yet, Runway has received support from major names in the media industry across movies, television and music. Madonna's Celebration Tour used Runway's tools to generate visuals for the stage. Additionally, Runway's technology was used by editors on the Oscar-winning film "Everything Everywhere All at Once" and Stephen Colbert's "The Late Show."
Art programs at schools including Harvard University, New York University and Rhode Island School of Design also have begun incorporating Runway into their design and film curriculum.
There's another problem Runway's founders say its AI can help solve and which the film industry has long failed on: accessibility. Roughly two out of 10 theatrical film directors are people of color and even less are women, according to a study from the University of California, Los Angeles.
"I'm calling it Hollywood 2.0, where everyone is gonna be able to make the films and the blockbusters that only a handful of people were able to before," Valenzuela said in an interview with Variety.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

9 minutes ago

• Forbes

Is ChatGPT Making Us Stupid?

Two research studies suggest that heavy use of AI is not only a game changer, but an alarming threat ... More to humanity's ability to solve problems, communicate with one another, and perhaps to thrive. In boardrooms and classrooms, coffee shops and cubicles, the same question keeps coming up: Is ChatGPT making us smarter, or is it making us intellectually lazy—maybe even stupid? There's no question that generative artificial intelligence is a game-changer. ChatGPT drafts our emails, answers our questions, and completes our sentences. For students, it's become the new CliffsNotes. For professionals, a brainstorming device. For coders, a potential job killer. In record time, it has become a productivity enhancer for almost everything. But what is it doing to our brains? As someone who has spent his career helping clients anticipate and prepare for the future, this question deserves our attention. With any new technology, concerns inevitably arise about its impact. When calculators were first introduced, people worried that students would lose their ability to perform basic arithmetic or mental math skills. When GPS was first introduced, some fretted that we would lose our innate sense of direction. And when the internet bloomed, people grew alarmed that easy access to information would erode our capacity for concentration and contemplation. 'Our ability to interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and without distraction, is what often gets shortchanged by internet grazing,' noted technology writer Nicholas Carr in a prescient 2008 Atlantic article, 'Is Google Making Us Stupid?' Today, Carr's question needs to be asked anew – but of a different techno-innovation. Just-released research studies are helping us understand what's going on when we allow ChatGPT to think for us. What Happens to the Brain on ChatGPT? Researchers at MIT invited fifty-four participants to write essays across four sessions, divided into three groups: one using ChatGPT, one using Google, and one using only their brainpower. In the final session, the groups switched roles. What these researchers found should make all of us pause. Participants who used ChatGPT consistently produced essays that scored lower in originality and depth than those who used search or wrote unaided. More strikingly, brain imaging revealed a decline in cognitive engagement in ChatGPT users. Brain regions associated with attention, memory, and higher-order reasoning were noticeably less active. The MIT researchers introduced the concept of "cognitive debt"—the subtle but accumulating cost to our mental faculties when we outsource too much of our thinking to AI. 'Just as relying on a GPS dulls our sense of direction, relying on AI to write and reason can dull our ability to do those very things ourselves,' notes the MIT report. 'That's a debt that compounds over time.' The second study, published in the peer-reviewed Swiss journal Societies, is titled 'AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking.' It broadens the lens from a lab experiment to everyday life. Researchers surveyed 666 individuals from various age and educational backgrounds to explore how often people rely on AI tools—and how that reliance affects their ability to think critically. The findings revealed a strong negative correlation between frequent AI use and critical thinking performance. Those who often turned to AI for tasks like writing, researching, or decision-making exhibited lower 'metacognitive' awareness and analytical reasoning. This wasn't limited to any one demographic, but younger users and those with lower educational attainment were particularly affected. What's more, the study confirmed that over-reliance on AI encourages 'cognitive offloading'—our tendency to let external tools do the work our brains used to do. While cognitive offloading isn't new (we've done it for centuries with calculators and calendars), AI takes it to a whole new level. 'When your assistant can 'think' for you, you may stop thinking altogether,' the report notes. Are We Letting the Tool Use Us? These studies aren't anti-AI. Neither am I. I use ChatGPT daily. As a futurist, I see ChatGPT and similar tools as transformational breakthroughs—the printing press of the 21st century. They unlock productivity, unleash creativity, and lower barriers to knowledge. But just as the printing press didn't eliminate the need to learn to read, ChatGPT doesn't absolve us of the responsibility to think. And that is the danger today, that people will stop doing their own thinking. These studies are preliminary, and further research is needed. However, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that heavy use of AI is not only a game changer, but an alarming threat to humanity's ability to solve problems, communicate with one another, and perhaps to thrive. In integrating metacognitive strategies—thinking about thinking—into education, workplace training, and even product design. In other words, don't just use AI—engage with it. The line we must straddle is between augmentation and abdication. Are we using AI to elevate our thinking? Or are we turning over the keys to robots? Here are four ideas for using this new technology, while keeping our cognitive edge sharp: The danger isn't that ChatGPT will replace us. But it can make us stupid—if we let it replace our thinking instead of enriching it. The difference lies in how we use it, and more importantly, how aware we are while using it. The danger is that we'll stop developing the parts of ourselves that matter most—because it's faster and easier to let the machine do it. Let's not allow that to happen.

Yahoo

12 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Son of Pulitzer-winning author Michael Chabon accused of rape, strangulation in NYC

NEW YORK — The 22-year-old son of the Pulitzer Prize-winning author Michael Chabon has been accused of choking and raping a woman in Manhattan last year, prosecutors announced. Abraham Chabon, a student at New York University, is facing a count of second-degree strangulation and first-degree rape in connection with the the alleged attack, according to a criminal complaint viewed by the Daily News He pleaded not guilty to both counts during an appearance in Manhattan Criminal Court on June 13 and he was released following the arraignment, after Judge Kacie Lally set bail at $45,000 cash or a $150,000 bond. The alleged incident occurred inside a building on East 12th Street on Jan. 25 2024, according to the complaint. That's where Chabon allegedly grabbed the woman by her neck and forced her onto the bed. She said he choked her to the point where she struggled breathe as he raped her. She also alleged that Chabon repeatedly struck her in the face 'causing stupor and loss of vision in one eye' as well as pain, swelling, and bruising to her neck and face. An attorney for Chabon, Priya Chaudhry, declared his innocence in a statement to The New York Times, adding that he 'was as shocked by these false allegations as anyone.' Chaudhry also noted that Chabon 'has strong family support and a devoted partner who all believe in his innocence. We hope the prosecutor's investigation reveals his innocence quickly.' His father, Michael Chabon's writings include 'The Mysteries of Pittsburgh,' 'Wonder Boys,' 'The Yiddish Policemen's Union,' 'Telegraph Avenue,' and 'The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay,' which won the 2001 Pulitzer Prize for fiction. It also served as inspiration for an opera of the same name, set to have its New York premiere at the Metropolitan Opera this fall. His mother, Ayelet Waldman, is also a writer known for her books 'Bad Mother' and 'A Really Good Day: How Microdosing Made a Mega Difference in My Mood, My Marriage, and My Life.' The couple share four children, including Abraham.

Yahoo

17 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Reddit in talks to use Sam Altman's World ID for user verification

-- Reddit Inc (NYSE:RDDT) is in talks to integrate World ID, an iris-scanning identity verification system developed by Tools for Humanity, according to a report by Semafor. The tool would allow Reddit users to prove they are real individuals while preserving their anonymity on the platform. The discussions come as social media companies face mounting pressure to combat AI-generated content and comply with emerging global regulations on age and identity verification. Governments are increasingly urging platforms to distinguish between authentic users and automated accounts. World ID's parent company, Tools for Humanity, was co-founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. The group's broader mission is to provide universal basic income globally through the Worldcoin cryptocurrency, distributed to individuals who verify their identity via iris scans using the company's Orb device. Adopting World ID would mark a major milestone for Tools for Humanity and represent a shift for Reddit, which has traditionally prioritized anonymity but is now preparing to face heightened scrutiny over platform integrity. The addition of biometric verification could help Reddit build greater trust with users and investors alike. Privacy advocates have raised questions about the ethics of biometric data collection, though proponents argue such systems offer a robust way to counter bots without requiring real names. The move could help Reddit strike a balance between user privacy and content authenticity. If the agreement proceeds, Reddit would become one of the highest-profile adopters of decentralized identity verification. The outcome may set a precedent for how social platforms adapt to the dual pressures of AI threats and regulatory demands. Related articles Reddit in talks to use Sam Altman's World ID for user verification - Semafor QXO won't participate in bidding war for GMS - source Regulators clear Canadian Natural's SLB acquisition after divestiture agreement Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data