Brazil to discuss adjustments to credit guarantee fund as reserves fall short of target

BRASILIA, May 29 (Reuters) - Brazil's Credit Guarantee Fund (FGC) should hold accounting reserves equivalent to 1% of eligible deposits but is currently at 0.35%, the fund's head Daniel Lima said on Thursday.
Discussions on necessary adjustments will take place in the coming months, Lima stressed.
Speaking at an event hosted by payment industry group Abipag, Lima also noted that the FGC's liquidity indicator stands at around 2.3% of eligible deposits, compared to a target range of 2.3% to 2.7%.
The FGC is a private nonprofit entity created to manage protection mechanisms for clients of financial institutions in the event of bank resolution.
The fund has drawn renewed attention following the high-profile acquisition of lender Banco Master by BRB (BSLI3.SA), opens new tab, a deal currently being analyzed by the central bank.
The transaction has sparked scrutiny as it involves two similarly sized banks, with Master having grown rapidly in recent years through an aggressive funding model based on high-yield debt distributed via investment platforms.
Lima noted that addressing potential contagion risks from mid-sized banks requires more timely access to information from each institution.
The central bank said earlier this year that it would carry out a scheduled review of the FGC next year as part of its regular four-year cycle on the matter.
Debt securities issued by banks are insured by the FGC up to a limit of 250,000 reais ($44,028) per financial institution.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Reuters

a day ago

• Reuters

Brazil to push for corporate, local government climate targets at COP30

BRASILIA, June 20 (Reuters) - COP30 president Brazil on Friday proposed expanding emissions reduction commitments to include pledges from companies, states, and cities, aiming to bolster global climate efforts following the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Brazilian diplomats preparing for the climate summit have been working closely with the U.N. to encourage countries to submit updated targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by September, after many missed the February deadline. The Paris accord, in which almost all nations agreed to limit warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels, requires countries to submit such targets, known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and update them every few years. In a letter released Friday, COP30 President Ambassador Andre Correa do Lago proposed widening the path for reducing emissions by creating a "global NDC" that would incorporate targets from various actors, not just countries, to transform the Global Stocktake - the process for reviewing Paris Agreement progress. "Our aim is to bring a new dynamic to global climate action, aligning the efforts made by businesses, civil society and all levels of government in coordinated action," Lago wrote, proposing the term "GDC," or "globally determined contribution," for the expanded initiative. While Lago did not explicitly frame the initiative as a response to U.S. policy changes, he acknowledged it would allow participation from U.S. companies and local governments that have kept their commitment to help curb climate change despite the Trump administration's formal exit from the Paris Agreement. "Our action agenda is opening up a lot of space for the U.S. side that wants to participate," Lago said, adding the proposal would also encourage countries with conservative emissions targets to be more ambitious. The Brazilian diplomat said private sector actors often move faster on climate action than governments, which are vulnerable to complex considerations such as the role of oil companies in spurring economic growth or the costs of transforming electricity grids. Dan Ioschpe, a Brazilian businessman appointed as COP30's "climate champion," said the initiative would provide clarity for non-state actors to align with Paris Agreement goals. "Not only in the United States, but in general in countries where the national government is not so involved in the issue, we are seeing governors, mayors, and the private sector extremely involved," Ioschpe said. COP30, to be hosted in the Amazonian city of Belem in November, marks the 10th anniversary of the Paris accord.

Spectator

2 days ago

• Spectator

Has Putin pushed the Russian economy to its limits?

The remarkable resurgence the Russian economy has experienced since Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine is losing momentum. Where once Putin could boast about 4.3 per cent growth rates for two years in a row – thumbing his nose at Western sanctions with all the aplomb of a man who'd discovered alchemy – the numbers now tell a somewhat different story. The party, as they say, is over – and the time to crank up sanctions against Moscow has come. For two years running, Putin's propagandists have crowed about Russia's economic vitality as proof that Western sanctions were about as effective as a chocolate teapot. The economy's steroid-fuelled growth, pumped up by hefty fiscal spending, facilitated the steepest rise in household incomes for nearly two decades. It pushed production and labour capabilities to the limit and propelled inflation into double digits, which the Central Bank tried to tame with a historically high record base rate. One thing the Kremlin certainly won't do is introduce austerity Now, though, the overheating Russian economy is finally starting to cool down. In the first quarter of this year, GDP growth crawled to a relatively anaemic 1.4 per cent year on year – the weakest performance in more than two years. Compared to the previous quarter, business activity between January and March contracted by 1.2 per cent, and all indicators suggest further decline lies ahead. Even the manufacturing sector, which had been recording double-digit growth with the enthusiasm of a Soviet five-year plan, has slumped to a mere 3 per cent growth in April – its lowest ebb since March 2023 – and to 2 per cent growth year-on-year in May. This is particularly telling, since manufacturing encompasses everything from the tanks to the boots which Putin's war machine devours. The buyer – the Russian state – hasn't stopped spending. Indeed, government expenditure remains higher than pre-invasion levels, with roughly half of the additional spending in the first quarter channelled toward military purposes. Yet warning signs in the budget are beginning to flash. May's fiscal deficit increased by 200 billion roubles (£1.9 billion) since the start of the year, reaching 3.4 trillion roubles (£32.2 billion) – some 1.5 per cent of GDP. Amid declining global oil prices, hydrocarbon revenues – a perennial Russian crutch – have tumbled 14.4 per cent in the first five months of the year, with May alone witnessing a precipitous 35 per cent decline. The government can finance the shortage in oil revenues through its rainy day fund, the so-called National Welfare Fund. This fund, designed to mitigate any decline in oil revenue, contains the cash equivalent to 1.3 per cent of GDP. This amount is set to increase by a further third in the coming months due to additional revenue from last year which has yet to be transferred. This buffer may last a year, slightly longer, depending on oil prices and the Kremlin's continued appetite for spending. However, the danger to the fiscal balance is not limited to oil prices. With economic activity slowing, the budget will receive less tax revenue from sales and corporate profits. The government's initial budget deficit target for 2025, set at 0.5 per cent, has been revised to 1.7 per cent, still relatively low compared to that of, say, the UK. As such, to finance the deficit, the government can borrow domestically, albeit at a high interest rate. One thing the Kremlin certainly won't do is introduce austerity. Instead of prudent belt-tightening, something far more ominous will follow: the inexorable militarisation of the Russian economy. Even if the war in Ukraine were to end tomorrow – a prospect about as likely as Putin taking up flower arranging – Russia's militarisation would continue apace. The army would need to replenish its depleted arsenal, and Moscow's economic planners have also convinced themselves that weapons manufacturing represents the golden path to prosperity. With demand for military goods remaining robust while overall output contracts, the arithmetic is brutally simple: the defence industry's share of the economy will grow by default. Combined with Putin's apocalyptic worldview and his circle's conviction that Russia faces an existential threat, this suggests a rather grim future for anything resembling a normal economy. It's a pattern hauntingly reminiscent of the 1980s, when the Soviet Union's economic decline coincided with an inability to reduce military spending. We all know how that particular experiment ended. This is where the effect of sanctions may become more visible. A tightening of restrictions on Russian oil and other exports would increase the cost of Russian oil sales, enabling its buyers, notably China, to negotiate a wider discount. A faster depletion of the National Welfare Fund, which is also used to smooth the volatility of the rouble, would make exchange rate swings even less predictable. A more rigorous sanctions regime against technological imports and the banking system would increase prices, reduce productivity and dent corporate profits, thus putting more pressure on the budget and inflation. Smart moves to encourage capital outflow and brain drain would damage the labour market and investments, also pushing inflation up. Just as in the Soviet era, it is during such times of hardship that outside economic pressure would have a more visible effect. The Russian economy is exhausting its two-year-long fever dream, built on public spending and a mortgaged future. Those with the power to engineer further sanctions against Moscow should sharpen their economic weapons and strike Putin's economy while it's weak.

The Independent

2 days ago

• The Independent

Bank of England boss not ‘convinced' of need for digital pound

The governor of the Bank of England has said he is not 'convinced' by new forms of money such as a digital pound, as he also warned over the use of cryptocurrencies. Andrew Bailey, speaking at a conference in Kyiv, Ukraine, said central banks have to be alert to the growing 'non-money system'. Mr Bailey said he remains 'to be convinced that we need to create new forms of money – such as central bank retail digital currency – to achieve' benefits such as smarter payments and fighting fraud. The Bank of England and the Government are exploring the launch of a digital pound which could be used by households and businesses in the UK alongside cash and bank deposits. Mr Bailey's remarks revealed doubts over the creation of a digital pound aimed at everyday consumers, which is being designed but with no certainty it will be officially launched. He also stressed that cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin were a 'risky asset class and should be seen as such'. The UK's financial watchdog recently said it planned to lift a ban on some crypto-linked investments for customers, despite warning that people could 'lose all their money' from buying it. Meanwhile, Mr Bailey said it was hard to say whether banks had faced 'excessive' post-financial crisis regulation. He said a challenging question was 'whether we have over-protected the banking system via excessive regulation, and in so doing pushed more risk into non-banks which would be more safely housed in banks'. 'Put another way, have we increased overall financial stability risk by raising the bar too high in banks? It's a fair enough question, but intrinsically hard to answer,' he said. He insisted that 'we have rightly raised regulatory standards for banks in the light of a financial crisis, the effects of which continue to be felt almost 15 years on'.