Letters to the Editor: new hospital, special place, a good moan
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including hospital cuts, a special place to sit and having a good moan. Cold feet and wanting to be half pregnant
I read with dismay that the proposed new Dunedin hospital is to have yet more cuts in the number of beds.
The decision was made way back that a new hospital would be built, rather than refurbishing the existing one. To me, the existing hospital does not appear to be that old, but it has been stated that there are flaws with the design and construction, that could not be overcome.
Since the decision to build the new hospital, it appears that the powers that be have got cold feet about the costs and have used every opportunity to delay and cut back, cumulating in the latest press release.
As I see it, the new hospital should have been an opportunity to build a modern teaching hospital to enhance the Otago Medical School.
We have had six years of Labour government, followed by a year and a-half of National government, yet we have not had a single sticking plaster delivered. In the meantime, we still need to pay for the upkeep of the existing hospital.
Does the government need to stop dithering and get away from the concept of wanting to be ''half pregnant''?
John Batt
Wakari Not a cent more
In the last five years Central Otago District Council has reported an annual surplus between $8.7 million (2024) and $28m (2022).
Its net external debt as a percentage of total assets is a minuscule 2%. Debt as a percentage of revenue is a measly 29% when there is capacity for 175%. Yet the CODC's long-term plan (LTP) identifies an average 13% rates rise across the district next financial year. Why?
Yes, there needs to be some spending on water infrastructure but neither the details nor the cost of this is identified in the LTP. There is also a real possibility that the cost of water services will be removed from the CODC balance sheet within two years as the new council-controlled organisation for water is established, probably in conjunction with Clutha, Gore and Waitaki councils.
Other hints in the LTP suggest the CODC wants today's ratepayers to pay for tomorrow's activities. For example the council proposes to fund a $200,000 grant for a new artificial turf at Maniototo Area School through a one-off charge to all ratepayers of $13.48.
If the money is borrowed it will cost each ratepayer $1.35 a year for 10 years - tomorrow's ratepayers paying for tomorrow's fun.
The CODC's reluctance to borrow and spread the infrastructure cost across future generations is unfair to today's ratepayers. The council financial statements suggest rates increases should be at the rate of inflation, and not a cent more.
Peter Williams
Cromwell Bumps and speed
In the article 'Boy racers' spark fear of accident (ODT 17.5.25) the complainant suggests that only council speed bumps will cause the culprits to slow down, even though new anti-street racing legislation is looming.
Adding speed bumps, to deter a few individuals, is unreasonable, it negatively affects all traffic and moves the problem elsewhere. The police are well equipped, and empowered, to deal to street racers. It is frustrating that permanent speed bumps are used to control a ''driver'' issue, penalising every road user. Uncomfortable at all times, they remove the joy of driving, they frustrate many drivers at redundant times, as do falsely set school speed limit displays.
Dunedin is inundated with speed bumps - Shore St has three, Tahuna Rd has four and Clyde St has five.
Tony Vink
Andersons Bay Touching, beautiful tribute to memorial seats
Opening the Otago Daily Times ''A special place to rest, and one full of memories'' by Don Ramsay (Opinion 20.5.25) brought happy tears to my eyes. It was a truly heartwarming read.
Bayfield Inlet holds a very special place in our family's hearts.
We have always appreciated the value of having seating along the walkway. As Don highlighted, people walk there for so many reasons - whether for physical rehabilitation, walking their dogs, taking the family for a stroll, or simply watching the wildlife on the water on one side and the sports being played on the other.
My mother was an animal lover, especially dogs. She found the walkway easily accessible and deeply enjoyable. Living with MS and other physical limitations, she loved nothing more than being able to walk her dogs along a flat, peaceful path, and having a place to sit and rest along the way made all the difference to her.
Before 2015, there were already a couple of memorial seats along the first part of the path, which she would often stop at. So, when Mum passed away, it felt only right to install another seat, further down the path, closer to Marne St, in memory of my mother, Da'Vella Young, and her beloved dogs.
What made reading this article all the more special for me was the timing. The very day the article was published was also the day I welcomed a new puppy into our family. It felt like a small but meaningful sign from above - a gentle nudge from Mum, acknowledging and blessing our new fur baby. The synchronicity brought me comfort, joy, and a profound sense of connection.
I know Mum would be thrilled to know that others are enjoying the memorial seats just as much as she once did. Each one is special, with its own unique story to tell.
Liz Young
Dunedin A good moan about people having a moan
Maybe it's just a symptom of ageing, but it does seem when one watches the news or reads the ODT in recent times, that every man and his dog is complaining about something.
Students are complaining about their flats; Maori are complaining the Budget ''lacked Maori-targeted funding''; prisoners bemoaning they cannot vote, and office workers feel undervalued - 61% according to the ODT (a 20% pay increase would miraculously cure this, it is alleged). Also, the new hospital is less than what was previously planned in some respects.
No counter to this avalanche of complaints is ever examined: the media just report what information they are given. Some questions. like ''why not move if you don't like your flat'' or ''change your office job?'' are never asked.
OK, prisoners cannot move, but someone could suggest they stop offending and regain their right to vote, and then perhaps give a thought to the rights of their victims?
Dunedin is lucky to be getting a new hospital at a cost of several billions. Sinking billions into bricks and mortar is of far less importance than gaining and training the very best clinicians. How many people in Otago have suffered not because of the state of the premises but the lack of trained staff?
K. J. Lawson
Oamaru Democratic principles
Metiria Stanton Turei (Opinion ODT 16.5.25) bemoans the undermining of democratic principles by the coalition government.
This is from a woman who wants Maori unelected representation in all facets of local government, a separate Maori health system, Maori control of waterways, and supports an unelected tribunal who see themselves as an upper house of the New Zealand Parliament.
It is laughable that Metiria Stanton Turei shows support for democracy, as she has shown in all her opinion pieces that she has no idea what it means.
Dave Tackney
Fairfield
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
a day ago
- Newsroom
Seymour's ‘light up' message alarms tobacco researchers
Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour's comments to a London audience calling smokers 'fiscal heroes' – and declaring people should 'light up' to save their government's balance sheet – are reprehensible and make light of addiction, tobacco researchers say. Seymour largely stands by his remarks, arguing smokers are a net economic positive through tobacco tax and reduced superannuation from early deaths – but has conceded he was wrong to describe as 'quite evil' the Labour government's plan to create a smokefree generation. Early in its term, the coalition Government sparked controversy by repealing a law that would have banned the sale of tobacco to anyone born after January 1, 2009 and dramatically reduced both the number of outlets able to sell tobacco and the nicotine levels in cigarettes. Seymour spoke about the decision following a speech to the Adam Smith Institute, a neoliberal think tank based in London, during a visit to the UK this month. Asked about the smokefree generation concept, which has been taken up by the British government, Seymour said the New Zealand policy had been 'quite evil, in a way' and described smokers as 'fiscal heroes'. 'If you want to save your country's balance sheet, light up, because … lots of excise tax, no pension – I mean, you're a hero,' he said to laughter from the audience. Seymour told Newsroom his remarks were based on arguments he made before about the role of the Government when it came to smoking. 'I'm not seriously suggesting that we should encourage people to smoke to save the Government money. It's clearly an absurd statement, but you do have to have a bit of a sense of humour in this life, otherwise it would be too dull.' The state should make sure the public was aware of the dangers of smoking, while stopping smokers from doing harm to others (such as through second-hand smoke) and ensuring they did not impose financial costs on others. 'As far as I can tell, that condition is well and truly satisfied: I mean, the Government gets $2 billion of tax revenue from about, what is it now, 8 percent of the population?' (The Customs Service collected $1.5b in tobacco excise and equivalent duties in 2023/24, while that year's NZ Health Survey reported a daily smoking rate of 6.9 percent.) Seymour said it was 'just a sad fact' that smokers were also likely to die younger, reducing the amount of superannuation they collected, while he was unconvinced their healthcare costs would be markedly higher than those who died of other illnesses. 'If anything, smokers are probably saving other citizens money.' However, he backtracked on his suggestion the last Government's smokefree generation plans were 'quite evil', saying: 'I'm not sure that was the right word, on reflection. 'I certainly think the idea that, in 30 years' time, someone's going to have to prove that they're 49 rather than 47 does seem draconian – it seems almost a bit of an Orwellian situation.' While the Adam Smith Institute's event page billed Seymour as the Deputy Prime Minister, he said his speech was delivered in a private capacity rather than on behalf of the Government, while he had not used taxpayer money for his travel (he also confirmed the Institute did not cover any of his costs). Labour health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall says the last Labour government's smokefree policy was fundamentally based on humanitarian grounds. Photo: Marc Daalder Labour Party health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall told Newsroom the minister's remarks showed the Government had the wrong priorities when it came to its smokefree policy. 'They are prioritising balancing the books on the misery done to smokers due to the harms of tobacco.' Verrall said there was clear evidence of tobacco's cost to the health system, and the last government's smokefree generation policy had been 'fundamentally based on humanitarian grounds'. 'This is an addictive product: it is unique in that it kills half the people who use it. It's not like the more nuanced debates we have about … social media for kids.' University of Otago associate professor Andrew Waa told Newsroom Seymour's 'perverse' arguments were further evidence of the Government placing tobacco tax revenue over other concerns. 'It's literally blood money: it's money that the Government taxes on a deadly product, and yet they're still treating it as a profit margin for them.' Waa said the minister's comments ignored the social costs of tobacco, and would only help an industry 'intent on exploiting addiction at whatever cost'. 'I don't know if it's naive, or if it's [his] ideology that it's all personal choice – there's no choice when it comes to smoking some of these things. 'There's a reason why certain communities are more likely to smoke, because they get tobacco products shoved in their face all the time; by the time they decide to think that they don't wanna use the stuff, it's too late.' Janet Hoek, the co-director of tobacco control research partnership ASPIRE Aotearoa, told Newsroom that the comments were 'really ridiculous and reprehensible'. 'It just seems incredibly disappointing that Mr Seymour apparently thinks it's amusing to suggest that addiction, and early and often painful death, are a good way to generate government revenue.' Hoek said the environmental and productivity costs associated with smoking also needed to be taken into account, as did the social harm done to communities when their loved ones died prematurely. While some politicians dismissed public health experts as 'muppets … living in ivory towers', the suggestion that smokers were making an informed choice was itself out of touch with reality.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Arrest after woman found dead in Tūrangi
Labour has overtaken National as the party New Zealanders consider most able to handle the cost of living, according to the latest Ipsos Issues Monitor survey.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
OUSA rep running for council criticised
A Labour candidate for the Dunedin City Council has become the target of a campaign calling for him to stand down as a student representative. Jett Groshinski's decision to run as a Labour-endorsed candidate at this year's local body elections has caused tension within the Otago University Students' Association (OUSA) executive, where he is the political representative. He has been allowed to continue his role in a reduced capacity, and OUSA president Liam White was confident any conflict of interest could be avoided. However, since then, fellow student Fergus Parks has posted flyers across the university campus calling for Mr Groshinski to step down from his representative role. Mr Parks said his posters were filling a communication gap left by OUSA. He was supportive of Mr Groshinski standing as a candidate, but the problem was he was doing it "at the same time while he's on the executive''. "The perception of the students is, 'oh, he's just been using this role as a means to support his campaign'" The biggest problem was it had been "effectively radio silence'' from OUSA on the matter, Mr Parks said. "There's been no official posts, no official notices from the president and everything which has so far happened has only been facilitated by the student newspaper [Critic Te Ārohi], which is independent of the OUSA. "The lack of clarity leading up to here just doesn't fill you with hope about how they're going to handle it" He was also concerned Mr Groshinski would continue to receive a full wage for reduced duties while other executive members took on more work. Mr Groshinski said the executive had agreed to a "conflict of interest plan'' to keep his two roles separate. He could comment on election matters as a candidate, but referred any requests for OUSA comment on to Mr White. Mr White said the OUSA executive had held thorough discussions on the matter and there was a "diversity of opinion amongst the executives''. "Some people thought that he should resign outright, that it wasn't a conflict that we could manage, and some of the executives disagreed with that. "But eventually we went with Jett not being involved in media. "He will not be involved in the OUSA local body election process ... and he's going to come off as chair of the political action committee" Mr White said he was confident Mr Groshinski and the OUSA were managing the situation, although he did say resignation was not out of the question if there was a serious breach of trust. There had been some frustration about others picking up parts of Mr Groshinski's role, but there was also an understanding "that just [had] to happen''. Asked about Mr Park's concerns on communication, Mr White said exams meant it was an exhausting time of year and he trusted Critic to give a fair representation of the situation. In a personal capacity, he did not want to drive more attention to the matter and would rather Mr Groshinski be seen as a student running for council, instead of standing as an OUSA executive member. OUSA was unlikely to endorse a candidate for the election and would instead focus on educating students about the candidates, he said. In 2022, Mr Groshinski unsuccessfully ran for Dunedin mayor and council.
